Spatial control of adult stem cell fate using nanotopographic cues

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2401-2410

  Ahn, Eun Hyun ^a,j   Kim, Younghoon ^h   Kshitiz, ^b,c   An, Steven S ^d,e,f   Afzal, Junaid ^g   Lee, Suengwon ^d   Kwak, Moonkyu ⁱ   Suh, Kahp Yang ⁱ   Kim, Deok Ho ^a,b   Levchenko, Andre ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

^c Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine   (United States)

^d Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^h Whiting School of Engineering   (United States)

ⁱ Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^j Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

more..

Author keywords

Adipogenesis; Capillary force lithography; Differentiation; Human mesenchymal stem cells; Nanotopography; Osteogenesis

Indexed keywords

ADIPOGENESIS; CAPILLARY FORCE LITHOGRAPHY; HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; OSTEOGENESIS;

CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPLEX NETWORKS; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); HIGHWAY PLANNING; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

STEM CELLS;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; OSTEOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEM CELL; TOPOGRAPHY;

ADIPOGENESIS; CAPILLARY FORCE LITHOGRAPHY; DIFFERENTIATION; HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; OSTEOGENESIS;

ADIPOCYTES; ADULT STEM CELLS; BIOMIMETICS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CYTOSKELETON; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSTEOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84891739845     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.037     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Palpant N.J., Murry C.E. Regenerative medicine: reprogramming the injured heart. Nature 2012, 485:585-586.
2. Delli Carri A., Onorati M., Castiglioni V., Faedo A., Camnasio S., Toselli M., et al. Human pluripotent stem cell differentiation into authentic striatal projection neurons. Stem Cell Rev 2013, 9:461-474.
3. Masaki T., Qu J.R., Cholewa-Waclaw J., Burr K., Raaum R., Rambukkana A. Reprogramming adult schwann cells to stem cell-like cells by leprosy bacilli promotes dissemination of infection. Cell 2013, 152:51-67.
4. Marban E., Malliaras K. Mixed results for bone marrow-derived cell therapy for ischemic heart disease. JAMA 2012, 308:2405-2406.
5. Makkar R.R., Smith R.R., Cheng K., Malliaras K., Thomson L.E., Berman D., et al. Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet 2012, 379:895-904.
6. Pittenger M.F., Mackay A.M., Beck S.C., Jaiswal R.K., Douglas R., Mosca J.D., et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999, 284:143-147.
7. Krampera M., Pizzolo G., Aprili G., Franchini M. Mesenchymal stem cells for bone, cartilage, tendon and skeletal muscle repair. Bone 2006, 39:678-683.
8. Lavrentieva A., Hatlapatka T., Neumann A., Weyand B., Kasper C. Potential for osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of MSC. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2013, 129:73-88.
9. Zhong W., Tian K., Zheng X., Li L., Zhang W., Wang S., et al. Mesenchymal stem cell and chondrocyte fates in a multishear microdevice are regulated by Yes-associated protein. Stem Cells Dev 2013, 22:2083-2093.
10. Jia B., Madsen L., Petersen R.K., Techer N., Kopperud R., Ma T., et al. Activation of protein kinase A and exchange protein directly activated by cAMP promotes adipocyte differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. PloS One 2012, 7:e34114.
11. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
12. Kshitiz, Kim D.H., Beebe D.J., Levchenko A. Micro- and nanoengineering for stem cell biology: the promise with a caution. Trends Biotechnol 2011, 29:399-408.
13. Yu B., Zhao X., Yang C., Crane J., Xian L., Lu W., et al. Parathyroid hormone induces differentiation of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells by enhancing bone morphogenetic protein signaling. JBone Miner Res 2012, 27:2001-2014.
14. Guang L.G., Boskey A.L., Zhu W. Age-related CXC chemokine receptor-4-deficiency impairs osteogenic differentiation potency of mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stromal stem cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2013, 45:1813-1820.
15. Wang Y.K., Chen C.S. Cell adhesion and mechanical stimulation in the regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. JCell Mol Med 2013, 17:823-832.
16. Gupta K., Kim D.H., Ellison D., Smith C., Kundu A., Tuan J., et al. Lab-on-a-chip devices as an emerging platform for stem cell biology. Lab Chip 2010, 10:2019-2031.
17. Mosadegh B., Agarwal M., Tavana H., Bersano-Begey T., Torisawa Y.S., Morell M., et al. Uniform cell seeding and generation of overlapping gradient profiles in a multiplexed microchamber device with normally-closed valves. Lab Chip 2010, 10:2959-2964.
18. Allioux-Guerin M., Icard-Arcizet D., Durieux C., Henon S., Gallet F., Mevel J.C., et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of cell response to a rigidity gradient: a quantitative study using multiple optical tweezers. Biophys J 2009, 96:238-247.
19. Kshitiz, Park J., Kim P., Helen W., Engler A.J., Levchenko A., et al. Control of stem cell fate and function by engineering physical microenvironments. Integr Biol (Camb) 2012, 4:1008-1018.
20. Reddy V.V. Topics in bone marrow biopsy pathology: role of marrow topography in myelodysplastic syndromes and evaluation of post-treatment and post-bone marrow transplant biopsies. Ann Diagn Pathol 2001, 5:110-120.
21. Diniz M.G., Soares G.A., Coelho M.J., Fernandes M.H. Surface topography modulates the osteogenesis in human bone marrow cell cultures grown on titanium samples prepared by a combination of mechanical and acid treatments. JMater Sci Mater Med 2002, 13:421-432.
22. Wang G., Zheng L., Zhao H., Miao J., Sun C., Ren N., et al. Invitro assessment of the differentiation potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on genipin-chitosan conjugation scaffold with surface hydroxyapatite nanostructure for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 2011, 17:1341-1349.
23. Ruiz S.A., Chen C.S. Emergence of patterned stem cell differentiation within multicellular structures. Stem Cells 2008, 26:2921-2927.
24. Kim D.H., Kshitiz, Smith R.R., Kim P., Ahn E.H., Kim H.N., et al. Nanopatterned cardiac cell patches promote stem cell niche formation and myocardial regeneration. Integr Biol (Camb) 2012, 4:1019-1033.
25. Ahn E.H., Mercado G.E., Lae M., Ladanyi M. Identification of target genes of PAX3-FOXO1 in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Oncol Rep 2013, 30:968-978.
26. Kshitiz, Hubbi M.E., Ahn E.H., Downey J., Afzal J., Kim D.H., et al. Matrix rigidity controls endothelial differentiation and morphogenesis of cardiac precursors. Sci Signal 2012, 5:ra41.
27. Fabry B., Maksym G.N., Butler J.P., Glogauer M., Navajas D., Fredberg J.J. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys Rev Lett 2001, 87:148102.
28. Laudadio R.E., Millet E.J., Fabry B., An S.S., Butler J.P., Fredberg J.J. Rat airway smooth muscle cell during actin modulation: rheology and glassy dynamics. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2005, 289:C1388-C1395.
29. Rosa A.L., Beloti M.M., van Noort R. Osteoblastic differentiation of cultured rat bone marrow cells on hydroxyapatite with different surface topography. Dent Mater 2003, 19:768-772.
30. Kilian K.A., Bugarija B., Lahn B.T., Mrksich M. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:4872-4877.
31. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
32. Polte T.R., Eichler G.S., Wang N., Ingber D.E. Extracellular matrix controls myosin light chain phosphorylation and cell contractility through modulation of cell shape and cytoskeletal prestress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2004, 286:C518-C528.
33. Chicurel M.E., Chen C.S., Ingber D.E. Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1998, 10:232-239.
34. Clark E.A., Brugge J.S. Integrins and signal transduction pathways: the road taken. Science 1995, 268:233-239.
35. Ng F., Boucher S., Koh S., Sastry K.S.R., Chase L., Lakshmipathy U., et al. PDGF, TGF-beta, and FGF signaling is important for differentiation and growth of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs): transcriptional profiling can identify markers and signaling pathways important in differentiation of MSCs into adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic lineages. Blood 2008, 112:295-307.
36. Ciciarello M., Zini R., Rossi L., Salvestrini V., Ferrari D., Manfredini R., et al. Extracellular purines promote thedifferentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to the osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. Stem Cells Dev 2013, 22:1097-1111.
37. Guvendiren M., Burdick J.A. Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics. Nat Commun 2012, 3:792.
38. Du J., Chen X.F., Liang X.D., Zhang G.Y., Xu J., He L.R., et al. Integrin activation and internalization on soft ECM as a mechanism of induction of stem cell differentiation by ECM elasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:9466-9471.
39. Edgar R., Domrachev M., Lash A.E. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:207-210.
40. Gilmore A.P. Anoikis. Cell Death Differ 2005, 12(Suppl.2):1473-1477.
41. Smyth G.K. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3. Article 3.
42. Gautier L., Cope L., Bolstad B.M., Irizarry R.A. Affy-analysis of affymetrix genechip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:307-315.
43. Du P., Kibbe W.A., Lin S.M. Lumi: a pipeline for processing illumina microarray. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1547-1548.
44. Subramanian A., Tamayo P., Mootha V.K., Mukherjee S., Ebert B.L., Gillette M.A., et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:15545-15550.
45. Thomas S., Bonchev D. Asurvey of current software for network analysis in molecular biology. Hum Genomics 2010, 4:353-360.