Nanotopography drives stem cell fate toward osteoblast differentiation through α1β1 integrin signaling pathway

Journal of Cellular Biochemistry

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 540-548

  Rosa, A L ^a   Kato, R B ^a   Castro Raucci, L M S ^a   Teixeira, L N ^a   De Oliveira, F S ^a   Bellesini, L S ^a   De Oliveira, P T ^a   Hassan, M Q ^b   Beloti, M M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Univ of Alabama School of Dentistry   (United States)

Author keywords

INTEGRIN; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; OSTEOBLAST; TITANIUM

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; OBTUSTATIN; PROTEIN INHIBITOR; SULFATE; TITANIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VERY LATE ACTIVATION ANTIGEN 1;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEM CELL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY;

INTEGRIN; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; OSTEOBLAST; TITANIUM;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; INTEGRIN ALPHA1BETA1; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; RATS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; VIPER VENOMS;

EID: 84892708008     PISSN: 07302312     EISSN: 10974644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.24688     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allori AC, Sailon AM, Warren SM,. 2008. Biological basis of bone formation, remodeling, and repair-part II: Extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 14: 275-283.
2. Beck GR, Jr., Sullivan EC, Moran E, Zerler B,. 1998. Relationship between alkaline phosphatase levels, osteopontin expression, and mineralization in differentiating MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem 68: 269-280.
3. 2 nanotube surface. Acta Biomater 5: 3215-3223.
4. Bueno RB, Adachi P, Castro-Raucci LM, Rosa AL, Nanci A, de Oliveira PT,. 2011. Oxidative nanopatterning of titanium surfaces promotes production and extracellular accumulation of osteopontin. Braz Dent J 22: 179-184.
5. Canty EG, Kadler KE,. 2005. Procollagen trafficking, processing and fibrillogenesis. J Cell Sci 118: 1341-1353.
6. de Oliveira PT, Nanci A,. 2004. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 25: 403-413.
7. de Oliveira PT, Zalzal SF, Beloti MM, Rosa AL, Nanci A,. 2007. Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography. J Biomed Mater Res A 80: 554-564.
8. Dimitrievska S, Bureau MN, Antoniou J, Mwale F, Petit A, Lima RS, Marple BR,. 2011. Titania-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite coatings support human mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res A 98: 576-588.
9. Divya Rani VV, Manzoor K, Menon D, Selvamurugan N, Nair SV,. 2009. The design of novel nanostructures on titanium by solution chemistry for an improved osteoblast response. Nanotechnology 20: 195101-195111.
10. Ekholm E, Hankenson KD, Uusitalo H, Hiltunen A, Gardner H, Heino J, Penttinen R,. 2002. Diminished callus size and cartilage synthesis in alpha 1 beta 1 integrin-deficient mice during bone fracture healing. Am J Pathol 160: 1779-1785.
11. Gams B, Kim RH, Sodek J,. 1999. Bone sialoprotein. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 10: 79-98.
12. Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Cheng A, Anderson DM, McLachlan T, Stephan I, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Sandhage KH, Fedorov AG, Rupp F, Boyan BD, Tannenbaum R, Schwartz Z,. 2013. The roles of titanium surface micro/nanotopography and wettability on the differential response of human osteoblast lineage cells. Acta Biomater 9: 6268-6277.
13. Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, Shimizu Y, Bronson RT, Gao YH, Inada M, Sato M, Okamoto R, Kitamura Y, Yoshiki S, Kishimoto T,. 1997. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 89: 755-764.
14. Marcinkiewicz C, Weinreb PH, Calvete JJ, Kisiel DG, Mousa SA, Tuszynski GP, Lobb RR,. 2003. Obtustatin: A potent selective inhibitor of alpha1beta1 integrin in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo. Cancer Res 63: 2020-2023.
15. Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Simões LG, Araújo AL, Leite ER, Duarte WR, Aragão FJ, Cooper LF,. 2009. The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specific gene expression. Biomaterials 30: 4053-4062.
16. Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Aragão FJ, Cooper LF,. 2010. The combination of micron and nanotopography by H(2)SO(4)/H(2)O(2) treatment and its effects on osteoblast-specific gene expression of hMSCs. J Biomed Mater Res A 94: 169-179.
17. Menon D, Divyarani VV, Lakshmanan VK, Anitha VC, Koyakutty M, Nair SV,. 2012. Osteointegration of titanium implant is sensitive to specific nanostructure morphology. Acta Biomater 8: 1976-1989.
18. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, Teng D, Engler AJ, Chien S, Jin S,. 2009. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 2130-2135.
19. Owen T, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, Barone L, Wilming LM, Tassinari MS, Kennedy MB, Pockwinse S, Lian JB, Stein GS,. 1990. Progressive development of the rat phenotype in vitro: Reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol 143: 420-430.
20. 2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm-An optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small 5: 666-671.
21. Raimondo T, Puckett S, Webster TJ,. 2010. Greater osteoblast and endothelial cell adhesion on nanostructured polyethylene and titanium. Int J Nanomedicine 5: 647-652.
22. Reddi AH, Cunningham NS,. 1993. Initiation and promotion of bone differentiation by bone morphogenetic proteins. J Bone Miner Res 8 (Suppl 2): S499-S502.
23. Siebers MC, ter Brugge PJ, Walboomers XF, Jansen JA,. 2005. Integrins as linker proteins between osteoblasts and bone replacing materials. A critical review. Biomaterials 26: 137-146.
24. Tran N, Webster TJ,. 2009. Nanotechnology for bone materials. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1: 336-351.
25. Variola F, Yi J-H, Richert L, Wuest JD, Rosei F, Nanci A,. 2008. Tailoring the surface properties of Ti6Al4V by controlled chemical oxidation. Biomaterials 29: 1285-1298.
26. Vetrone F, Variola F, Tambasco de Oliveira P, Zalzal SF, Yi JH, Sam J, Bombonato-Prado KF, Sarkissian A, Perepichka DF, Wuest JD, Rosei F, Nanci A,. 2009. Nanoscale oxidative patterning of metallic surfaces to modulate cell activity and fate. Nano Lett 9: 659-665.
27. Wang M,. 2003. Developing bioactive composite materials for tissue replacement. Biomaterials 24: 2133-2151.
28. Ward BC, Webster TJ,. 2006. The effect of nanotopography on calcium and phosphorus deposition on metallic materials in vitro. Biomaterials 27: 3064-3074.
29. Watari S, Hayashi K, Wood JA, Russell P, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ, Genetos DC,. 2012. Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs cells by submicron topographically-patterned ridges and grooves. Biomaterials 33: 128-136.
30. Yi J-H, Bernard C, Variola F, Zalzal SF, Wuest JD, Rosei F, Nanci A,. 2006. Characterization of a bioactive nanotextured surface created by controlled chemical oxidation of titanium. Surf Sci 600: 4613-4621.
31. 2 nanotube layers on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res A 94: 1012-1022.
32. Zhang Z, Sun J, Hu H, Wang Q, Liu X,. 2011. Osteoblast-like cell adhesion on porous silicon-incorporated TiO2 coating prepared by micro-arc oxidation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 97: 224-234.