The influence of corporate social responsibility on consumers' attitudes and intentions toward genetically modified foods: Evidence from Italy

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 112, Issue , 2016, Pages 2861-2869

  Pino, Giovanni ^a   Amatulli, Cesare ^b   De Angelis, Matteo ^b   Peluso, Alessandro M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^b LUISS UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Consumer buying intentions; Consumer perceptions; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Genetically modified (GM) foods

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PUBLIC HEALTH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ATTITUDES; CONSUMER BUYING; CONSUMER PERCEPTION; CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES (CSR); GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84958663193     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Agudo Valiente, J.M., Garces-Ayerbe, C., Figueras, M.D., November 2012. Social responsibility practices and evaluation of corporate performance. J. Clean. Prod. 35, 25-38.
2. Aguinis, H., Glavas, A., 2012. What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J. Manag. 38 (4), 932-968.
3. Ajzen, I., 1985. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In:Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action Control: from Cognition to Behavior. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
4. Alvarado-Herrera, A., Bigné, E., Aldas-Manzano, J., Curras-Perez, R., 2015. A scale for measuring consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility following the sustainable development paradigm. J. Bus. Ethics (in press).
5. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103 (3), 411-423.
6. Arli, D.I., Lasmono, H.K., 2010. Consumers' perception of corporate social responsibility in a developing country. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 34 (1), 46-51.
7. Aupperle, K.E., 1984. An empirical measure of corporate social orientation. Res. Corp. Soc. Perform. Policy 6, 27-54.
8. Bandalos, D.L., 2002. The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Struct. Equ. Model. 9 (1), 78-102.
9. Bhate, S., 2007. Health of the nation: an individual or a corporate social responsibility? A preliminary investigation into consumer perceptions. J. Public Aff. 7 (2), 164-180.
10. Bawa, A.S., Anilakumar, K.R., 2013. Genetically modified foods: safety, risks and public concerns - a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 50 (6), 1035-1046.
11. BBC News, 1996. First GM Food Goes on Sale in UK (5 February). http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/5/newsid-4647000/4647390.stm.
12. Beckman, S., 2007. Consumers and corporate social responsibility. Australas. Mark. J. 15 (1), 27-36.
13. Bigné, E., Currás-Pérez, R., Aldás-Manzano, J., 2012. Dual nature of cause-brand fit influence on corporate social responsibility consumer perception. Eur. J. Mark. 46 (3/4), 575-594.
14. Biswas, A., Roy, M., 2015. Green products: an exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the east.J. Clean. Prod. 87 (15), 463-468.
15. Boccia, F., 2006. Agri-biotechnologies in the Italian system. New Medit. 2, 37-46.
16. Bravo, R., Matute, J., Pina, J.M., 2012. Corporate social responsibility as a vehicle to reveal the corporate identity: a study focused on the websites of Spanish financial entities. J. Bus. Ethics 107 (2), 129-146.
17. Brown, T., Dacin, P., 1997. The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J. Mark. 61 (1), 68-84.
18. Burke, L., Logsdon, J.M., 1996. How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Plan. 29, 495-502.
19. Byrne, B.M., 2009. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Routledge, New York.
20. Canavari, M., Nayga, R.M., 2009. On consumers' willingness to purchase nutritionally enhanced genetically modified food. Appl. Econ. 41 (1), 125-137.
21. Carroll, A.B., 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 4 (4), 497-505.
22. Carroll, A.B., 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus. Horizons 34 (4), 39-48.
23. Carroll, A.B., 1999. Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct. Bus. Soc. 38 (3), 268-295.
24. Chang, C., 2008. To donate or not to donate? Product characteristics and framing effects of cause-related marketing on consumer purchase behavior. Psychol. Mark. 25 (12), 1089-1110.
25. Chang, H.S., Chen, T.Y., Tseng, C.M., 2009. How public-issue-promoted and revenue-related types of social marketing influence customer-perceived value in Taiwan's banking industry. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 21 (1), 35-49.
26. Clapp, J., 2008. Illegal GMO releases and corporate responsibility: questioning the effectiveness of voluntary measures. Ecol. Econ. 66 (2-3), 348-358.
27. Clarkson, M.E., 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20 (1), 92-117.
28. Coffman, D.L., MacCallum, R.C., 2005. Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivar. Behav. Res. 40 (2), 235-259.
29. Confagricoltura, 2015. OGM e biotecnologie: un'opportunita per il futuro dell'agricoltura. http://www.confagricoltura.it/ita/territorio-nord/province/ogm-e-biotecnologie-un-opportunita-per-il-futuro-dell-agricoltura.php.
30. Corti, M., 2011. OGM e zootecnia: prodotti derivati da animali alimentati con alimenti GM sono realmente uguali a quelli di animali alimentati con razioni GM free? In:Bianco, E. (Ed.), Scienza Incerta e Dubbi dei Consumatori. Il Caso degli Organismi Geneticamente Modificati, Slow Food, Bra (Italy), pp. 135-146.
31. Costa-Font, M., Gil, J.M., 2009. Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: a cross country study. Food Qual. Prefer. 20 (6), 399-409.
32. Crane, A., Matten, D., 2004. Business Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK).
33. Creyer, E.H., Ross, W.T., 1996. The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Mark. Lett. 7 (2), 173-185.
34. Currás-Pérez, R., Bigné, E., Alvarado-Herrera, A., 2009. The role of self-definitional principles in consumer identification with a socially responsible company. J. Bus. Ethics 89 (4), 547-564.
35. Ejnavarzala, H., 2012. Genetically Modified Food. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization.
36. Emiroʇlu, H., 2002. Foods produced using biotechnology: how does the law protect consumers? Int. J. Consum. Stud. 26 (3), 198-209.
37. Eurobarometer, 2010. Biotechnology Report. http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCgQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Fpublic-opinion%2Farchives%2Febs%2Febs-341-en.pdf&ei=B38YVayHGqTY7AbauYGwDw&usg=AFQjCNGdtkl0v0ESQoBAYhohUpwwhk-tbw&bvm=bv.89381419,d.d2s (accessed 25.02.15.).
38. European Commission, 2010. A Decade of EU-funded GMO Research. http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Fresearch%2Fbiosociety%2Fpdf%2Fa-decade-of-eu-funded-gmo-research.pdf&ei=AugXVd-oAsu0UZyNgMgC&usg=AFQjCNFQHor7dffMiZruuXOHhvvZFx8xRA&bvm=bv.89381419,d.d24 (accessed 22.01.15.).
39. Finucane, M.L., Holup, J.H., 2005. Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 60 (7), 1603-1612.
40. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading (USA).
41. Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Pittman, Boston (USA).
42. Frewer, L.J., Coles, D., Hodebine, L.M., Kleter, G.A., 2014. Attitudes towards genetically modified animals in food production. Br. Food J. 116 (8), 1291-1313.
43. Frewer, L.J., van der Lans, I.A., Fischer, A.R.H., Reinders, M.J., Menozzi, D., Zhang, X., van den Berg, I., Zimmermann, K.L., 2013. Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 30 (2), 142-152.
44. García de Los Salmones, M., Herrero Crespo, A., Rodríguez del Bosque, I., 2005. Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services. J. Bus. Ethics 61 (4), 369-385.
45. Gaskell, G., Stares, S., 2013. Have GM crops and food a future in Europe? In:Bennett, D.J., Jennings, R.C. (Eds.), Successful Agricultural Innovation in Emerging Economies: New Genetic Technologies for Global Food Production. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK), pp. 331-347.
46. Grunert, K., Bredahl, L., Scholderer, J., 2003. Four questions on European consumers' attitudes toward the use of genetic modification in food production. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 4 (4), 435-445.
47. Harrison, R.W., Boccaletti, S., House, L., 2004. Risk perceptions of urban Italian and United States consumers for genetically modified foods. AgBioForum 7 (4), 195-201.
48. Honkanen, P., Verplanken, B., 2004. Understanding attitudes towards genetically modified food. J. Consum. Policy 27 (4), 401-420.
49. Hossain, F., Onyango, B., 2004. Product attributes and consumer acceptance of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified foods. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 28 (3), 255-267.
50. Hossain, F., Onyango, B., Schilling, B., Hallman, W., Adelaja, A., 2003. Product attributes, consumer benefits and public approval of genetically modified foods. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 27 (5), 353-365.
51. Hu, L., Bentler, P.M., 1998. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6 (1), 1-55.
52. Huang, J., Hu, R., Rozelle, S., Pray, C., 2005. Insect-resistant GM rise in farmers' fields: assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science 308 (5722), 688-690.
53. James, C., 2015. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. Ithaca, NY. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/49/executivesummary/default.asp (accessed 26.03.15.).
54. Kim, Y.G., Jang, S.Y., Kim, A.K., 2014. Application of the theory of planned behavior to genetically modified foods: moderating effects of food technology neophobia. Food Res. Int. 62, 947-954.
55. Lang, J.T., Hallman, W.K., 2005. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Risk Anal. 25 (5), 1241-1252.
56. Laros, F.J.M., Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., 2004. Importance of fear in the case of genetically modified food. Psychol. Mark. 21 (11), 889-908.
57. Lavorata, L., Pontier, S., 2005. The success of a retailer's ethical policy: focusing on local actions. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev. 9 (11), 1-9.
58. Lee, J., Lee, Y., 2015. The interactions of CSR, self-congruity and purchase intention among Chinese consumers.Australas. Mark. J. 23 (1), 19-26.
59. Lee, E.M., Park, S.Y., Rapert, M.I., Newman, C.L., 2012. Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues? J. Bus. Res. 65 (11), 1558-1564.
60. Legge, J., Durant, R.F., 2010. Public opinion, risk assessment, and biotechnology: lessons from attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the European Union. Rev. Policy Res. 27 (1), 59-76.
61. Levidow, L., Boschert, K., 2008. Coexistence or contradiction? GM crops versus alternative agricultures in Europe. Geoforum 39 (1), 174-190.
62. Lichtenstein, D., Drumwright, M., Braig, B., 2004. The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. J. Mark. 68 (4), 16-32.
63. Lozano, R., Huisingh, D., 2011. Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. J. Clean. Prod. 12, 99-107.
64. Macek, T., Kotrba, P., Svatos, A., Novakova, M., Demnerova, K., Mackova, M., 2008. Novel roles for genetically modified plants in environmental protection. Trends Biotechnol. 26 (3), 146-152.
65. MacDonald, C., Whellams, M., 2007. Corporate decisions about labelling genetically modified foods. J. Bus. Ethics 75 (2), 181-189.
66. McGarry Wolf, M., Bertolini, P., Parker-Garcia, J., 2004. A comparison of consumer attitudes towards GM food in Italy and the USA. In:Evenson, R.E., Santaniello, V. (Eds.), Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 131-142.
67. Maignan, I., 2001. Consumers' perception of corporate social responsibility: a cross cultural perception. J. Bus. Ethics 30 (1), 57-72.
68. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O.C., 2001. Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument - concepts, evidence and research directions.Eur. J. Mark. 36 (3-4), 457-484.
69. Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J., Harris, K.E., 2001. Do consumer expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. J. Consum. Aff. 35 (1), 45-72.
70. Miles, S., Ueland, Ø., Frewer, L.J., 2005. Public attitudes towards genetically-modified food. Br. Food J. 107 (4-5), 246-262.
71. Moon, W., Balasubramanian, S.K., 2002. Public perceptions and willingness-to-pay a premium for non-GM foods in the US and UK. Agbioforum 4 (3-4), 212-231.
72. Nasser, F., Wisenbaker, J., 2003. A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 63 (5), 729-757.
73. Nisim, S., Benjamin, O., 2008. Power and size of firms as reflected in cleaning subcontractors' practices of social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 83 (4), 673-683.
74. Öberseder, M., Schlegemilch, B.B., Murphy, P.E., Gruber, V., 2014. Consumers' perceptions of corporate social responsibility: scale development and validation. J. Bus. Ethics 124, 101-115.
75. Onyango, B., Nayga Jr., R.M., 2004. Consumer acceptance of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified food: relevance of gene transfer technology. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 29 (3), 567-583.
76. Park, J., Lee, H., Kim, C., 2014. Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers' perspectives. J. Bus. Res. 67 (3), 295-302.
77. Pérez, A., Rodríguez del Bosque, I., 2013. Measuring CSR image: three studies to develop and to validate a reliable measurement tool. J. Bus. Ethics 118 (2), 265-286.
78. Pérez, A., García de los Salmones, M.M., Rodríguez del Bosque, I., 2013. The effect of corporate associations on consumer behaviour. Eur. J. Mark. 47 (1/2), 218-238.
79. Phillips, D.M., Hallman, W.K., 2013. Consumer risk perceptions and marketing strategy: the case of genetically modified food. Psychol. Mark. 30 (9), 739-748.
80. Phipps, R.H., Park, J.R., 2002. Environmental benefits of genetically modified crops: global and European perspectives on their ability to reduce pesticide use. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 11, 1-18.
81. Platania, M., Pivitera, D., 2009. Critical aspects of consumption of genetically modified foods in Italy. In:Lindgreen, A., Hingley, M.K., Vanhamme, J. (Eds.), The Crisis of Food Brands. Sustaining Safe, Innovative and Competitive Food Supply. Gower Publishing Company, Burlington (USA), pp. 121-138.
82. Pomering, A., Dolnicar, S., 2009. Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? J. Bus. Ethics 85 (2), 285-301.
83. Prati, G., Pietrantoni, L., Zani, B., 2012. The prediction of intention to consume genetically modified food: test of an integrated psychosocial model. Food Qual. Prefer. 25 (2), 163-170.
84. Qaim, M., Kouser, S., 2013. Genetically modified crops and food security. PLoS One 8 (6), 1-7.
85. Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M.C.H., Au, A.K.M., 2010. Consumer support for corporate social responsibility (CSR). The role of religion and values. J. Bus. Ethics 91 (1), 61-72.
86. Raspor, P., 2006. Faces of foods on the world of food systems. Acta Aliment. 35 (3), 247-249.
87. Raybould, A.F., Gray, A.J., 1993. Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J. Appl. Ecol. 30 (2), 199-219.
88. Rimal, A., Moon, W., Balasubramanian, S., 2007. Labelling genetically modified food products: consumers' concern in the United Kingdom. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 31 (4), 436-442.
89. Savadori, L., Savio, S., Nicotra, E., Rumiati, R., Finucane, M., Slovic, P., 2004. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Anal. 24 (5), 1289-1299.
90. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B., 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Mark. Res. 38 (2), 225-243.
91. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B., Korschun, D., 2006. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 34 (2), 158-166.
92. Singh, J., de Los Salmones Sanchez, M., del Bosque, I.R., 2008. Understanding corporate social responsibility and product perceptions in consumer markets: a cross-cultural evaluation. J. Bus. Ethics 80 (3), 597-611.
93. Smith, W.J., Wokutch, R.E., Harrington, K.V., Dennis, B., 2001. An examination of the influence of diversity and stakeholder role on corporate social orientation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 40 (3), 266-294.
94. Spence, A., Townsend, E., 2006. Examining consumer behavior toward genetically modified (GM) food in Britain. Risk Anal. 26 (3), 657-670.
95. Stanaland, A.J.S., Lwin, M.O., Murphy, P.E., 2011. Consumer perceptions of the antecedents and consequences of corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 102 (1), 47-55.
96. Swaen, V., 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility: Do Managers and Consumers Have the Same Conception of Doing Good?. In: Paper Presented at the 10th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network, Corporate Social Responsibility - Governance for Sustainability, June 23-26, Göteborg, Sweden.
97. Swanson, D.L., 1995. Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20 (1), 43-64.
98. Tamis, W.L.M., Van Dommlen, A., De Snoo, G.R., 2009. Lack of transparency on environmental risks of genetically modified micro-organisms in industrial biotechnology. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (6), 581-592.
99. Torres, A., Bijmolt, T.H., Tribó, J.A., Verhoef, P., 2012. Generating global brand equity through corporate social responsibility to key stakeholders. Int. J. Res. Mark. 29 (1), 13-24.
100. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Report of the 96th Plenary Meeting of the World Commission on Environment and Development, 11th December. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42-187.htm.
101. van Marrewijk, M., 2003. Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. J. Bus. Ethics 44 (2-3), 95-105.
102. Vilella-Vila, M., Costa-Font, J., Mossialos, E., 2005. Consumers involvement and acceptance of biotechnology in the European Union: a specific focus on Spain and the UK. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 29 (2), 18-118.
103. Wartick, S.L., Cochran, P.L., 1985. The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Acad. Manag. Rev. 10 (4), 758-769.
104. Weisenfield, U., 2012. Corporate social responsibility in innovation: insights from two cases of Syngenta's activities in genetically modified organisms. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Innov. 21 (2), 199-211.
105. Wohlers, T.E., 2015. The role of risk perception and political culture: a comparative study of regulating genetically modified food. In:Mercantini, J.M., Colette, F. (Eds.), Risk and Cognition, 80. Springer, New York, pp. 21-59.
106. Wood, D.J., 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16 (4), 691-718.
107. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). http://www.wbcsd.org/work-program/business-role/previous-work/corporate-social-responsibility.aspx (accessed 01.04.15.).
108. Wu, D.D., Olson, D.L., Birge, J.R., 2013. Risk management in cleaner production. J. Clean. Prod. 53, 1-6.
109. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J.G., Chen, Q., 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consum. Res. 37 (2), 197-206.
110. Zeng, S.X., Meng, X.H., Yin, H.T., Tam, C.M., Sun, L., 2010. Impact of cleaner production on business performance. J. Clean. Prod. 18 (10-11), 975-983.