Social responsibility practices and evaluation of corporate social performance

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 35, Issue , 2012, Pages 25-38

  Agudo Valiente, José M ^a   Ayerbe, Concepción Garcés ^a   Figueras, Manuel Salvador ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; CSP; CSR; Factor analysis; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; INFERENCE ENGINES; SURVEYS;

BAYESIAN INFERENCE; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES (CSR); SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES; STAKEHOLDER PRESSURES; STAKEHOLDERS; SUSTAINABILITY MANAGEMENTS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84877142283     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alcaide, J., Alcaide, P., 2001. Renta nacional de España y su distribución provincial. Año 1995 y avances 1996 a 1999. Bilbao Fundación BBVA, Spain.
2. Aupperle, K.E., 1984. An empirical measure of corporate social orientation. In: Preston, L.E. (Ed.), 1984. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, vol. 6. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 27-54.
3. Bagozzi, R.P., 2000. On the concept of intentional social action in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 27, 388-396.
4. Baumgartner, R.J., Ebner, D., 2010. Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development 18 (2), 76-89.
5. Bernardo, J.M., Smith, A.F.M., 1994. Bayesian Theory. Wiley. Ch. 2. Foundations.
6. Bernstein, A., 11 September 2000. Too much corporate power. Business Week, 149.
7. Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. In: Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics.
8. Carroll, A.B., 1979. A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4 (4), 497-505.
9. Carroll, A.B., JulyeAugust 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 39-48.
10. Carroll, A.B., Buchholtz, A.K., 2009. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, seventh ed. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH.
11. Carroll, A.B., Shabana, K., 2010. The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of Conceps, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1), 85-105.
12. Centelles, F., 1993. El Estado AutonómicoTeoríaY Práctica. Toledo Azacanes, D.L., Spain.
13. Clarkson, M.B.E., 1988. Corporate social performance in Canada 1976-1986. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 10, 241-265.
14. Clarkson, M.B.E., 1995. A stakeholder framework for Analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20 (1), 92-117.
15. Clarkson, M.B.E., Starik, M., Cochran, P., Jones, T., et al., 1994. The Toronto Conference Reflections on stakeholder theory. Business and Society 33 (1), 82-131.
16. Das, S., Chen, M.-H., Kim, S., Warren, N., 2008. A Bayesian structural equations model for Multilevel data with missing responses and missing Covariates. Bayesian Analysis 3 (1), 197-224.
17. De Schutter, O., 2008. Corporate social responsibility European style. European Law Journal 14, 203-236.
18. European Commission. 2003. Commission Recommendation of May 6 2003 Concerning the Definition of Mico, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. C(2003) 1422.
19. Gildea, R.L., 1995. Consumer Survey Confirms corporate social responsibility actions affects buying decisions. Public Relations Quarterly 39, 20-21.
20. Hutchins, M.J., Sutherland, J.W., 2008. An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (15), 1688-1698.
21. Jamali, D., Mirshak, R., 2007. Corporate social responsibility (CSR): theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics 72, 243-262.
22. Kotler, P., Lee, N., 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
23. Lee, S.-Y., 2007. Structural Equation Modelling a Bayesian Approach. In: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
24. Lee, M.D.P., 2008. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews 10, 53-73.
25. Lozano, R., Huisingh, D., 2011. Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 99-107.
26. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21, 603-617.
27. Mitnick, B.M., 2000. Commitment, revelation, and the testaments of belief: the metrics of measurement of corporate social performance. Business and Society 39, 419-465.
28. Murray, K.B., Vogel, C., 1997. Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm Financial versus non-financial impacts. Journal of Business Research 38 (2), 141-159. (Pubitemid 127160053)
29. Perrini, F., 2006. SMEs and CSR theory Evidence and implications from an Italian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3), 305-316. (Pubitemid 44505765)
30. Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A., 2007. CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3), 285-300.
31. Russo, M.V., Fouts, P.A., 1997. A Resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3), 534-559.
32. Russo, A., Tencati, A., 2009. Formal vs. Informal CSR strategies evidence from Italian micro, small, medium-sized, and large firms. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2), 339-353.
33. Spence, L.J., 1999. Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics A European Review 8 (3), 163-174.
34. Spence, L.J., 2007. CSR and small business in a European Policy context the Five "C"s of CSR and small business research Agenda 2007. Business and Society Review 112 (4), 533-552.
35. Spence, L.J., Rutherfoord, R., 2003. Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics editorial. Journal of Business Ethics 47 (1), 1-5. (Pubitemid 38097282)
36. Tsoutsoura, M., 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Center for Responsible Business. Working Paper Series núm 7, UK Social Investment Forum. http//www.uksif.org.
37. Van der Heijden, A., Driessen, P.P.J., Cramer, J.M., 2010. Making sense of corporate social responsibility: exploring organizational processes and strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (18), 1787-1796.
38. Waddock, S., 2009. Making a difference? Corporate responsibility as a social movement. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 33, 35-43.
39. Wartick, S.L., Mahon, J.F., 2009. Corporate social performance profiling: the importance of multiple stakeholder perspectives. In: Paper presented At the Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, Snowmass, CO, 18-21 June.
40. Warttick, S.L., Cochran, P., 1985. The evolution of the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review 10, 758-769.
41. Weber, M., 2008. The business case for corporate social responsibility: a company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal 26, 247-261.
42. Wood, D.J., 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16 (4), 691-718.
43. Wood, D.J., 1994. Business and Society, second ed. HarperCollins, New York.
44. Wood, D.J., 2010. Measuring corporate social performance: a review. International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1), 50-84.
45. Zadek, S., 2000. Doing Good and Doing Well: Making the Business Case for Corporate Citizenship. Research Report 1282-00-RR. The Conference Board, New York.