Erratum: The evolutionary turnover of recombination hot spots contributes to speciation in mice (Genes & Development ((2016)) 30 (266–280) DOI: 10.1101/gad.270009.115);The evolutionary turnover of recombination hot spots contributes to speciation in mice

Genes and Development

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 266-280

  Smagulova, Fatima ^a,c   Brick, Kevin ^b   Pu, Yongmei ^a   Camerini Otero, R Daniel ^b   Petukhova, Galina V ^a  

^a UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

DSB hot spots; Homologous recombination; Hybrid sterility; Meiosis; Prdm9; Recombination hot spots; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE; GENE CONVERSION; GENE DELETION; GENE INSERTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMAN; INDEL MUTATION; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; MOUSE; MUS MUSCULUS CASTANEUS; MUS MUSCULUS MOLOSSINUS; MUS MUSCULUS MUSCULUS; NONHUMAN; PRDM9 GENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOMBINATION HOT SPOT; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; METABOLISM;

HISTONE LYSINE METHYLTRANSFERASE; PRDM9 PROTEIN, MOUSE; PROTEIN BINDING;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; GENETIC SPECIATION; HISTONE-LYSINE N-METHYLTRANSFERASE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MICE; PROTEIN BINDING; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84957801876     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.352049.124     Document Type: Erratum

References (65)

1. Bailey TL, Machanick P. 2012. Inferring directDNAbinding from ChIP-seq. Nucleic Acids Res 40: e128.
2. Baker CL, Kajita S, Walker M, Saxl RL, Raghupathy N, Choi K, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2015. PRDM9 drives evolutionary erosion of hotspots in Mus musculus through haplotype-specific initiation of meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet 11: e1004916.
3. Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, Przeworski M, Coop G, de Massy B. 2010. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327: 836–840.
4. Baudat F, Imai Y, de Massy B. 2013. Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat Rev Genet 14: 794–806.
5. Berg IL, Neumann R, Lam KW, Sarbajna S, Odenthal-Hesse L, May CA, Jeffreys AJ. 2010. PRDM9 variation strongly influences recombination hot-spot activity and meiotic instability in humans. Nat Genet 42: 859–863.
6. Berg IL, Neumann R, Sarbajna S, Odenthal-Hesse L, Butler NJ, Jeffreys AJ. 2011. Variants of the protein PRDM9 differentially regulate a set of human meiotic recombination hotspots highly active in African populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108: 12378–12383.
7. Bernstein BE, Birney E, Dunham I, Green ED, Gunter C, Snyder M, Consortium EP. 2012. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489: 57–74.
8. Bhattacharyya T. 2013. “Genetics and genomics of hybrid sterility.” PhD thesis, Charles University, Prague.
9. Bhattacharyya T, Gregorova S, Mihola O, Anger M, Sebestova J, Denny P, Simecek P, Forejt J. 2013. Mechanistic basis of infertility of mouse intersubspecific hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110: E468–E477.
10. Bhattacharyya T, Reifova R, Gregorova S, Simecek P, Gergelits V, Mistrik M, Martincova I, Pialek J, Forejt J. 2014. X chromosome control of meiotic chromosome synapsis in mouse inter- subspecific hybrids. PLoS Genet 10: e1004088.
11. Billings T, Sargent EE, Szatkiewicz JP, Leahy N, Kwak IY, Bektassova N, Walker M, Hassold T, Graber JH, Broman KW, et al. 2010.Patterns ofrecombinationactivityonmousechromosome 11 revealed by high resolutionmapping. PLoSOne 5: e15340.
12. Billings T, Parvanov ED, Baker CL, Walker M, Paigen K, Petkov PM. 2013.DNAbinding specificities of the long zinc-finger recombination protein PRDM9. Genome Biol 14: R35.
13. Boulton A, Myers RS, Redfield RJ. 1997. The hotspot conversion paradox and the evolution of meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 8058–8063.
14. Brick K, Smagulova F, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2012. Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 485: 642–645.
15. Buard J, Rivals E, Dunoyer de Segonzac D, Garres C, Caminade P, de Massy B, Boursot P. 2014. Diversity of Prdm9 zinc finger array in wild mice unravels new facets of the evolutionary turnover of this coding minisatellite. PLoS One 9: e85021.
16. Chambers SR, Hunter N, Louis EJ, Borts RH. 1996. The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss. Mol Cell Biol 16: 6110–6120.
17. Datta A, Hendrix M, Lipsitch M, Jinks-Robertson S. 1997. Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 9757–9762.
18. Derrien T, Estellé J, Marco Sola S, Knowles DG, Raineri E, Guigó R, Ribeca P. 2012. Fast computation and applications of genome mappability. PLoS One 7: e30377.
19. Elliott B, Richardson C, Winderbaum J, Nickoloff JA, Jasin M. 1998. Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 18: 93–101.
20. Geraldes A, Basset P, Gibson B, Smith KL, Harr B, Yu HT, Bulatova N, Ziv Y, Nachman MW. 2008. Inferring the history of speciation in house mice from autosomal, X-linked, Y-linked and mitochondrial genes. Mol Ecol 17: 5349–5363.
21. Hayashi K, Yoshida K, Matsui Y. 2005.Ahistone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase. Nature 438: 374–378.
22. Hunter N, Chambers SR, Louis EJ, Borts RH. 1996. The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. EMBO J 15: 1726–1733.
23. Jeffreys AJ, Cotton VE, Neumann R, Lam KW. 2013. Recombination regulator PRDM9 influences the instability of its own coding sequence in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110: 600–605.
24. Kauppi L, Barchi M, Lange J, Baudat F, Jasin M, Keeney S. 2013. Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis. Genes Dev 27: 873–886.
25. Keane TM, Goodstadt L, Danecek P, White MA, Wong K, Yalcin B, Heger A, Agam A, Slater G, Goodson M, et al. 2011. Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477: 289–294.
26. Khil PP, Smagulova F, Brick KM, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2012. Sensitive mapping of recombination hotspots using sequencing-based detection of ssDNA. Genome Res 22: 957–965.
27. Klein J, Flaherty L, VandeBerg JL, Shreffler DC. 1978. H-2 haplotypes, genes, regions, and antigens: first listing. Immunogenetics 6: 489–512.
28. Kono H, Tamura M, Osada N, Suzuki H, Abe K, Moriwaki K, Ohta K, Shiroishi T. 2014. Prdm9 polymorphism unveils mouse evolutionary tracks. DNA Res 21: 315–326.
29. Lam I, Keeney S. 2015. Mechanism and regulation of meiotic recombination initiation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7: a016634.
30. Lercher MJ, Hurst LD. 2003. Imprinted chromosomal regions of the human genome have unusually high recombination rates. Genetics 165: 1629–1632.
31. Lesecque Y, Glémin S, Lartillot N, Mouchiroud D, Duret L. 2014. The red queen model of recombination hotspots evolution in the light of archaic and modern human genomes. PLoS Genet 10: e1004790.
32. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754–1760.
33. Liu EY, Morgan AP, Chesler EJ, Wang W, Churchill GA, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F. 2014. High-resolution sex-specific linkage maps of the mouse reveal polarized distribution of crossovers in male germline. Genetics 197: 91–106.
34. Machanick P, Bailey TL. 2011. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets. Bioinformatics 27: 1696–1697.
35. Mahony S, Benos PV. 2007. STAMP: a Web tool for exploring DNA-binding motif similarities. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W253–W258.
36. Margolin G, Khil PP, Kim J, Bellani MA, Camerini-Otero RD. 2014. Integrated transcriptome analysis of mouse spermatogenesis. BMC Genomics 15: 39.
37. Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Schimenti JC, Forejt J. 2009. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323: 373–375.
38. Myers S, Bottolo L, Freeman C, McVean G, Donnelly P. 2005. A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome. Science 310: 321–324.
39. Myers S, Bowden R, Tumian A, Bontrop RE, Freeman C, MacFie TS, McVean G, Donnelly P. 2010. Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327: 876–879.
40. Nakahashi H, Kwon KR, Resch W, Vian L, Dose M, Stavreva D, Hakim O, Pruett N, Nelson S, Yamane A, et al. 2013. A genome- wide map of CTCF multivalency redefines the CTCF code. Cell Rep 3: 1678–1689.
41. Narasimhan V, Hunt K, Mason D, Baker CL, Karczewski K, Barnes M, Barnett A, Bates C, Bellary S, Bockett N, et al. 2015. Health and population effects of rare gene knockouts in adult humans with related parents. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/031641.
42. Ng SH, Madeira R, Parvanov ED, Petros LM, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2009. Parental origin of chromosomes influences crossover activity within the Kcnq1 transcriptionally imprinted domain of Mus musculus. BMC Mol Biol 10: 43.
43. Oliver PL, Goodstadt L, Bayes JJ, Birtle Z, Roach KC, Phadnis N, Beatson SA, Lunter G, Malik HS, Ponting CP. 2009. Accelerated evolution of the Prdm9 speciation gene across diverse metazoan taxa. PLoS Genet 5: e1000753.
44. Paigen K, Szatkiewicz JP, Sawyer K, Leahy N, Parvanov ED, Ng SH, Graber JH, Broman KW, Petkov PM. 2008. The recombinational anatomy of a mouse chromosome. PLoS Genet 4: e1000119.
45. Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2010. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327: 835.
46. Persikov AV, Singh M. 2014. De novo prediction of DNA-binding specificities for Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 42: 97–108.
47. Persikov AV, Osada R, Singh M. 2009. Predicting DNA recognition by Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Bioinformatics 25: 22–29.
48. Pratto F, Brick K, Khil P, Smagulova F, Petukhova GV, Camerini-Otero RD. 2014. Recombination initiation maps of individual human genomes. Science 346: 1256442.
49. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDtools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26: 841–842.
50. Rayssiguier C, Thaler DS, Radman M. 1989. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature 342: 396–401.
51. Sandovici I, Kassovska-Bratinova S, Vaughan JE, Stewart R, Leppert M, Sapienza C. 2006. Human imprinted chromosomal regions are historical hot-spots of recombination. PLoS Genet 2: e101.
52. Ségurel L, Leffler EM, Przeworski M. 2011. The case of the fickle fingers: how the PRDM9 zinc finger protein specifies meiotic recombination hotspots in humans. PLoS Biol 9: e1001211.
53. Sharon E, Lubliner S, Segal E. 2008. A feature-based approach to modeling protein-DNA interactions. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000154.
54. Shen P, Huang HV. 1986. Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics 112: 441–457.
55. Silver LM. 1995. Mouse genetics. Oxford University Press, New York.
56. Smagulova F, Gregoretti IV, Brick K, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2011. Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 472: 375–378.
57. Spies M, Fishel R. 2015. Mismatch repair during homologous and homeologous recombination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7: a022657.
58. Storchová R, Gregorová S, Buckiová D, Kyselová V, Divina P, Forejt J. 2004. Genetic analysis of X-linked hybrid sterility in the house mouse. Mamm Genome 15: 515–524.
59. Sun F, Fujiwara Y, Reinholdt LG, Hu J, Saxl RL, Baker CL, Petkov PM, Paigen K, Handel MA. 2015. Nuclear localization of PRDM9 and its role in meiotic chromatin modifications and homologous synapsis. Chromosoma 124: 397–415.
60. Thacker D, Mohibullah N, Zhu X, Keeney S. 2014. Homologue engagement controls meiotic DNA break number and distribution. Nature 510: 241–246.
61. Thomas JH, Emerson RO, Shendure J. 2009. Extraordinary molecular evolution in the PRDM9 fertility gene. PLoS One 4: e8505.
62. Turner LM, Schwahn DJ, Harr B. 2012. Reduced male fertility is common but highly variable in form and severity in a natural house mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 66: 443–458.
63. White MA, Ikeda A, Payseur BA. 2012. A pronounced evolutionary shift of the pseudoautosomal region boundary in house mice. Mamm Genome 23: 454–466.
64. Yetter RA, Hartley JW, Morse HC. 1983. H-2-linked regulation of xenotropic murine leukemia virus expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci 80: 505–509.
65. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, et al. 2008. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9: R137.