Diversity of Prdm9 zinc finger array in wild mice unravels new facets of the evolutionary turnover of this coding minisatellite

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Buard, Jérôme ^a   Rivals, Eric ^b   Dunoyer De Segonzac, Denis ^a,c   Garres, Charlotte ^a,c   Caminade, Pierre ^c   De Massy, Bernard ^a   Boursot, Pierre ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (France)

^b LIRMM   (France)

^c INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN PRDM 9; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN;

ALLELE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CODON; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING MOTIF; DNA POLYMORPHISM; GENE DOSAGE; GENE FLOW; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; MUS MACEDONICUS; MUS MUSCULUS CASTANEUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; MUS MUSCULUS MUSCULUS; MUS SPICILEGUS; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PRDM9 GENE; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VARIABLE NUMBER OF TANDEM REPEAT; ZINC FINGER MOTIF;

ALLELES; AMINO ACIDS; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DOSAGE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GEOGRAPHY; HETEROZYGOTE; HISTONE-LYSINE N-METHYLTRANSFERASE; MICE; MINISATELLITE REPEATS; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIFS; OPEN READING FRAMES; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; ZINC FINGERS;

EID: 84898420312     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085021     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Handel MA, Schimenti JC (2010) Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility. Nat Rev Genet 11: 124-136.
2. McKee BD (2009) Homolog pairing and segregation in Drosophila meiosis. Genome Dyn 5: 56-68.
3. Otto SP, Lenormand T (2002) Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat Rev Genet 3: 252-261. (Pubitemid 34279794)
4. Coop G, Przeworski M (2007) An evolutionary view of human recombination. Nat Rev Genet 8: 23-34. (Pubitemid 46006047)
5. Baudat F, de Massy B (2007) Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis. Chromosome Res 15: 565-577. (Pubitemid 47221367)
6. Baudat F, Imai Y, de Massy B (2013) Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat Rev Genet 14: 794-806.
7. Webster MT, Hurst LD (2012) Direct and indirect consequences of meiotic recombination: implications for genome evolution. Trends Genet 28: 101-109.
8. Lichten M, de Massy B (2011) The impressionistic landscape of meiotic recombination. Cell 147: 267-270.
9. de Massy B (2013) Initation of Meiotic Recombination: How and Where? Conversation and Specificities Among Eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet. in press
10. Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, et al. (2010) PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327: 836-840.
11. Myers S, Bowden R, Tumian A, Bontrop RE, Freeman C, et al. (2010) Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327: 876-879.
12. Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K (2010) Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327: 835.
13. Brick K, Smagulova F, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV (2012) Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 485: 642-645.
14. Myers S, Freeman C, Auton A, Donnelly P, McVean G (2008) A common sequence motif associated with recombination hot spots and genome instability in humans. Nat Genet 40: 1124-1129.
15. Grey C, Barthes P, Chauveau-Le Friec G, Langa F, Baudat F, et al. (2011) Mouse PRDM9 DNA-Binding Specificity Determines Sites of Histone H3 Lysine 4 Trimethylation for Initiation of Meiotic Recombination. PLoS Biol 9: e1001176.
16. Billings T, Parvanov ED, Baker CL, Walker M, Paigen K, et al. (2013) DNA binding specificities of the long zinc finger recombination protein PRDM9. Genome Biol 14: R35.
17. Hinch AG, Tandon A, Patterson N, Song Y, Rohland N, et al. (2011) The landscape of recombination in African Americans. Nature 476: 170-175.
18. Oliver PL, Goodstadt L, Bayes JJ, Birtle Z, Roach KC, et al. (2009) Accelerated Evolution of the Prdm9 Speciation Gene across Diverse Metazoan Taxa. PLoS Genet 5: e1000753.
19. Ponting CP (2011) What are the genomic drivers of the rapid evolution of PRDM9? Trends Genet 27: 165-171.
20. Berg IL, Neumann R, Lam KW, Sarbajna S, Odenthal-Hesse L, et al. (2010) PRDM9 variation strongly influences recombination hot-spot activity and meiotic instability in humans. Nat Genet 42: 859-863.
21. Berg IL, Neumann R, Sarbajna S, Odenthal-Hesse L, Butler NJ, et al. (2011) Variants of the protein PRDM9 differentially regulate a set of human meiotic recombination hotspots highly active in African populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 12378-12383.
22. Groeneveld LF, Atencia R, Garriga RM, Vigilant L (2012) High Diversity at PRDM9 in Chimpanzees and Bonobos. PLoS One 7: e39064.
23. Kong A, Thorleifsson G, Gudbjartsson DF, Masson G, Sigurdsson A, et al. (2010) Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals. Nature 467: 1099-1103.
24. Keane TM, Goodstadt L, Danecek P, White MA, Wong K, et al. (2011) Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477: 289-294.
25. Jeffreys AJ, Cotton VE, Neumann R, Lam KW (2013) Recombination regulator PRDM9 influences the instability of its own coding sequence in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 600-605.
26. Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Schimenti JC, Forejt J (2009) A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323: 373-375.
27. Boursot P, Auffray JC, Britton-Davidian J, Bonhomme F (1993) The evolution of house mice. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 24: 119-152.
28. Chevret P, Veyrunes F, Britton-Davidian J (2005) Molecular phylogeny of the genus Mus (Rodentia : Murinae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear data. Biol J Linn Soc 84: 417-427. (Pubitemid 40441048)
29. She JX, Bonhomme F, Boursot P, Thaler L, Catzeflis F (1990) Molecular phylogenies in the genus Mus: comparative analysis of electrophoretic, scnDNA hybridisation, and mtDNA RFLP data. Biol J Linn Soc 41: 83-103.
30. Suzuki H, Shimada T, Terashima M, Tsuchiya K, Aplin K (2004) Temporal, spatial, and ecological modes of evolution of Eurasian Mus based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 33: 626-646. (Pubitemid 39444505)
31. Tucker PK, Sandstedt SA, Lundrigan BL (2005) Phylogenetic relationships in the subgenus Mus (genus Mus, family Muridae, subfamily Murinae): examining gene trees and species trees. Biol J Linn Soc 84: 653-662. (Pubitemid 40441066)
32. Geraldes A, Basset P, Gibson B, Smith KL, Harr B, et al. (2008) Inferring the history of speciation in house mice from autosomal, X-linked, Y-linked and mitochondrial genes. Mol Ecol 17: 5349-5363.
33. Geraldes A, Basset P, Smith KL, Nachman MW (2011) Higher differentiation among subspecies of the house mouse (Mus musculus) in genomic regions with low recombination. Mol Ecol 20: 4722-4736.
34. Karn RC, Orth A, Bonhomme F, Boursot P (2002) The complex history of a gene proposed to participate in a sexual isolation mechanism in house mice. Mol Biol Evol 19: 462-471. (Pubitemid 34289422)
35. Baines JF, Harr B (2007) Reduced X-linked diversity in derived populations of house mice. Genetics 175: 1911-1921. (Pubitemid 46789972)
36. Halligan DL, Oliver F, Eyre-Walker A, Harr B, Keightley PD (2010) Evidence for pervasive adaptive protein evolution in wild mice. PLoS Genet 6: e1000825.
37. Phifer-Rixey M, Bonhomme F, Boursot P, Churchill GA, Pialek J, et al. (2012) Adaptive evolution and effective population size in wild house mice. Mol Biol Evol 29: 2949-2955.
38. Rajabi-Maham H, Orth A, Siahsarvie R, Boursot P, Darvish J, et al. (2012) The south-eastern house mouse Mus musculus castaneus (Rodentia: Muridae) is a polytypic subspecies. Biol J Linn Soc 107: 295-306.
39. Suzuki H, Nunome M, Kinoshita G, Aplin KP, Vogel P, et al. (2013) Evolutionary and dispersal history of Eurasian house mice Mus musculus clarified by more extensive geographic sampling of mitochondrial DNA. Heredity 111: 375-390.
40. Wolfe SA, Nekludova L, Pabo CO (2000) DNA recognition by Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29: 183-212. (Pubitemid 30599592)
41. Yang Z (2007) PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1586-1591.
42. Persikov AV, Osada R, Singh M (2009) Predicting DNA recognition by Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Bioinformatics 25: 22-29.
43. Persikov AV, Singh M (2013) De novo prediction of DNA-binding specificities for Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. in press
44. Berard S, Rivals E (2003) Comparison of minisatellites. J Comput Biol 10: 357-372. (Pubitemid 37372154)
45. Berard S, Nicolas F, Buard J, Gascuel O, Rivals E (2006) A fast and specific alignment method for minisatellite maps. Evol Bioinform Online 2: 303-320.
46. Bonhomme F, Rivals E, Orth A, Grant G, Jeffreys A, et al. (2007) Species-wide distribution of highly polymorphic minisatellite markers suggests past and present genetic exchanges among house mouse subspecies. Genome Biology 8: R80.
47. Darvish J, Orth A, Bonhomme F (2006) Genetic transition in the house mouse, Mus musculus of Eastern Iranian Plateau. Folia Zoologica 55: 349-357. (Pubitemid 46142078)
48. Duvaux L, Belkhir K, Boulesteix M, Boursot P (2011) Isolation and gene flow: inferring the speciation history of European house mice. Mol Ecol 20: 5248-5264.
49. Bonhomme F, Orth A, Cucchi T, Rajabi-Maham H, Catalan J, et al. (2011) Genetic differentiation of the house mouse around the Mediterranean basin: matrilineal footprints of early and late colonization. Proc R Soc B 278: 1034-1043.
50. Britton Davidian J, Fel-Clair F, Lopez J, Alibert P, Boursot P (2005) Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory-bred hybrids. Biol J Linn Soc 84: 379-393. (Pubitemid 40441045)
51. Good JM, Dean MD, Nachman MW (2008) A complex genetic basis to X-linked hybrid male sterility between two species of house mice. Genetics 179: 2213-2228.
52. Oka A, Mita A, Takada Y, Koseki H, Shiroishi T (2010) Reproductive isolation in hybrid mice due to spermatogenesis defects at three meiotic stages. Genetics 186: 339-351.
53. Turner LM, Schwahn DJ, Harr B (2012) Reduced male fertility is common but highly variable in form and severity in a natural house mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 66: 443-458.
54. White MA, Stubbings M, Dumont BL, Payseur BA (2012) Genetics and evolution of hybrid male sterility in house mice. Genetics 191: 917-934.
55. Vyskočilová M, Pražanová G, Piálek J (2009) Polymorphism in hybrid male sterility in wild-derived Mus musculus musculus strains on proximal chromosome 17. Mammalian Genome 20: 83-91.
56. Pool JE, Nielsen R (2009) Inference of historical changes in migration rate from the lengths of migrant tracts. Genetics 181: 711-719.
57. Staubach F, Lorenc A, Messer PW, Tang K, Petrov DA, et al. (2012) Genome patterns of selection and introgression of haplotypes in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus) . PLoS Genet 8: e1002891.
58. Maheshwari S, Barbash DA (2011) The genetics of hybrid incompatibilities. Annu Rev Genet 45: 331-355.
59. Presgraves DC (2010) The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nat Rev Genet 11: 175-180.
60. Boulton A, Myers RS, Redfield RJ (1997) The hotspot conversion paradox and the evolution of meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 8058-8063. (Pubitemid 27343776)
61. Coop G, Myers SR (2007) Live Hot, Die Young: Transmission Distortion in Recombination Hotspots. PLoS Genet 3: e35.
62. Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R (2002) Reciprocal crossover asymmetry and meiotic drive in a human recombination hot spot. Nat Genet 31: 267-271.
63. Ptak SE, Hinds DA, Koehler K, Nickel B, Patil N, et al. (2005) Fine-scale recombination patterns differ between chimpanzees and humans. Nat Genet 37: 429-434.
64. Kauppi L, Barchi M, Lange J, Baudat F, Jasin M, et al. (2013) Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis. Genes Dev 27: 873-886.
65. Axelsson E, Webster MT, Ratnakumar A, Ponting CP, Lindblad-Toh K (2012) Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome. Genome Res 22: 51-63.
66. Munoz-Fuentes V, Di Rienzo A, Vila C (2011) Prdm9, a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots, is not functional in dogs and their wild relatives, wolves and coyotes. PLoS One 6: e25498.
67. Clement Y, Arndt PF (2013) Meiotic Recombination Strongly Influences GC-Content Evolution in Short Regions in the Mouse Genome. Mol Biol Evol. in press
68. Duret L, Galtier N (2009) Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10: 285-311.
69. Smagulova F, Gregoretti IV, Brick K, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, et al. (2011) Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 472: 375-378.
70. McVean G (2010) What drives recombination hotspots to repeat DNA in humans? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365: 1213-1218.
71. Thomas JH, Schneider S (2011) Coevolution of retroelements and tandem zinc finger genes. Genome Res 21: 1800-1812.
72. Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R, Wilson V (1990) Repeat unit sequence variation in minisatellites: a novel source of DNA polymorphism for studying variation and mutation by single molecule analysis. Cell 60: 473-485.
73. Desper R, Gascuel O (2002) Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J Comput Biol 9: 687-705. (Pubitemid 36042994)
74. Guénoche A, Garreta H (2001) Can We Have Confidence in a Tree Representation? In: Gascuel O, Sagot M-F, editors. Computational Biology: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.pp. 45-56. (Pubitemid 33298829)
75. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731-2739.
76. Carvalho AM, Freitas AT, Oliveira AL, Sagot MF (2006) An efficient algorithm for the identification of structured motifs in DNA promoter sequences. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 3: 126-140.
77. Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS (2011) FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27: 1017-1018.
78. Team RC (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria:R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
79. Auton A, Fledel-Alon A, Pfeifer S, Venn O, Segurel L, et al. (2012) A Fine-Scale Chimpanzee Genetic Map from Population Sequencing. Science 336: 193-198.
80. Steiner CC, Ryder OA (2013) Characterization of prdm9 in equids and sterility in mules. PLoS One 8: e61746.