Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation

Nature

Volumn 477, Issue 7364, 2011, Pages 289-294

  Keane, Thomas M ^a   Goodstadt, Leo ^b   Danecek, Petr ^a   White, Michael A ^c   Wong, Kim ^a   Yalcin, Binnaz ^b   Heger, Andreas ^d   Agam, Avigail ^b,d   Slater, Guy ^a   Goodson, Martin ^b   Furlotte, Nicholas A ^e   Eskin, Eleazar ^e   Nellåker, Christoffer ^d   Whitley, Helen ^b   Cleak, James ^b   Janowitz, Deborah ^b,f   Hernandez Pliego, Polinka ^b   Edwards, Andrew ^b   Belgard, T Grant ^d   Oliver, Peter L ^d   McIntyre, Rebecca E ^a   Bhomra, Amarjit ^b   Nicod, Jérôme ^b   Gan, Xiangchao ^b   Yuan, Wei ^b   Van Der Weyden, Louise ^a   Steward, Charles A ^a   Bala, Sendu ^a   Stalker, Jim ^a   Mott, Richard ^b   Durbin, Richard ^a   Jackson, Ian J ^g   Czechanski, Anne ^h   Guerra Assunçao, José ⁱ   Donahue, Leah Rae ^h   Reinholdt, Laura G ^h   Payseur, Bret A ^c   Ponting, Chris P ^d   Birney, Ewan ⁱ   Flint, Jonathan ^b   Adams, David J ^a   more..

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^h JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

ⁱ WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ALLELE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL CHANGE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; LABORATORY METHOD; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENETICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RODENT;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; GENE CONTROL; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

MUS;

EID: 80052851950     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature10413     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Paigen, K. One hundred years of mouse genetics: an intellectual history. II. The molecular revolution (1981-2002). Genetics 163, 1227-1235 (2003).
2. Paigen, K. One hundred years of mouse genetics: an intellectual history. I. The classical period (1902-1980). Genetics 163, 1-7 (2003). (Pubitemid 36222648)
3. Dietrich, W. F. et al. Genetic identification of Mom-1, a major modifier locus affecting Min-induced intestinal neoplasia in themouse. Cell 75, 631-639 (1993). (Pubitemid 23346362)
4. Church, D. M. et al. Lineage-specific biology revealed by a finished genome assembly of the mouse. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000112 (2009).
5. Waterston, R. H. et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420, 520-562 (2002). (Pubitemid 35477048)
6. van der Weyden, L., Adams, D. J. & Bradley, A. Tools for targeted manipulation of the mouse genome. Physiol. Genomics 11, 133-164 (2002).
7. Ringwald, M. et al. The IKMC web portal: a central point of entry to data and resources from the International Knockout Mouse Consortium. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D849-D855 (2011).
8. Skarnes, W. C. et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature 474, 337-342 (2011).
9. Frazer, K. A. et al. A sequence-based variation map of 8.27 million SNPs in inbred mouse strains. Nature 448, 1050-1053 (2007). (Pubitemid 47345584)
10. Quinlan, A. R. et al. Genome-wide mapping and assembly of structural variant breakpoints in the mouse genome. Genome Res. 20, 623-635 (2010).
11. Gale, G. D. et al. A genome-wide panel of congenic mice reveals widespread epistasis of behavior quantitative trait loci. Mol. Psychiatry 14, 631-645 (2009).
12. Iakoubova, O. A. et al. Genome-tagged mice (GTM): two sets of genome-wide congenic strains. Genomics 74, 89-104 (2001). (Pubitemid 32500269)
13. Bennett, B. J. et al. A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice. Genome Res. 20, 281-290 (2010).
14. Singer, J. B. et al. Genetic dissection of complex traits with chromosome substitution strains of mice. Science 304, 445-448 (2004). (Pubitemid 38495941)
15. Shao, H. et al. Analyzing complex traits with congenic strains. Mamm. Genome 21, 276-286 (2010).
16. Hunter, K. W. & Crawford, N. P. The future of mouse QTL mapping to diagnose disease in mice in the age of whole-genome association studies. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 131-141 (2008).
17. Rozmahe, R. et al. Modulation of disease severity in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator deficient mice by a secondary genetic factor. Nature Genet. 12, 280-287 (1996).
18. Shao, H. et al. Genetic architecture of complex traits: large phenotypic effects and pervasive epistasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19910-19914 (2008).
19. Flint, J. & Mackay, T. F. Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans. Genome Res. 19, 723-733 (2009).
20. Bentley, D. R. et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 456, 53-59 (2008).
21. Turner, D. J., Keane, T. M., Sudbery, I.&Adams, D. J. Next-generation sequencing of vertebrate experimental organisms. Mamm. Genome 20, 327-338 (2009).
22. Guan, C., Ye, C., Yang, X. & Gao, J. A review of current large-scale mouse knockout efforts. Genesis 48, 73-85 (2010).
23. Churchill, G. A. et al. The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nature Genet. 36, 1133-1137 (2004).
24. Valdar, W. et al. Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice. Nature Genet. 38, 879-887 (2006). (Pubitemid 44141655)
25. Davis, R. C. et al. A genome-wide set of congenic mouse strains derived fromDBA/2J on a C57BL/6J background. Genomics 86, 259-270 (2005). (Pubitemid 41096695)
26. Steward, C. A. et al. Genome-wide end-sequenced BAC resources for the NOD/MrkTac and NOD/ShiLtJ mouse genomes. Genomics 95, 105-110 (2010).
27. Sherry, S. T., Ward, M. & Sirotkin, K. dbSNP-database for single nucleotide polymorphisms and other classes of minor genetic variation. Genome Res. 9, 677-679 (1999). (Pubitemid 29412785)
28. Yalcin, B. et al. Sequence-based characterization of structural variation in the mouse genome. Nature doi:10.1038/nature10432 (this issue).
29. Deem, A. et al. Break-induced replication is highly inaccurate. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000594 (2011).
30. Mihola, O., Trachtulec, Z., Vlcek, C., Schimenti, J. C. & Forejt, J. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323, 373-375 (2009).
31. McDonald, J. P. et al. 129-derived strains of mice are deficient in DNA polymerase iota and have normal immunoglobulin hypermutation. J. Exp. Med. 198, 635-643 (2003). (Pubitemid 37040397)
32. Koike, H., Arguello, P.A., Kvajo, M., Karayiorgou, M.&Gogos, J. A. Disc1ismutatedin the 129S6/SvEv strain and modulates working memory in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3693-3697 (2006). (Pubitemid 43376617)
33. Lutzmann, M. & Mechali, M. How to load a replicative helicase onto chromatin: a moreandmore complexmatter duringevolution.Cell Cycle 8,1309-1313(2009).
34. Mural, R. J. et al. A comparison of whole-genome shotgun-derived mouse chromosome 16 and the human genome. Science 296, 1661-1671 (2002). (Pubitemid 34579160)
35. Ané, C., Larget, B., Baum, D. A., Smith, S. D. & Rokas, A. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 412-426 (2007). (Pubitemid 46204374)
36. Pamilo, P., Nei, M. & Li, W. H. Accumulation of mutations in sexual and asexual populations. Genet. Res. 49, 135-146 (1987).
37. Rosenberg, N. A. The probability of topological concordance of gene trees and species trees. Theor. Popul. Biol. 61, 225-247 (2002). (Pubitemid 38042804)
38. Baum, D. A. Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy. Taxon 56, 417-426 (2007). (Pubitemid 47025837)
39. Laurie, C. C. et al. Linkage disequilibriumin wild mice. PLoS Genet. 3, e144 (2007).
40. McDaniell, R. et al. Heritable individual-specific and allele-specific chromatin signatures in humans. Science 328, 235-239 (2010).
41. Huang, D. W. et al. Extracting biological meaning from large gene lists with DAVID. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 13, Unit 13.11 (2009).
42. Solberg, L. C. et al. A protocol for high-throughput phenotyping, suitable for quantitative trait analysis in mice. Mamm. Genome 17, 129-146 (2006). (Pubitemid 43209152)
43. Yalcin, B., Flint, J. & Mott, R. Using progenitor strain information to identify quantitative trait nucleotides in outbred mice. Genetics 171, 673-681 (2005). (Pubitemid 43156455)
44. Mott, R., Talbot, C. J., Turri, M. G., Collins, A. C. & Flint, J. A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12649-12654 (2000).
45. White, M. A. Ané, C. Dewey, C. N., Larget, B. R. & Payseur, B. A. Fine-scale phylogenetic discordance across the house mouse genome. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000729 (2009).