What are we missing? Spanish lecturers’ perceptions of their assessment practices

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 48-59

  Quesada Serra, V ^a   Rodriguez Gomez G ^a   Ibarra Saiz M S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÁDIZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

assessment in higher education; feedback; peer assessment; progress monitoring; self assessment; student participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955337162     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: 14703300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2014.930353     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. J.M.Arribas, (2012). Academic performance in terms of the applied assessment system. RELIEVE, 18, 1–15. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v18n1/RELIEVEv18n1_3eng.pdf
2. C.Biencinto,, E.Carpintero,, C.Núñez,, & M.García, (2013). Psychometric properties of the ActEval questionnaire on university teachers’ assessment activity. RELIEVE, 19, 1–15. doi:10.7203/relieve.19.1.2611.
3. D.Boud,, & N.Falchikov, (2007). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 399–413.
4. D.Boud,, & E.Molloy, (2012). Feedback in higher and professional education. London: Routledge.
5. D.Boud,, & E.Molloy, (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.69146210.1080/02602938.2012.691462
6. C.Brew,, P.Riley,, & C.Walta, (2009). Education students and their teachers: Comparing views on participative assessment practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 641–657.
7. D.Carless, (2012). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D.Boud, & L.Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 90–103). London: Routledge.
8. D.Carless,, D.Salter,, M.Yang,, & J.Lam, (2010). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407.
9. F.Dochy,, M.Segers,, & D.Sluijsmans, (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331–350.10.1080/03075079912331379935
10. Eurydice. (2009). Key data on education in Europe 2009. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA P9 Eurydice). Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/105EN.pdf
11. R.Fletcher,, L.Meyer,, & H.Anderson, (2012). Faculty and students conceptions of assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 64, 119–133. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9484-110.1007/s10734-011-9484-1
12. G.Gibbs,, & C.Simpson, (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
13. S.Hanrahan,, & G.Isaacs, (2001). Assessing self- and peer assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20, 53–70.
14. D.Hounsell, (2007). Towards more sustainable feedback to students. In D.Boud, & N.Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education. Learning for the Longer Term (pp. 101–113). London: Routledge.
15. M.S.Ibarra,, & G.Rodríguez, (2010). An approach to the dominant discourse of learning assessment in higher education. Revista de Educación, 351, 385–407.
16. A.G.Ljungman,, & C.Silén, (2008). Examination involving students as peer examiners. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 289–300.10.1080/02602930701293306
17. V.M.López-Pastor, (2009). La Evaluación Formativa y Compartida en Docencia Universitaria: Propuestas, Técnicas, Instrumentos y Experiencias [Formative and shared assessment at universities: Proposals, techniques, instruments and experiences]. Madrid: Narcea.
18. P.McLaughlin,, & N.Simpson, (2004). Peer assessment in first year university: How the students feel. Studies in Educational evaluation, 30, 135–149.10.1016/j.stueduc.2004.06.003
19. D.Nicol, (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517.
20. D.Nicol,, & D.Macfarlane‐Dick, (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
21. P.Orsmond,, S.Merry,, & K.Reiling, (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 309–323.10.1080/0260293022000001337
22. V.Quesada-Serra,, G.Rodríguez-Gómez,, & M.S.Ibarra-Sáiz, (2013). ActEval: A questionnaire for the analysis and consideration of university teachers’ assessment activity. Revista de Educación, 362, 69–104. doi:10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-362-153
23. G.Rodríguez-Gómez,, M.S.Ibarra-Sáiz,, B.Gallego-Noche,, M.A.Gómez-Ruiz,, & V.Quesada, (2012). The student’s voice in assessment: A pathway not yet developed at university. RELIEVE, 18, 1–21. doi:10.7203/relieve.18.2.1991
24. C.Rust,, M.Price,, & B.O’Donovan, (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 147–164.
25. D.R.Sadler, (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.
26. D.Sluijsmans, (2002). Student involvement in assessment. The training of peer assessment skills. Heerlen: Interuniversity Center for Educational Research.
27. L.Stefani, (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 69–75.10.1080/03075079412331382153
28. P.Sutton, (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.64778110.1080/14703297.2012.647781
29. K.J.Topping, (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276.10.3102/00346543068003249
30. A.Vargha,, & H.D.Delaney, (2000). A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 101–132.
31. M.Yang,, & D.Carless, (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 285–297.10.1080/13562517.2012.719154