Beyond the User Preferences: Aligning the Prototype Design to the Users' Expectations

Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 16-39

  Borsci, Simone ^a   Kuljis, Jasna ^b   Barnett, Julie ^c   Pecchia, Leandro ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Perceived aesthetics; Perceived usability; Pre use appraisal; User intention to purchase; User preference

Indexed keywords

LIFE CYCLE; SALES; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

PERCEIVED AESTHETICS; PERCEIVED USABILITY; PRE-USE APPRAISAL; USER INTENTION; USER PREFERENCE;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84955170728     PISSN: 10908471     EISSN: 15206564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20611     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Akins, R., Tolson, H., &, Cole, B., (2005). Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: Application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5 (1), 37.
2. Benbasat, I., &, Barki, H., (2007). Quo vadis, TAM ? Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8 (4), 211-218.
3. Ben-Bassat, T., Meyer, J., &, Tractinsky, N., (2006). Economic and subjective measures of the perceived value of aesthetics and usability. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 13 (2), 210-234.
4. Borsci, S., Kurosu, M., Federici, S., &, Mele, M. L., (2013). Computer systems experiences of users with and without disabilities: An evaluation guide for professionals. London: CRC Press.
5. Borsci, S., Macredie, R. D., Barnett, J., Martin, J., Kuljis, J., &, Young, T., (2013). Reviewing and extending the five-user assumption: A grounded procedure for interaction evaluation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20 (5), 1-23.
6. Borsci, S., Macredie, R. D., Martin, J. L., &, Young, T., (2014). How many testers are needed to assure the usability of medical devices ? Expert Review of Medical Devices, 11 (5), 513-525.
7. Borsci, S., Martin, J., &, Barnett, J., (2013). A grounded procedure for managing data and sample size of a home medical device assessment. In, M. Kurosu, (Ed.), Human-computer interaction: Human-centred design approaches, methods, tools, and environments (Vol. 8004, pp. 166-175). Berlin: Springer.
8. Chae, M., &, Kim, J., (2004). Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23 (3), 165-181.
9. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., &, Norman, K. L., (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 213-218). Washington, DC: ACM.
10. Choi, J. H., &, Lee, H.-J., (2012). Facets of simplicity for the smartphone interface: A structural model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70 (2), 129-142.
11. Chuang, M. C., Chang, C. C., &, Hsu, S. H., (2001). Perceptual factors underlying user preferences toward product form of mobile phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27 (4), 247-258.
12. Clodfelter, R., &, Fowler, D., (2001). Do consumers' perceptions of product quality differ from objective measures of product quality ? Conway: University of Central Arkansas, Small Business Advancement National Center.
13. De Angeli, A., Hartmann, J., &, Sutcliffe, A., (2009). The effect of brand on the evaluation of websites. Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part II (pp. 638-651). Uppsala, Sweden: Springer.
14. De Angeli, A., Sutcliffe, A., &, Hartmann, J., (2006). Interaction, usability and aesthetics: What influences users' preferences ? Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 271-280). University Park, PA: ACM.
15. Dillon, A., (2001). Beyond usability: Process, outcome and affect in human-computer interactions. Canadian Journal of Library and Information Science, 26 (4), 57-69.
16. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., &, Grewal, D., (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (3), 307-319.
17. Freling, T., Crosno, J., &, Henard, D., (2011). Brand personality appeal: Conceptualization and empirical validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (3), 392-406.
18. Glasscock, N. F., &, Wogalter, M. S., (2006). Evaluating preferences for mobile phone features. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50 (12), 1259-1263.
19. Good, P., (2000). Permutation tests: a practical guide for resampling methods for testing hypotheses. New York: Springer.
20. Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., &, Krishnan, R., (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62 (2), 46-59.
21. Han, S. H., Kim, K. J., Yun, M. H., Hong, S. W., &, Kim, J., (2004). Identifying mobile phone design features critical to user satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 14 (1), 15-29.
22. Harper, B., Slaughter, L., &, Norman, K., (1998). Questionnaire administration via the WWW: A validation & reliability study for a user satisfaction questionnaire, WebNet 97. Toronto, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
23. Hassenzahl, M., (2004). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In, A. B. Mark, O. Kees, F. M. Andrew, &, C. W. Peter, (Eds.), Funology (pp. 31-42). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
24. Hassenzahl, M., (2008). Aesthetics in interactive products: Correlates and consequences of beauty. In, H. N. J. Schifferstein, &, P. Hekkert, (Eds.), Product experience (pp. 287-302). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
25. Haverila, M., (2011). Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repurchase intent among male users. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 19 (4), 238-246.
26. Işiklar, G., &, Büyüközkan, G., (2007). Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives. Computer Standands & Interfaces, 29 (2), 265-274.
27. ISO. (1998). ISO 9241-11:1998 ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals-Part 11: Guidance on usability. Brussels: CEN.
28. ISO. (2010). ISO 9241-210:2010 ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Brussels: CEN.
29. Johnson, M., Firoozbakhsh, K., Moniem, M., &, Jamshidi, M., (2001). Determining flexor-tendon repair techniques via soft computing. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE, 20 (6), 176-183.
30. Kurosu, M., (2010). Concept structure of UX (user experience) and its measurement. Paper presented at the Joint International Conference of Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction and Ergofuture: APCHI & Ergofuture '10, August 3-5, 2010, Bali, India.
31. Kurosu, M., (2012). Three dimensions of artefact design-meaning, quality and Kansei. Paper presented at the Human Interface Symposium 2012, September 4-7. Fukuoka City, Japan.
32. Kurosu, M., &, Kashimura, K., (1995). Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 292-293). Denver, CO: ACM.
33. Lavie, T., &, Tractinsky, N., (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60 (3), 269-298.
34. Lee, S., &, Koubek, R. J., (2010). Understanding user preferences based on usability and aesthetics before and after actual use. Interacting with Computers, 22 (6), 530-543.
35. Lee, S., &, Koubek, R. J., (2011). The impact of cognitive style on user preference based on usability and aesthetics for computer-based systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27 (11), 1083-1114.
36. Lewis, J. R., (1991). Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: The ASQ. SIGCHI Bulletin, 23 (1), 78-81.
37. Lewis, J. R., (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7 (1), 57-78.
38. Lewis, J. R., (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 14 (3-4), 463-488.
39. Linden, A., Adams, J., &, Roberts, N., (2005). Evaluating disease management program effectiveness. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, 13 (3), 159-167.
40. Martínez Salinas, E., &, Pina Pérez, J. M., (2009). Modeling the brand extensions' influence on brand image. Journal of Business Research, 62 (1), 50-60.
41. Ngo, D. C. L., Teo, L. S., &, Byrne, J. G., (2003). Modelling interface aesthetics. Information Sciences, 152 (1), 25-46.
42. Pecchia, L., Martin, J. L., Ragozzino, A., Vanzanella, C., Scognamiglio, A., Mirarchi, L., &, Morgan, S. P., (2013). User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study on a computed tomography (CT) scanner. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13 (1), 2.
43. Reinecke, K., &, Bernstein, A., (2011). Improving performance, perceived usability, and aesthetics with culturally adaptive user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18 (2), 1-29.
44. Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., &, Jain, A. K., (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 28-36.
45. Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., &, Hoonhout, J., (2011). User experience white paper. Result from Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience, September 15-18, 2010. Dagstuhl, DE: Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience.
46. Rotter, J. B., (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43 (1), 56-67.
47. Sattler, H., Völckner, F., Riediger, C., &, Ringle, C. M., (2010). The impact of brand extension success drivers on brand extension price premiums. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (4), 319-328.
48. Schrepp, M., Held, T., &, Laugwitz, B., (2006). The influence of hedonic quality on the attractiveness of user interfaces of business management software. Interacting with Computers, 18 (5), 1055-1069.
49. Seva, R. R., &, Helander, M. G., (2009). The influence of cellular phone attributes on users' affective experiences: A cultural comparison. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39 (2), 341-346.
50. Sonderegger, A., &, Sauer, J., (2010). The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Applied Ergonomics, 41 (3), 403-410.
51. Taylor, V., &, Bearden, W., (2002). The effects of price on brand extension evaluations: The moderating role of extension similarity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (2), 131-140.
52. Tractinsky, N., (1997). Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 115-122). Atlanta, GA: ACM.
53. Tractinsky, N., Cokhavi, A., Kirschenbaum, M., &, Sharfi, T., (2006). Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64 (11), 1071-1083.
54. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., &, Ikar, D., (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13 (2), 127-145.
55. van den Heuvel, T,., van Trijp, H., van Woerkum, C., Jan Renes, R., &, Gremmen, B., (2007). Linking product offering to consumer needs: Inclusion of credence attributes and the influences of product features. Food Quality and Preference, 18 (2), 296-304.
56. van der Heijden, H,. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management, 40 (6), 541-549.
57. Wells, J. D., Valacich, J. S., &, Hess, T. J., (2011). What signal are you sending? How website quality influences perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions. MIS Quarterly, 35 (2), 373-396.
58. Yun, M. H., Han, S. H., Hong, S. W., &, Kim, J., (2003). Incorporating user satisfaction into the look-and-feel of mobile phone design. Ergonomics, 46 (13-14), 1423-1440.
59. Zhu, H., Wang, Q., Yan, L., &, Wu, G., (2009). Are consumers what they consume? Linking lifestyle segmentation to product attributes: An exploratory study of the Chinese mobile phone market. Journal of Marketing Management, 25 (3-4), 295-314.