Evaluating disease management program effectiveness: An introduction to the bootstrap technique

Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 159-167

  Linden, Ariel ^a,d   Adams, John L ^b   Roberts, Nancy ^c  

^a LINDEN CONSULTING GROUP   (United States)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c EARLE A CHILES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; COMPUTER; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; ERROR; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

EID: 21044448156     PISSN: 11738790     EISSN: 11738790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00115677-200513030-00002     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. American Healthways and the John Hopkins Consensus Conference. Consensus report: standard outcome metrics and evaluation methodology for disease management programs. Dis Manag 2003; 6 (3): 121-38
2. Linden A, Adams J, Roberts N. An assessment of the total population approach for evaluating disease management program effectiveness. Dis Manag 2003; 6 (2): 93-102
3. Linden A, Adams J, Roberts N. Evaluating disease management program effectiveness: an introduction to time series analysis. Dis Manag 2003; 6 (4): 243-55
4. Linden A, Adams J, Roberts N. Evaluation methods in disease management: determining program effectiveness. Position Paper for the Disease Management Association of America (DMAA). 2003 Oct
5. Linden A, Adams J, Roberts N. Using propensity scores to construct comparable control groups for disease management program evaluation. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2005; 13 (2): 107-27
6. Linden A, Roberts N. Disease management interventions: what's in the black box? Dis Manag 2004; 7 (4): 275-91
7. Linden A, Adams J, Roberts N. Evaluating disease management program effectiveness: an introduction to survival analysis. Dis Manag 2004; 7 (3): 180-90
8. Linden A, Adams J, Roberts N. Using an empirical method for establishing clinical outcome targets in disease management programs. Dis Manag 2004; 7 (2): 93-101
9. Mosteller F, Tukey J. Data analysis and regression. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley, 1977
10. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. JSTOR 1979; 7: 1-26
11. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993
12. Chernick MR. Bootstrap methods: a practitioner's guide. New York: Wiley, 2000
13. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997
14. Lunneborg CE. Data analysis by resampling; concepts and applications. Pacific Grove (CA): Brooks-Cole, 2000
15. Pearson ES. 'Student': a statistical biography of William Sealy Gosset, Edited and Augmented by R. L. Plackett with the Assistance of G. A. Barnard, Oxford: University Press, 1990
16. Disease Management Consortium, LLC, 2004 [online]. Available from URL: www.dismgmt.com [Accessed 2005 Jan 2]
17. Vogt PW. Dictionary of statistics and methodology: a non-technical guide for the social sciences. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage, 1999
18. Blank S, Seiter C, Bruce P. Resampling Stats add-in for Excel user's guide. Arlington (VA): Resampling Stats Inc, 2003
19. Ludbrook J, Dudley H. Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research. Am Stat 1998; 52 (2): 127-32
20. Reichardt CS, Gollob HF. Justifying the use and increasing the power of a t test for a randomized experiment with a convenience sample. Psychol Methods 1999; 4: 117-28