Modelling interface aesthetics

Information Sciences

Volumn 152, Issue SUPPL, 2003, Pages 25-46

  Ngo, David Chek Ling ^a,c   Teo, Lian Seng ^a   Byrne, John G ^b  

^a MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c NONE   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Aesthetic characteristics; Aesthetic measures; Interface aesthetics; Multi screen interfaces; Screen design

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DISPLAY DEVICES; SCREEN PRINTING;

INTERFACE AESTHETICS;

INTEGRATED CIRCUIT LAYOUT;

EID: 0037621975     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00404-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Maquet J. The Aesthetic Experience. 1986;Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
2. Foley J.D., van Dam A., Feiner S.K., Hughes J.F. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. second ed. 1990;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
3. Marcus A. Graphic Design for Electronic Documents and User Interfaces. 1992;ACM Press, New York.
4. Tractinsky N. Aesthetics and Apparent Usability: Empirically Assessing Cultural and Methodological Issues. CHI '97 Conference Proceedings. 1997;Association for Computing Machinery, New York.
5. Kurosu M., Kashimura K. Apparent Usability vs. Inherent Usability. CHI '95 Conference Companion. 1995;Association for Computing Machinery, New York.
6. S.C. Toh, Cognitive and motivational effects of two multimedia simulation presentation modes on science learning, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Science Malaysia, Malaysia, 1998.
7. Aspillaga M. Screen design: a location of information and its effects on learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction. 18(3):1991;89-92.
8. Szabo M., Kanuka H. Effects of Violating Screen Design Principles of Balance, Unity and Focus on Recall Learning, Study Time, and Completion Rates. ED-Media/ED-Telecom 98 Conference Proceedings. 1998;Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA.
9. Heines J. Screen design strategies for computer-assisted instruction. 1984;Digital Press, Bedford, MA.
10. Grabinger R.S. Computer screen designs: viewer judgements. Educational Technology Research and Development. 41(2):1991;35-73.
11. Tullis T.S. An evaluation of alphanumeric, graphic, and colour information displays. Human Factors. 23:1981;541-550.
12. T.S. Tullis, Predicting the usability of alphanumeric displays, Ph.D. Dissertation, Rice University, Kansas, 1984.
13. Keister R.S., Gallaway G.R. Making software user friendly: an assessment of data entry performance. HFS 27th Annual Meeting Proceedings. 1983;Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA.
14. Tullis T.S. Screen design. Helander M. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. 1988;377-411 Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
15. Streveler D.J., Wasserman A.I. Quantitative measures of the spatial properties of screen designs. INTERACT '84 Conference Proceedings. 1984;North Holland, Amsterdam.
16. Sears A. Layout appropriateness: guiding user interface design with simple task descriptions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 19(7):1993;707-719.
17. D.C.L. Ngo, Visit: visitor information system implementation tool, Ph.D. Dissertation, Trinity College, Dublin, 1994.
18. Ngo D.C.L., Byrne J.G. Aesthetic measures for screen design. OZCHI '98 Conference Proceedings. 1998;IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA.
19. Ngo D.C.L., Samsudin A., Abdullah R. Aesthetic measures for assessing graphic screens. Journal of Information Science and Engineering. 16(1):2000;97-116.
20. Arlov L. GUI design for dummies. 1997;IDG Books Worldwide Inc. Foster City, CA.
21. Arnheim R. Art and visual perception. 1954;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
22. Dondis D.A. A primer of visual literacy. 1973;The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Galitz W.O. The essential guide to user interface design: an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. 1997;John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
24. Reilly S.S., Roach J.W. Improved visual design for graphics display. CG&A. (February):1984;42-51.
25. Bonsiepe G. A method of quantifying order in typographic design. Journal of Typographic Research. 2:1968;203-220.
26. Ross S.M., Morrison G.R. In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: issues concerning external validity, media replications, and learner control. Educational Technology Research and Development. 37(1):1989;19-33.