Linking product offering to consumer needs; inclusion of credence attributes and the influences of product features

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 296-304

  van den Heuvel, Timon ^a   van Trijp, Hans ^a   van Woerkum, Cees ^a   Jan Renes, Reint ^a   Gremmen, Bart ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Consumer; Credence attributes; Physical and expert sensory characteristics; Quality Guidance Model

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 33750025889     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Auerswald H., Peters P., Bruckner B., Krumbein A., and Kuchenbuch R. Sensory analysis and instrumental measurements of short-term stored tomatoes. Postharvest Biology and Technology 15 (1998) 323-334
2. Bentler P.M., and Chou C.P. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research 16 (1987) 78-117
3. Bernues A., Olaizola A., and Corcoran K. Labelling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Science 65 (2003) 1095-1106
4. Bredahl L., Grunert K.G., and Fertin C. Relating consumer perceptions of pork quality to physical product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference 9 (1998) 273-281
5. Brunswik E. Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review 55 (1943) 255-272
6. Brunswik E. Conceptual framework of psychology (1952), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
7. Chin, W. W. (2001). PLS-Graph Manual version 3.0, unpublished manuscript.
8. Cooper R.G. From experience. The invisible success factors in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (1999) 115-133
9. Darby M.R., and Karni E. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 16 (1973) 67-88
10. Fishbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research (1975), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
11. Griffin A., and Hauser J.R. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing-a comparison between two new product teams. Management Science 38 3 (1996) 360-373
12. Grunert K.G., Bredahl L., and Brunso K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector a review. Meat Science 66 (2004) 259-272
13. Grunert K.G., Larsen H.H., Madsen T.K., and Baadsgaard A. Market orientation in food and agriculture (1996), Kluwer, New York
14. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., and Black W.C. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 4th ed. (1995), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
15. Hauser J.R., and Clausing D. The house of quality. Harvard Business Review May-June (1988) 63-73
16. Jahns G., Moller Nielsen H., and Paul W. Measuring image analysis attributes and modelling fuzzy consumer aspects for tomato quality grading. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 31 (2001) 17-29
17. Johansson L., Haglund å., Berglund L., Lea P., and Risvik E. Preference for tomatoes, affected by sensory attributes and information about growth conditions. Food Quality and Preference 10 (1999) 289-298
18. Kelly G.A. The psychology of personal Constructs: A theory of personality (1955), Norton, New York
19. Lohmöller, J.-B. (1984). LVPLS Program manual, version 1.6. Zentralarchiv für empirische sozialforschung, Universität zu Köln, Köln.
20. LycoRed Natural Products Industries Limited (2005). Available from http://www.lycored.com/Glossary.cfm?Section=1#P.
21. Moskowitz H.R. Food concepts and products. Just-in-time development (1994), Food & Nutrition Press, Inc., Trumbull, Connecticut
22. Moskowitz H.R. Inter-relating data sets for product development: The reverse engineering approach. Food Quality and Preference 11 (2000) 105-119
23. Poulsen C.S., Juhl H.J., Kristensen K., Bech A.C., and Engelund E. Quality guidance and quality formation. Food Quality and Preference 7 2 (1996) 127-135
24. Reynolds T.J., and Gutman J. Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research Feb/Mar (1988) 11-31
25. Sijtsema S.J., Backus G.B.C., Linnemann A.R., and Jongen W.M.F. Consumer orientation of product developers and their product perception compared to that of consumers. Trends in Food Science & Technology 15 (2004) 489-497
26. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. Product quality: An investigation into the concept and how it is perceived by consumers (1989), Van Gorcum, Assen
27. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research 21 (1990) 309-333
28. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., and Van Trijp J.C.M. Quality guidance: A consumer-based approach to food quality improvement using partial least squares. European Review of Agricultural Economics 23 (1996) 195-215
29. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., and Van Trijp J.C.M. Task experience and validity in perceptual mapping. A comparison of two consumer-adaptive techniques. International Journal of Research in Marketing 13 (1996) 265-276
30. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., and Van Trijp J.C.M. Attribute elicitation in marketing research: A comparison of three procedures. Marketing Letters 8 (1997) 153-165
31. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., Van Trijp J.C.M., and Ten Berge J.M.F. Perceptual mapping based on idiosyncratic sets of attributes. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (1994) 15-27
32. Tenenhaus, M., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2002). State-of-art on PLS Path Modeling through the available software. Les Cahiers de Recherché 764 HEC Business School.
33. Tikunov Y., Lommen A., De Vos C.H., Verhoeven H.A., Bino R.J., Hall R.D., et al. A novel approach for non-targeted data analysis for metabolomics: large-scale profiling of tomato fruit volatiles. Plant Physiology 139 (2005) 1125-1137
34. Van Trijp J.C.M., and Schifferstein N.J. Sensory analysis in marketing practice: Comparison and integration. Journal of sensory studies 10 (1995) 127-147
35. Zwick W.R., and Velicer W.F. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin 99 (1986) 432-442