Dynamic Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Plant Phenomic Data

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 822-833

  Li, Zitong ^a   Sillanpää, Mikko J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Functional mapping; High throughput phenotyping; Multiple locus method; Plant growth and development; Quantitative trait loci; Timecourse

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84952639430     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.08.012     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Mackay T.F.C., et al. The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 5:565-577.
2. Collard B.C., Mackill D.J. Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2008, 363:557-572.
3. He J., et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), an ultimate marker-assisted selection (MAS) tool to accelerate plant breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5:484.
4. Huang X., Han B. Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65:531-551.
5. Tisné S., et al. Phenoscope: an automated large-scale phenotyping platform offering high spatial homogeneity. Plant 2013, 74:534-544.
6. Cobb J.N., et al. Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:867-887.
7. Walter A., et al. Advanced phenotyping offers opportunities for improved breeding of forage and turf species. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110:1271-1279.
8. Araus J.L., Carns J.E. Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:52-61.
9. Yang W., et al. Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:5087.
10. Topp C.N., et al. 3D phentyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:E1695-E1704.
11. Fahlgren N., et al. Light, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 24:93-99.
12. Sozzani R., et al. Advanced imaging techniques for the study of plant growth and development. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:304-310.
13. Li L., et al. A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors 2014, 14:20078-20111.
14. Brien C.J., et al. Accounting for variation in designing greenhouse experiments with special reference to greenhouses containing plants on conveyor systems. Plant Methods 2013, 9:5.
15. Zhang X., et al. Natural genetic variation for growth and development revealed by high-throughput phenotyping in Arabidopsis thaliana. G3 2012, 2:29-34.
16. Tessmer O.L., et al. Functional approach to high-thoughput plant growth analysis. BMC Syst. Biol. 2013, 7:S17.
17. Moore C.R., et al. High-throughput computer vision introduces the time axis to a quantitative trait map of a plant growth response. Genetics 2013, 195:1077-1086.
18. Chen D., et al. Dissecting the phenotypic components of crop plant growth and drought responses based on high-throughput image analysis. Plant Cell 2014, 26:4636-4655.
19. Brown T.B., et al. TraitCapture: genomic and environment modelling of plant phenomic data. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 18:73-79.
20. Honsdorf N., et al. High-throughput phenotyping to detect drought tolerance QTL in wild barley introgression lines. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e97047.
21. Foulkes A.S. Applied Statistical Genetics with R: For Population-based Association Studies 2009, Springer.
22. Lander E.S., Botstein D. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 1989, 121:185-199.
23. Jiang C., Zeng Z-B. Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 1995, 140:1111-1127.
24. Ma C., et al. Functional mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying the character process: a theoretical framework. Genetics 2002, 161:1751-1762.
25. Wu R., Lin M. Functional mapping-how to map and study the genetic architecture of dynamical complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7:229-237.
26. He Q., et al. Mapping genes for plant structure, development and evolution: functional mapping meets ontology. Trends Genet. 2010, 26:39-46.
27. Wang Z., et al. Modeling phenotypic plasticity in growth trajectories: a statistical framework. Evolution 2013, 68:81-91.
28. Pletcher S.D., Geyer C.J. The genetic analysis of age-dependent traits: modelling the character process. Genetics 1999, 151:825-835.
29. Hastie T., Tibshirani R. Varying-coefficient models. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 1993, 55:757-796.
30. Ramsay J.O., et al. Functional Data Analysis with R and Matlab 2009, Springer.
31. Baert A., et al. Functional unfold principal component analysis for automatic plant-based stress detection in grapevine. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39:519-530.
32. Campbell M.T., et al. Integrating image-based phenomics and association analysis to dissect the genetic architecture of temporal salinity responses in rice. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168:1476-1489.
33. Xiong H., et al. A flexible estimating equations approach for mapping function valued traits. Genetics 2011, 189:305-316.
34. Liu G.F., et al. Functional mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with rice tillering. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2010, 284:263-271.
35. Hurtado P.X., et al. Dynamics of senescence-related QTLs in potato. Euphytica 2011, 183:289-302.
36. Li Z., et al. Functional multi-locus QTL mapping of temporal trends in Scots pine wood traits. G3 (Bethesda) 2014, 4:2365-2379.
37. Sikorska K., et al. Fast linear mixed model computations for genome-wide association studies with longitudinal data. Stat. Med. 2012, 32:165-180.
38. Kwak I.Y., et al. A simple regression-based method to map quantitative trait loci underlying function-valued phenotypes. Genetics 2014, 197:1409-1416.
39. Piepho H.P., et al. A stage-wise approach for the analysis of multi-environment trials. Biom. J. 2012, 54:844-860.
40. 1-penalized estimators or high-dimensional time-course data. Electron. J. Statist. 2007, 1:597-615.
41. Jansen R.C. Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 1993, 135:205-211.
42. Yi H., et al. Penalized multimarker vs. single-marker regression methods for genome-wide association studies of quantitative traits. Genetics 2015, 199:205-222.
43. Li Z., Sillanpää M.J. A Bayesian nonparametric approach for mapping dynamic quantitative traits. Genetics 2013, 194:997-1016.
44. Sillanpää M.J., Corander J. Model choice in gene mapping: what and why. Trends Genet. 2002, 18:301-307.
45. Segura V., et al. An effcient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:825-830.
46. Li Z., Sillanpää M.J. Overview of LASSO-related penalized regression methods for quantitative trait mapping and genomic selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125:419-435.
47. O'Hara R.B., Sillanpää M.J. A review of Bayesian variable selection methods: What, how, and which?. Bayesian Anal. 2009, 4:85-118.
48. Hastie T., et al. Elements of Statistical Learning 2009, Springer. 2nd Edn.
49. Izenman A.J. Modern Multivariate Statistical Techniques 2008, Springer.
50. Broman K.W., Speed T.P. A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 2002, 64:641-656.
51. Daye Z.J., et al. A sparse structured shrinkage estimator for nonparametric varying-coefficient model with an application in genomics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 2012, 21:110-133.
52. Park T., Casella G. The Bayesian LASSO. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2008, 103:681-686.
53. Yang R., Xu S. Bayesian shrinkage analysis of quantitative trait loci for dynamic traits. Genetics 2007, 176:1169-1185.
54. Sillanpää M.J., et al. Simultaneous estimation of multiple quantitative trait loci and growth curve parameters through hierarchical Bayesian modeling. Heredity 2012, 108:134-146.
55. Kyung M., et al. Penalized regression, standard errors, and Bayesian Lassos. Bayesian Anal. 2010, 4:369-412.
56. Bühlmann P., et al. High-dimensional statistics with a view towards applications in biology. Annu. Rev. Statist. Appl. 2014, 1:255-278.
57. Meinshausen N., et al. P-values for high-dimensional regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2009, 104:1671-1681.
58. Meinshausen N., Bühlmann P. Stability selection. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 2010, 72:417-473.
59. Li Z., Sillanpää M.J. Estimation of quantitative trait locus effects with epistasis by variational Bayes algorithms. Genetics 2012, 190:231-249.
60. Mulder H.A., et al. Estimation of genetic variance for macro- and micro-environmental sensitivity using double hierarchical generalized linear models. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2013, 45:23.
61. Fahrmeir L., Kneib T. Bayesian Smoothing and Regression for Longitudinal, Spatial and Event History Data 2011, Oxford University Press.
62. Rousset F., Ferdy J-B. Testing environmental and genetic effects in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Ecography 2014, 37:781-790.
63. Yap J.S., et al. Functional mapping of reaction norms to multiple environmental signals through nonparametric covariance estimation. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11:23.
64. Smith A.B., et al. Varietal selection for perennial crops where data relate to multiple harvests from a series of field trials. Euphytica 2007, 157:253-266.
65. Li Z., et al. A robust multiple-locus method for quantitative trait locus analysis of non-normally distributed multiple traits. Heredity 2015, 115:556-564.
66. Goulding E.H., et al. A robust automated system elucidates mouse home cage behavioral structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:20575-20582.
67. Schaefer A.T., Claridge-Chang A. The surveillance state of behavioral automation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2012, 22:170-176.
68. Broman K.W., Sen S. A Guide to QTL Mapping with R/qtl 2009, Springer.
69. Bradbury P.J., et al. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 2012, 23:2633-2635.
70. Piepho H.P. A mixed-model approach to mapping quantitative trait loci in Barley on the basis of multiple environmental data. Genetics 2000, 156:2043-2050.
71. Yi N. Statistical analysis of genetic interactions. Genet. Res. 2010, 92:443-459.
72. Desta Z.A., Ortiz R. Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:592-601.
73. Sillanpää M.J. On statistical methods for estimating heritability in wild populations. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:1324-1332.
74. Sun L., Wu R. Mapping complex traits as a dynamic system. Phys. Life Rev. 2015, 13:155-185.
75. Haley C.S., Knott S.A. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 1992, 69:315-324.
76. Halperin E., Stephan D.A. SNP imputation in association studies. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27:349-351.
77. Marchini J., Howie B. Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:499-511.
78. Sen S., Churchill G.A. A statistical framework for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 2001, 159:371-387.