Dissecting the phenotypic components of crop plant growthand drought responses based on high-throughput image analysis w open

Plant Cell

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 4636-4655

  Chen, Dijun ^a,b   Neumann, Kerstin ^a   Friedel, Swetlana ^a   Kilian, Benjamin ^a,c   Chen, Ming ^b   Altmann, Thomas ^a   Klukas, Christian ^a,b  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Bayer Cropscience Belgium   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE;

WATER;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CROP; DROUGHT; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HORDEUM; IMAGE PROCESSING; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PROCEDURES;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; DROUGHTS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; HORDEUM; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; WATER;

EID: 84961290867     PISSN: 10404651     EISSN: 1532298X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.129601     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Araus, J.L., Slafer, G.A., Reynolds, M.P., and Royo, C. (2002). Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 89: 925–940.
2. Arvidsson, S., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., and Mueller-Roeber, B. (2011). A growth phenotyping pipeline for Arabidopsis thaliana integrating image analysis and rosette area modeling for robust quantification of genotype effects. New Phytol. 191:895-907.
3. Aulchenko, Y.S., Ripke, S., Isaacs, A., and van Duijn, C.M. (2007). GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23:1294-1296.
4. Baker, N.R. (2008). Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59:89-113.
5. Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57:289-300.
6. Berger, B., Parent, B., and Tester, M. (2010). High-throughput shoot imaging to study drought responses. J. Exp. Bot. 61:3519-3528.
7. Biskup, B., Scharr, H., Fischbach, A., Wiese-Klinkenberg, A., Schurr, U., and Walter, A. (2009). Diel growth cycle of isolated leaf discs analyzed with a novel, high-throughput three-dimensional imaging method is identical to that of intact leaves. Plant Physiol. 149:1452-1461.
8. Blackman, V. (1919). The compound interest law and plant growth. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 3:353-360.
9. Bouslama, M., and Schapaugh, W.T. (1984). Stress tolerance in soybeans. 1. Evaluation of 3 screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci. 24:933-937.
10. Busemeyer, L., Ruckelshausen, A., Möller, K., Melchinger, A.E., Alheit, K.V., Maurer, H.P., Hahn, V., Weissmann, E.A., Reif, J.C., and Würschum, T. (2013). Precision phenotyping of biomass accumulation in triticale reveals temporal genetic patterns of regulation. Sci. Rep. 3: 2442.
11. Bylesjö, M., Segura, V., Soolanayakanahally, R.Y., Rae, A.M., Trygg, J., Gustafsson, P., Jansson, S., and Street, N.R. (2008). LAMINA: a tool for rapid quantification of leaf size and shape parameters. BMC Plant Biol. 8: 82.
12. Calderini, D., Savin, R., Abeledo, L., Reynolds, M., and Slafer, G. (2001). The importance of the period immediately preceding anthesis for grain weight determination in wheat. In Wheat in a Global Environment, Z. Bedö and L. Láng, eds (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer), pp. 503–509.
13. Camargo, A., Papadopoulou, D., Spyropoulou, Z., Vlachonasios, K., Doonan, J.H., and Gay, A.P. (2014). Objective definition of rosette shape variation using a combined computer vision and data mining approach. PLoS ONE 9: e96889.
14. Chang, C.C., and Lin, C.J. (2011). LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2:1-27.
15. Chen, Y., and Lübberstedt, T. (2010). Molecular basis of trait correlations. Trends Plant Sci. 15:454-461.
16. Damgaard, C., and Weiner, J. (2008). Modeling the growth of individuals in crowded plant populations. J. Plant Ecol. 1:111-116.
17. Davey, J.W., Hohenlohe, P.A., Etter, P.D., Boone, J.Q., Catchen, J.M., and Blaxter, M.L. (2011). Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12:499-510.
18. De Vylder, J., Vandenbussche, F., Hu, Y., Philips, W., and Van Der Straeten, D. (2012). Rosette tracker: an open source image analysis tool for automatic quantification of genotype effects. Plant Physiol. 160:1149-1159.
19. Dhondt, S., Wuyts, N., and Inzé, D. (2013). Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends Plant Sci. 18:428-439.
20. Eberius, M., and Lima-Guerra, J. (2009). High-throughput plant phenotyping: Data acquisition, transformation, and analysis. In Bioinformatics: Tools and Applications, D. Edwards, J. Stajich, andD.Hansen, eds (New York: Springer), pp. 259–278.
21. Edwards, D., Batley, J., and Snowdon, R.J. (2013). Accessing complex crop genomes with next-generation sequencing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126:1-11.
22. El-Lithy, M.E., Clerkx, E.J., Ruys, G.J., Koornneef, M., and Vreugdenhil, D. (2004). Quantitative trait locus analysis of growth-related traits in a new Arabidopsis recombinant inbred population. Plant Physiol. 135:444-458.
23. Erickson, R.O. (1976). Modeling of plant growth. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 27:407-434.
24. Fiorani, F., and Schurr, U. (2013). Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64:267-291.
25. Fischer, R.A., and Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. 1. Grain-yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29:897-912.
26. Furbank, R.T., and Tester, M. (2011). Phenomics—technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci. 16:635-644.
27. Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B., Cullis, B., and Thompson, R. (2009). ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. (Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International).
28. Golzarian, M.R., Frick, R.A., Rajendran, K., Berger, B., Roy, S., Tester, M., and Lun, D.S. (2011). Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high-throughput images of cereal plants. Plant Methods 7: 2.
29. Gompertz, B. (1825). On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 115:513-583.
30. Granier, C., et al. (2006). PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytol. 169:623-635.
31. Green, J.M., Appel, H., Rehrig, E.M., Harnsomburana, J., Chang, J.F., Balint-Kurti, P., and Shyu, C.R. (2012). PhenoPhyte: a flexible affordable method to quantify 2D phenotypes from imagery. Plant Methods 8: 45.
32. Grubbs, F.E. (1950). Sample criteria for testing outlying observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 21:27-58.
33. Hartmann, A., Czauderna, T., Hoffmann, R., Stein, N., and Schreiber, F. (2011). HTPheno: an image analysis pipeline for high-throughput plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 148.
34. Holland, J.B., Nyquist, W.E., and Cervantes-Martínez, C.T. (2003). Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: An update. Plant Breed. Rev. 22:9-112.
35. Houle, D., Govindaraju, D.R., and Omholt, S. (2010). Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:855-866.
36. Hunt, R. (1982). Plant growth curves: the functional approach to plant growth analysis. (London: Edward Arnold).
37. Iyer-Pascuzzi, A.S., Symonova, O., Mileyko, Y., Hao, Y., Belcher, H., Harer, J., Weitz, J.S., and Benfey, P.N. (2010). Imaging and analysis platform for automatic phenotyping and trait ranking of plant root systems. Plant Physiol. 152:1148-1157.
38. Jansen, M., et al. (2009). Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 36:902-914.
39. Joosen, R.V., Arends, D., Li, Y., Willems, L.A., Keurentjes, J.J., Ligterink, W., Jansen, R.C., and Hilhorst, H.W. (2013). Identifying genotype-by-environment interactions in the metabolism of germinating arabidopsis seeds using generalized genetical genomics. Plant Physiol. 162:553-566.
40. Kang, H.M., Zaitlen, N.A., Wade, C.M., Kirby, A., Heckerman, D., Daly, M.J., and Eskin, E. (2008). Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178:1709-1723.
41. Karadavut, U., Kayis, S.A., Palta, Ç., and Okur, O. (2008). A growth curve application to compare plant heights and dry weights of some wheat varieties, American-Eurasian. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 3: 888– 892.
42. Karadavut, U., Palta, Ç., Kokten, K., and Bakoglu, A. (2010). Comparative study on some non-linear growth models for describing leaf growth of maize. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 12:227-230.
43. Karaletsos, T., Stegle, O., Dreyer, C., Winn, J., and Borgwardt, K.M. (2012). ShapePheno: unsupervised extraction of shape phenotypes from biological image collections. Bioinformatics 28: 1001– 1008.
44. Karkach, A. (2006). Trajectories and models of individual growth. Demogr. Res. 15:347-400.
45. Klukas, C., Chen, D., and Pape, J.M. (2014). Integrated Analysis Platform: An open-source information system for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Plant Physiol. 165:506-518.
46. Knipling, E.B. (1970). Physical and physiological basis for the reflectance of visible and near-infrared radiation from vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 1:155-159.
47. Kohonen, T. (1990). The self-organizing map. Proc. IEEE 78: 1464– 1480.
48. Lilley, J., Ludlow, M., McCouch, S., and O’Toole, J. (1996). Locating QTL for osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 47:1427-1436.
49. Lipka, A.E., Tian, F., Wang, Q., Peiffer, J., Li, M., Bradbury, P.J., Gore, M.A., Buckler, E.S., and Zhang, Z. (2012). GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 28: 2397– 2399.
50. Loo, L.H., Wu, L.F., and Altschuler, S.J. (2007). Image-based multivariate profiling of drug responses from single cells. Nat. Methods 4:445-453.
51. Mantel, N. (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209-220.
52. Meade, K.A., Cooper, M., and Beavis, W.D. (2013). Modeling biomass accumulation in maize kernels. Field Crops Res. 151:92-100.
53. Meijón, M., Satbhai, S.B., Tsuchimatsu, T., and Busch, W. (2014). Genome-wide association study using cellular traits identifies a new regulator of root development in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 46:77-81.
54. Moore, C.R., Johnson, L.S., Kwak, I.Y., Livny, M., Broman, K.W., and Spalding, E.P. (2013). High-throughput computer vision introduces the time axis to a quantitative trait map of a plant growth response. Genetics 195:1077-1086.
55. Munns, R., James, R.A., Sirault, X.R., Furbank, R.T., and Jones, H.G. (2010). New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. J. Exp. Bot. 61:3499-3507.
56. Nagel, K.A., et al. (2012). GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enabling simultaneous measurements of root and shoot growth for plants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons. Funct. Plant Biol. 39:891-904.
57. Nezhad, K.Z., Weber, W., Röder, M., Sharma, S., Lohwasser, U., Meyer, R., Saal, B., and Börner, A. (2012). QTL analysis for thousand-grain weight under terminal drought stress in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 186:127-138.
58. Nyquist, W.E. (1991). Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant populations. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 10:235-322.
59. O’Brien, R.M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual. Quant. 41:673-690.
60. Painawadee, M., Jogloy, S., Kesmala, T., Akkasaeng, C., and Patanothai, A. (2009). Heritability and correlation of drought resistance traits and agronomic traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Asian J. Plant Sci. 8:325-334.
61. Paine, C.E.T., Marthews, T.R., Vogt, D.R., Purves, D., Rees, M., Hector, A., and Turnbull, L.A. (2012). How to fit nonlinear plant growth models and calculate growth rates: an update for ecologists. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:245-256.
62. Paproki, A., Sirault, X., Berry, S., Furbank, R., and Fripp, J. (2012). A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 12: 63.
63. Paradis, E., Claude, J., and Strimmer, K. (2004). APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
64. Paul-Victor, C., Züst, T., Rees, M., Kliebenstein, D.J., and Turnbull, L.A. (2010). A new method for measuring relative growth rate can uncover the costs of defensive compounds in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 187:1102-1111.
65. Porth, I., Klápšt_e, J., Skyba, O., Lai, B.S., Geraldes, A., Muchero, W., Tuskan, G.A., Douglas, C.J., El-Kassaby, Y.A., and Mansfield, S.D. (2013). Populus trichocarpa cell wall chemistry and ultrastructure trait variation, genetic control and genetic correlations. New Phytol. 197:777-790.
66. Rajendran, K., Tester, M., and Roy, S.J. (2009). Quantifying the three main components of salinity tolerance in cereals. Plant Cell Environ. 32:237-249.
67. Reymond, M., Muller, B., Leonardi, A., Charcosset, A., and Tardieu, F. (2003). Combining quantitative trait Loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiol. 131:664-675.
68. Ribaut, J.-M., Jiang, C., Gonzalez-de-Leon, D., Edmeades, G., and Hoisington, D. (1997). Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in tropical maize. 2. Yield components and marker-assisted selection strategies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:887-896.
69. Schadt, E.E., Linderman, M.D., Sorenson, J., Lee, L., and Nolan, G.P. (2010). Computational solutions to large-scale data management and analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:647-657.
70. Seelig, H.D., Hoehn, A., Stodieck, L.S., Klaus, D.M., Adams, W.W., and Emery, W.J. (2008). The assessment of leaf water content using leaf reflectance ratios in the visible, near-, and short-waveinfrared. Int. J. Remote Sens. 29:3701-3713.
71. Seelig, H.D., Hoehn, A., Stodieck, L.S., Klaus, D.M., Adams, W.W., and Emery, W.J. (2009). Plant water parameters and the remote sensing R (1300)/R (1450) leaf water index: controlled condition dynamics during the development of water deficit stress. Irrig. Sci. 27:357-365.
72. Sellammal, R., Robin, S., and Raveendran, M. (2014). Association and heritability studies for drought resistance under varied moisture stress regimes in backcross inbred population of rice. Rice Sci. 21:150-161.
73. Slovak, R., Göschl, C., Su, X., Shimotani, K., Shiina, T., and Busch, W. (2014). A scalable open-source pipeline for large-scale root phenotyping of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26:2390-2403.
74. Sozzani, R., and Benfey, P.N. (2011). High-throughput phenotyping of multicellular organisms: finding the link between genotype and phenotype. Genome Biol. 12: 219.
75. Stacklies, W., Redestig, H., Scholz, M., Walther, D., and Selbig, J. (2007). pcaMethods—a bioconductor package providing PCA methods for incomplete data. Bioinformatics 23:1164-1167.
76. Stackpole, D.J., Vaillancourt, R.E., Alves, A., Rodrigues, J., and Potts, B.M. (2011). Genetic variation in the chemical components of Eucalyptus globulus wood. G3 (Bethesda) 1:151-159.
77. Sultan, S.E. (2000). Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci. 5:537-542.
78. Szira, F., Bálint, A., Börner, A., and Galiba, G. (2008). Evaluation of drought-Related traits and screening methods at different developmental stages in spring barley. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 194:334-342.
79. Tardieu, F., and Tuberosa, R. (2010). Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13: 206–212.
80. Tessmer, O.L., Jiao, Y., Cruz, J.A., Kramer, D.M., and Chen, J. (2013). Functional approach to high-throughput plant growth analysis. BMC Syst. Biol. 7 (suppl. 6): S17.
81. Thornley, J.H., and France, J. (2007). Mathematical Models in Agriculture: Quantitative Methods for the Plant, Animal and Ecological Sciences, (Wallingford, UK: CABI).
82. Tuberosa, R. (2012). Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Front. Physiol 3: 347.
83. Tucker, C.J. (1980). Remote sensing of leaf water content in the near infrared. Remote Sens. Environ. 10:23-32.
84. Vanclay, J.K. (1994). Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests. (Wallingford, UK: CABI).
85. Van Poecke, R.M., Sato, M., Lenarz-Wyatt, L., Weisberg, S., and Katagiri, F. (2007). Natural variation in RPS2-mediated resistance among Arabidopsis accessions: correlation between gene expression profiles and phenotypic responses. Plant Cell 19:4046-4060.
86. Visscher, P.M., Hill, W.G., and Wray, N.R. (2008). Heritability in the genomics era—concepts and misconceptions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9:255-266.
87. Walter, A., Scharr, H., Gilmer, F., Zierer, R., Nagel, K.A., Ernst, M., Wiese, A., Virnich, O., Christ, M.M., Uhlig, B., Jünger, S., and Schurr, U. (2007). Dynamics of seedling growth acclimation towards altered light conditions can be quantified via GROWSCREEN: a setup and procedure designed for rapid optical phenotyping of different plant species. New Phytol. 174:447-455.
88. Wang, L., Uilecan, I.V., Assadi, A.H., Kozmik, C.A., and Spalding, E.P. (2009). HYPOTrace: image analysis software for measuring hypocotyl growth and shape demonstrated on Arabidopsis seedlings undergoing photomorphogenesis. Plant Physiol. 149: 1632– 1637.
89. Weight, C., Parnham, D., and Waites, R. (2008). LeafAnalyser: a computational method for rapid and large-scale analyses of leaf shape variation. Plant J. 53:578-586.
90. Woo, N.S., Badger, M.R., and Pogson, B.J. (2008). A rapid, noninvasive procedure for quantitative assessment of drought survival using chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Methods 4: 27.
91. Wu, R., and Lin, M. (2006). Functional mapping - how to map and study the genetic architecture of dynamic complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:229-237.
92. Xiong, L., Wang, R.G., Mao, G., and Koczan, J.M. (2006). Identification of drought tolerance determinants by genetic analysis of root response to drought stress and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 142:1065-1074.
93. Yang, W., et al. (2014). Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice. Nat. Commun. 5: 5087.
94. Yin, X., Struik, P.C., Tang, J., Qi, C., and Liu, T. (2005a). Model analysis of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. J. Exp. Bot. 56:959-965.
95. Yin, X., Struik, P.C., van Eeuwijk, F.A., Stam, P., and Tang, J. (2005b). QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. J. Exp. Bot. 56:967-976.
96. Zeide, B. (1993). Analysis of growth equations. Forest Sci. 39:594-616.
97. Zhang, X., Hause, R.J., Jr., and Borevitz, J.O. (2012). Natural genetic variation for growth and development revealed by high-throughput phenotyping in Arabidopsis thaliana. G3 (Bethesda) 2:29-34.
98. Zhao, K., et al. (2011). Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa. Nat. Commun. 2: 467.
99. Züst, T., Joseph, B., Shimizu, K.K., Kliebenstein, D.J., and Turnbull, L.A. (2011). Using knockout mutants to reveal the growth costs of defensive traits. Proc. Biol. Sci. 278:2598-2603.