Advanced imaging techniques for the study of plant growth and development

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 304-310

  Sozzani, Rosangela ^a   Busch, Wolfgang ^b   Spalding, Edgar P ^c   Benfey, Philip N ^d  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GREGOR MENDEL INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT BIOLOGY   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Imaging techniques; Plant growth and development; Systems level modeling

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PROCEDURES; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TIME;

IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84899904146     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.12.003     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Sozzani R., et al. Spatiotemporal regulation of cell-cycle genes by SHORTROOT links patterning and growth. Nature 2010, 466:128-132.
2. Dinneny J.R., et al. Cell identity mediates the response of Arabidopsis roots to abiotic stress. Science 2008, 320:942-945.
3. Iyer-Pascuzzi A.S., et al. Cell identity regulators link development and stress responses in the Arabidopsis root. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:770-782.
4. Grandjean O., et al. In vivo analysis of cell division, cell growth, and differentiation at the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16:74-87.
5. Reddy G.V., et al. Real-time lineage analysis reveals oriented cell divisions associated with morphogenesis at the shoot apex of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2004, 131:4225-4237.
6. Campilho A., et al. Time-lapse analysis of stem-cell divisions in the Arabidopsis thaliana root meristem. Plant J. 2006, 48:619-627.
7. Grieneisen V.A., et al. Auxin transport is sufficient to generate a maximum and gradient guiding root growth. Nature 2007, 449:1008-1013.
8. Grieneisen V.A., et al. Morphogengineering roots: comparing mechanisms of morphogen gradient formation. BMC Syst. Biol. 2012, 6:37.
9. Cruz-Ramirez A., et al. A bistable circuit involving SCARECROW-RETINOBLASTOMA integrates cues to inform asymmetric stem cell division. Cell 2012, 150:1002-1015.
10. Prusinkiewicz P., Runions A. Computational models of plant development and form. New Phytol. 2012, 193:549-569.
11. Roeder A.H., et al. Computational morphodynamics of plants: integrating development over space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:265-273.
12. Prusinkiewicz P., Rolland-Lagan A.G. Modeling plant morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9:83-88.
13. Roeder A.H., et al. Variability in the control of cell division underlies sepal epidermal patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000367.
14. Robinson S., et al. Generation of spatial patterns through cell polarity switching. Science 2011, 333:1436-1440.
15. Hamant O., et al. Developmental patterning by mechanical signals in Arabidopsis. Science 2008, 322:1650-1655.
16. Heisler M.G., et al. Alignment between PIN1 polarity and microtubule orientation in the shoot apical meristem reveals a tight coupling between morphogenesis and auxin transport. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000516.
17. Paige J.S., et al. RNA mimics of green fluorescent protein. Science 2011, 333:642-646.
18. 2+, pH, and reactive oxygen species using fluorescent probes in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62:273-297.
19. De Michele R., et al. Fluorescent sensors reporting the activity of ammonium transceptors in live cells. eLife 2013, 2:e00800.
20. Brunoud G., et al. A novel sensor to map auxin response and distribution at high spatio-temporal resolution. Nature 2012, 482:103-106.
21. Wend S., et al. A quantitative ratiometric sensor for time-resolved analysis of auxin dynamics. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3:2052.
22. Grossmann G., et al. The RootChip: an integrated microfluidic chip for plant science. Plant Cell 2011, 23:4234-4240.
23. Schermelleh L., et al. A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:165-175.
24. Leung B.O., Chou K.C. Review of super-resolution fluorescence microscopy for biology. Appl. Spectrosc. 2011, 65:967-980.
25. Gutierrez R., et al. Opportunities to explore plant membrane organization with super-resolution microscopy. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:463-466.
26. Kleine-Vehn J., et al. Recycling, clustering, and endocytosis jointly maintain PIN auxin carrier polarity at the plasma membrane. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:540.
27. Fitzgibbon J., et al. Super-resolution imaging of plasmodesmata using three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153:1453-1463.
28. Sena G., et al. Quantitation of cellular dynamics in growing Arabidopsis roots with light sheet microscopy. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e21303.
29. Maizel A., et al. High-resolution live imaging of plant growth in near physiological bright conditions using light sheet fluorescence microscopy. Plant J. 2011, 68:377-385.
30. Rosquete M.R., et al. An auxin transport mechanism restricts positive orthogravitropism in lateral roots. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:817-822.
31. Lucas M., et al. Lateral root morphogenesis is dependent on the mechanical properties of the overlaying tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:5229-5234.
32. Pitrone P.G., et al. OpenSPIM: an open-access light-sheet microscopy platform. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:598-599.
33. Gualda E.J., et al. OpenSpinMicroscopy: an open-source integrated microscopy platform. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:599-600.
34. Fernandez R., et al. Imaging plant growth in 4D: robust tissue reconstruction and lineaging at cell resolution. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:547-553.
35. Green A.A., et al. Genetic control of organ shape and tissue polarity. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000537.
36. Lobet G., et al. An online database for plant image analysis software tools. Plant Methods 2013, 9:38.
37. Lewis D.R., et al. Separating the roles of acropetal and basipetal auxin transport on gravitropism with mutations in two Arabidopsis multidrug resistance-like ABC transporter genes. Plant Cell 2007, 19:1838-1850.
38. Miller N.D., et al. Computer-vision analysis of seedling responses to light and gravity. Plant J. 2007, 52:374-381.
39. Miller N.D., et al. Detection of a gravitropism phenotype in glutamate receptor-like 3.3 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana using machine vision and computation. Genetics 2010, 186:585-593.
40. French A., et al. High-throughput quantification of root growth using a novel image-analysis tool. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150:1784-1795.
41. Galkovskyi T., et al. GiA Roots: software for the high throughput analysis of plant root system architecture. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12:116.
42. Iyer-Pascuzzi A.S., et al. Imaging and analysis platform for automatic phenotyping and trait ranking of plant root systems. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152:1148-1157.
43. Clark R.T., et al. Three-dimensional root phenotyping with a novel imaging and software platform. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156:455-465.
44. Topp C.N., et al. 3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:E1695-E1704.
45. Walter A., et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics of expansion growth in roots: automatic quantification of diurnal course and temperature response by digital image sequence processing. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53:689-698.
46. van der Weele C.M., et al. A new algorithm for computational image analysis of deformable motion at high spatial and temporal resolution applied to root growth. Roughly uniform elongation in the meristem and also, after an abrupt acceleration, in the elongation zone. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132:1138-1148.
47. Chavarria-Krauser A., et al. Spatio-temporal quantification of differential growth processes in root growth zones based on a novel combination of image sequence processing and refined concepts describing curvature production. New Phytol. 2008, 177:811-821.
48. Basu P., et al. A novel image-analysis technique for kinematic study of growth and curvature. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145:305-316.
49. Zheng X., et al. AUXIN UP-REGULATED F-BOX PROTEIN1 regulates the cross talk between auxin transport and cytokinin signaling during plant root growth. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156:1878-1893.
50. Mairhofer S., et al. RooTrak: automated recovery of three-dimensional plant root architecture in soil from X-ray microcomputed tomography images using visual tracking. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:561-569.
51. Wu G., Spalding E.P. Separate functions for nuclear and cytoplasmic cryptochrome 1 during photomorphogenesis of Arabidopsis seedlings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:18813-18818.
52. Wu G., et al. A role for ABCB19-mediated polar auxin transport in seedling photomorphogenesis mediated by cryptochrome 1 and phytochrome B. Plant J. 2010, 62:179-191.
53. Wang L., et al. HYPOTrace: image analysis software for measuring hypocotyl growth and shape demonstrated on Arabidopsis seedlings undergoing photomorphogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149:1632-1637.
54. Cole B., et al. Automated analysis of hypocotyl growth dynamics during shade avoidance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2011, 65:991-1000.
55. Men Y., et al. A high-throughput imaging system to quantitatively analyze the growth dynamics of plant seedlings. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 2012, 4:945-952.
56. Leister D., et al. Large-scale evaluation of plant growth in Arabidopsis thaliana by non-invasive image analysis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1999, 37:671-678.
57. De Vylder J., et al. Rosette tracker: an open source image analysis tool for automatic quantification of genotype effects. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160:1149-1159.
58. Zhang X., et al. Natural genetic variation for growth and development revealed by high-throughput phenotyping in Arabidopsis thaliana. G3 (Bethesda) 2012, 2:29-34.
59. Walter A., et al. Dynamics of seedling growth acclimation towards altered light conditions can be quantified via GROWSCREEN: a setup and procedure designed for rapid optical phenotyping of different plant species. New Phytol. 2007, 174:447-455.
60. Dornbusch T., et al. Measuring the diurnal pattern of leaf hyponasty and growth in Arabidopsis - a novel phenotyping approach using laser scanning. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39:860-869.
61. Fang S., et al. 3D reconstruction and dynamic modeling of root architecture in situ and its application to crop phosphorus research. Plant J. 2009, 60:1096-1108.
62. Moore C.R., et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci affecting Arabidopsis thaliana seed morphology features extracted computationally from images. G3 (Bethesda) 2013, 3:109-118.
63. Herridge R.P., et al. Rapid analysis of seed size in Arabidopsis for mutant and QTL discovery. Plant Methods 2011, 7:3.
64. Tanabata T., et al. SmartGrain: high-throughput phenotyping software for measuring seed shape through image analysis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160:1871-1880.
65. Skirycz A., et al. Survival and growth of Arabidopsis plants given limited water are not equal. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29:212-214.
66. Tisne S., et al. Phenoscope: an automated large-scale phenotyping platform offering high spatial homogeneity. Plant J. 2013, 74:534-544.
67. Granier C., et al. PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytol. 2006, 169:623-635.
68. Moore C., et al. High-throughput image analysis and computation introduces the time axis to a genetic architecture map of Arabidopsis root gravitropism. Genetics 2013, 195:1077-1086.
69. Subramanian R., et al. A high throughput robot system for machine vision based plant phenotype studies. Mach. Vis. Appl. 2013, 24:619-636.
70. Meijon M., et al. Genome-wide association study using cellular traits identifies a new regulator of root development in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 2013, 10.1038/ng.2824.
71. Busch W., et al. A microfluidic device and computational platform for high-throughput live imaging of gene expression. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:1101-1106.
72. Clark R.T., et al. High-throughput two-dimensional root system phenotyping platform facilitates genetic analysis of root growth and development. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36:454-466.