Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships

Medical Teacher

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 88-95

  Bok, Harold G J ^a   Jaarsma, Debbie A D C ^b   Spruijt, Annemarie ^c   Van Beukelen, Peter ^a   Van Der Vleuten, Cees P M ^c   Teunissen, Pim W ^c,d  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; EMBEDDING; EXERCISE; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; NARRATIVE; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STUDENT; TEACHER; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; WORKPLACE; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; PROCEDURES; TRUST;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; FORMATIVE FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; TRUST;

EID: 84951820232     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1017448     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bok HGJ, Jaarsma DADC, Teunissen PW, van der Vleuten CPM, van Beukelen P. 2011. Development and validation of a competency framework for veterinarians. JVME 38(3):262-269.
2. Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW. 2013. Patients and learners: Time for a reevaluation of our goals in bringing them together. Med Educ 47(12):1157-1159.
3. Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW, Favier RP, Rietbroek NJ, Theyse LFH, Brommer H, Haarhuis JCM, van Beukelen P, van der Vleuten CPM, Jaarsma DADC. 2013a. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: When theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ 13:123.
4. Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, Fokkema JPI, van Beukelen P, Jaarsma DADC, van der Vleuten CPM. 2013b. Clarifying students' feedbackseeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Med Educ 47(3):282-291.
5. Brutus S. 2010. Words versus numbers: A theoretical exploration of giving and receiving narrative comments in performance appraisal. Hum Res Man Rev 20(2):144-157.
6. Bunnis S, Kelly DR. 2010. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 44(4):358-366.
7. Crommelinck M, Anseel F. 2013. Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: A literature review. Med Educ 47(3):232-241.
8. Driessen EW, Overeem K, van Tartwijk J. 2010. Learning from practice: Mentoring, feedback, and portfolios. In: Dornan T, Mann K, Scherpbier AJJA, Spencer J, editors. Medical education: Theory and practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone-Elsevier. pp 211-228.
9. Driessen EW, Scheele F. 2013. What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research. Med Teach 35(7):569-574.
10. Fokkema JPI, Teunissen PW, Westerman M, van der Lee N, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Dörr PJ, Scheele F. 2013. Exploration of perceived effects of innovations in postgraduate medical education. Med Educ 47(3):271-281.
11. Govaerts MJB, Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM, Muijtjens AMM. 2011. Workplace-based assessment: Effects of rater expertise. Adv Health Sci Educ 16(2):151-165.
12. Govaerts MJB, van de Wiel MWJ, Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM, Muijtjens AMM. 2012. Workplace-based assessment: Raters' performance theories and constructs. Adv Health Sci Educ 18(3):375-396.
13. Govaerts MJB, van de Wiel MWJ, van der Vleuten CPM. 2013. Quality of feedback following performance assessments: Does assessor expertise matter? Eur Jour Train Dev 37(1):105-125.
14. Govaerts MJB, van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. 2005. The use of observational diaries in in-training evaluation: Student perceptions. Adv Health Sci Edu 10(3):171-188.
15. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. 2005. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp 191-215.
16. Hong Y, Chiu C, Dweck CS, Sacks R. 1997. Implicit theories and evaluative processes in person cognition. J Exp Soc Psychol 33(3):296-323.
17. King N. 2004. Using templates in the thematic analysis of texts. In: Cassell C, Symon G, editors. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage Publications. pp 256-270.
18. Kogan JR, Conforti L, Bernabeo E, Iobst W, Holmboe E. 2011. Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via observation: A conceptual model. Med Educ 45(10):1048-1060.
19. Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. 2009. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical students: A systematic review. JAMA 302(12):1316-1326.
20. Mastenbroek NJJM, Jaarsma ADC, Scherpbier AJJA, van Beukelen P, Demerouti E. 2014. The role of personal resources in explaining well-being and performance: A study among young veterinary professionals. Eur J Work Org Psychol 23(2):190-202.
21. Mazor KM, Zanetti ML, Alper EJ, Hatem D, Barrett SV, Meterko V, Gammon W, Pugnaire MP. 2007. Assessing professionalism in the context of an objective structured clinical examination: An in-depth study of the rating process. Med Educ 41(4):331-340.
22. McGill DA, van der Vleuten CPM, Clarke MJ. 2011. Supervisor assessment of clinical and professional competence of medical students: A reliability study using workplace data and a focused analytical literature review. Adv Health Sci Educ 16(3):405-425.
23. Norcini JJ, Burch V. 2007. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE guide No. 31. Med Teach 29(9/10):855-871.
24. Patton MQ. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. pp 207-351.
25. Pelgrim EAM, Kramer AWM, Mokkink HGA, van den Elsen L, Grol RPTM, van der Vleuten CPM. 2011. In-training assessment using direct observation of single-patient encounters: A literature review. Adv Health Sci Edu 16(1):131-142.
26. Pelgrim EAM, Kramer AWM, Mokkink HGA, van der Vleuten CPM. 2013. Factors influencing teachers' feedback-giving behaviour. In: Pelgrim EAM, editor. Clarifying observation and assessment feedback in workplace-based learning, PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen. pp 117-134.
27. Teunissen PW, Bok HGJ. 2013. Believing is seeing: How people's beliefs influence goals, emotions and behaviour. Med Educ 47(11):1064-1072.
28. Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Boor K, Scheele F. 2009. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behaviour in relation to night shifts. Acad Med 84(7):910-917.
29. Van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Dolmans DHJM, Schuwirth LWT, Verwijnen GM, Wolfhagen HAP. 2000. Clerkship assessment assessed. Med Teach 22(6):592-600.
30. Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LKJ, van Tartwijk J. 2012. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach 34(3):205-214.
31. Watling CJ, Driessen EW, van der Vleuten CPM, Vanstone M, Lingard L. 2013. Beyond individualism: Professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ 47(6):585-594.
32. Watling CJ, Lingard L. 2012. Toward meaningful evaluation of medical students: The influence of participants' perceptions of the process. Adv Health Sci Educ 17(2):183-194.