Teaching the female brain: How girls learn math and science

Teaching the Female Brain: How Girls Learn Math and Science

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-193

  James, Abigail Norfleet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950244258     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452219134     Document Type: Book

References (212)

1. Ackerman, P. L., Bowen, K. R., Beier, M. E., & Kanfer, R. (2001). Determinants of individual differences and gender differences in knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 797-825. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.797
2. Altermatt, E. R., & Kim, M. E. (2004). Can anxiety explain sex differences in college entrance exam scores? Journal of College Admission, 183, 6-11.
3. American Association of University Women (AAUW). (1992). How schools shortchange girls: The AAUW report. New York: Marlowe & Company.
4. American Association of University Women (AAUW). (2008). AAUW's position on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) education. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from http://www.aauw.org/advocacy/issue_advocacy/actionpages/STEM.cfm
5. Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 719-747. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6<719::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-R http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291098-2736%28199908%2936:6%3C719::AID-TEA8%3E3.0.CO;2-R
6. Anno, M., & Anno, M. (1983). Anno's mysterious multiplying jar. New York: Philomel Books.
7. Apter, T. (2006). Resolving the confidence crisis. Educational Leadership, 63(7), 42-46.
8. Armstrong, T. (1996). ADD: Does it really exist? Phi Delta Kappan, 77(6), 424-428.
9. Barnett, M. A., Quackenbush, S. W., & Sinisi, C. (1996). Factors affecting children's, adolescents', and young adults' perceptions of parental discipline. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 157(4), 411-424. doi:10.1080/00221325.1996.9914875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1996.9914875
10. Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: The truth about the male and female brain. New York: Basic Books.
11. Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (1996). The 1991 international assessment of educational progress in mathematics and sciences: The gender differences perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 365-377. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.365
12. Benenson, J., & Christakos, A. (2003). The greater fragility of females' versus males' closest same-sex friendship. Child Development, 74(4), 1123-1129. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00596
13. Benenson, J. F., & Heath, A. (2006). Boys withdraw more in one-on-one interactions, whereas girls withdraw more in groups. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 272-282. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.272
14. Beshir, M. Y., & Ramsey, J. D. (1981). Comparison between male and female subjective estimates of thermal effects and sensations. Applied Ergonomics, 12(1), 29-33. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(81)90091-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870%2881%2990091-0
15. Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers' beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97-109. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97
16. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369-386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
17. Boyatzis, C. J., Chazan, E., & Ting, C. Z. (1993). Preschool children's decoding of facial emotions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154(3), 375-382.
18. Breakwell, G., Vignoles, V. L., & Robertson, T. (2003). Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations: The case of gender and science education. British Journal of Psychology, 94(4), 437-455. doi:10.1348/000712603322503024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712603322503024
19. Breland, H. M., Danos, D. O., Kahn, H. D., Kubota, M. Y., & Bonner, M. W. (1994). Performance versus objective testing and gender: An exploratory study of an advanced placement history examination. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(4), 275-293. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00447.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00447.x
20. Buck, G., & Ehlers, N. (2002). Four criteria for engaging girls in the middle level classroom. Middle School Journal, 34(1), 48-53.
21. Burkam, D. T., Lee, V. E., & Smerdon, B. A. (1997). Gender and science learning early in high school: Subject matter and laboratory experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 297-331.
22. Burns, M. (1994). The greedy triangle. New York: Scholastic.
23. Cahill, L. (2003). Sex- and hemisphere-related influences on the neurobiology of emotionally influenced memory. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 27, 1235-1241. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.09.019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.09.019
24. Carr, M., & Davis, H. (2001). Gender differences in arithmetic strategy use: A function of skill and preference. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 330-347. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1059
25. Carr, M., & Jessup, D. L. (1997). Gender differences in first-grade mathematics strategy use: Social and metacognitive influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 318-328. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.318
26. Carreker, S. (2004). Dyslexia: Beyond the myth. Retrieved April 25, 2007, from http://www.ldonline.org/article/277
27. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (2001). Spatial-mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematics self-confidence as mediators of gender differences on mathematics subtests using cross-national gender-based items. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 32(1), 28-57. doi:10.2307/749620 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749620
28. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 697-705. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.697
29. Cassidy, J. W., & Ditty, K. M. (2001). Gender differences among newborns on a transient otoacoustic emissions test for hearing. Journal of Music Therapy, 38(1), 28-35.
30. Cattaneo, Z., Postma, A., & Vecchi, T. (2006). Gender differences in memory for object and word locations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 904-919. doi:10.1080/02724980543000079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980543000079
31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008, June 8). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance-United States, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/pdf/yrbss07_mmwr.pdf.
32. Coleman, M. S. (2000). Undercounted and underpaid heroines: The path to equal opportunity in employment during the twentieth century. Working USA, 3(5), 37-65. doi:10.1111/j.1743-4580.2000.00037.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-4580.2000.00037.x
33. College Board (2006). 2006 college-bound seniors: Total group profile report. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2006/national-report.pdf
34. Connellan, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Batki, A., & Ahluwalia, J. (2000). Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior & Development, 23(1), 113-118. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(00)00032-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383%2800%2900032-1
35. Corbett, C., Hill, C., & St. Rose, A. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
36. Corso, J. F. (1959). Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31(4), 498-508. doi:10.1121/1.1907742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907742
37. Cox, A., & Fisher, M. (2008). A qualitative investigation of an all-female group in a software engineering course project. Journal of Information Technology Education, 7, 1-20.
38. Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258-261. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00347
39. De Bellis, M. D., Keshavan, M. S., Beers, S. R., Hall, J., Frustaci, K., Masalehdan, A., et al. (2001). Sex differences in brain maturation during childhood and adolescence. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 552-557. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.6.552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/11.6.552
40. de Courten-Myers, G. M. (1999). The human cerebral cortex: Gender differences in structure and function. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 58(3), 217-226. doi:10.1097/00005072-199903000-00001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199903000-00001
41. de Goede, M., Kessels, R. P. C., & Postma, A. (2006). Individual variation in human spatial ability: Differences between men and women in object location memory. Cognitive Processing, 7(Suppl. 1), 153. doi:10.1007/s10339-006-0119-x http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0119-x
42. Dickhäuser, O., & Meyer, W. U. (2006). Gender differences in young children's math ability attributions. Psychology Science, 48(1), 3-16.
43. Ding, C. S., Song, K., & Richardson, L. I. (2006). Do mathematical gender differences continue? A longitudinal study of gender difference and excellence in mathematics performance in the U.S. Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 40(3), 279-295.
44. Ding, N., & Harskamp, E. (2006). How partner gender influences female students' problem solving in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 331-343. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9021-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9021-7
45. Dresel, M., Ziegler, A., Broome, P., & Heller, K. A. (1998). Gender differences in science education: The double-edged role of prior knowledge in physics. Roeper Review, 21(2), 101-106. doi:10.1080/02783199809553939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553939
46. Du, Y., Weymouth, C. M., & Dragseth, K. (2003, April 21-25). Gender differences and student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
47. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198-208. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198
48. Dysgraphia. (2007). RetrievedApril 25, 2007, from http://www.ncld.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=468
49. Elliott, C. D. (1971). Noise tolerance and extraversion in children. British Journal of Psychology, 62(3), 375-380. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1971.tb02048.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1971.tb02048.x
50. Epstein, D. (1999). Real boys don't work: "Underachievement," masculinity, and the harassment of "sissies." In D.Epstein, J.Elwood, V.Hey, & J.Maw (Eds.), Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
51. Feist, G. J. (2006). How development and personality influence scientific thought, interest, and achievement. Review of General Psychology, 10(2), 163-182. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.2.163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.2.163
52. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M., & Levi, L. W. (1998). A longitudinal study of gender differences in young children's mathematical thinking. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 6-11.
53. Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teachers' attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 55-69. doi:10.1007/BF00311015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00311015
54. Ferreira, M. (2001). Building communities through role models, mentors, and hands-on-science. School Community Journal, 11(2), 27-37.
55. Fine, J. G., Semrud-Clikeman, M., Keith, T., Stapleton, L. M., & Hynd, G. W. (2007). Reading and the corpus callosum: An MRI family study of volume and area. Neuropsychology, 21(2), 235-241. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.235
56. Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Kloosterman, P. (2004). New perspectives on the gender stereotyping of mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(4), 389-420. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0604_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0604_2
57. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics-A "hopeless" issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497-514. doi:10.1007/BF03173468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173468
58. Friedman, L. (1995). The space factor in mathematics: Gender differences. Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 22-50.
59. Frings, L., Wagner, K., Uterrainer, J., Spreer, J., Halsband, U., & Schulze-Bonhage, A. (2006). Gender-related differences in lateralization of hippocampal activation and cognitive strategy. NeuroReport, 17(4), 417-421. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000203623.02082.e3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000203623.02082.e3
60. Gallagher, A. M. (1998). Gender and antecedents of performance in mathematics testing. Teachers College Record, 100(2), 297-314.
61. Gallagher, A. M., & De Lisi, R. (1994). Gender differences in scholastic aptitude test-mathematics problem solving among high-ability students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 204-211. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.204
62. Gallagher, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics. In A. M.Gallagher & J. C.Kaufman (Eds.), Gender difference in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
64. Gaub, M., & Carlson, C. (1997). Gender differences in ADHD: Ameta-analysis and critical review. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(8), 1036-1045. doi:10.1097/00004583-199708000-00011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199708000-00011
65. Geffen, G., Moar, K. J., Hanlon, A. P., Clark, C. R., & Geffen, L. B. (1990). Performance measures of 16- to 86-year-old males and females on the auditory verbal learning test. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4(1), 45-63. doi:10.1080/13854049008401496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854049008401496
66. Geiger, J. F., & Litwiller, R. M. (2005). Spatial working memory and gender differences in science. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(1), 49-57.
67. Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., et al. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience, 2(10), 861-863. doi:10.1038/13158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/13158
68. Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J. D., Jeffries, N. O., Rajapakse, J. C., Vaituzis, A. C., Liu, H., et al. (1999). Development of the human corpus callosum during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 23, 571-588. doi:10.1016/S0278-5846(99)00017-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-5846%2899%2900017-2
69. Giedd, J. N., Castellanos, F. X., Rajapakse, J. C., Vaituzis, A. C., & Raporport, J. L. (1997). Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 21, 1185-1201. doi:10.1016/S0278-5846(97)00158-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-5846%2897%2900158-9
70. Gould, J. C., Weeks, V., & Evans, S. (2003). Science starts early. Gifted Child Today, 26(2), 38-42.
71. Green, K. S., & Gynther, M. D. (1995). Blue versus periwinkle: Color identification and gender. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80(1), 27-32. doi:10.2466/pms.1995.80.1.27 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1995.80.1.27
72. Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008, May 30). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320, 1164-1165. doi:10.1126/science.1154094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1154094
73. Gur, R., Alsop, D., Glahn, D., Petty, R., Swanson, C. L., Maldjian, J. A., et al. (2000). An fMRI study of sex differences in regional activation to a verbal and a spatial task. Brain and Language, 74, 157-170. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2325
74. Guzzetti, B. J. (2001). Texts and talk: The role of gender in learning physics. In E. B.Moje & D. G.O'Brien (Eds.), Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76. Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Shibley Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1-51.
77. Hammrich, P. L. (1998). Sisters in science: An intergenerational science program for elementary school girls. School Community Journal, 8(2), 21-35.
78. Harshman, R. A., & Paivio, A. (1987). "Paradoxical" sex differences in self-reported imagery. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 287-302. doi:10.1037/h0084160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0084160
79. Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
80. Henrie, R. L., Aron, R. H., Nelson, B., & Poole, D. A. (1997). Gender-related knowledge variations within geography. Sex Roles, 36(9-10), 605-623. doi:10.1023/A:1025618024694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025618024694
81. Herbert, J., & Stipek, D. (2005). The emergence of gender differences in children's perceptions of their academic competence. Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 276-296. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2005.02.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.02.007
82. Hinshaw, S. P., Owens, E. B., Sami, N., & Fargeon, S. (2006). Prospective follow-up of girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder into adolescence: Evidence for continuing cross-domain impairment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 489-499. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.489
83. Hirt, E. R., McCrea, S. M., & Boris, H. I. (2003). "I know you self-handicapped last exam": Gender differences in reactions to self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 177-193. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.177
84. Hodgson, B. (2000). Women in science-or are they? Physics Education, 35(6), 451-453. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/35/6/313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/35/6/313
85. Hoffman, L. (2002). Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447-465. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752%2801%2900010-X
86. Hong, E., O'Neil, H. F., & Feldon, D. (2005). Gender effects on mathematics achievement. In A. M.Gallagher & J. C.Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
87. Honigsfeld, A., & Dunn, R. (2003). High school male and female learning-style similarities and differences in diverse nations. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(4), 195-207. doi:10.1080/00220670309598809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670309598809
88. Horton, N. K., Ray, G. E., & Cohen, R. (2001). Children's evaluations of inductive discipline as a function of transgression type and induction orientation. Child Study Journal, 31(2), 71-93.
89. Howard, L., & James, A. N. (2003). What principals need to know about teaching: Differentiated instruction. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals.
90. Huang, J. (1993). An investigation of gender differences in cognitive abilities among Chinese high school students. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(6), 717-719. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90012-R http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869%2893%2990012-R
91. Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2007). Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 545-560. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.545
92. Hunt, D. M. (2007). The 2007 Hollywood writers report: Whose stories are we telling?Los Angeles, CA: Writers Guild of America, West.
93. Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 236-248. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.236
94. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
95. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Ryan, M. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299-324. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x
96. Iijima, M., Arisaka, O., Minamoto, F., & Arai, Y. (2001). Sex differences in children's free drawings: Astudy on girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior, 40(2), 99-104. doi:10.1006/hbeh.2001.1670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.2001.1670
97. Jackson, T., Iezzi, T., Gunderson, J., Nagasaka, T., & Fritch, A. (2002). Gender differences in pain perception: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Sex Roles, 47(11), 561-568. doi:10.1023/A:1022077922593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022077922593
98. Jacobs, J. E., & Bleeker, M. M. (2004). Girls' and boys' developing interests in math and science: Doparents matter? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 106, 5-21. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1534-8687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28ISSN%291534-8687
99. James, A. N. (2007). Teaching the male brain: How boys think, feel, and learn in school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
100. Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students' attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 41-57. doi:10.1080/02635140500068435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635140500068435
101. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women's math performance. Psychological Science, 16(3), 175-179. doi:10.1111/psci.2005.16.issue-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psci.2005.16.issue-3
102. Johnson, E. S., & Meade, A. C. (1987). Developmental patterns of spatial ability: An early sex difference. Child Development, 58, 725-740. doi:10.2307/1130210 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130210
103. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
104. Jones, L. G. (1989). Context, confidence and the able girl. Educational Research, 31(3), 189-194. doi:10.1080/0013188890310304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013188890310304
105. Jones, M. G., Brader-Araje, L., Carboni, L. W., Carter, G., Rua, M. J., Banilower, E., et al. (2000). Tool time: Gender and students' use of tools, control, and authority. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 760-783. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<760::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-V http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736%28200010%2937:8%3C760::AID-TEA2%3E3.0.CO;2-V
106. Kahle, J. B. (1989). Images of scientists: Gender issues in science classrooms. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
107. Kalist, D. E. (2002). The gender earnings gap in the RN labor market. Nursing Economics, 20(4), 155-162.
108. Kaufmann, L., Lochy, A., Drexler, A., & Semenza, C. (2004). Deficient arithmetic fact retrieval-storage or access problem? Neuropsychologia, 42(4), 482-496. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.09.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.09.004
109. Keller, C. (2001). Effect of teachers' stereotyping on students' stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain. The Journal of Social Psychology, 14(2), 165-173. doi:10.1080/00224540109600544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600544
110. Keller, J. (2002). Blatant stereotype threat and women's math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47(3/4), 193-198. doi:10.1023/A:1021003307511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021003307511
111. Kennedy, H. L., & Parks, J. (2000). Society cannot continue to exclude women from the fields of science and mathematics. Education, 120(3), 529-537.
112. Kenney-Benson, G.A., Pomerantz, E. M., Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2006). Sex differences in math performance: The role of children's approach to school-work. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 11-26. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.11
113. Keri, G. (2002). Male and female college students' learning styles differ: An opportunity for instructional diversification. College Student Journal, 36(3), 433-441.
114. Killgore, W. D. S., Oki, M., & Yurgelun-Todd, D.A. (2001). Sex-specific developmental changes in amygdala responses to affective faces. NeuroReport, 12(2), 427-433. doi:10.1097/00001756-200102120-00047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200102120-00047
115. Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 198-214. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.198
116. Kimura, D. (2000). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book/The MIT Press.
117. Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 710-726. doi:10.3758/BF03195337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195337
118. Kramer, J. H., Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., O'Donnell, L., & Prifitera, A. (1997). Developmental sex differences in verbal learning. Neuropsychology, 11(4), 577-584. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.11.4.577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.11.4.577
119. Lachance, J. A., & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2006). A longitudinal analysis of sex differences in math and spatial skills in primary school age children. Learning & Individual Differences, 16(3), 195-216. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.12.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.12.001
120. Lawton, C. A., & Hatcher, D. W. (2005). Gender differences in integration of images in visuospatial memory. Sex Roles, 53(9-10), 717-725. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7736-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7736-1
121. Lazear, D. (1992). Teaching for multiple intelligences. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
122. Lesko, A. C., & Corpus, J. H. (2006). Discounting the difficult: How high math-identified women respond to stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 54(1-2), 113-125. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-8873-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-8873-2
123. Lewin, C., Wolgers, G., & Herlitz, A. (2001). Sex differences favoring women in verbal but not visuospatial episodic memory. Neuropsychology, 15(2), 165-173. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.15.2.165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.15.2.165
124. Linderman, J., Kantrowitz, L., & Flannery, K. (2005). Male vulnerability to reading disability is not likely to be a myth: A call for new data. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(2), 109-129. doi:10.1177/00222194050380020201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380020201
125. Linn, M., & Petersen, A. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498. doi:10.2307/1130467 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130467
126. Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 996-1009. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.996
127. Lloyd, J. E. V., Walsh, J., & Yailagh, M. S. (2005). Sex differences in performance attributions, self-efficacy, and achievement in mathematics: If I'm so smart, why don't I know it? Canadian Journal of Education, 28(3), 384-408. doi:10.2307/4126476 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4126476
128. Logan, K. (2007). Should computing be taught in single-sex environments? An analysis of the computing learning environment of upper secondary students. Educational Studies, 33(2), 233-248. doi:10.1080/03055690601068493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03055690601068493
129. Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J. C., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., Nazarian, B., et al. (2008). Learning through hand- or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes: Behavioral and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(5), 802-815. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20504
130. Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J. C., & Velay, J. L. (2006). Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Human Movement Science, 25, 646-656. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.007
131. Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 718-729doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718
132. Lucas, J. W., & Lovaglia, M. J. (2005). Self-handicapping: Gender, race, and status. Current Research in Social Psychology, 10(15), 234-249.
133. Lummis, M., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Gender differences in beliefs and achievement: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 254-263. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.254
134. Lutchmaya, S., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). Human sex differences in social and non-social looking preferences, at 12 months of age. Infant Behavior & Development, 25(3), 319-325. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00095-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383%2802%2900095-4
135. Lynn, R., & Irwing, P. (2002). Sex differences in general knowledge, semantic memory, and reasoning ability. British Journal of Psychology, 93(4), 545-556. doi:10.1348/000712602761381394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712602761381394
136. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, growing together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
137. Majeres, R. L. (1999). Sex differences in phonological processes: Speeded matching and word reading. Memory & Cognition, 27(2), 246-253. doi:10.3758/BF03211409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211409
138. Martins, I. P., Castro-Caldas, A., Townes, B. D., Ferreira, G., Rodrigues, P., Marques, S., et al. (2005). Age and sex differences in neurobehavioral performance: A study of Portuguese elementary school children. International Journal of Neuroscience, 115, 1687-1709. doi:10.1080/00207450590958556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207450590958556
139. McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 424-453. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.424
140. McEwen, A., Knipe, D., & Gallagher, T. (1997). The impact of single-sex and coeducational schooling on participation and achievement in science: A 10-year perspective. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15(2), 223-233. doi:10.1080/0263514970150207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150207
141. McFadden, D. (1998). Sex differences in the auditory system. Developmental Neuropsychology, 14(2-3), 261-298. doi:10.1080/87565649809540712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87565649809540712
142. McGuiness, D. (1976). Away from a unisex psychology: Individual differences in visual sensory and perceptual processes. Perception, 5(3), 279-294. doi:10.1068/p050279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p050279
143. Meece, J. L., & Jones, M. G. (1996). Gender differences in motivation and strategy use in science: Are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 393-406. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199604)33:4<393::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-N http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291098-2736%28199604%2933:4%3C393::AID-TEA3%3E3.0.CO;2-N
144. Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high-school students' views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363-381. doi:10.1080/09500690500277664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277664
145. Miller, R. J. (2001). Gender differences in illusion response: The influence of spatial strategy and sex ratio. Sex Roles, 44(3-4), 209-225. doi:10.1023/A:1010907204430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010907204430
146. Morgan, C., Isaac, J. D., & Sansone, C. (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, 44(5-6), 295-318. doi:10.1023/A:1010929600004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010929600004
147. Morton, B. E., & Rafto, S. E. (2006). Corpus callosum size is linked to dichotic deafness and hemisphericity, not sex or handedness. Brain and Cognition, 62(1), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.001
148. Mulvey, P. J., & Nicholson, S. (2006). Enrollments and degree reports, 2004. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics.
149. Naglieri, J. A., & Rojahn, J. (2001). Gender differences in planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive (pass) cognitive processes and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 430-437. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.430
150. Naka, M. (1998). Repeated writing facilitates children's memory for pseudocharacters and foreign letters. Memory and Cognition, 26(4), 804-809. doi:10.3758/BF03211399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211399
151. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2007a). Percentage of students from kindergarten through eighth grade participating in weekly nonparental after-school care arrangements: 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
152. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2007b). The nation's report card: An introduction to the national assessment of educational progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
153. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2007). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering, (NSF 07-315). Arlington, VA: Author.
154. Neuschwander, C. (1997). Sir cumference and the round table. Waltertown, MA: Charlesbridge.
155. Njemanze, P. C. (2007). Cerebral lateralisation for facial processing: Gender-related cognitive styles determined using fourier analysis of mean cerebral blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral arteries. Laterality, 12(1), 31-49. doi:10.1080/13576500600886796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13576500600886796
156. Papanicolaou, A. C., Simos, P. G., Castillo, E., Breier, J., Katz, J. S., & Wright, A. A. (2002). The hippocampus and memory of verbal and pictorial material. Learning and Memory, 9(3), 99-104. doi:10.1101/lm.44302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.44302
157. Penner, A. M. (2003). International gender x item difficulty interactions in mathematics and science achievement tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 650-655. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.650
158. Pomerantz, E. M., Altermatt, E. R., & Saxon, J. J. (2002). Making the grade, but feeling distressed: Gender differences in academic performance and internal distress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 396-404. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.396
159. Pomerantz, E. M., & Ruble, D. N. (1998). The role of maternal control in the development of sex differences in child self-evaluative factors. Child Development, 69(2), 458-478.
160. Posadas, B. M. (1997). Crossing the collar line: Working women at desks, switchboards, and tables. Journal of Urban History, 23(6), 777-788. doi:10.1177/009614429702300608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009614429702300608
161. Pyryt, M. C., Sandals, L. H., & Begoray, J. (1998). Learning style preferences of gifted, average-ability, and special needs students: A multivariate perspective. Journal for Research in Childhood Education, 13(1), 71-76. doi:10.1080/02568549809594728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02568549809594728
162. Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Lehmann, W. (2002). Girls' spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experiences and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 245-260. doi:10.1348/000709902158874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709902158874
163. Räty, H., & Kasanen, K. (2007). Gendered views of ability in parents' perceptions of their children's academic competencies. Sex Roles, 56, 117-124.
164. Rahm, J., & Moore, J. C. (2005). The role of afterschool and community science programs in the lives of urban youth. School Science and Mathematics, 105(6), 383-391. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18129.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18129.x
165. Reid, P. T., & Roberts, S. K. (2006). Gaining options: A mathematics program for potentially talented at-risk adolescent girls. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(2), 288-304. doi:10.1353/mpq.2006.0019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0019
166. Robert, M., & Harel, F. (1996). The gender difference in orienting liquid surfaces and plumb-lines: Its robustness, its correlates and the associated knowledge of physics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 280-314. doi:10.1037/1196-1961.50.3.280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.50.3.280
167. Rucklidge, J. J., & Tannock, R. (2001). Psychiatric, psychosocial, and cognitive functioning of female adolescents with ADHD. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(5), 530-540. doi:10.1097/00004583-200105000-00012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200105000-00012
168. Salminen-Karlsson, M. (2007). Girls' groups and boys' groups at a municipal technology centre. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 1019-1033. doi:10.1080/09500690600930998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690600930998
169. Sasser, A. C. (2005). Gender differences in physician pay. The Journal of Human Resources, 40(2), 476-504.
170. Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters. New York: Doubleday.
171. Sax, L. (2008, June 18). Where the girls aren't. Education Week, 27(42), 36-29.
172. Seitsinger, A. M., Barboza, H. C., & Hird, A. (1998, April 13-17). Single-sex mathematics instruction in an urban independent school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
173. Shalev, R. S. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Child Neurology, 19(10), 765-770.
174. Shaywitz, B., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., et al. (1995). Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature, 373, 607-609. doi:10.1038/373607a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/373607a0
175. Shettle, C., Roey, S., Mordica, J., Perkins, R., Nord, C., Teodorovic, J., et al. (2007). The nation's report card: America's high school graduates. In Department of Education (Ed.), (NCES 2007-467). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
176. Shucard, J. L., & Shucard, D. W. (1990). Auditory evoked potentials and hand preference in 6-month-old infants: Possible gender-related differences in cerebral organization. Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 923-930. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.923
177. Snowden, R. J. (2002). Visual attention to color: Parvocellular guidance of attentional resources? Psychological Science, 13(2), 180-184. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00433
178. Snyder, T. D., Tan, A. G., & Hoffman, C. M. (2006). Digest of education statistics 2005. In U.S. Department of Education (Ed.), (Vol. NCES 2006-030). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
179. Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? American Psychologist, 60(9), 950-958. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950
180. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4-28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
181. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
182. Steele, J., James, J. B., & Barnett, R. C. (2002). Learning in a man's world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46-50. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00042
183. Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in children's achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 361-371. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.361
184. Stumpf, H. (1998). Gender-related differences in academically talented students' scores and use of time on tests of spatial ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(3), 157-171. doi:10.1177/001698629804200304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001698629804200304
185. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411-429. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411
186. Tenenbaum, H. R., & Leaper, C. (2003). Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities? Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 34-47. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.34 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.34
187. Thies, A. P. (1999-2000). The neuropsychology of learning styles. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 50-62.
188. Tibbetts, S. L. (1977). Sex-role stereotyping and its effects on boys. Journal of the NAWDAC, 40(3), 109-111.
189. Tolley, K. (2003). The science education of American girls. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
190. Tomlinson, C. A. (2004a). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
191. Tomlinson, C. A. (2004b). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
192. Trahan, D. E., & Quintana, J. W. (1990). Analysis of gender effects upon verbal and visual memory performance in adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 5(4), 325-334.
193. Turton, S., & Campbell, C. (2005). Tend and befriend versus fight or flight: Gender differences in behavioral response to stress among university students. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 10(4), 209-232. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9861.2005.tb00013.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2005.tb00013.x
194. Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1990). Learning together: A history of coeducation in American public schools. New York: Yale University Press.
195. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Women in the labor force: A databook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
196. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Occupation by sex: 2000 qt-p27. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
197. U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2007 (126 ed.). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
198. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
199. Van Houtte, M. (2004). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: The difference between boys' and girls' academic culture. Educational Studies, 30(2), 159-173. doi:10.1080/0305569032000159804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159804
200. Velle, W. (1987). Sex differences in sensory functions. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30(4), 490-522.
201. Vermeer, H. J., Boekaerts, M., & Seegers, G. (2000). Motivational and gender differences: Sixth-grade students' mathematical problem-solving behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 308-315. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.308
202. Virginia Department of Education. (2005). Life science standards of learning. Retrieved July 26, 2005, from http://www.doe.virginia.gov/go/Sols/science7.pdf
203. Vuontela, V., Steenari, M. R., Carlson, S., Koivisto, J., Fjallberg, M., & Aronen, E. T. (2003). Audiospatial and visuospatial working memory in 6-13 year old school children. Learning and Memory, 10, 74-81. doi:10.1101/lm.53503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.53503
204. Warner, S., & Moore, S. (2004). Excuses, excuses: Self-handicapping in an Australian adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(4), 271-281. doi:10.1023/B:JOYO.0000032636.35826.71 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000032636.35826.71
205. Webb, R. M., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2002). Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 785-794. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.785
206. Wein, H. (2000). Stress and disease: New perspectives. National Institute of Health Word on Health. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/program/digest/d04/tables/xls/tabnl21.xls
207. Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 210-216. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.210
208. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
209. Witt, S. D. (1997). Parental influence on children's socialization to gender roles. Adolescence, 32(126), 253-259.
210. Yanowitz, K. L., & Vanderpool, S. S. (2004). Assessing girls' reactions to science workshops. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 353-359. doi:10.1023/B:JOST.0000045462.08497.1c http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000045462.08497.1c
211. Yurgelun-Todd, D.A., Killgore, W. D. S., & Cintron, C. B. (2003). Cognitive correlates of medial temporal lobe development across adolescence: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96(1), 3-17. doi:10.2466/pms.2003.96.1.3 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.96.1.3
212. Zohar, A., & Sela, D. (2003). Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 245-268. doi:10.1080/09500690210126766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126766