The ability and willingness of family-controlled firms to arrive at organizational ambidexterity

Journal of Family Business Strategy

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 105-116

  Veider, Viktoria ^a   Matzler, Kurt ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (Austria)

Author keywords

Ability and willingness; Ambidexterity; Exploitation; Exploration; Family firm; Innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950138098     PISSN: 18778585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Allio, M.K., Family businesses: their virtues, vices, and strategic path. Strategy and Leadership 32:4 (2004), 24–33.
2. Allison, T.H., McKenny, A.F., Short, J.C., Integrating time into family business research: using random coefficient modeling to examine temporal influences on family firm ambidexterity. Family Business Review 27:1 (2014), 20–34.
3. Anderson, R.C., Reeb, D.M., Board composition: balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 49:2 (2004), 209–237.
4. Anderson, R.C., Mansi, S.A., Reeb, D.M., Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 68:2 (2003), 263–285.
5. Andriopoulos, C., Lewis, M.W., Exploitation–exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science 20:4 (2009), 696–717.
6. Arregle, J.-L., Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Hitt, M.A., Internationalization of family-controlled firms: a study of the effects of external involvement in governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36:6 (2012), 1115–1143.
7. Astrachan, J.H., Klein, S.B., Smyrnios, K.X., The F-PEC scale of family influence: a proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review 15:1 (2002), 45–58.
8. Bammens, Y., Notelaers, G., Van Gils, A., Implications of family business employment for employees’ innovative work involvement. Family Business Review 28:2 (2014), 123–144.
9. Basco, R., Rodríguez, M.J.P., Studying the family enterprise holistically. Evidence for integrated family and business systems. Family Business Review 22:1 (2009), 82–95.
10. Beckman, C.M., The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal 49:4 (2006), 741–758.
11. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Larraza-Kintana, M., Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Administrative Science Quarterly 55:1 (2010), 82–113.
12. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review 25:3 (2012), 258–279.
13. Family-controlled firms and stakeholder management: a socioemotional wealth preservation perspective. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Meja, L.R., (eds.), 2014, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
14. Block, J.H., Jaskiewicz, P., Miller, D., Ownership versus management effects on performance in family and founder companies: a Bayesian reconciliation. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2:4 (2011), 232–245.
15. Carmeli, A., Halevi, M.Y., How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly 20:2 (2009), 207–218.
16. Carnes, C.M., Ireland, D.R., Familiness and innovation: resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27:4 (2013), 339–358.
17. Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., Zhang, H., Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science 20:4 (2009), 781–796.
18. Carney, M., Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29:3 (2005), 249–265.
19. Cassia, L., De Massis, A., Pizzurno, E., Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms: An empirically grounded theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 18:2 (2012), 198–232.
20. Cheng, Y.-T., Van de Ven, A.H., Learning the innovation journey: order out of chaos?. Organization Science 7:6 (1996), 593–614.
21. Chirico, F., Ireland, R.D., Sirmon, D.G., Franchising and the family firm: creating unique sources of advantage through familiness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35:3 (2011), 483–501.
22. Chirico, F., Sirmon, D.G., Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., Resource orchestration in family firms: investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 5:4 (2011), 307–326.
23. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Litz, R.A., Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28:4 (2004), 335–354.
24. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Sharma, P., Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29:5 (2005), 555–576.
25. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Pearson, A.W., Barnett, T., Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36:2 (2012), 267–293.
26. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Wright, M., The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32:3 (2015), 310–318.
27. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Steier, L.P., Rau, S.B., Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: an introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36:6 (2012), 1103–1113.
28. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., De Massis, A., A closer look at socioemotional wealth: its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39:2 (2015), 173–182.
29. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J.P., Lang, L.H., Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance 57:6 (2002), 2741–2771.
30. Classen, N., Van Gils, A., Bammens, Y., Carree, M., Accessing resources from innovation partners: the search breadth of family SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management 50:2 (2012), 191–215.
31. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 128–152.
32. Corbetta, G., Salvato, C.A., The board of directors in family firms: one size fits all?. Family Business Review 17:2 (2004), 119–134.
33. Daily, C.M., Dollinger, M.J., An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review 5:2 (1992), 117–136.
34. Davis, J., Schoorman, D.F., Donaldson, L., Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 22:1 (1997), 20–47.
35. Davis, J.H., Allen, M.R., Hayes, H.D., Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34:6 (2010), 1093–1116.
36. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Lichtenthaler, U., Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review 26:1 (2013), 10–31.
37. De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Campopiano, G., Cassia, L., The impact of family involvement on SMEs’ performance: Theory and evidence. Journal of Small Business Management 53:4 (2014), 924–948.
38. De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management 52:2 (2014), 344–364.
39. Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., van Essen, M., Zellweger, T., Doing more with less: innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 2015 DOI: amj.2014.0424.
40. Dyer, W.G. Jr, Examining the family effect on firm performance. Family Business Review 19:4 (2006), 253–273.
41. Etzioni, A., A comparative analysis of complex organizations. 1961, Free Press, New York.
42. Faccio, M., Lang, L.H.P., The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 65:3 (2002), 365–395.
43. Fama, E.F., Jensen, M., Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26:2 (1983), 301–325.
44. Floyd, S.W., Lane, P.J., Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review 25:1 (2000), 154–177.
45. Gagné, M., Sharma, P., De Massis, A., The study of organizational behaviour in family business. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 23:5 (2014), 643–656.
46. Garcia, R., Calantone, R., A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19:2 (2002), 110–132.
47. Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Markets, hierarchies, and families: toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34:6 (2010), 1145–1172.
48. Gedajlovic, E., Cao, Q., Zhang, H., Corporate shareholdings and organizational ambidexterity in high-tech SMEs: evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Business Venturing 27:6 (2012), 652–665.
49. Ghosal, S., Bartlett, C.A., The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to management. 1997, Harper Collins Publishers.
50. Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J., The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47:2 (2004), 209–226.
51. Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Haynes-Takacs, K., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K.J.L., Moyano-Fuentes, J., Socioemotional wealth and business risk in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly 52:1 (2007), 106–137.
52. Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., De Castro, J., The bind that ties: socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals 5:1 (2011), 653–707.
53. Grant, R.M., Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7:4 (1996), 375–387.
54. Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., Shalley, C.E., The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 49:4 (2006), 693–706.
55. Habbershon, T.G., Williams, M.L., A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review 12:1 (1999), 1–25.
56. Habbershon, T.G., Williams, M., MacMillan, I.C., A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing 18:4 (2003), 451–465.
57. Hall, A., Nordqvist, M., Professional management in family businesses: toward an extended understanding. Family Business Review 21:1 (2008), 51–69.
58. Hauswald, H., Hack, A., Impact of family control/influence on stakeholders’ perceptions of benevolence. Family Business Review 26:4 (2013), 356–373.
59. He, Z.-L., Wong, P.-K., Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypotheses. Organization Science 15:4 (2004), 481–494.
60. Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Johnson, R.A., Grossman, W., Conflicting voices: the effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal 45:4 (2002), 697–716.
61. Jansen, J.J., Van Den Bosch, F.A., Volberda, H.W., Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science 52:11 (2006), 1661–1674.
62. Jansen, J.J.P., Tempelaar, M.P., van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W., Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science 20:4 (2009), 797–811.
63. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H., The nature of man. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7:2 (1994), 4–19.
64. Johannisson, B., Huse, M., Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: an ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12:4 (2000), 353–378.
65. Jones, C.D., Makri, M., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Affiliate directors and perceived risk bearing in publicly traded, family-controlled firms: the case of diversification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32:6 (2008), 1007–1026.
66. Kammerlander, N., Ganter, M., An attention-based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: exploring the role of family CEOs’ noneconomic goals. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32:3 (2014), 361–383.
67. Katila, R., Ahuja, G., Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45:6 (2002), 1183–1194.
68. Kauppila, O.-P., Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships. Strategic Organization 8:4 (2010), 283–312.
69. Kellermanns, F.W., Eddleston, K., Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: a family perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30:6 (2006), 809–830.
70. Klein, S.B., Astrachan, J.H., Smyrnios, K.X., The F-PEC scale of family influence: construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29:3 (2005), 321–339.
71. Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: the mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38:5 (2014), 1001–1026.
72. König, A., Kammerlander, N., Enders, A., The family innovator's dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review 38:3 (2013), 418–441.
73. Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Bianchi, M., Fang, H., Technology acquisition in family and non-family firms: a longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30:6 (2013), 1073–1088.
74. Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Fang, H., Frattini, F., Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Business Economics 43:3 (2014), 597–619.
75. Kraiczy, N.D., Hack, A., Kellermanns, F.W., New product portfolio performance in family firms. Journal of Business Research 67:6 (2014), 1065–1073.
76. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54:2 (1999), 471–517.
77. Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., Lester, R.H., Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science 22:3 (2011), 704–721.
78. Levinthal, D.A., March, J.G., The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal 14 (1993), 95–112.
79. Ling, Y., Kellermanns, F.W., The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: the moderating role of information exchange frequency. Journal of Management Studies 47:2 (2010), 322–344.
80. Lubatkin, M.H., Schulze, W.S., Ling, Y., Dino, R.N., The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior 26:3 (2005), 313–330.
81. Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., Veiga, J.F., Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management 32:5 (2006), 646–672.
82. Lubatkin, M.H., Ling, Y., Schulze, W.S., An organizational justice-based view of self-control and agency costs in family firms. Journal of Management Studies 44:6 (2007), 955–971.
83. Lumpkin, G., Brigham, K.H., Moss, T.W., Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 22:3-4 (2010), 241–264.
84. Lumpkin, G.T., Brigham, K.H., Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35:6 (2011), 1149–1169.
85. March, J.G., Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2:1 (1991), 71–87.
86. March, J.G., Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management Journal 27:3 (2006), 201–214.
87. Matzler, K., Veider, V., Hautz, J., Stadler, C., The impact of family ownership, management and governance on innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32:3 (2014), 319–333.
88. McConaughy, D., Walker, M., Henderson, G., Mishra, C., Founding family controlled firms: efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics 7:1 (1998), 1–19.
89. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., The best of both worlds: exploitation and exploration in successful family businesses. Advances in Strategic Management 23 (2006), 215–240.
90. Miller, K.D., Zhao, M., Calantone, R.J., Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to March's exploration–exploitation model. Academy of Management Journal 49:4 (2006), 709–722.
91. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Scholnick, B., Stewardship vs. stagnation: an empirical comparison of small family and Non-Family businesses. Journal of Management Studies 45:1 (2008), 51–78.
92. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R.H., Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organization Science 24:1 (2013), 189–209.
93. Mom, T.J., Van Den Bosch, F.A., Volberda, H.W., Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science 20:4 (2009), 812–828.
94. Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., Yeung, B., Corporate governance, economic entrenchment and growth. 2004, National Bureau of Economic Research.
95. Morck, R., Yeung, B., Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27:4 (2003), 367–382.
96. Moss, T.W., Payne, G.T., Moore, C.B., Strategic consistency of exploration and exploitation in family businesses. Family Business Review 27:1 (2014), 51–71.
97. Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., Wiklund, J., Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review 20:1 (2007), 33–47.
98. Nordqvist, M. (2005). Understanding the role of ownership in strategizing: a study of family firms, JIBS Dissertation Series No. 029, Jönköping International Business School.
99. O'Reilly, C., Tushman, M., Organizational ambidexterity: past, present and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives 27:4 (2013), 324–338.
100. Patel, P.C., Chrisman, J.J., Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal 35:4 (2014), 617–627.
101. Patel, P.C., Fiet, J.O., Knowledge combination and the potential advantages of family firms in searching for opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35:6 (2011), 1179–1197.
102. Probst, G., Raisch, S., Organizational crisis: the logic of failure. The Academy of Management Executive 19:1 (2005), 90–105.
103. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management 34:3 (2008), 375–409.
104. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., Tushman, M.L., Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science 20:4 (2009), 685–695.
105. Salvato, C.A., Melin, L., Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: the role of family social capital. Family Business Review 21:3 (2008), 259–276.
106. Schulze, W.S., Gedajlovic, E.R., Whither family business?. Journal of Management Studies 47:2 (2010), 191–204.
107. Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N., Buchholtz, A.K., Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence. Organization Science 12:2 (2001), 99–116.
108. Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N., Richard, N., Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms. Management Decision Economics 23:4-5 (2002), 247–259.
109. Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., Chirico, F., Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: Exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 37:1 (2012), 69–85.
110. Simon, H., Hidden champions of the 21st century: success strategies of unknown world market leaders. 2009, Springer, London.
111. Simsek, Z., Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies 46:4 (2009), 597–624.
112. Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Managing resources: linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27:4 (2003), 339–358.
113. Sirmon, D.G., Arregle, J.-L., Hitt, M.A., Webb, J.W., The role of family influence in firms’ strategic responses to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32:6 (2008), 979–998.
114. Smith, W.K., Tushman, M.L., Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science 16:5 (2005), 522–536.
115. Stewart, A., Help one another, use one another: toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27:4 (2003), 383–396.
116. Stubner, S., Blarr, W.H., Brands, C., Wulf, T., Organizational ambidexterity and family firm performance. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 25:2 (2012), 217–229.
117. Tagiuri, R., Davis, J., Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review 9:2 (1996), 199–208.
118. Talke, K., Salomo, S., Kock, A., Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: the relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 28:6 (2011), 819–832.
119. Taylor, A., Greve, H.R., Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal 49:4 (2006), 723–740.
120. Taylor, A., Helfat, C.E., Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organization Science 20:4 (2009), 718–739.
121. Thaler, R.H., Shefrin, H.M., An economic theory of self-control. The Journal of Political Economy, 1981, 392–406.
122. Tiwana, A., Do bridging ties coomplement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal 29:3 (2008), 251–272.
123. Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., Zahra, S.A., Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal 30:2 (2009), 221–231.
124. Verbeke, A., Kano, L., The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: family-based human asset specifity and bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36:6 (2012), 1183–1205.
125. Zahra, S.A., Entreureneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review 18:1 (2005), 23–40.