Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 251-272

  Tiwana, Amrit ^a,b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alliance ambidexterity; Burt complements; Combinatorial innovation; Knowledge integration; Network configuration; Structural holes

Indexed keywords

COMBINATORIAL MATHEMATICS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

BURT COMPLEMENTS; NETWORK CONFIGURATION;

INNOVATION;

EID: 40549118875     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.666     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Adler PS. 1989. When knowledge is the critical resource, knowledge management is the critical task. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 36(2): 87-94.
2. Ahuja G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 425-455.
3. Amit R, Schoemaker PJH. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14(1): 33-46.
4. Amit R, Zott C. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, June-July Special Issue 22: 493-520.
5. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF. 1992. Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science 3(3): 321-341.
6. Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R. 2003. Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science 49(4): 571-582.
7. Baker W. 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology 96: 589-625.
8. Baron R, Kenny D. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173-1182.
9. Bhattacharya S, Krishnan V, Mahajan V. 1998. Managing new product definition in highly dynamic environments. Management Science 44(11): 50-64.
10. Burt R. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press: Boston, MA.
11. Burt R. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 339-365.
12. Burt R. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110(2): 349-399.
13. Campion C, Medsker G, Higgs A. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology 46(3): 823-855.
14. Carlile P. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science 13(4): 442-455.
15. Carlile P. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science 15(5): 555-568.
16. Carlile P, Rebentisch E. 2003. Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science 49(9): 1180-1195.
17. Child J, McGrath R. 2001. Organizations unfettered: organizational form in an information-intensive economy. Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1135-1148.
18. Cohen W, Levinthal D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128-152.
19. Coleman J. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95-120.
20. Darr E, Argote L, Epple D. 1995. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: productivity in franchises. Management Science 41(11): 1750-1762.
21. Dougherty D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science 3(2): 179-202.
22. Dyer JH, Nobeoka K. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, March Special Issue 21: 345-367.
23. Dyer JH, Singh H. 1998. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660-679.
24. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, October-November Special Issue 21: 1105-1121.
25. Ethiraj SK, Kale P, Krishnan MS, Singh JV. 2005. Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal 26(1): 25-45.
26. Faraj S, Sproull L. 2000. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science 46(12): 1554-1568.
27. Garud R, Nayyar PR. 1994. Transformative capacity: continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal 15(5): 365-385.
28. Gerwin D, Ferris J. 2004. Organizing new product development projects in strategic alliances. Organization Science 15(1): 22-37.
29. Gibson C, Birkinshaw J. 2004. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47(2): 209-226.
30. Goold M, Quinn JJ. 1990. The paradox of strategic controls. Strategic Management Journal 11(1): 43-57.
31. Granovetter M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: (May): 1360-1380.
32. Grant R. 1996a. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7(4): 375-387.
33. Grant R. 1996b. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 109-122.
34. Grant R, Baden-Fuller C. 2004. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41(1): 61-84.
35. Gulati R, Singh H. 1998. The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 781-814.
36. Hansen M. 1999. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 83-111.
37. Henderson R, Clark K. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9-30.
38. Henderson R, Cockburn I. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 63-84.
39. Hollenbeck J, Ilgen D, Sego D, Hedlund J. 1995. Multilevel theory of team decision making: decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology 80(2): 292-317.
40. Hoopes DG, Postrel S. 1999. Shared knowledge, 'glitches,' and product development performance. Strategic Management Journal 20(9): 837-865.
41. Hulland J. 1999. Use of partial least squares (pis) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal 20(2): 195-204.
42. Ingram P, Roberts P. 2000. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. American Journal of Sociology 106: 387-423.
43. wg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(2): 306-309.
44. Jarvis C, Mackenzie S, Podsakoff P. 2003. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 30(2): 199-218.
45. Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, March Special Issue 21: 217-237.
46. Kenny D, Kashy D, Bolger N. 1998. Data analysis in social psychology. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindzey G (eds). McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA; 233-265.
47. Kogut B, Zander U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3: 383-397.
48. Lance C. 1988. Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Applied Psychological Measurement 12(2): 163-175.
49. Lapre M, Wassenhove L. 2001. Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity improvement in factories. Management Science 47(10): 1311-1325.
50. Larsson R, Bengtsson L, Henriksson K, Sparks J. 1998. The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science 9(3): 285-305.
51. Levin D, Cross R. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science 50(11): 1477-1490.
52. Lovelace K, Shapiro D, Weingart L. 2001. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 779-793.
53. MacKinnon D, Lockwood C, Hoffman J, West S, Sheets V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods 7(1): 83-104.
54. McEvily B, Marcus A. 2005. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 26(11): 1033-1055.
55. McEvily B, Zaheer A. 1999. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 20(12): 1133-1156.
56. Milgrom P, Roberts J. 1995. Complementarities and fit: strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19(2/3): 179-208.
57. Molm L, Peterson G, Takashaki N. 1999. Power in negotiated and reciprocal exchange. American Sociological Review 64(6): 876-890.
58. Mowery D, Oxley JE, Silverman BS. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 77-91.
59. Nahapeit J, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242-266.
60. Nickerson JA, Zenger TR. 2004. A knowledge-based theory of the firm - the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science 15(6): 617-632.
61. Nidumolu S. 1995. The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Information Systems Research 6(3): 191-219.
62. Nonaka I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5: 14-37.
63. Nunally J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York.
64. Obstfeld D. 2005. Social networks, the tertius lungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 100-130.
65. Okhuysen G, Eisenhardt K. 2002. Integrating knowledge in groups: how formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science 13(4): 370-386.
66. Oxley JE, Sampson RC. 2004. The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, August-September Special Issue 25: 723-749.
67. Patnayakuni R, Rai A, Tiwana A. 2007. Systems development process improvement: a knowledge integration perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53(2): 286-300.
68. Pelled LH. 1996. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organization Science 7(6): 615-631.
69. Pisano GP. 1994. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: an empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 85-100.
70. Poppo L, Zenger T. 1998. Testing alternative theories of the firm: transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management Journal 19(9): 853-877.
71. Powell W, Koput K, Smith-Doerr L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116-145.
72. Regans R, McEvily B. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2): 240-267.
73. Regans R, Zuckerman E. 2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D groups. Organization Science 12(4): 502-517.
74. Regans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B. 2004. How to make the team: social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 49(1): 101-133.
75. Robillard P. 1999. The role of knowledge in software development. Communications of the ACM 42(1): 87-92.
76. Rodan S, Galunic C. 2004. More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal 25(6): 541-562.
77. Rus I, Lindvall M. 2002. Knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE Software 19(3): 26-38.
78. Sabherwal R, Becerra-Fernandez I. 2005. Integrating specific knowledge: insights from the Kennedy space center. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52(3): 301-314.
79. Simonin BL. 1999. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 20(7): 595-623.
80. Spender J-C, Grant RM. 1996. Knowledge and the firm: overview. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 5-9.
81. Srinivasan R, Lilien G, Rangaswamy A. 2002. Technological opportunism and radical technology adoption: an application to e-business. Journal of Marketing 66(3): 47-60.
82. Sternberg R. 2000. Understanding practical intelligence: the role of tacit knowledge. In Practical Intelligence on Everyday Life, Sternberg R (ed). Cambridge University Press: New York; 104-143.
83. Stuart T. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(3): 668-698.
84. Sundaramurthy C, Lewis M. 2003. Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review 28(3): 397-415.
85. Szulanski G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 27-43.
86. Tiwana A, Keil M. 2007. Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management Journal 28(6): 623-634.
87. Tiwana A, McLean ER. 2005. Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(1): 13-43.
88. Tsai W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44(5): 996-1004.
89. Tsoukas H. 1996. The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 11-25.
90. Uzzi B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review 61: 674-698.
91. Uzzi B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35-67.
92. Verona G. 1999. A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review 24(1): 132-142.
93. Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza HJ. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, June-July Special Issue 22: 587-613.
94. Yourdon E. 2002. Managing High-Intensity Internet Projects. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
95. Zaheer A, Bell G. 2005. Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal 26(9): 809-825.
96. Zahra S, George G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 185-203.