Revealing gene regulation and associations through biological networks

Current Plant Biology

Volumn 3-4, Issue , 2015, Pages 30-39

  Liseron Monfils, Christophe ^a   Ware, Doreen ^a,b  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor   (United States)

^b ROBERT W HOLLEY CENTER FOR AGRICULTURE AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Candidate genes; Co expression; Gene prioritization; In vitro networks; Inference networks; QTL

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949535863     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22146628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpb.2015.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (131)

1. Doebley J.F., Gaut B.S., Smith B.D. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 2006, 127:1309-1321.
2. Wright S.I., Bi I.V., Schroeder S.G., Yamasaki M., Doebley J.F., McMullen M.D., Gaut B.S. The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science 2005, 308:1310-1314.
3. Zheng B.S., Yang L., Zhang W.P., Mao C.Z., Wu Y.R., Yi K.K., Liu F.Y., Wu P. Mapping QTLs and candidate genes for rice root traits under different water-supply conditions and comparative analysis across three populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 107:1505-1515.
4. Tuberosa R., Salvi S. Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11:405-412.
5. Hirel B., Bertin P., Quilleré I., Bourdoncle W., Attagnant C., Dellay C., Gouy A., Cadiou S., Retailliau C., Falque M., Gallais A. Towards a better understanding of the genetic and physiological basis for nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125:1258-1270.
6. Pflieger S., Lefebvre V., Causse M. The candidate gene approach in plant genetics: a review. Mol. Breed. 2001, 7:275-291.
7. Schena M., Shalon D., Davis R.W., Brown P.O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 1995, 270:467-470.
8. Marguerat S., Bahler J. RNA-seq: from technology to biology. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.: CMLS 2010, 67:569-579.
9. Schuster S.C. Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:16-18.
10. Cahais V., Gayral P., Tsagkogeorga G., Melo-Ferreira J., Ballenghien M., Weinert L., Chiari Y., Belkhir K., Ranwez V., Galtier N. Reference-free transcriptome assembly in non-model animals from next-generation sequencing data. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2012, 12:834-845.
11. Filichkin S.A., Priest H.D., Givan S.A., Shen R., Bryant D.W., Fox S.E., Wong W.K., Mockler T.C. Genome-wide mapping of alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genom. Res. 2010, 20:45-58.
12. Kudapa H., Azam S., Sharpe A.G., Taran B., Li R., Deonovic B., Cameron C., Farmer A.D., Cannon S.B., Varshney R.K. Comprehensive transcriptome assembly of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) using sanger and next generation sequencing platforms: development and applications. PLoS One 2014, 9:e86039.
13. Loraine A.E., McCormick S., Estrada A., Patel K., Qin P. RNA-seq of Arabidopsis pollen uncovers novel transcription and alternative splicing. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162:1092-1109.
14. Martin J.A., Wang Z. Next-generation transcriptome assembly. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:671-682.
15. Xia Z., Xu H., Zhai J., Li D., Luo H., He C., Huang X. RNA-Seq analysis and de novo transcriptome assembly of Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77:299-308.
16. Yang X., Yu X.Y., Li Y.F. De novo assembly and characterization of the Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) transcriptome using next-generation pyrosequencing. PLoS One 2013, 8:e69168.
17. Schmid M., Davison T.S., Henz S.R., Pape U.J., Demar M., Vingron M., Scholkopf B., Weigel D., Lohmann J.U. A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana development. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37:501-506.
18. Kilian J., Whitehead D., Horak J., Wanke D., Weinl S., Batistic O., D'Angelo C., Bornberg-Bauer E., Kudla J., Harter K. The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J. 2007, 50:347-363.
19. Libault M., Farmer A., Joshi T., Takahashi K., Langley R.J., Franklin L.D., He J., Xu D., May G., Stacey G. An integrated transcriptome atlas of the crop model Glycine max, and its use in comparative analyses in plants. Plant J. 2010, 63:86-99.
20. Brady S.M., Orlando D.A., Lee J.Y., Wang J.Y., Koch J., Dinneny J.R., Mace D., Ohler U., Benfey P.N. A high-resolution root spatiotemporal map reveals dominant expression patterns. Science 2007, 318:801-806.
21. Jiao Y., Tausta S.L., Gandotra N., Sun N., Liu T., Clay N.K., Ceserani T., Chen M., Ma L., Holford M., Zhang H.Y., Zhao H., Deng X.W., Nelson T. A transcriptome atlas of rice cell types uncovers cellular, functional and developmental hierarchies. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:258-263.
22. Sato Y., Takehisa H., Kamatsuki K., Minami H., Namiki N., Ikawa H., Ohyanagi H., Sugimoto K., Antonio B.A., Nagamura Y. RiceXPro version 3.0: expanding the informatics resource for rice transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D1206-D1213.
23. Sekhon R.S., Lin H., Childs K.L., Hansey C.N., Buell C.R., de Leon N., Kaeppler S.M. Genome-wide atlas of transcription during maize development. Plant J. 2011, 66:553-563.
24. Cartwright D.A., Brady S.M., Orlando D.A., Sturmfels B., Benfey P.N. Reconstructing spatiotemporal gene expression data from partial observations. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2581-2587.
25. Pautler M., Eveland A.L., LaRue T., Yang F., Weeks R., Lunde C., Je B.I., Meeley R., Komatsu M., Vollbrecht E., Sakai H., Jackson D. FASCIATED EAR4 encodes a bZIP transcription factor that regulates shoot meristem size in maize. Plant Cell 2015, 27:104-120.
26. Eveland A.L., Goldshmidt A., Pautler M., Morohashi K., Liseron-Monfils C., Lewis M.W., Kumari S., Hiraga S., Yang F., Unger-Wallace E., Olson A., Hake S., Vollbrecht E., Grotewold E., Ware D., Jackson D. Regulatory modules controlling maize inflorescence architecture. Genom. Res. 2014, 24:431-443.
27. Darmency H. Pleiotropic effects of herbicide-resistance genes on crop yield: a review. Pest Manage. Sci. 2013, 69:897-904.
28. Nadakuduti S.S., Pollard M., Kosma D.K., Allen C., Ohlrogge J.B., Barry C.S. Pleiotropic phenotypes of the sticky peel mutant provide new insight into the role of CUTIN DEFICIENT2 in epidermal cell function in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159:945-960.
29. Barabasi A.L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999, 286:509-512.
30. Jeong H., Tombor B., Albert R., Oltvai Z.N., Barabasi A.L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407:651-654.
31. Ravasz E., Somera A.L., Mongru D.A., Oltvai Z.N., Barabasi A.L. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 2002, 297:1551-1555.
32. Hahn M.W., Kern A.D. Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22:803-806.
33. Bonacich P., Lloyd P. Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Soc. Netw. 2001, 23:191-201.
34. Smoot M.E., Ono K., Ruscheinski J., Wang P.L., Ideker T. Cytoscape 2. 8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:431-432.
35. Hu Z., Hung J.H., Wang Y., Chang Y.C., Huang C.L., Huyck M., DeLisi C. VisANT 3. 5: multi-scale network visualization, analysis and inference based on the gene ontology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:W115-W121.
36. Bastian M., Heymann S., Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. A.f.t.A.o.A. Intelligence (Ed.) Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 2009.
37. Csardi G., Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJ., Complex Syst. 2006, 1695.
38. Assenov Y., Ramirez F., Schelhorn S.E., Lengauer T., Albrecht M. Computing topological parameters of biological networks. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:282-284.
39. Brohee S., Faust K., Lima-Mendez G., Vanderstocken G., van Helden J. Network analysis tools: from biological networks to clusters and pathways. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3:1616-1629.
40. Arabidopsis Interactome Mapping Consortium, Evidence for network evolution in an Arabidopsis interactome map, Science 333 (2011) 601-607.
41. Kerrien S., Aranda B., Breuza L., Bridge A., Broackes-Carter F., Chen C., Duesbury M., Dumousseau M., Feuermann M., Hinz U., Jandrasits C., Jimenez R.C., Khadake J., Mahadevan U., Masson P., Pedruzzi I., Pfeiffenberger E., Porras P., Raghunath A., Roechert B., Orchard S., Hermjakob H. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D841-D846.
42. Lee T., Yang S., Kim E., Ko Y., Hwang S., Shin J., Shim J.E., Shim H., Kim H., Kim C., Lee I. AraNet v2: an improved database of co-functional gene networks for the study of Arabidopsis thaliana and 27 other nonmodel plant species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43:D996-1002.
43. Wallach T., Schellenberg K., Maier B., Kalathur R.K., Porras P., Wanker E.E., Futschik M.E., Kramer A. Dynamic circadian protein-protein interaction networks predict temporal organization of cellular functions. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003398.
44. Bolduc N., Yilmaz A., Mejia-Guerra M.K., Morohashi K., O'Connor D., Grotewold E., Hake S. Unraveling the KNOTTED1 regulatory network in maize meristems. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:1685-1690.
45. Taylor-Teeples M., Lin L., de Lucas M., Turco G., Toal T.W., Gaudinier A., Young N.F., Trabucco G.M., Veling M.T., Lamothe R., Handakumbura P.P., Xiong G., Wang C., Corwin J., Tsoukalas A., Zhang L., Ware D., Pauly M., Kliebenstein D.J., Dehesh K., Tagkopoulos I., Breton G., Pruneda-Paz J.L., Ahnert S.E., Kay S.A., Hazen S.P., Brady S.M. An Arabidopsis gene regulatory network for secondary cell wall synthesis. Nature 2015, 517:571-575.
46. Boruc J., Van den Daele H., Hollunder J., Rombauts S., Mylle E., Hilson P., Inze D., De Veylder L., Russinova E. Functional modules in the Arabidopsis core cell cycle binary protein-protein interaction network. Plant Cell 2010, 22:1264-1280.
47. Chávez Montes R.A., Herrera-Ubaldo H., Serwatowska J., de Folter S. Towards a comprehensive and dynamic gynoecium gene regulatory network. Curr. Plant Biol. 2015, (in Press).
48. Thiele I., Palsson B.O. A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5:93-121.
49. Henry C.S., DeJongh M., Best A.A., Frybarger P.M., Linsay B., Stevens R.L. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:977-982.
50. Seaver S.M., Gerdes S., Frelin O., Lerma-Ortiz C., Bradbury L.M., Zallot R., Hasnain G., Niehaus T.D., El Yacoubi B., Pasternak S., Olson R., Pusch G., Overbeek R., Stevens R., de Crecy-Lagard V., Ware D., Hanson A.D., Henry C.S. High-throughput comparison, functional annotation, and metabolic modeling of plant genomes using the PlantSEED resource. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111:9645-9650.
51. Chae L., Kim T., Nilo-Poyanco R., Rhee S.Y. Genomic signatures of specialized metabolism in plants. Science 2014, 344:510-513.
52. Freeling M. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60:433-453.
53. Teichmann S.A., Babu M.M. Gene regulatory network growth by duplication. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:492-496.
54. Mattick J.S., Gagen M.J. Accelerating networks. Science 2005, 307:856-858.
55. Ku H.M., Vision T., Liu J., Tanksley S.D. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:9121-9126.
56. Wagner A., Fell D.A. The small world inside large metabolic networks. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2001, 268:1803-1810.
57. Shiu S.H., Shih M.C., Li W.H. Transcription factor families have much higher expansion rates in plants than in animals. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139:18-26.
58. Choi S.H., Hyeon do Y., Lee L.H., Park S.J., Han S., Lee I.C., Hwang D., Nam H.G. Gene duplication of type-B ARR transcription factors systematically extends transcriptional regulatory structures in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:7197.
59. Yilmaz A., Mejia-Guerra M.K., Kurz K., Liang X., Welch L., Grotewold E. AGRIS: the Arabidopsis gene regulatory information server, an update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D1118-D1122.
60. Lamesch P., Berardini T.Z., Li D., Swarbreck D., Wilks C., Sasidharan R., Muller R., Dreher K., Alexander D.L., Garcia-Hernandez M., Karthikeyan A.S., Lee C.H., Nelson W.D., Ploetz L., Singh S., Wensel A., Huala E. The Arabidopsis information resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D1202-D1210.
61. Chatr-Aryamontri A., Breitkreutz B.J., Heinicke S., Boucher L., Winter A., Stark C., Nixon J., Ramage L., Kolas N., O'Donnell L., Reguly T., Breitkreutz A., Sellam A., Chen D., Chang C., Rust J., Livstone M., Oughtred R., Dolinski K., Tyers M. The BioGRID interaction database: 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D816-D823.
62. Toufighi K., Brady S.M., Austin R., Ly E., Provart N.J. The botany array resource: e-northerns, expression angling, and promoter analyses. Plant J. 2005, 43:153-163.
63. Langfelder P., Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9:559.
64. DiLeo M.V., Strahan G.D., den Bakker M., Hoekenga O.A. Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) applied to the tomato fruit metabolome. PLoS One 2011, 6:e26683.
65. Downs G.S., Bi Y.M., Colasanti J., Wu W., Chen X., Zhu T., Rothstein S.J., Lukens L.N. A developmental transcriptional network for maize defines coexpression modules. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161:1830-1843.
66. Ma C., Wang X. Application of the Gini correlation coefficient to infer regulatory relationships in transcriptome analysis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160:192-203.
67. Peng J., Wang P., Zhou N., Zhu J. Partial correlation estimation by joint sparse regression models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2009, 104:735-746.
68. Schafer J., Strimmer K. An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:754-764.
69. Priness I., Maimon O., Ben-Gal I. Evaluation of gene-expression clustering via mutual information distance measure. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8:111.
70. Steuer R., Kurths J., Daub C.O., Weise J., Selbig J. The mutual information: detecting and evaluating dependencies between variables. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:S231-S240.
71. Hausser J., Strimmer K. Entropy inference and the James-Stein estimator, with application to nonlinear gene association networks. J. Mach. Learn Res. 2009, 10:1469-1484.
72. Basso K., Margolin A.A., Stolovitzky G., Klein U., Dalla-Favera R., Califano A. Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37:382-390.
73. Margolin A.A., Nemenman I., Basso K., Wiggins C., Stolovitzky G., Dalla Favera R., Califano A. ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7(Suppl. 1):S7.
74. Kinney J.B., Atwal G.S. Equitability, mutual information, and the maximal information coefficient. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111:3354-3359.
75. Kinney J.B., Atwal G.S. Reply to Reshef et al.: falsifiability or bust. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111:E3364.
76. Liu H.M., Rao N., Yang D., Yang L., Li Y., Ou F. A novel method for identifying SNP disease association based on maximal information coefficient. Genet. Mol. Res.: GMR 2014, 13:10863-10877.
77. Reshef D.N., Reshef Y.A., Mitzenmacher M., Sabeti P.C. Cleaning up the record on the maximal information coefficient and equitability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111:E3362-E3363.
78. Bansal M., di Bernardo D. Inference of gene networks from temporal gene expression profiles. IET Syst. Biol. 2007, 1:306-312.
79. Palle S.R., Seeve C.M., Eckert A.J., Cumbie W.P., Goldfarb B., Loopstra C.A. Natural variation in expression of genes involved in xylem development in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Genet. Genom. 2010, 7:193-206.
80. Allen J.D., Xie Y., Chen M., Girard L., Xiao G. Comparing statistical methods for constructing large scale gene networks. PLoS One 2012, 7:e29348.
81. Garg A., Mohanram K., De Micheli G., Xenarios I. Implicit methods for qualitative modeling of gene regulatory networks. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 786:397-443.
82. Li F., Long T., Lu Y., Ouyang Q., Tang C. The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101:4781-4786.
83. Orlando D.A., Lin C.Y., Bernard A., Wang J.Y., Socolar J.E., Iversen E.S., Hartemink A.J., Haase S.B. Global control of cell-cycle transcription by coupled CDK and network oscillators. Nature 2008, 453:944-947.
84. Dash S., Van Hemert J., Hong L., Wise R.P., Dickerson J.A. PLEXdb: gene expression resources for plants and plant pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D1194-D1201.
85. Hruz T., Laule O., Szabo G., Wessendorp F., Bleuler S., Oertle L., Widmayer P., Gruissem W., Zimmermann P. Genevestigator v3: a reference expression database for the meta-analysis of transcriptomes. Adv. Bioinform. 2008, 2008(420747).
86. Obayashi T., Okamura Y., Ito S., Tadaka S., Aoki Y., Shirota M., Kinoshita K. ATTED-II in 2014: evaluation of gene coexpression in agriculturally important plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55:e6.
87. Geisler-Lee J., O'Toole N., Ammar R., Provart N.J., Millar A.H., Geisler M. A predicted interactome for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145:317-329.
88. Obayashi T., Nishida K., Kasahara K., Kinoshita K. ATTED-II updates: condition-specific gene coexpression to extend coexpression analyses and applications to a broad range of flowering plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52:213-219.
89. Hirai M.Y., Klein M., Fujikawa Y., Yano M., Goodenowe D.B., Yamazaki Y., Kanaya S., Nakamura Y., Kitayama M., Suzuki H., Sakurai N., Shibata D., Tokuhisa J., Reichelt M., Gershenzon J., Papenbrock J., Saito K. Elucidation of gene-to-gene and metabolite-to-gene networks in Arabidopsis by integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:25590-25595.
90. Hirai M.Y., Sugiyama K., Sawada Y., Tohge T., Obayashi T., Suzuki A., Araki R., Sakurai N., Suzuki H., Aoki K., Goda H., Nishizawa O.I., Shibata D., Saito K. Omics-based identification of Arabidopsis Myb transcription factors regulating aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:6478-6483.
91. Petricka J.J., Schauer M.A., Megraw M., Breakfield N.W., Thompson J.W., Georgiev S., Soderblom E.J., Ohler U., Moseley M.A., Grossniklaus U., Benfey P.N. The protein expression landscape of the Arabidopsis root. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:6811-6818.
92. Mangan S., Alon U. Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:11980-11985.
93. Milo R., Shen-Orr S., Itzkovitz S., Kashtan N., Chklovskii D., Alon U. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 2002, 298:824-827.
94. Ingram P.J., Stumpf M.P., Stark J. Network motifs: structure does not determine function. BMC Genom. 2006, 7:108.
95. Widder S., Sole R., Macia J. Evolvability of feed-forward loop architecture biases its abundance in transcription networks. BMC Syst. Biol. 2012, 6:7.
96. Siegal-Gaskins D., Mejia-Guerra M.K., Smith G.D., Grotewold E. Emergence of switch-like behavior in a large family of simple biochemical networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7:e1002039.
97. Elowitz M.B., Leibler S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 2000, 403:335-338.
98. Wong E., Baur B., Quader S., Huang C.H. Biological network motif detection: principles and practice. Briefings Bioinform. 2012, 13:202-215.
99. Holland J.B. Genetic architecture of complex traits in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:156-161.
100. Bernardo R. What if we knew all the genes for a quantitative trait in hybrid crops?. Crop Sci. 2001, 41:1-4.
101. Buckler E.S., Holland J.B., Bradbury P.J., Acharya C.B., Brown P.J., Browne C., Ersoz E., Flint-Garcia S., Garcia A., Glaubitz J.C., Goodman M.M., Harjes C., Guill K., Kroon D.E., Larsson S., Lepak N.K., Li H., Mitchell S.E., Pressoir G., Peiffer J.A., Rosas M.O., Rocheford T.R., Romay M.C., Romero S., Salvo S., Sanchez Villeda H., da Silva H.S., Sun Q., Tian F., Upadyayula N., Ware D., Yates H., Yu J., Zhang Z., Kresovich S., McMullen M.D. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 2009, 325:714-718.
102. Maruyama K., Sakuma Y., Kasuga M., Ito Y., Seki M., Goda H., Shimada Y., Yoshida S., Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Identification of cold-inducible downstream genes of the Arabidopsis DREB1A/CBF3 transcriptional factor using two microarray systems. Plant J. 2004, 38:982-993.
103. Michaelson J.J., Loguercio S., Beyer A. Detection and interpretation of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). Methods 2009, 48:265-276.
104. C.Gene Ontology The gene ontology project in 2008. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:D440-D444.
105. Ficklin S.P., Feltus F.A. Gene coexpression network alignment and conservation of gene modules between two grass species: maize and rice. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156:1244-1256.
106. Prifti E., Zucker J.D., Clement K., Henegar C. Interactional and functional centrality in transcriptional co-expression networks. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:3083-3089.
107. Mochida K., Uehara-Yamaguchi Y., Yoshida T., Sakurai T., Shinozaki K. Global landscape of a co-expressed gene network in barley and its application to gene discovery in Triticeae crops. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52:785-803.
108. Tranchevent L.C., Capdevila F.B., Nitsch D., De Moor B., De Causmaecker P., Moreau Y. A guide to web tools to prioritize candidate genes. Briefings Bioinform. 2011, 12:22-32.
109. Warde-Farley D., Donaldson S.L., Comes O., Zuberi K., Badrawi R., Chao P., Franz M., Grouios C., Kazi F., Lopes C.T., Maitland A., Mostafavi S., Montojo J., Shao Q., Wright G., Bader G.D., Morris Q. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:W214-W220.
110. De Bodt S., Hollunder J., Nelissen H., Meulemeester N., Inze D. CORNET 2.0: integrating plant coexpression, protein-protein interactions, regulatory interactions, gene associations and functional annotations. New Phytol. 2012, 195:707-720.
111. Gillis J., Pavlidis P. Guilt by association is the exception rather than the rule in gene networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8:e1002444.
112. Ahnert S.E. Generalised power graph compression reveals dominant relationship patterns in complex networks. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4(4385).
113. Pastor-Satorras R., Smith E., Solé R.V. Evolving protein interaction networks through gene duplication. J. Theor. Biol. 2003, 222:199-210.
114. Blanc G., Wolfe K.H. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell 2004, 16:1679-1691.
115. Gibon Y., Usadel B., Blaesing O.E., Kamlage B., Hoehne M., Trethewey R., Stitt M. Integration of metabolite with transcript and enzyme activity profiling during diurnal cycles in Arabidopsis rosettes. Genom. Biol. 2006, 7:R76.
116. Carter S.L., Brechbuhler C.M., Griffin M., Bond A.T. Gene co-expression network topology provides a framework for molecular characterization of cellular state. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:2242-2250.
117. Yu H., Kim P.M., Sprecher E., Trifonov V., Gerstein M. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3:e59.
118. Jeong H., Mason S.P., Barabasi A.L., Oltvai Z.N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411:41-42.
119. Song J., Singh M. From hub proteins to hub modules: the relationship between essentiality and centrality in the yeast interactome at different scales of organization. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9:e1002910.
120. Han J.D., Bertin N., Hao T., Goldberg D.S., Berriz G.F., Zhang L.V., Dupuy D., Walhout A.J., Cusick M.E., Roth F.P., Vidal M. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2004, 430:88-93.
121. Agarwal S., Deane C.M., Porter M.A., Jones N.S. Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000817.
122. Palumbo M.C., Zenoni S., Fasoli M., Massonnet M., Farina L., Castiglione F., Pezzotti M., Paci P. Integrated network analysis identifies fight-club nodes as a class of hubs encompassing key putative switch genes that induce major transcriptome reprogramming during grapevine development. Plant Cell 2014, 26:4617-4635.
123. Langfelder P., Mischel P.S., Horvath S. When is hub gene selection better than standard meta-analysis?. PLoS One 2013, 8:e61505.
124. Garbutt C.C., Bangalore P.V., Kannar P., Mukhtar M.S. Getting to the edge: protein dynamical networks as a new frontier in plant-microbe interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5:312.
125. Sahni N., Yi S., Zhong Q., Jailkhani N., Charloteaux B., Cusick M.E., Vidal M. Edgotype: a fundamental link between genotype and phenotype. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2013, 23:649-657.
126. Charloteaux B., Zhong Q., Dreze M., Cusick M.E., Hill D.E., Vidal M. Protein-protein interactions and networks: forward and reverse edgetics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 759:197-213.
127. Nepusz T., Vicsek T. Controlling edge dynamics in complex networks. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8:568-573.
128. Jiang W., Zhou H., Bi H., Fromm M., Yang B., Weeks D.P. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:e188.
129. Chen K., Gao C. Targeted genome modification technologies and their applications in crop improvements. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33:575-583.
130. Zetsche B., Gootenberg J.S., Abudayyeh O.O., Slaymaker I.M., Makarova K.S., Essletzbichler P., Volz S.E., Joung J., van der Oost J., Regev A., Koonin E.V., Zhang F. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 2015, 163:759-771.
131. Lee T., Kim H., Lee I. Network-assisted crop systems genetics: network inference and integrative analysis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 24:61-70.