Network-assisted crop systems genetics: Network inference and integrative analysis

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 24, Issue , 2015, Pages 61-70

  Lee, Tak ^a   Kim, Hyojin ^a   Lee, Insuk ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

CROP; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENOME;

CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOME, PLANT; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84923041126     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.02.001     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815.
2. Hamilton J.P., Buell C.R. Advances in plant genome sequencing. Plant J 2012, 70:177-190.
3. Brenchley R., Spannagl M., Pfeifer M., Barker G.L., D'Amore R., Allen A.M., McKenzie N., Kramer M., Kerhornou A., Bolser D., et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 2012, 491:705-710.
4. Cao K., Zheng Z., Wang L., Liu X., Zhu G., Fang W., Cheng S., Zeng P., Chen C., Wang X., et al. Comparative population genomics reveals the domestication history of the peach, Prunus persica, and human influences on perennial fruit crops. Genome Biol 2014, 15:415.
5. Gaut B.S. The complex domestication history of the common bean. Nat Genet 2014, 46:663-664.
6. Hirsch C.N., Flint-Garcia S.A., Beissinger T.M., Eichten S.R., Deshpande S., Barry K., McMullen M.D., Holland J.B., Buckler E.S., Springer N., et al. Insights into the effects of long-term artificial selection on seed size in maize. Genetics 2014, 198:409-421.
7. Lin T., Zhu G., Zhang J., Xu X., Yu Q., Zheng Z., Zhang Z., Lun Y., Li S., Wang X., et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat Genet 2014, 46:1220-1226.
8. Huang X., Wei X., Sang T., Zhao Q., Feng Q., Zhao Y., Li C., Zhu C., Lu T., Zhang Z., et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat Genet 2010, 42:961-967.
9. Huang X., Zhao Y., Wei X., Li C., Wang A., Zhao Q., Li W., Guo Y., Deng L., Zhu C., et al. Genome-wide association study of flowering time and grain yield traits in a worldwide collection of rice germplasm. Nat Genet 2012, 44:32-39.
10. Matsuda F., Nakabayashi R., Yang Z., Okazaki Y., Yonemaru J.I., Ebana K., Yano M., Saito K. Metabolome-genome-wide association study (mGWAS) dissects genetic architecture for generating natural variation in rice secondary metabolism. Plant J 2014.
11. Tian F., Bradbury P.J., Brown P.J., Hung H., Sun Q., Flint-Garcia S., Rocheford T.R., McMullen M.D., Holland J.B., Buckler E.S. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet 2011, 43:159-162.
12. Li H., Peng Z., Yang X., Wang W., Fu J., Wang J., Han Y., Chai Y., Guo T., Yang N., et al. Genome-wide association study dissects the genetic architecture of oil biosynthesis in maize kernels. Nat Genet 2013, 45:43-50.
13. Olukolu B.A., Wang G.F., Vontimitta V., Venkata B.P., Marla S., Ji J., Gachomo E., Chu K., Negeri A., Benson J., et al. A genome-wide association study of the maize hypersensitive defense response identifies genes that cluster in related pathways. PLoS Genet 2014, 10:e1004562.
14. Mamidi S., Lee R.K., Goos J.R., McClean P.E. Genome-wide association studies identifies seven major regions responsible for iron deficiency chlorosis in soybean (Glycine max). PLOS ONE 2014, 9:e107469.
15. Hwang E.Y., Song Q., Jia G., Specht J.E., Hyten D.L., Costa J., Cregan P.B. A genome-wide association study of seed protein and oil content in soybean. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:1.
16. Rhee S.Y., Mutwil M. Towards revealing the functions of all genes in plants. Trends Plant Sci 2014, 19:212-221.
17. Lehner B. Genotype to phenotype: lessons from model organisms for human genetics. Nat Rev Genet 2013, 14:168-178.
18. Lee I. Network approaches to the genetic dissection of phenotypes in animals and humans. Anim Cells Syst 2013, 17:75-79.
19. Bassel G.W., Lan H., Glaab E., Gibbs D.J., Gerjets T., Krasnogor N., Bonner A.J., Holdsworth M.J., Provart N.J. Genome-wide network model capturing seed germination reveals coordinated regulation of plant cellular phase transitions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:9709-9714.
20. Gutierrez R.A., Lejay L.V., Dean A., Chiaromonte F., Shasha D.E., Coruzzi G.M. Qualitative network models and genome-wide expression data define carbon/nitrogen-responsive molecular machines in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol 2007, 8:R7.
21. Lee I., Ambaru B., Thakkar P., Marcotte E.M., Rhee S.Y. Rational association of genes with traits using a genome-scale gene network for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:149-156.
22. Pop A., Huttenhower C., Iyer-Pascuzzi A., Benfey P.N., Troyanskaya O.G. Integrated functional networks of process, tissue, and developmental stage specific interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Syst Biol 2010, 4:180.
23. Arabidopsis Interactome Mapping Consortium Evidence for network evolution in an Arabidopsis interactome map. Science 2011, 333:601-607.
24. Jones A.M., Xuan Y., Xu M., Wang R.S., Ho C.H., Lalonde S., You C.H., Sardi M.I., Parsa S.A., Smith-Valle E., et al. Border control - a membrane-linked interactome of Arabidopsis. Science 2014, 344:711-716.
25. Van Leene J., Hollunder J., Eeckhout D., Persiau G., Van De Slijke E., Stals H., Van Isterdael G., Verkest A., Neirynck S., Buffel Y., et al. Targeted interactomics reveals a complex core cell cycle machinery in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Syst Biol 2010, 6:397.
26. Vernoux T., Brunoud G., Farcot E., Morin V., Van den Daele H., Legrand J., Oliva M., Das P., Larrieu A., Wells D., et al. The auxin signalling network translates dynamic input into robust patterning at the shoot apex. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:508.
27. Kim E., Kim H., Lee I. JiffyNet: a web-based instant protein network modeler for newly sequenced species. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:W192-W197.
28. De Bodt S., Hollunder J., Nelissen H., Meulemeester N., Inze D. CORNET 2.0: integrating plant coexpression, protein-protein interactions, regulatory interactions, gene associations and functional annotations. New Phytol 2012, 195:707-720.
29. Franceschini A., Szklarczyk D., Frankild S., Kuhn M., Simonovic M., Roth A., Lin J., Minguez P., Bork P., von Mering C., et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D808-D815.
30. Gu H., Zhu P., Jiao Y., Meng Y., Chen M. PRIN: a predicted rice interactome network. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:161.
31. Hamada K., Hongo K., Suwabe K., Shimizu A., Nagayama T., Abe R., Kikuchi S., Yamamoto N., Fujii T., Yokoyama K., et al. OryzaExpress: an integrated database of gene expression networks and omics annotations in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 2011, 52:220-229.
32. Ho C.L., Wu Y., Shen H.B., Provart N.J., Geisler M. A predicted protein interactome for rice. Rice (N Y) 2012, 5:15.
33. Jupiter D., Chen H., VanBuren V. STARNET 2: a web-based tool for accelerating discovery of gene regulatory networks using microarray co-expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:332.
34. Katari M.S., Nowicki S.D., Aceituno F.F., Nero D., Kelfer J., Thompson L.P., Cabello J.M., Davidson R.S., Goldberg A.P., Shasha D.E., et al. VirtualPlant: a software platform to support systems biology research. Plant Physiol 2010, 152:500-515.
35. Kourmpetis Y.A., van Dijk A.D., van Ham R.C., ter Braak C.J. Genome-wide computational function prediction of Arabidopsis proteins by integration of multiple data sources. Plant Physiol 2011, 155:271-281.
36. Lee I., Seo Y.S., Coltrane D., Hwang S., Oh T., Marcotte E.M., Ronald P.C. Genetic dissection of the biotic stress response using a genome-scale gene network for rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:18548-18553.
37. Lee T.H., Kim Y.K., Pham T.T., Song S.I., Kim J.K., Kang K.Y., An G., Jung K.H., Galbraith D.W., Kim M., et al. RiceArrayNet: a database for correlating gene expression from transcriptome profiling, and its application to the analysis of coexpressed genes in rice. Plant Physiol 2009, 151:16-33.
38. Mutwil M., Klie S., Tohge T., Giorgi F.M., Wilkins O., Campbell M.M., Fernie A.R., Usadel B., Nikoloski Z., Persson S. PlaNet: combined sequence and expression comparisons across plant networks derived from seven species. Plant Cell 2011, 23:895-910.
39. Obayashi T., Okamura Y., Ito S., Tadaka S., Aoki Y., Shirota M., Kinoshita K. ATTED-II in 2014: evaluation of gene coexpression in agriculturally important plants. Plant Cell Physiol 2014, 55:e6.
40. Ogata Y., Suzuki H., Sakurai N., Shibata D. CoP: a database for characterizing co-expressed gene modules with biological information in plants. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1267-1268.
41. Sato Y., Namiki N., Takehisa H., Kamatsuki K., Minami H., Ikawa H., Ohyanagi H., Sugimoto K., Itoh J., Antonio B.A., et al. RiceFREND: a platform for retrieving coexpressed gene networks in rice. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D1214-D1221.
42. Wong D.C., Sweetman C., Drew D.P., Ford C.M. VTCdb: a gene co-expression database for the crop species Vitis vinifera (grapevine). BMC Genomics 2013, 14:882.
43. Yim W.C., Yu Y., Song K., Jang C.S., Lee B.M. PLANEX: the plant co-expression database. BMC Plant Biol 2013, 13:83.
44. Yu J., Zhang Z., Wei J., Ling Y., Xu W., Su Z. SFGD: a comprehensive platform for mining functional information from soybean transcriptome data and its use in identifying acyl-lipid metabolism pathways. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:271.
45. Yu H., Luscombe N.M., Lu H.X., Zhu X., Xia Y., Han J.D., Bertin N., Chung S., Vidal M., Gerstein M. Annotation transfer between genomes: protein-protein interologs and protein-DNA regulogs. Genome Res 2004, 14:1107-1118.
46. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol 1990, 215:403-410.
47. Remm M., Storm C.E., Sonnhammer E.L. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J Mol Biol 2001, 314:1041-1052.
48. Ostlund G., Schmitt T., Forslund K., Kostler T., Messina D.N., Roopra S., Frings O., Sonnhammer E.L. InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D196-D203.
49. Dimmer E.C., Huntley R.P., Alam-Faruque Y., Sawford T., O'Donovan C., Martin M.J., Bely B., Browne P., Mun Chan W., Eberhardt R., et al. The UniProt-GO Annotation database in 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:D565-D570.
50. McGary K.L., Park T.J., Woods J.O., Cha H.J., Wallingford J.B., Marcotte E.M. Systematic discovery of nonobvious human disease models through orthologous phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:6544-6549.
51. McGary K.L., Lee I., Marcotte E.M. Broad network-based predictability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene loss-of-function phenotypes. Genome Biol 2007, 8:R258.
52. Barrett T., Wilhite S.E., Ledoux P., Evangelista C., Kim I.F., Tomashevsky M., Marshall K.A., Phillippy K.H., Sherman P.M., Holko M., et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets - update. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D991-D995.
53. Rustici G., Kolesnikov N., Brandizi M., Burdett T., Dylag M., Emam I., Farne A., Hastings E., Ison J., Keays M., et al. ArrayExpress update - trends in database growth and links to data analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D987-D990.
54. Dash S., Van Hemert J., Hong L., Wise R.P., Dickerson J.A. PLEXdb: gene expression resources for plants and plant pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:D1194-D1201.
55. Usadel B., Obayashi T., Mutwil M., Giorgi F.M., Bassel G.W., Tanimoto M., Chow A., Steinhauser D., Persson S., Provart N.J. Co-expression tools for plant biology: opportunities for hypothesis generation and caveats. Plant Cell Environ 2009, 32:1633-1651.
56. Mutwil M., Usadel B., Schutte M., Loraine A., Ebenhoh O., Persson S. Assembly of an interactive correlation network for the Arabidopsis genome using a novel heuristic clustering algorithm. Plant Physiol 2010, 152:29-43.
57. Obayashi T., Kinoshita K. Rank of correlation coefficient as a comparable measure for biological significance of gene coexpression. DNA Res 2009, 16:249-260.
58. Wang Z., Gerstein M., Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:57-63.
59. Zhao S., Fung-Leung W.P., Bittner A., Ngo K., Liu X. Comparison of RNA-Seq and microarray in transcriptome profiling of activated T cells. PLOS ONE 2014, 9:e78644.
60. Fu X., Fu N., Guo S., Yan Z., Xu Y., Hu H., Menzel C., Chen W., Li Y., Zeng R., et al. Estimating accuracy of RNA-Seq and microarrays with proteomics. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:161.
61. Bottomly D., Walter N.A., Hunter J.E., Darakjian P., Kawane S., Buck K.J., Searles R.P., Mooney M., McWeeney S.K., Hitzemann R. Evaluating gene expression in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse striatum using RNA-Seq and microarrays. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17820.
62. Wang C., Gong B., Bushel P.R., Thierry-Mieg J., Thierry-Mieg D., Xu J., Fang H., Hong H., Shen J., Su Z., et al. The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance. Nat Biotechnol 2014, 32:926-932.
63. Giorgi F.M., Del Fabbro C., Licausi F. Comparative study of RNA-seq- and microarray-derived coexpression networks in Arabidopsis thaliana. Bioinformatics 2013, 29:717-724.
64. Hong S., Chen X., Jin L., Xiong M. Canonical correlation analysis for RNA-seq co-expression networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:e95.
65. Kensche P.R., van Noort V., Dutilh B.E., Huynen M.A. Practical and theoretical advances in predicting the function of a protein by its phylogenetic distribution. J R Soc Interface 2008, 5:151-170.
66. Korbel J.O., Jensen L.J., von Mering C., Bork P. Analysis of genomic context: prediction of functional associations from conserved bidirectionally transcribed gene pairs. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:911-917.
67. Shin J., Lee T., Kim H., Lee I. Complementarity between distance- and probability-based methods of gene neighbourhood identification for pathway reconstruction. Mol Biosyst 2014, 10:24-29.
68. Du Z., Zhou X., Ling Y., Zhang Z., Su Z. agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:W64-W70.
69. Usadel B., Poree F., Nagel A., Lohse M., Czedik-Eysenberg A., Stitt M. A guide to using MapMan to visualize and compare Omics data in plants: a case study in the crop species, Maize. Plant Cell Environ 2009, 32:1211-1229.
70. Kanehisa M., Goto S., Sato Y., Kawashima M., Furumichi M., Tanabe M. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:D199-D205.
71. Dreher K. Putting The Plant Metabolic Network pathway databases to work: going offline to gain new capabilities. Methods Mol Biol 2014, 1083:151-171.
72. Bork P., Jensen L.J., von Mering C., Ramani A.K., Lee I., Marcotte E.M. Protein interaction networks from yeast to human. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004, 14:292-299.
73. Wang P.I., Marcotte E.M. It's the machine that matters: predicting gene function and phenotype from protein networks. J Proteomics 2010, 73:2277-2289.
74. Warde-Farley D., Donaldson S.L., Comes O., Zuberi K., Badrawi R., Chao P., Franz M., Grouios C., Kazi F., Lopes C.T., et al. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:W214-W220.
75. Carter H., Hofree M., Ideker T. Genotype to phenotype via network analysis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013, 23:611-621.
76. Jia P., Zhao Z. Network assisted analysis to prioritize GWAS results: principles, methods and perspectives. Hum Genet 2014, 133:125-138.
77. Jia P., Wang L., Meltzer H.Y., Zhao Z. Common variants conferring risk of schizophrenia: a pathway analysis of GWAS data. Schizophr Res 2010, 122:38-42.
78. Akula N., Baranova A., Seto D., Solka J., Nalls M.A., Singleton A., Ferrucci L., Tanaka T., Bandinelli S., Cho Y.S., et al. A network-based approach to prioritize results from genome-wide association studies. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e24220.
79. Garcia-Alonso L., Alonso R., Vidal E., Amadoz A., de Maria A., Minguez P., Medina I., Dopazo J. Discovering the hidden sub-network component in a ranked list of genes or proteins derived from genomic experiments. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:e158.
80. Lee I., Blom U.M., Wang P.I., Shim J.E., Marcotte E.M. Prioritizing candidate disease genes by network-based boosting of genome-wide association data. Genome Res 2011, 21:1109-1121.
81. Rossin E.J., Lage K., Raychaudhuri S., Xavier R.J., Tatar D., Benita Y., International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium, Cotsapas C., Daly M.J. Proteins encoded in genomic regions associated with immune-mediated disease physically interact and suggest underlying biology. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1001273.