Educational design research

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 131-140

  McKenney, Susan ^a   Reeves, Thomas C ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Design experiments; Design research; Design based research; Formative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946067678     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41 (1), 16-25.
2. Bannan-Ritland, B., & Baek, J. (2008). Teacher design research: An emerging paradigm for teachers' professional development. In A. Kelly, R. Lesh, & J. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. London: Routledge.
3. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 1-14.
4. Basham, J. D., Meyer, H., & Perry, E. (2010). The design and application of the digital backpack. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42 (4), 339-359.
5. Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39 (4), 243-253.
6. Bell, P., Hoadley, C., & Linn, M. (2004). Design-based research in education. In M. Linn, E. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments of science education (pp. 73-85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
7. Bereiter, C. (2002). Design research for sustained innovation. Cognitive Studies, 9 (3), 321-327.
8. Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34 (6), 3-15.
9. Brar, R. (2010). The design and study of a learning environment to support growth and change in students' knowledge of fraction multiplication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of California, Berkeley.
10. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2), 141-178.
11. Burkhardt, H. (2006). From design research to large-scale impact:Engineering research in education. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research. London: Routledge.
12. Burkhardt, H. (2009). On strategic design. Educational Designer:Journal of the International Society for Design and Development in Education, 1 (3). Available online at: http://www.educationaldesigner. org/ed/volume1/issue3/article9/index.htm.
13. Carter, C. A., Ruhe, M. C., Weyer, S. M., Litaker, D., Fry, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2007). An appreciative inquiry approach to practice improvement and transformative change in health care settings. Quality Management in Health Care, 16 (3), 194-204.
14. Clarke, A. (1999). Evaluation research: An introduction to principles, methods and practice. London: Sage.
15. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Lagemann & L. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research:problems and possibilities (pp. 15-22). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 105-114.
17. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 5-8.
18. Dewey, J. (1900). Psychology and social practice. Psychological Review, 7, 105-124.
19. Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student: A design-based research case study of student constructed personal learning environments in a middle school science course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Florida.
20. Edelson, D. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (1), 105-121.
21. Ejersbo, L., Engelhardt, R., Frølunde, L., Hanghøj, T., Magnussen, R., & Misfeldt, M. (2008). Balancing product design and theoretical insight. In A. Kelly, R. Lesh, & J. Baek (Eds.), The handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 149-163). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22 (4), 16-23.
23. Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47 (2), 335-397.
24. Glaser, R. (1976). Components of a psychology of instruction: Toward a science of design. Review of Educational Research, 46 (1), 29-39.
25. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Outline of a method for design research in mathematics education. In J. V. D. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research. London: Routledge.
26. Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C., & Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. Austin, TX: The Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.
27. Havelock, R. (1971). Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge.
28. Kaestle, C. F. (1993). The awful reputation of education research. Educational Researcher, 22 (1), 23, 26-31.
29. Kali, Y. (2008). The design principles database as means for promoting design-based research. In A. Kelly, R. Lesh, & J. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 423-438). London: Routledge.
30. Kelly, A. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 3-4.
31. Kelly, A., Lesh, R., & Baek, J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Kim, H., & Hannafin, M. (2008). Grounded design of web-enhanced case-based activity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 161-179.
33. Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives-The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56 (2), 203-228.
34. Lagemann, E. (2002). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Laurel, B. (2003). Design research: Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Lee, J. J. (2009). Understanding how identity supportive games can impact ethnic minority possible selves and learning: A design-based research study. Unpublished dissertation study, The Pennsylvania State University.
37. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
38. Linn, M., & Eylon, B. (2006). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 511-544). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of designbased research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educational Researcher, 42 (2), 97-100.
40. McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.
41. McKenney, S., van den Akker, J., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Design research from the curriculum perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 67-90). London: Routledge.
42. Mills, G. E. (2002). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
43. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054.
44. Münsterberg, H. (1899). Psychology and life. Boston, MA: Houghton Mif fl in.
45. Newman, D. (1990). Opportunities for research on the organizational impact of school computers. Educational Researcher, 19 (3), 8-13.
46. Oh, E. (2011). Collaborative group work in an online learning environment:A design research study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Georgia.
47. Oh, E., & Reeves, T. (2010). The implications of the differences between design research and instructional systems design for educational technology researchers and practitioners. Educational Media International, 47 (4), 263-275.
48. Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation and design. Educational Researcher, 40 (7), 331-337.
49. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2009). An introduction to educational design research: Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai. Enschede, The Netherlands:SLO-Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Institute.
50. Quintana, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G. et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (3), 337-386.
51. Raval, H. (2010). Supporting para-teachers in an Indian NGO: The plan-enact-re fl ect cycle. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Twente University.
52. Reeves, T. C. (2011). Can educational research be both rigorous and relevant? Educational Designer: Journal of the International Society for Design and Development in Education, 1 (4). Available online at: http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume1/issue4/.
53. Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from the technology perspective. In J. V. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 86-109). London:Routledge.
54. Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2008). Formative and design experiments:Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
55. Reynolds, R., & Caperton, I. (2011). Contrasts in student engagement, meaning-making, dislikes, and challenges in a discovery-based program of game design learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59 (2), 267-289.
56. Richey, R., & Klein, J. (2007). Design and development research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2009). Bridging the cultures of educational research and design. Educational Designer: Journal of the International Society for Design and Development in Education, 1 (2). Available online at: http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume1/issue2/ article5/index.htm.
58. Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan, C. S. (2011). E-moderation of synchronous discussions in educational settings: A nascent practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20 (3), 395-442.
59. Shavelson, R., Phillips, D., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 25-28.
60. Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteurs quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
61. Thomas, M. K., Barab, S. A., & Tuzun, H. (2009). Developing critical implementations of technology-rich innovations: A cross-case study of the implementation of Quest Atlantis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41 (2), 125-153.
62. van Aken, X. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (2), 219-246.
63. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1-14). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
64. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006a). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
65. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006b). Introducing educational design research. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 3-7). London: Routledge.
66. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology- enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53 (4), 5-23.
67. Xie, Y., & Sharma, P. (2011). Exploring evidence of re fl ective thinking in student artifacts of blogging-mapping tool: A design-based research approach. Instructional Science, 39 (5), 695-719.
68. Yin, R. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.