Alternatives for skin sensitisation: Hazard identification and potency categorisation: Report from an EPAA/CEFIC LRI/Cosmetics Europe cross sector workshop, ECHA Helsinki, April 23rd and 24th 2015

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 660-666

  Basketter, David ^a   Ashikaga, Takao ^b   Casati, Silvia ^c   Hubesch, Bruno ^d,e   Jaworska, Joanna ^e   de Knecht, Joop ^f   Landsiedel, Robert ^g   Manou, Irene ^h   Mehling, Annette ^g   Petersohn, Dirk ⁱ   Rorije, Emiel ^j   Rossi, Laura H ^k   Steiling, Winfried ^l   Teissier, Silvia ^m   Worth, Andrew ^c  

^a DABMEB CONSULTANCY LTD   (United Kingdom)

^b SHISEIDO RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

^c ECVAM   (Italy)

^d Cefic   (Belgium)

^e Procter and Gamble ^*  (Belgium)

^f OECD   (France)

^g BASF SE   (Germany)

^h EPAA Industry Secretariat   (Belgium)

ⁱ HENKEL KGAA   (Germany)

^j NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^k EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY   (Finland)

^l Assoc of the Ger Chemical Industry   (Germany)

^m L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Hazard classification; In vitro alternatives; Integrated approaches to testing and assessment; Integrated testing strategies; Skin sensitisation

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; EUROPE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN SENSITIZATION; TOXICITY TESTING; ANIMAL; DRUG EFFECTS; EDUCATION; FINLAND; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN; SKIN ALLERGY; TRENDS;

COSMETIC;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; COSMETICS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; EDUCATION; EUROPE; FINLAND; HUMANS; RESEARCH REPORT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN;

EID: 84945560786     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adler S., Basketter D.A., Creton S., Pelkonen O., van Benthem J., Zuang V., et al. Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010. Arch. Toxicol. 2011, 85. 367-485.
2. Basketter D.A., Alepee N., Ashikaga T., Barroso J., Gilmour N., Goebel C., Hibatallah J., Hoffmann S., Kern P., Martinozzi-Teissier S., Maxwell G., Millet M., Reisinger K., Sakaguchi H., Schepky A., Tialhardat M., Templier M. Categorisation of chemicals according to their relative human skin sensitizing potency. Dermatitis 2014, 25:11-21.
3. Basketter D., Alepee N., Casati S., Crozier J., Eigler D., Griem P., Hubesch B., de Knecht J., Landsiedel R., Louekari K., Manou I., Maxwell G., Mehling A., Netzeva T., Petry T., Rossi L. Skin sensitisation - moving forward with non-animal strategies. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 67:531-535.
4. Basketter D.A., Clewell H., Kimber I., Rossi A., Blaauboer B., Burrier R., Daneshian M., et al. A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing. ALTEX 2012, 29:5-91.
5. Basketter D.A., McFadden J.F., Gerberick G.F., Cockshott A., Kimber I. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay. A commentary and the implications for REACH. Contact Dermat. 2009, 60:65-69.
6. Bauch C., Kolle S.N., Ramirez T., Eltze T., Fabian E., Mehling A., Teubner W., van Ravenzwaay B., Landsiedel R. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2012, 63:489-504. Erratum in: Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2012 64: 285.
7. Cottrez F., Boitel E., Auriault C., Aeby P., Groux H. Genes specifically modulated in sensitized skins allow the detection of sensitizers in a reconstructed human skin model. Development of the SENS-IS assay. Toxicol. Vitro 2015, 29:787-802.
8. Dean J.H., Twerdok L.E., Tice R.R., Sailstad D.M., Hattan D.G., Stokes W.S. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. II. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2001, 34:258-273.
9. Del Bufalo A., Bernad J., Dardenne C., Verda D., Meunier J.R., Rousset F., Martinozzi-Teissier S., Pipy B. Contact sensitizers modulate the arachidonic acid metabolism of PMA-differentiated U-937 monocytic cells activated by LPS. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2011, 256:35-43.
10. EURL ECVAM Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) ECVAM Validation Study Report 2012, January 2012, Last accessed 08/09/2015. https://eurl-ecvam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/eurl-ecvam-recommendations/files-dpra/DPRA%20Validation%20Study%20Report.pdf.
11. EURL ECVAM Recommendation on the KeratinoSens Assay for Skin Sensitisation Testing 2014, February 2014, Last accessed 08/09/2015. https://eurl-ecvam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/eurl-ecvam-recommendations/file-kerati/JRC_SPR_Keratinosens_Rec_17_02_2014.pdf.
12. EURL ECVAM Recommendation on the Human Cell line Activation Test (h-CLAT) for Skin Sensitisation testing 2015, March 2015, Last accessed 08/09/2015. https://eurl-ecvam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/news/news_docs/eurl-ecvam-recommendation-on-the-human-cell-line-activation-test-h-clat-for-skin-sensitisation-testing.
13. Gomes C., Noçairi H., Thomas M., Collin J.F., Ibanez F., Saporta G. Stacking Prediction for a Binary Outcome. COMPSTAT, 20th International Conference on Computational Statistics, Limassol, Cyprus. 2012 2012, 271-282.
14. Hirota M., Fukui S., Okamoto K., Kurotani S., Imai N., Fujishiro M., Kyotani D., Kato Y., Kasahara T., Fujita M., Toyoda A., Sekiya D., Watanabe S., Seto H., Takenouchi O., Ashikaga T., Miyazawa M. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2015, 35:1333-1347.
15. Jaworska J., Dancik Y., Kern P., Gerberick F., Natsch A. Bayesian integrated testing strategy to assess skin sensitization potency: from theory to practice. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2013, 33:1353-1364.
16. Mehling A., Eriksson T., Eltze T., Kolle S., Ramirez T., Teubner W., van Ravenzwaay B., Landsiedel R. Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86:1273-1295.
17. Natsch A., Emter R., Gfeller H., Haupt T., Ellis G. Predicting skin sensitizer potency based on in vitro data from KeratinoSens and kinetic peptide binding: global versus domain-based assessment. Toxicol. Sci. 2015, 143:319-332.
18. Natsch A., Ryan C.A., Foertsch L., Emter R., Jaworska J., Gerberick G.F., Kern P. A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2013, 33:1337-1352.
19. OECD The Adverse Outcome Pathway for Skin Sensitisation Initiated by Covalent Binding to Proteins Part 1: Scientific Evidence 2012, Series on Testing and Assessment No.168. ENV/JM/MONO(2012)10/PART1 and Part 2: Use of the AOP to Develop Chemical Categories and Integrated Assessment and Testing Approaches. Series on Testing and Assessment No.168. ENV/JM/MONO(2012)10/PART2.
20. OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 442C 2015, (In chemico skin sensitisation: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay. Paris, France).
21. OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 442D 2015, In vitro skin sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method. Paris, France.
22. OECD Report of the Workshop on a Framework for the Development and Use of Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment 2015, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 215. 17-19 November 2014, Crystal City VA, USA. Paragraphs 17-21, Last accessed 08/09/2015. http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/testing/reportoftheworkshoponaframeworkforthedevelopmentanduseofintegratedapproachestotestingandassessment.htm.
23. Patlewicz G., Kuseva C., Kesova A., Popova I., Zhechev T., Pavlov T., Roberts D.W., Mekenyan O. Towards AOP application-implementation of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) into a pipeline tool for skin sensitization. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 69:529-545.
24. Piroird C., Ovigne J.M., Rousset F., Martinozzi-Teissier S., Gomes C., Cotovio J., Alépée N. The myeloid U937 skin sensitization test (U-SENS) addresses the activation of dendritic cell event in the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization. Toxicol. Vitro 2015, 29:901-916.
25. Ramirez T., Mehling A., Kolle S.N., Wruck C.J., Teubner W., Eltze T., Aumann A., Urbisch D., van Ravenzwaay B., Landsiedel R. LuSens: a keratinocyte based ARE reporter gene assay for use in integrated testing strategies for skin sensitization hazard identification. Toxicol. Vitro 2014, 28:1482-1497.
26. Reisinger K., Hoffmann S., Alépée N., Ashikaga T., Barroso J., Elcombe C., Gellatly N., Galbiati V., Gibbs S., Groux H., Hibatallah J., Keller D., Kern P., Klaric M., Kolle S., Kuehnl J., Lambrechts N., Lindstedt M., Millet M., Martinozzi-Teissier S., Natsch A., Petersohn D., Pike I., Sakaguchi H., Schepky A., Tailhardat M., Templier M., van Vliet E., Maxwell G. Systematic evaluation of non-animal test methods for skin sensitisation safety assessment. Toxicol. Vitro 2015, 29:259-270.
27. Reuter H., Gerlach S., Spieker J., Ryan C., Bauch C., Mangez C., Winkler P., Landsiedel R., Templier M., Mignot A., Gerberick F., Wenck H., Aeby P., Schepky A. Evaluation of an optimized protocol using human peripheral blood monocyte derived dendritic cells for the in vitro detection of sensitizers: results of a ring study in five laboratories. Toxicol. Vitro 2015, 29:976-986.
28. Russell W.M.S., Burch R.L. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique 1959, Methuen, London.
29. Steiling W., Basketter D., Berthold K., Butler M., Garrigue J.-L., Kimber I., Lea L., Newsome C., Roggeband R., Stropp G., Waterman S., Wiemann C. Skin sensitisation testing - new perspectives and recommendations. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2001, 39:293-301.
30. Urbisch D., Mehling A., Guth K., Ramirez T., Honarvar N., Kolle S., Landsiedel R., Jaworska J., Kern P.S., Gerberick F., Natsch A., Emter R., Ashikaga T., Miyazawa M., Sakaguchi H. Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 71:337-351.
31. van der Veen J.W., Rorije E., Emter R., Natsch A., van Loveren H., Ezendam J. Evaluating the performance of integrated approaches for hazard identification of skin sensitizing chemicals. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 69:371-379.
32. Vocanson M., Nicolas J.-F., Basketter D.A. In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitisers. Exp. Rev. Dermatol 2013, 8:395-405.
33. Wong C.L., Ghassabian S., Smith M.T., Lam A.L. In vitro methods for hazard assessment of industrial chemicals - opportunities and challenges. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6:1-13.