A randomized trial of lesson study with mathematical resource kits: Analysis of impact on teachers’ beliefs and learning community

Large-Scale Studies in Mathematics Education

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 133-158

  Lewis, Catherine C ^a   Perry, Rebecca Reed ^a  

^a MILLS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944540229     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07716-1_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Akiba, M., Chiu, Y.-F., Zhuang, Y.-L., & Mueller, H. E. (2008). Standards-based mathematics reforms and mathematics achievement of American Indian/Alaska native eighth graders. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16(20), 1-31.
2. Beckmann, S. (2005). Mathematics for elementary teachers. Boston: Pearson.
3. Birman, B. F., Boyle, A., Le Floch, K., Elledge, A., Holtzman, D., Song, M., et al. (2009). State and local implementation of the no child left behind act: Volume Vlll-teacher quality under NCLB: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
4. Bloom, H. S., Richburg-Hayes, L., & Black, A. R. (2007). Using covariates to improve precision for studies that randomize schools to evaluate educational interventions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(1), 30-59.
5. Borko, H., Davinroy, K. H., Bliem, C. L., & Cumbo, K. B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers’ experiences in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 273-306.
6. Britt, M. S., Irwin, K. C., & Ritchie, G. (2001). Professional conversations and professional growth. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 29-53.
7. California Department of Education. (2005). CST released test questions—standardized testing and reporting (STAR). From http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/sr/css05rtq.asp
8. Campbell, P. F., & Malkus, N. N. (2011). The impact of elementary mathematics coaches on student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 11(3), 430-454.
9. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Porthsmouth, NH: Hienemann.
10. Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Teacher Development. (2005). Diagnostic teacher assessment in mathematics and science, elementary mathematics, rational numbers assessment, version 1.2 and middle school mathematics, number and computation assessment, version 2. From http://louisville.edu/education/research/centers/crmstd/diag_math_assess_elem_teachers.html
11. Chazan, D., Ben-Chaim, D., & Gormas, J. (1998). Shared teaching assignments in the service of mathematics reform: Situated professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(7), 687-702.
12. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967.
13. CRC (Center for Research on the Context of Teaching). (1994). Survey of elementary mathematics education in California: Teacher questionnaire. Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education.
14. Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M., & Ueno, K. (2006). Are teachers who need sustained, content-focused professional development getting it? An administrator’s dilemma. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 179-215
15. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A case of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
16. Fisler, J. L., & Firestone, W. A. (2006). Teacher learning in a school-university partnership Exploring the role of social trust and teaching efficacy beliefs. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1155-1185.
17. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 58(4), 304-313.
18. Gersten, R., Taylor, M. J., Keys, T. D., Rolfhus, E., & Newman-Gonchar, R. (2014). Summary of research on the effectiveness of math professional development approaches. (No. REL 2014-010). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.
19. Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2014). Mathematics teachers’learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 5-36.
20. Grandau, L. (2005). Learning from self-study: Gaining knowledge about how fourth graders move from relational description to algebraic generalization. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2),202-221.
21. Hackenberg, A., Norton, A., Wilkins J., & Steffe, L. (2009). Testing hypotheses about students’ operational development of fractions. Paper presented at the NCTM Research Pre-Session
22. Hill, H. C. (2010). The nature and predictors of elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 513-545.
23. Hironaka, H., & Sugiyama, Y. (2006). Mathematics for elementary school, grades 1-6. Tokyo: Tokyo Shoseki. English language version available at http://www.globaledresources.com.
24. Horizon Research, Inc. (2000). 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education Mathematics Teacher Questionnaire. http://www.horizon-research.com/horizonresearchwp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/math_teacher.pdf.
25. Institute of Education Sciences/National Center for Education Statistics (IES/NCES). (2007). NAEP questions tool. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/itmrlsx/landing.aspx
26. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work topromote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203-235.
27. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Learning Mathematics for Teaching. (2007). Survey of teachers of mathematics, winter 2007, form LMT PR-07. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, School of Education.
29. Lewis, C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinneman.
30. Lewis, C., & Perry, R. (2014). Lesson study with mathematical resources: A sustainable model for locally led teacher professional learning. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 22-42.
31. Lewis, C., & Perry, R. (under review). Scale-up of instructional improvement through lesson study. Unpublished manuscript.
32. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Friedkin, S. (2011). Using Japanese curriculum materials to support lesson study outside Japan: Toward coherent curriculum. Educational Studies in Japan: lnternational Yearbook, 6, 5-19.
33. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285-304.
34. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 55(3), 3-14.
35. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The case of elementary science instruction. Journal of Educational Policy, 12(5), 313-331.
36. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). Alesson is like a swiftly flowing river: Research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education. American Educator, Winter, 14-17 & 50-52.
37. Lin, X. (2001). Reflective adaptation of a technology artifact: A case study of classroom change. Cognition and lnstruction, 19(4), 395-440.
38. Lin, P. (2002). On enhancing teachers’ knowledge by constructing cases in the classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(4), 317-349.
39. Manouchehri, A. (2001). Collegial interaction and reflective practice. Action in Teacher Education, 22(4), 86-97.
40. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. University of Chicago Press.
41. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities.New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Michigan State University. (2003). Teacher learning through professional development, 2003 SVMl teacher survey. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
43. Murata, A. (2003). Teacher learning and lesson study: Developing efficacy through experiencing student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the School Science and Mathematics Association, Columbus, OH.
44. Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1080-1110.
45. Noffke S., & Somekh B. (2009). The SAGE handbook of educational action research. London: Sage.
46. Norton, A. H., & McCloskey, A. V. (2008). Modeling students’ mathematics using Steffe’s fraction schemes. Teaching Children Mathematics, 15(1), 48-54.
47. Perry, R., & Lewis, C. (2010). Building demand for research through lesson study. In C. E. Coburn & M. K. Stein, Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide (pp. 131-145). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
48. Post, T. R., Harel, G., Behr, M. J., & Lesh, R. A. (1988). Intermediate teachers’ knowledge of rational number concepts. In E. Fennema (Ed.), Papers from the First Wisconsin Symposium for Research on Teaching and Learning Mathematics (pp. 194-219). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
49. Puchner, L. D., & Taylor, A. R. (2006). Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 922-934.
50. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352-388.
52. Saxe, G. B. (2007). Learning about fractions as points on a number line. In W. G. Martin, M. E. Strutchens, & P. C. Elliott, The Learning of Mathematics (Vol. 69th Yearbook, pp. 221-237). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
53. Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From the teachers’ seminar to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 55-87.
54. Schorr, R. Y., & Koellner-Clark, K. (2003). Using a modeling approach to analyze the ways in which teachers consider new ways to teach mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2), 191-210.
55. Seymour, J. R., & Lehrer, R. (2006). Tracing the evolution of pedagogical content knowledge as the development of interanimated discourses. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 549-582.
56. Sherer, J., & Spillane, J. (2011). Constancy and change in work practice in schools: The role of organizational routines. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 611-657.
57. Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163-183.
58. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20-37.
59. Smith, T., & Desimone, L. M. (2003). Do changes in patterns of participation in teachers’ professional development reflect the goals of standards-based reforms? Educational Horizons, 81(3), 119-129.
60. Song, M., & Herman, R. (2010). Critical issues and common pitfalls in designing and conducting impact studies in education lessons learned from the what works clearinghouse (Phase I). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(3), 351-371.
61. Spillane, J. P. (2000). A fifth-grade teacher’s reconstruction of mathematics and literacy teaching: Exploring interactions among identity, learning, and subject matter. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 307-330.
62. Steinberg, R. M., Empson, S. B., & Carpenter, T. P. (2004). Inquiry into children’s mathematical thinking as a means to teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 237-267.
63. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Summit Books.
64. Takahashi, A., Watanabe, T., Yoshida, M., & Wang-Iverson, P. (2005). Improving content and pedagogical knowledge through kyozaikenkyu. In P. Wang-Iverson & M. Yoshida, Building our understanding of lesson study (pp. 77-84). Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
65. Taylor, A. R., Anderson, S., Meyer, K., Wagner, M. K., & West, C. (2005). Lesson study: A professional development model for mathematics reform. Rural Educator, 26(2), 17-22.
66. Thijs, A., & van den Berg, E. (2002). Peer coaching as part of a professional development program for science teachers in Botswana. lnternational Journal of Educational Development, 22, 55-68.
67. Ticha, M., & Hospesova, A. (2006). Qualified pedagogical reflection as a way to improve mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 129-156.
68. Tobin, K., & Espinet, M. (1990). Teachers as peer coaches in high school mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 232-244.
69. Van de Walle, J. A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
70. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ –learning to notice— in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276.
71. Wang-Iverson, P., & Yoshida, M. (2005). Building our understanding of lesson study. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
72. Ward, J., & Thomas, G. (2009). From presentation on teaching scenarios. Retrieved June 1, 2009, from http://www.nzmaths.co.nz/fractions
73. Zech, L. K., Gause-Vega, C. L., Bray, M. H., Secules, T., & Goldman, S. R. (2000). Content-based collaborative inquiry: A professional development model for sustaining educational reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 207-217.
74. Zhou, Z., Peverly, S. T., & Xin, T. (2006). Knowing and teaching fractions: A cross-cultural study of American and Chinese mathematics teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(4), 438-457.