Can Autonomous Vehicles Be Safe and Trustworthy? Effects of Appearance and Autonomy of Unmanned Driving Systems

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 682-691

  Lee, Jae Gil ^a   Kim, Ki Joon ^a   Lee, Sangwon ^a   Shin, Dong Hee ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

FACTORIAL EXPERIMENT; HUMAN INTERVENTION; HUMAN LIKE; MEDIATION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL PRESENCE; UNMANNED DRIVING SYSTEM; UNMANNED DRIVINGS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 84943386354     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1070547     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. H.Aarts,, & A.Dijksterhuis, (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 53–63.
2. C.Bartneck,, T.Kanda,, O.Mubin,, & A.A.Mahmud, Al A. (2009). Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 195–204.
3. C.Bartneck,, D.Kulić,, E.Croft,, & S.Zoghbi, (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 71–81.
4. R.Benenson,, T.Fraichard,, & M.Parent, (2008). Achievable safety of driverless ground vehicles. Proceedings of Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision ’08, 515–521.
5. S.Chaiken, (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M.Zanna, J.Olson, & C.Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 143–177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. M.M.A.de Graaf,, & S.Ben Allouch, (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61, 1476–1486.
7. C.F.DiSalvo,, F.Gemperle,, J.Forlizzi,, & S.Kiesler, (2002). All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems ’02, 321–326
8. B.R.Duffy, (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177–190.
9. T.Eddy,, J.G.G.Gallup,, & D.Povinelli, (1993). Attribution of cognitive states to animals: Anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 87–101.
10. N.Epley,, A.Waytz,, & J.T.Cacioppo, (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864–886.
11. M.Gill,, W.Swann,, & D.Silvera, (1998). On the genesis of confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1101–1114.
12. J.Goetz,, S.Kiesler,, & A.Powers, (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human–robot cooperation. Proceedings of the Robot and Human Interactive Communication ’03, 55–60
13. L.Gong, (2008). How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1494–1509.
14. Guizzo, E. (2011). How Google’s self-driving car works. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/how-google-self-driving-car-works
15. B.E.Hayes,, J.Perander,, T.Smecko,, & J.Trask, (1998). Measuring perceptions of workplace safety: Development and validation of the work safety scale. Journal of Safety Research, 29, 145–161.
16. C.Heeter, (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1, 262–271.
17. M.Itoh,, & T.Inagaki, (2004). A microworld approach to identifying issues of human-automation systems design for supporting operator’s situation awareness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 3–24.
18. D.Johnson,, & K.Grayson, (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58, 500–507.
19. R.F.Khan,, & A.Sutcliffe, (2013). Attractive agents are more persuasive. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30, 142–150.
20. K.J.Kim, (2014). Can smartphones be specialists? Effects of specialization in mobile advertising. Telematics and Informatics, 31, 640–647.
21. K.J.Kim,, E.Park,, & S.S.Sundar, (2013). Caregiving role in human–robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1799–1806.
22. K.J.Kim,, & S.S.Sundar, (in press). Mobile persuasion: Can screen size and presentation mode make a difference to trust? Human Communication Research. doi:10.1111/hcre.12064.
23. J.D.Lee,, & K.A.See, (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50–80.
24. K.M.Lee, (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27–50.
25. K.M.Lee,, & C.Nass, (2003). Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction. Proceedings of CHI’03, 289–296.
26. K.M.Lee,, & C.Nass, (2004). The multiple source effect and synthesized speech: Doubly disembodied language as a conceptual framework. Human Communication Research, 30, 182–207.
27. K.M.Lee,, W.Peng,, S.Jin,, & C.Yan, (2006). Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56, 754–772.
28. J.Leonard,, J.How,, S.Teller,, M.Berger,, S.Campbell,, G.Fiore,, … J.Williams, (2008). A perception-driven autonomous urban vehicle. Journal of Field Robotics, 25, 727–774.
29. J.D.Lewis,, & A.Weigert, (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985.
30. Q.Li,, N.Zheng,, & H.Cheng, (2004). Springrobot: A prototype autonomous vehicle and its algorithms for lane detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 5, 300–308.
31. D.J.McAllister, (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.
32. C.Nass,, B.J.Fogg,, & Y.Moon, (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 45, 669–678.
33. C.Nass,, & Y.Moon, (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81–103.
34. C.Nass,, Y.Moon,, B.J.Fogg,, B.Reeves,, & D.C.Dryer, (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 223–239.
35. Nawaguna, E. (2014). Ford teams with Stanford, MIT to research automated driving. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/22/us-usa-ford-autonomous-driving-idUSBREA0L1BX20140122
36. U.Ozguner,, C.Stiller,, & K.Redmill, (2007). Systems for safety and autonomous behavior in cars: The DARPA Grand Challenge experience. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95, 397–412.
37. R.Parasuraman,, & V.Riley, (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse and abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230–253.
38. R.Parasuraman,, T.Sheridan,, & C.Wickens, (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-30, 286–297.
39. K.J.Preacher,, & A.F.Hayes, (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
40. L.Qiu,, & I.Benbasat, (2009). Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A Social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 145–182.
41. B.Reeves,, & C.Nass, (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42. J.Rowley,, & F.Johnson, (2013). Understanding trust formation in digital information sources: The case of Wikipedia. Journal of Information Science, 39, 494–508.
43. S.J.Russell,, & P.Norvig, (1995). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44. T.B.Sheridan,, & R.Parasuraman, (2005). Human-automation interaction. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1, 89–129.
45. H.Soh,, L.N.Reid,, & K.W.King, (2009). Measuring trust in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38, 83–104.
46. Statistics Korea. (2015). Vehicle registration statistics. Retrieved from http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1257
47. S.S.Sundar, (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M.J.Metzger & A.J.Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 72–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. C.Thorpe,, M.Hebert,, T.Kanade, & S.Shafer, (1988). Vision and navigation for the Carnegie- Mellon Navlab. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis, 10, 362–373.
49. G.H.Walker,, N.A.Stanton,, & M.S.Young, (2001). Where is computing driving cars? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 13, 203–229
50. S.Watt, (1995). A brief naive psychology manifesto. Informatica, 19, 495–500.
51. A.Waytz,, J.Heafner,, & N.Epley, (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117.
52. Y.U.Yim,, & S.Oh, (2003). Three-feature based automatic lane detection algorithm (TFALDA) for autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 4, 219–225.