All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads

Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 321-326

  DiSalvo, Carl F ^a   Gemperle, Francine ^a   Forlizzi, Jodi ^a   Kiesler, Sara ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Design research; Human robot interaction; Interaction design; Social robots

Indexed keywords

DESIGN RESEARCH; FACIAL FEATURE; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTIONS; HUMANOID ROBOT; INTERACTION DESIGN; ROBOT HEAD; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MACHINE DESIGN; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; RESEARCH;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 77953073554     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/778712.778756     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bates, J. The Role of Emotion in Believable Agents. Communications of the ACM, 37 (7). 122-125.
2. Bates, B. The Human Face. BBC Worldwide Limited, New York, 2001.
3. Breazeal, C. and Velasquez, J., Toward Teaching a Robot 'Infant' using Emotive Communication Acts. In Proceedings of Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, workshop on Socially Situated Intelligence '98, (Zurich, Switzerland, 1998), 25-40.
4. Breazeal, C. and Velasquez, J., Robot in Society: Friend or Appliance? In Proceedings of Agents 99 Workshop on emotion-based agent architectures, (Seattle, WA, 1999), 18-26.
5. Breazeal, C. and Scassellati, B., How to Build Robots That Make Friends and Influence People. In Proceedings of IROS-99, (Kyonju, Korea, 1999).
6. Bruce, A., Nourbakhsh, I. and Simmons, R. The Role of Expressiveness and Attention in Human-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings, AAAI Fall Symposium. (2001).
7. Cassell, J. Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2000.
8. Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Vilhjlmsson, H. and Yan, H., More Than Just a Pretty Face: Affordance in Embodiment. In Proceedings of 2000 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, (New Orleans, LA, USA, 2000).
9. Don, A., Brennan, S., Laurel, B. and Schneiderman, B., Anthropomorphism: From Eliza to Terminator 2. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems '92, (1992), 67-70.
10. Ekman, P. (ed.), Emotion in the Human Face. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: UK, 1982.
11. Humanoid Interaction Lab, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan. http://www.etl.go.jp/etl/robotics/Projects/ Humanoid/
12. Humanoid Robotics Institute, Waseda University, Japan. http://www.humanoid.waseda.ac.jp/
13. Humanoid Robotics Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/humanoid-robotics-group/
14. Hassin, R. and Trope, Y. Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78 (5). 837-852.
15. Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L. 'Social' Human Computer Interaction. In Friedman, B. ed. Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1997, 191-199.
16. Klingspor, V., Demiris, J. and Kaiser, M. Human-Robot-Communication and Machine Learning. Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal, 12 (7-8). 573-617.
17. Langlois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121.
18. Langlois, J.H., Roggman, L.A., & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5, 214-220.
19. Langlois Lab,University of Texas, Austin,USA.http://homepage.psy.utexas. edu/HomePage/Group/LangloisLAB/composites.html
20. Laurel, B. Interface Agents: Metaphors with Character. in Friedman, B. ed. Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1997, 207-219.
21. Moon, Y. When the Interface is the Face: Social Responses to Interactive Technologies. Report (113). 23-24.
22. Nass, C. and Steuer, J. Anthropomorphism, Agency, and Ethopoeia: Computers as Social Actors. Human Communication Research, 19 (4). 504-527.
23. Nass, C., Steuer, J. and Tauber, E., Computers are Social Actors. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems '94, (1994), ACM Press: New York, 72-78.
24. Reichard,J. Robots: Fact, Fiction, and Prediction. Penguin Books, 1978.
25. Reilly, W.S.N., A Methodology for Building Believable Social Agents. In Proceedings of Autonomous Agents '97, (Marina Del Rey, California USA, 1997), 114-121.
26. Roy, N., Baltus, G., Fox, D., Gemperle, F., Goetz, J., Hirsch, T., Margaritis, D., Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J., Schulte, J. and Thrun, S. Towards Personal Service Robots for The Elderly. http://www.cs.cmu.ed/~nursebot/web/ papers.html
27. Social Robots Project, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. http://www2/cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/robocomp/social/www/SRPmain.html
28. Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J.H. and et al. When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction, 11 (2). 97-124.
29. Takeuchi, A. and Nagao, K., Communicative Facial Displays as A New Conversational Modality. In Proceedings of INTERCHI '93, (Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1993), ACM Press: New York, 187-193.
30. Takeuchi, A. and Naito, T., Situated Facial displays: Towards Social interaction. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems '95, (1995), ACM Press: New York, 450-455.
31. Zebrowitz, L.A. Reading faces: Window to the soul? Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA, 1997.