Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 71-81

  Bartneck, Christoph ^a   Kulić, Dana ^b   Croft, Elizabeth ^c   Zoghbi, Susana ^c  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Human factors; Measurement; Perception; Robot

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MEASUREMENT; ROBOTS; SEMANTICS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SOCIAL ROBOTS; SURVEYS;

EMPIRICAL STUDIES; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI); LITERATURE REVIEWS; MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS; MEASUREMENTS OF; RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL SCALE; STANDARDIZED MEASUREMENT;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS;

EID: 67650702793     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Sony (1999) Aibo, vol 1999
2. Breemen A, Yan X, Meerbeek B (2005) iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality. In: Fourth international conference on autonomous agents & multi agent systems, Utrecht
3. Bartneck C, Rauterberg M (2007) HCI reality-an unreal tournament. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65:737-743
4. Kiesler S, Goetz J (2002) Mental models of robotic assistants. In: CHI'02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
5. Fink A (2003) The survey kit, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
6. Kooijmans T, Kanda T, Bartneck C, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Accelerating robot development through integral analysis of human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 23:1001-1012
7. Dawis RV (1987) Scale construction. J Counsel Psychol 34:481-489
8. Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J (2001) A cross-media presence questionnaire: The itc sense of presence inventory. Presence 10:282-297
9. Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:143-166
10. Bartneck C, Forlizzi J (2004) A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. In: Ro-Man2004, Kurashiki, pp 591-594
11. Dautenhahn K (2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 362:679-704
12. Chalmers AF (1999) What is this thing called science? 3rd edn. Hackett, Indianapolis
13. Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1-55
14. Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH (1957) The measurements of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Champaign
15. Friborg O, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge JH (2006) Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: A psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Pers Individ Differ 40:873-884
16. Powers A, Kiesler S (2006) The advisor robot: tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. In: 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
17. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
18. Ishiguro H (2005) Android Science-Towards a new cross-interdisciplinary framework. In: CogSci workshop towards social mechanisms of android science, Stresa, pp 1-6
19. Minato T, Shimada M, Itakura S, Lee K, Ishiguro H (2005) Does gaze reveal the human likeness of an android? In: 4th IEEE international conference on development and learning, Osaka
20. MacDorman KF (2006) Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley. In: ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium: toward social mechanisms of android science, Vancouver
21. Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff? In: 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2007, Jeju, Korea, pp 368-373
22. Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2008) My robotic doppelganger-a critical look at the uncanny valley theory. In: Interaction studies-social behaviour and communication in biological and artificial systems
23. Fogg BJ (2003) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo
24. Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 57:243-249
25. Scholl B, Tremoulet PD (2000) Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn Sci 4:299-309
26. Parisi D, Schlesinger M (2002) Artificial life and Piaget. Cogn Dev 17:1301-1321
27. Blythe P, Miller GF, Todd PM (1999) How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions. In: Gigerenzer G, Todd P (eds) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, London, pp 257-285
28. Turkle S (1998) Cyborg babies and cy-dough-plasm: ideas about life in the culture of simulation. In: Davis-Floyd R, Dumit J (eds) Cyborg babies: from techno-sex to techno-tots. Routledge, New York, pp 317-329
29. Kahn P, Ishiguro H, Friedman B, Kanda T (2006) What is a human?-Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. In: The 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, ROMAN 2006, Salt Lake City, pp 364-371
30. Calverley DJ (2005) Toward a method for determining the legal status of a conscious machine. In: AISB 2005 symposium on next generation approaches to machine consciousness: imagination, development, intersubjectivity, and embodiment, Hatfield
31. Calverley DJ (2006) Android science and animal rights, does an analogy exist? Connect Sci 18:403-417
32. Zykov V, Mytilinaios E, Adams B, Lipson H (2005) Self-reproducing machines. Nature 435:163-164
33. Tremoulet PD, Feldman J (2000) Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 29:943-951
34. McAleer P, Mazzarino B, Volpe G, Camurri A, Patterson H, Pol-lick F (2004) Perceiving animacy and arousal in transformed displays of human interaction. J Vis 4:230-230
35. Lee KM, Park N, Song H (2005) Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Hum Commun Res 31:538-563
36. Bartneck C, Kanda T, Mubin O, Mahmud AA (2007) The perception of animacy and intelligence based on a robot's embodiment. In: Humanoids 2007, Pittsburgh
37. Clark N, Rutter D (1985) Social categorization, visual cues and social judgments. Eur J Soc Psychol 15:105-119
38. Robbins T, DeNisi A (1994) A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in performance evaluations. J Appl Psychol 79:341-353
39. Berg JH, Piner K (1990) Social relationships and the lack of social relationship. In: Duck W, Silver RC (eds) Personal relationships and social support. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 104-221
40. Nass C, Reeves B (1996) The media equation. SLI Publications/Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
41. Monahan JL (1998) I don't know it but I like you-the influence of non-conscious affect on person perception. Hum Commun Res 24:480-500
42. Burgoon JK, Hale JL (1987) Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes for relational communication. Commun Monogr 54:19-41
43. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1992) What computers still can't do: a critique of artificial reason. MIT Press, Cambridge
44. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE, Athanasiou T (1986) Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Free Press, New York
45. Weizenbaum J (1976) Computer power and human reason: from judgment to calculation. Freeman, San Francisco
46. Searle JR (1980) Minds, brains and programs. Behav Brain Sci 3:417-457
47. Koda T (1996) Agents with faces: a study on the effect of personification of software agents. MIT Media Lab, Cambridge
48. Warner RM, Sugarman DB (1996) Attributes of personality based on physical appearance, speech, and handwriting. J Pers Soc Psy-chol 50:792-799
49. Parise S, Kiesler S, Sproull LD, Waters K (1996) My partner is a real dog: cooperation with social agents. In: 1996 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, pp 399-408
50. Kiesler S, Sproull L, Waters K (1996) A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:47-65
51. Bartneck C, Verbunt M, Mubin O, Mahmud AA (2007) To kill a mockingbird robot. In: 2nd ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, Washington DC, pp 81-87
52. American National Standards Institute (1999) RIA/ANSI R15.06-1999 American national standard for industrial robots and robot systems-safety requirements. American National Standards Institute, New York
53. Yamada Y, Hirasawa Y, Huang S, Umetani Y, Suita K (1997) Human-robot contact in the safeguarding space. In: IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics, vol 2, pp 230-236
54. Yamada Y, Yamamoto T, Morizono T, Umetani Y (1999) FTA-based issues on securing human safety in a human/robot coexistence system. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, 1999. IEEE SMC'99 conference proceedings, vol 2, pp 1058-1063
55. Bicchi A, Rizzini SL, Tonietti G (2001) Compliant design for intrinsic safety: general issues and preliminary design. In: 2001 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2001. Proceedings, vol 4, pp 1864-1869
56. Bicchi A, Tonietti G (2004) Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 11:22-33
57. Zinn M, Khatib O, Roth B, Salisbury JK (2002) Towards a human-centered intrinsically safe robotic manipulator. In: IARPIEEE/RAS joint workshop on technical challenges for dependable robots in human environments, Toulouse, France
58. Zinn M, Khatib O, Roth B (2004) A new actuation approach for human friendly robot design. In: 2004 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. Proceedings. ICRA'04, vol 1, pp 249-254
59. Heinzmann J, Zelinsky A (1999) Building human-friendly robot systems. Int Symp Robot Res 305-312
60. Heinzmann J, Zelinsky A (2003) Quantitative safety guarantees for physical human-robot interaction. Int J Robot Res 22:479-504
61. Lew JY, Yung-Tsan J, Pasic H (2000) Interactive control of human/robot sharing same workspace. In: 2000 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2000 (IROS 2000). Proceedings. pp 535-540
62. Zurada J, Wright AL, Graham JH (2001) A neuro-fuzzy approach for robot system safety. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 31:49-64
63. Traver VJ, del Pobil AP, Perez-Francisco M (2000) Making service robots human-safe. In: 2000 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2000). Proceedings, vol 1, pp 696-701
64. Ikuta K, Ishii H, Nokata M (2003) Safety evaluation method of design and control for human-care robots. Int J Robot Res 22:281-297
65. Haddadin S, Albu-Schaffer A, Hirzinger G (2007) Safe physical human-robot interaction: Measurements, analysis & new insights. In: International symposium on robotics research (ISRR2007), Hiroshima, Japan
66. Kulic D, Croft E (2005) Anxiety detection during human-robot interaction. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Edmonton, Canada, pp 389-394
67. Rani P, Sarkar N, Smith CA, Kirby LD (2004) Anxiety detecting robotic system-towards implicit human-robot collaboration. Ro-botica 22:85-95
68. Rani P, Sims J, Brackin R, Sarkar N (2002) Online stress detection using phychophysiological signals for implicit human-robot cooperation. Robotica 20:673-685
69. Inoue K, Nonaka S, Ujiie Y, Takubo T, Arai T (2005) Comparison of human psychology for real and virtual mobile manipulators. In: IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication, pp 73-78
70. Wada K, Shibata T, Saito T, Tanie K (2004) Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proc IEEE 92:1780-1788
71. Koay KL, Walters ML, Dautenhahn K (2005) Methodological issues using a comfort level device in human-robot interactions. In: IEEE RO-MAN, pp 359-364
72. Sarkar N (2002) Psychophysiological control architecture for human-robot coordination-concepts and initial experiments. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Washington, DC, USA, pp 3719-3724
73. Nonaka S, Inoue K, Arai T, Mae Y (2004) Evaluation of human sense of security for coexisting robots using virtual reality. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp 2770-2775
74. Kulic D, Croft E (2007) Physiological and subjective responses to articulated robot motion. Robotica 25:13-27
75. Kulic D, Croft E (2006) Estimating robot induced affective state using hidden Markov models. In: RO-MAN 2006-the 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Hatfield, pp 257-262
76. Kulic D, Croft EA (2007) Affective state estimation for human-robot interaction. IEEE Robot Trans 23:991-1000
77. Kulic D, Croft E (2005) Safe planning for human-robot interaction. J Robot Syst 22:383-396
78. Khatib O (1986) Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Int J Robot Res 5:90-98