Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation

Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 55-60

  Goetz, Jennifer ^a   Kiesler, Sara ^b   Powers, Aaron ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPEARANCE AND BEHAVIOR; HUMAN LIKENESS; HUMAN-ROBOT COOPERATION; ROBOT APPEARANCE; SOCIAL CUES;

COMMUNICATION; EXPERIMENTS;

ROBOTS;

EID: 84881092526     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251796     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Aarts H, Dijksterhuis A. Attitudes and social cognition - habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior, in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 78, 2000, pp. 53-63.
2. Bar-Cohen Y., Breazeal C. Biologically-inspired robots, SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, 2003.
3. Bates, J. The role of emotion in believable agents, in Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, 1994, pp. 122-125.
4. Breazeal, C.L. Designing sociable robots, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
5. Bock BC, Marcus BH, Pinto B.M., Forsyth LH Maintenance of physical activity following an individualized motivationally tailored intervention, in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 23, 2001, pp. 79-87.
6. Bonner BL. The effects of extroversion on influence in ambiguous group tasks, in Small Groups, Vol. 31, 2000, pp. 225-244.
7. Campbell D, Crichton L, Hansen J.T., Webber PA New edition of the SVIB: The Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory, in Measurement & Evaluation in Guidance, Vol. July 7(2), 1974, pp. 92-95.
8. Cialdini RB. Influence: the psychology of persuasion, William Morrow, New York, 1993.
9. DiSalvo CF, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J., Kiesler S. All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads, in Proceedings of the DIS Conference, London, England, June 25-28, 2002, pp. 321-326.
10. Feigenbaum EA, McCorduck P. The fifth generation: Artificial intelligence and Japan's computer challenge to the world, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1982.
11. Francis L, Monahan K, Berger C. A laughing matter? The uses of humor in medical interactions, in Motivation & Emotion, Vol 23, 1999, pp. 155-174.
12. Friedman B, Kahn PH, Hagman, J. Hardware companions? What online AIBO discussions forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship, in Proceedings of the conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003), Vol. 5, 2003, pp. 273-280.
13. Hall JA, Roter DL, Rand CS Communication of affect between patient and physician, in Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 22, 1981, pp. 18-30.
14. Haskell WL. The efficacy and safety of exercise programs in cardiac rehabilitation, in Medicine & science in sports and exercise, Vol. 26, 1994, pp. 815-823.
15. John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle R. The Big-Five Inventory, Technical Report, Insititute of Personality and Social Research, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1991.
16. LeBaron S, Reyher J, Stack JM Paternalistic vs egalitarian physician styles: The treatment of patients in crisis, in Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 21, 1985, pp. 56-62.
17. Mateas M. An Oz-centric review of interactive drama and believable agents, In MJ Wooldridge & M Veloso (Eds.), Artificial intelligence today: Recent trends and developments. NY, Springer, 1999, pp. 297-398.
18. Nass C, Moon Y. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers, in Journal of Social Issues, Vol 56, 2000, pp. 81-103
19. Parise S, Kiesler S, Sproull L., Waters K. Cooperating with life-like interface agents, in Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 15, 1999, 123-142.
20. Raingruber BJ. Settling into and moving in a climate of care: Styles and patterns of interaction between nurse psychotherapists and clients, in Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, Vol. 37, 2001, pp. 15-27.
21. Reeves B, Nass C. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1996.
22. Rousseau D, Hayes-Roth B. Interacting with personality-rich characters, Sept Technical Report No. KSL 97-06, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1997.
23. Scholl BJ, Tremoulet P. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 4(8), 2000, pp. 299-309
24. Siino RM. Making sense of new technology: Organizational sensemaking of autonomous mobile robots as a lead-in to structuring. Unpublished manuscript, WTO, Stanford University, May 2003.
25. Thrun S, Beetz M, Bennewitz M., Burgard W, Cremers AB, Dellaert F, Fox D., Haehnel D, Rosenberg C, Roy N., Schulte J, Schulz D. Probabilistic algorithms and the interactive museum tour-guide robot, Minerva, in International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 19, 2000, pp. 972-999.
26. Wetter AC, Goldberg JP, King A.C., Sigman-Grant M, Baer R, Crayton E., Devine C, Drewnowski A, Dunn A., Johnson G, Pronk N, Saelens B., Snyder D, Novelli P, Walsh K., Warland R. How and why do individuals make food and physical activity choices? Nutrition Reviews, Vol. 59(3 Pt 2), 2001, pp. 11-20.
27. Zebrowitz LA, Collins MA, Dutta R. The relationship between appearance and personality across the life span, in Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, 1998, pp. 736-749.