Nanomedicine applications in orthopedic medicine: State of the art

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 10, Issue , 2015, Pages 6039-6054

  Mazaheri, Mozhdeh ^a   Eslahi, Niloofar ^a   Ordikhani, Farideh ^a   Tamjid, Elnaz ^b   Simchi, Abdolreza ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Implantable materials; Nanomedicine; Nanotoxicology; Orthopedics; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

NANOCOATING; NANOMATERIAL; NANOTUBE; POLYMER;

BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; CANCER THERAPY; CERAMICS; CORROSION; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MECHANICAL STRESS; NANOMEDICINE; NANOTOXICOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOPEDICS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; CHEMISTRY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; TRENDS;

HUMANS; NANOMEDICINE; NANOSTRUCTURES; ORTHOPEDICS; POLYMERS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS;

EID: 84943146045     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S73737     Document Type: Review

References (154)

1. Wang M, Thanou M. Targeting nanoparticles to cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2010;62(2):90-99.
2. Liu H, Webster TJ. Nanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials. 2007;28(2):354-369.
3. Li X, Wang L, Fan Y, Feng Q, Cui F-Z, Watari F. Nanostructured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101A(8):2424-2435.
4. McMahon RE, Wang L, Skoracki R, Mathur AB. Development of nanomaterials for bone repair and regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;101B(2):387-397.
5. Tran N, Webster TJ. Nanotechnology for bone materials. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2009;1(3):336-351.
6. McMahon RE, Wang L, Skoracki R, Mathur AB. Development of nanomaterials for bone repair and regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101(2):387-397.
7. Tautzenberger A, Kovtun A, Ignatius A. Nanoparticles and their potential for application in bone. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:4545-4557.
8. Wang P, Zhao L, Liu J, Weir MD, Zhou X, Xu HH. Bone tissue engineering via nanostructured calcium phosphate biomaterials and stem cells. Bone Res. 2014;(2) Article 14017.
9. Simchi A, Tamjid E, Pishbin F, Boccaccini AR. Recent progress in inorganic and composite coatings with bactericidal capability for orthopaedic applications. Nanomedicine. 2011;7(1):22-39.
10. Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today. 2013;16(12):496-504.
11. Zhang L, Webster TJ. Nanotechnology and nanomaterials: promises for improved tissue regeneration. Nano Today. 2009;4(1):66-80.
12. Shirwaiker RA, Samberg ME, Cohen PH, Wysk RA, Monteiro-Riviere NA. Nanomaterials and synergistic low-intensity direct current (LIDC) stimulation technology for orthopedic implantable medical devices. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2013;5(3):191-204.
13. Andronescu E, Ficai M, Voicu G, Ficai D, Maganu M, Ficai A. Synthesis and characterization of collagen/hydroxyapatite: magnetite composite material for bone cancer treatment. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(7):2237-2242.
14. Schiavi J, Keller L, Morand D-N, et al. Active implant combining human stem cell microtissues and growth factors for bone-regenerative nanomedicine. Nanomedicine. 2015;10(5):753-763.
15. Levengood SKL, Zhang M. Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(21):3161-3184.
16. Venkatesan J, Kim S-K. Chitosan composites for bone tissue engineering-an overview. Mar Drugs. 2010;8(8):2252-2266.
17. Kim J, Kim IS, Cho TH, et al. Bone regeneration using hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel with bone morphogenic protein-2 and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28(10):1830-1837.
18. Patterson J, Siew R, Herring SW, Lin ASP, Guldberg R, Stayton PS. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels with controlled degradation properties for oriented bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2010;31(26):6772-6781.
19. Lee P, Tran K, Chang W, Shelke NB, Kumbar SG, Yu X. Influence of chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronic acid presence in nanofibers and its alignment on the bone marrow stromal cells: cartilage regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10(8):1469-1479.
20. Correia C, Bhumiratana S, Yan L-P, et al. Development of silk-based scaffolds for tissue engineering of bone from human adipose-derived stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(7):2483-2492.
21. Zhang W, Zhu C, Ye D, et al. Porous silk scaffolds for delivery of growth factors and stem cells to enhance bone regeneration. PloS One. 2014;9(7):e102371.
22. Zhang Y, Fan W, Nothdurft L, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of adenovirus combined silk fibroin scaffolds for bone morphogenetic protein-7 gene delivery. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2011;17(8):789-797.
23. Xin X, Hussain M, Mao JJ. Continuing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and induced chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages in electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffold. Biomaterials. 2007;28(2):316-325.
24. Park GE, Pattison MA, Park K, Webster TJ. Accelerated chondrocyte functions on NaOH-treated PLGA scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26(16):3075-3082.
25. Gentile P, Chiono V, Carmagnola I, Hatton PV. An overview of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(3):3640-3659.
26. Tamjid E, Bagheri R, Vossoughi M, Simchi A. Effect of TiO2 morphology on in vitro bioactivity of polycaprolactone/TiO2 nanocomposites. Mater Lett. 2011;65(15-16):2530-2533.
27. Tamjid E, Bagheri R, Vossoughi M, Simchi A. Effect of particle size on the in vitro bioactivity, hydrophilicity and mechanical properties of bioactive glass-reinforced polycaprolactone composites. Mater Sci Eng C. 2011;31(7):1526-1533.
28. Kamath MS, Ahmed SSSJ, Dhanasekaran M, Santosh SW. Polycaprolactone scaffold engineered for sustained release of resveratrol: therapeutic enhancement in bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:183-195.
29. Streicher RM, Schmidt M, Fiorito S. Nanosurfaces and nanostructures for artificial orthopedic implants. 2007.
30. Xing ZC, Han SJ, Shin YS, et al. Enhanced osteoblast responses to poly(methyl methacrylate)/hydroxyapatite electrospun nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2013;24(1):61-76.
31. Jaeblon T. Polymethylmethacrylate: properties and contemporary uses in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(5):297-305.
32. Lopes MS, Jardini AL, Filho RM. Poly (lactic acid) production for tissue engineering applications. Procedia Eng. 2012;42(0):1402-1413.
33. Ma R, Tang T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(4):5426-5445.
34. Evans NT, Torstrick FB, Lee CSD, et al. High-strength, surface-porous polyether-ether-ketone for load-bearing orthopedic implants. Acta Biomater. 2015;13(0):159-167.
35. Xia L, Feng B, Wang P, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of surface-structured implants for bone formation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:4873.
36. Mishnaevsky Jr L, Levashov E, Valiev RZ, et al. Nanostructured titanium-based materials for medical implants: Modeling and development. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2014;81(0):1-19.
37. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials. 2004;25(19):4731-4739.
38. Ryu JJ, Shrotriya P. Influence of roughness on surface instability of medical grade cobalt-chromium alloy (CoCrMo) during contact corrosion-fatigue. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;273:536-541.
39. Yamanaka K, Mori M, Chiba A. Nanoarchitectured Co-Cr-Mo orthopedic implant alloys: Nitrogen-enhanced nanostructural evolution and its effect on phase stability. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(4):6259-6267.
40. Zhao L, Wang H, Huo K, et al. Antibacterial nano-structured titania coating incorporated with silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2011;32(24):5706-5716.
41. Esfandiari N, Simchi A, Bagheri R. Size tuning of Ag-decorated TiO2 nanotube arrays for improved bactericidal capacity of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(8):2625-2635.
42. Pauksch L, Hartmann S, Rohnke M, et al. Biocompatibility of silver nanoparticles and silver ions in primary human mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblasts. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(1):439-449.
43. Krawczynska AT, Gloc M, Lublinska K. Intergranular corrosion resistance of nanostructured austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Sci. 2013;48(13):4517-4523.
44. Cai Y, Zhang K, Zhang Z, Dong J, Lei Y, Zhang T. Surface nanostructure formations in an AISI 316L stainless steel induced by pulsed electron beam treatment. J Nanomater. 2015;2015:5.
45. Mohandas G, Oskolkov N, McMahon MT, Walczak P, Janowski M. Porous tantalum and tantalum oxide nanoparticles for regenerative medicine. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2014;74:188-196.
46. Zhou C, Deng C, Chen X, et al. Mechanical and biological properties of the micro-/nano-grain functionally graded hydroxyapatite bioceramics for bone tissue engineering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015(0).
47. Bosco R, Iafisco M, Tampieri A, Jansen JA, Leeuwenburgh SCG, van den Beucken JJJP. Hydroxyapatite nanocrystals functionalized with alendronate as bioactive components for bone implant coatings to decrease osteoclastic activity. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;328(0):516-524.
48. Patel KD, El-Fiqi A, Lee H-HH-Y, et al. Chitosan-nanobioactive glass electrophoretic coatings with bone regenerative and drug delivering potential. J Mater Chem. 2012;22(47):24945-24956.
49. Price RL, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanostructured surfaces of carbon and alumina. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003;41(3):372-375.
50. Yang L, Zhang L, Webster TJ. Carbon nanostructures for orthopedic medical applications. Nanomedicine. 2011;6(7):1231-1244.
51. Newman P, Minett A, Ellis-Behnke R, Zreiqat H. Carbon nanotubes: their potential and pitfalls for bone tissue regeneration and engineering. Nanomedicine. 2013;9(8):1139-1158.
52. Zhao C, Lu X, Zanden C, Liu J. The promising application of graphene oxide as coating materials in orthopedic implants: preparation, characterization and cell behavior. Biomed Mater. 2015;10(1):015019.
53. Mansoorianfar M, Shokrgozar MA, Mehrjoo M, Tamjid E, Simchi A. Nanodiamonds for surface engineering of orthopedic implants: enhanced biocompatibility in human osteosarcoma cell culture. Diam Relat Mater. 2013;40(0):107-114.
54. Garmendia N, Olalde B, Obieta I. 16-Biomedical applications of ceramic nanocomposites. In: Banerjee R, Manna I, editors. Ceramic Nanocomposites: Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2013:530-547.
55. Gain AK, Zhang L, Liu W. Microstructure and material properties of porous hydroxyapatite-zirconia nanocomposites using polymethyl methacrylate powders. Mater Des. 2015;67(0):136-144.
56. Hickey DJ, Ercan B, Sun L, Webster TJ. Adding MgO nanoparticles to hydroxyapatite-PLLA nanocomposites for improved bone tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2015;14(0):175-184.
57. Liao CZ, Li K, Wong HM, Tong WY, Yeung KWK, Tjong SC. Novel polypropylene biocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotubes and hydroxyapatite nanorods for bone replacements. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33(3):1380-1388.
58. Liu X, Mou Y, Wu S, Man HC. Synthesis of silver-incorporated hydroxyapatite nanocomposites for antimicrobial implant coatings. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;273(0):748-757.
59. Yan Y, Zhang X, Huang Y, Ding Q, Pang X. Antibacterial and bioactivity of silver substituted hydroxyapatite/TiO2 nanotube composite coatings on titanium. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;314(0):348-357.
60. Pishbin F, Mourino V, Gilchrist JB, et al. Single-step electrochemical deposition of antimicrobial orthopaedic coatings based on a bioactive glass/chitosan/nano-silver composite system. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(7):7469-7479.
61. Zhou C, Shi Q, Guo W, et al. Electrospun bio-nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by cellulose nanocrystals reinforcing maleic anhydride grafted PLA. ACS Appl Mater interfaces. 2013;5(9):3847-3854.
62. Cheng Y, Ramos D, Lee P, Liang D, Yu X, Kumbar SG. Collagen functionalized bioactive nanofiber matrices for osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10(2):287-298.
63. El-Ghannam A. Bone reconstruction: from bioceramics to tissue engineering. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2(1):87-101.
64. Wu S, Liu X, Yeung KWK, Liu C, Yang X. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2014;80(0):1-36.
65. Hoexter DL. Bone regeneration graft materials. J Oral Implantol. 2002;28(6):290-294.
66. Salgado AJ, Oliveira JM, Martins A, et al. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: past, present, and future. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;108:1-33.
67. Thibault RA, Mikos AG, Kasper FK. Scaffold/extracellular matrix hybrid constructs for bone-tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2013;2(1):13-24.
68. Stevens MM. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater Today. 2008;11(5):18-25.
69. Laurencin CT, Ambrosio AM, Borden MD, Cooper JA Jr. Tissue engineering: orthopedic applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 1999;1:19-46.
70. Christenson EM, Anseth KS, van den Beucken JJJP, et al. Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(1):11-22.
71. Qu D, Mosher CZ, Boushell MK, Lu HH. Engineering complex orthopaedic tissues via strategic biomimicry. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;3:3.
72. de Guzman RC, Saul JM, Ellenburg MD, et al. Bone regeneration with BMP-2 delivered from keratose scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2013;34(6):1644-1656.
73. Reddi AH, Cunningham NS. Bone induction by osteogenin and bone morphogenetic proteins. Biomaterials. 1990;11:33-34.
74. Liu C, Wan P, Tan LL, Wang K, Yang K. Preclinical investigation of an innovative magnesium-based bone graft substitute for potential orthopaedic applications. J Orthop Translat. 2014;2(3):139-148.
75. Pompa L, Rahman ZU, Munoz E, Haider W. Surface characterization and cytotoxicity response of biodegradable magnesium alloys. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;49(0):761-768.
76. Serra G, Morais L, Elias CN, et al. Nanostructured severe plastic deformation processed titanium for orthodontic mini-implants. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33(7):4197-4202.
77. Estrin Y, Ivanova EP, Michalska A, Truong VK, Lapovok R, Boyd R. Accelerated stem cell attachment to ultrafine grained titanium. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(2):900-906.
78. Wang CT, Gao N, Gee MG, Wood RJK, Langdon TG. Processing of an ultrafine-grained titanium by high-pressure torsion: an evaluation of the wear properties with and without a TiN coating. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;17(0):166-175.
79. Park J-W, Kim Y-J, Park CH, et al. Enhanced osteoblast response to an equal channel angular pressing-processed pure titanium substrate with microrough surface topography. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(8):3272-3280.
80. Perla V, Webster TJ. Better osteoblast adhesion on nanoparticulate selenium-A promising orthopedic implant material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;75(2):356-364.
81. Tran PA, Sarin L, Hurt RH, Webster TJ. Titanium surfaces with adherent selenium nanoclusters as a novel anticancer orthopedic material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93(4):1417-1428.
82. Tran P, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanostructured selenium compacts for anti-cancer orthopedic applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(3):391.
83. Catledge SA, Fries MD, Vohra YK, et al. Nanostructured ceramics for biomedical implants. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2002;2(3-4):293-312.
84. Simchi A, Tamjid E, Pishbin F, Boccaccini A. Recent progress in inorganic and composite coatings with bactericidal capability for orthopaedic applications. Nanomedicine. 2011;7(1):22-39.
85. Ovid’ko I, Sheinerman A. Micromechanisms for improved fracture toughness in nanoceramics. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2011;29(2):105-125.
86. Hafezi F, Hosseinnejad F, Fooladi A, Mohit Mafi S, Amiri A, Nourani M. Transplantation of nano-bioglass/gelatin scaffold in a non-autogenous setting for bone regeneration in a rabbit ulna. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(11):2783-2792.
87. Agarwal R, García AJ. Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
88. Gallo J, Holinka M, Moucha CS. Antibacterial surface treatment for orthopaedic implants. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(8):13849-13880.
89. Park H, Temenoff JS, Mikos AG. Biodegradable orthopedic implants. Engineering of Functional Skeletal Tissues. New York: Springer; 2007:55-68.
90. Mandal BB, Grinberg A, Seok Gil E, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL. High-strength silk protein scaffolds for bone repair. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2012;109(20):7699-7704.
91. Sahoo NG, Pan YZ, Li L, He CB. Nanocomposites for bone tissue regeneration. Nanomedicine. 2013;8(4):639-653.
92. Sadat-Shojai M, Khorasani M-T, Jamshidi A. 3-Dimensional cell-laden nano-hydroxyapatite/protein hydrogels for bone regeneration applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;49(0):835-843.
93. Baradaran S, Moghaddam E, Basirun WJ, et al. Mechanical properties and biomedical applications of a nanotube hydroxyapatite-reduced graphene oxide composite. Carbon. 2014;69(0):32-45.
94. Wu M, Wang Q, Liu X, Liu H. Biomimetic synthesis and characterization of carbon nanofiber/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. Carbon. 2013;51(0):335-345.
95. Deligianni DD, Katsala N, Ladas S, Sotiropoulou D, Amedee J, Missirlis Y. Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. Biomaterials. 2001;22(11):1241-1251.
96. Koller G, Cook RJ, Thompson ID, Watson TF, Di Silvio L. Surface modification of titanium implants using bioactive glasses with air abrasion technologies. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(12):2291-2296.
97. Chen W-C, Chen Y-S, Ko C-L, Lin Y, Kuo T-H, Kuo H-N. Interaction of progenitor bone cells with different surface modifications of titanium implant. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;37(0):305-313.
98. Variola F, Brunski JB, Orsini G, de Oliveira PT, Wazen R, Nanci A. Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives. Nanoscale. 2011;3(2):335-353.
99. Ciganovic J, Stasic J, Gakovic B, et al. Surface modification of the titanium implant using TEA CO 2 laser pulses in controllable gas atmospheres-Comparative study. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;258(7):2741-2748.
100. Lorenzetti M, Biglino D, Novak S, Kobe S. Photoinduced properties of nanocrystalline TiO2-anatase coating on Ti-based bone implants. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;37(0):390-398.
101. Lin L, Wang H, Ni M, et al. Enhanced osteointegration of medical titanium implant with surface modifications in micro/nanoscale structures. J Orthop Translat. 2014;2(1):35-42.
102. Li L-H, Kong Y-M, Kim H-W, et al. Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation. Biomaterials. 2004;25(14):2867-2875.
103. Ordikhani F, Tamjid E, Simchi A. Characterization and antibacterial performance of electrodeposited chitosan-vancomycin composite coatings for prevention of implant-associated infections. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;41(0):240-248.
104. Rosales-Leal JI, Rodríguez-Valverde MA, Mazzaglia G, et al. Effect of roughness, wettability and morphology of engineered titanium surfaces on osteoblast-like cell adhesion. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2010;365(1-3):222-229.
105. Wu S, Liu X, Yeung KW, et al. Surface nano-architectures and their effects on the mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of Ti-based orthopedic implants. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;233:13-26.
106. Prodana M, Duta M, Ionita D, et al. A new complex ceramic coating with carbon nanotubes, hydroxyapatite and TiO2 nanotubes on Ti surface for biomedical applications. Ceram Int. 2015;41(5, Part A):6318-6325.
107. Salou L, Hoornaert A, Louarn G, Layrolle P. Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces: an experimental study in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2015;11(0):494-502.
108. Prodanov L, Lamers E, Domanski M, Luttge R, Jansen JA, Walboomers XF. The effect of nanometric surface texture on bone contact to titanium implants in rabbit tibia. Biomaterials. 2013;34(12):2920-2927.
109. Safonov V, Zykova A, Smolik J, Rogowska R, Lukyanchenko V, Kolesnikov D. Modification of implant material surface properties by means of oxide nano-structured coatings deposition. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;310(0):174-179.
110. Park SW, Lee D, Lee HR, et al. Generation of functionalized polymer nanolayer on implant surface via initiated chemical vapor deposition (iCVD). J Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;439(0):34-41.
111. Ordikhani F, Simchi A. Long-term antibiotic delivery by chitosan-based composite coatings with bone regenerative potential. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;317(0):56-66.
112. Ahmed RA, Fekry AM, Farghali RA. A study of calcium carbonate/multiwalled-carbon nanotubes/chitosan composite coatings on Ti-6Al-4V alloy for orthopedic implants. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;285, Part B(0):309-316.
113. Ordikhani F, Ramezani Farani M, Dehghani M, Tamjid E, Simchi A. Physicochemical and biological properties of electrodeposited graphene oxide/chitosan films with drug-eluting capacity. Carbon. 2015;84(0):91-102.
114. Nguyen HQ, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Valiquette N, Yakubovich R. The effect of sol-gel-formed calcium phosphate coatings on bone ingrowth and osteoconductivity of porous-surfaced Ti alloy implants. Biomaterials. 2004;25(5):865-876.
115. Shim IK, Chung HJ, Jung MR, et al. Biofunctional porous anodized titanium implants for enhanced bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(10):3639-3648.
116. Ordikhani F, Tamjid E, Simchi A. Characterization and antibacterial performance of electrodeposited chitosan-vancomycin composite coatings for prevention of implant associated infections. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014(41):240-248.
117. Radin S, Ducheyne P. Controlled release of vancomycin from thin sol-gel films on titanium alloy fracture plate material. Biomaterials. 2007;28(9):1721-1729.
118. Mattioli-Belmonte M, Cometa S, Ferretti C, et al. Characterization and cytocompatibility of an antibiotic/chitosan/cyclodextrins nanocoating on titanium implants. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;110(0):173-182.
119. Chennell P, Feschet-Chassot E, Devers T, Awitor KO, Descamps S, Sautou V. In vitro evaluation of TiO2 nanotubes as cefuroxime carriers on orthopaedic implants for the prevention of periprosthetic joint infections. Int J Pharm. 2013;455(1-2):298-305.
120. Yun YH, Eteshola E, Bhattacharya A, et al. Tiny medicine: nanomaterial-based biosensors. Sensors (Basel). 2009;9(11):9275-9299.
121. Yang L, Webster T. Monitoring tissue healing through nanosensors. In: Webster TJ, editor. Nanotechnology Enabled In Situ Sensors for Monitoring Health. New York: Springer; 2011:41-59.
122. Lin Y, Taylor S, Li H, et al. Advances toward bioapplications of carbon nanotubes. J Mater Chem. 2004;14(4):527-541.
123. Supronowicz PR, Ajayan PM, Ullmann KR, Arulanandam BP, Metzger DW, Bizios R. Novel current-conducting composite substrates for exposing osteoblasts to alternating current stimulation. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59(3):499-506.
124. Sirinrath S, Thomas JW. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes enhance electrochemical properties of titanium to determine in situ bone formation. Nanotechnology. 2008;19(29):295101.
125. Yun Y, Bange A, Heineman WR, et al. A nanotube array immunosensor for direct electrochemical detection of antigen-antibody binding. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2007;123(1):177-182.
126. Jiang L, Gao L. Fabrication and characterization of carbon nanotube-titanium nitride composites with enhanced electrical and electrochemical properties. J Am Ceram Soc. 2006;89(1):156-161.
127. Bull E, Madani SY, Sheth R, Seifalian A, Green M, Seifalian AM. Stem cell tracking using iron oxide nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:1641-1653.
128. Wimpenny I, Markides H, El Haj AJ. Orthopaedic applications of nanoparticle-based stem cell therapies. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012;3(2):13.
129. Hsieh MF, Li JK, Lin CA, et al. Tracking of cellular uptake of hydrophilic CdSe/ZnS quantum dots/hydroxyapatite composites nanoparticles in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2009;9(4):2758-2762.
130. Xi D, Dong S, Meng X, Lu Q, Meng L, Ye J. Gold nanoparticles as computerized tomography (CT) contrast agents. RSC Adv. 2012;2(33):12515-12524.
131. Popovtzer R, Agrawal A, Kotov NA, et al. Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer. Nano Lett. 2008;8(12):4593-4596.
132. Ahn S, Jung S, Lee S. Gold nanoparticle contrast agents in advanced X-ray imaging technologies. Molecules. 2013;18(5):5858-5890.
133. Ganesh N, Ashokan A, Rajeshkannan R, Chennazhi K, Koyakutty M, Nair SV. Magnetic resonance functional nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated poly(caprolactone) composite scaffolds for in situ monitoring of bone tissue regeneration by MRI. Tissue Eng A. 2014;20(19-20):2783-2794.
134. Potapova I. Functional imaging in diagnostic of orthopedic implant-associated infections. Diagnostics. 2013;3(4):356.
135. Ruther C, Lohrengel A, Kluess D, et al. Current Possibilities for Detection of Loosening of Total Hip Replacements and How Intelligent Implants Could Improve Diagnostic Accuracy. Rijeka, Croatia: INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2012.
136. Gou P, Kraut ND, Feigel IM, et al. Carbon nanotube chemiresistor for wireless pH sensing. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4468.
137. Kansara M, Thomas DM. Molecular pathogenesis of osteosarcoma. DNA Cell Biol. 2007;26(1):1-18.
138. Suva LJ, Washam C, Nicholas RW, Griffin RJ. Bone metastasis: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7(4):208-218.
139. Mohamed M, Borchard G, Jordan O. In situ forming implants for local chemotherapy and hyperthermia of bone tumors. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2012;22:393-408.
140. Li B, Jia D, Zhou Y, Hu Q, Cai W. In situ hybridization to chitosan/magnetite nanocomposite induced by the magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater. 2006;306(2):223-227.
141. Hu Q, Chen F, Li B, Shen J. Preparation of three-dimensional nano-magnetite/chitosan rod. Mater Lett. 2006;60(3):368-370.
142. Murakami S, Hosono T, Jeyadevan B, Kamitakahara M, Ioku K. Hydrothermal synthesis of magnetite/hydroxyapatite composite material for hyperthermia therapy for bone cancer. J Ceram Soc Jpn. 2008;116(1357):950-954.
143. Thomas K, Sayre P. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part I: evaluating the human health implications of exposure to nanoscale materials. Toxicol Sci. 2005;87(2):316-321.
144. Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(7):823-839.
145. Majestic BJ, Erdakos GB, Lewandowski M, et al. A review of selected engineered nanoparticles in the atmosphere: sources, transformations, and techniques for sampling and analysis. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2010;16(4):488-507.
146. Madl AK, Kovochich M, Liong M, Finley BL, Paustenbach DJ, Oberdörster G. Toxicology of wear particles of cobalt-chromium alloy metal-on-metal hip implants Part II: Importance of physicochemical properties and dose in animal and in vitro studies as a basis for risk assessment. Nanomedicine. 2015;11(5):1285-1298.
147. Webster TJ, Ahn ES. Nanostructured biomaterials for tissue engineering bone. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007;103:275-308.
148. Cheng L-C, Jiang X, Wang J, Chen C, Liu R-S. Nano-bio effects: interaction of nanomaterials with cells. Nanoscale. 2013;5(9):3547-3569.
149. Li X, Wang L, Fan Y, Feng Q, Cui F-Z. Biocompatibility and toxicity of nanoparticles and nanotubes. J Nanomater. 2012;2012:19.
150. Bakand S, Hayes A, Dechsakulthorn F. Nanoparticles: a review of particle toxicology following inhalation exposure. Inhal Toxicol. 2012;24(2):125-135.
151. Fan AM, Alexeeff G. Nanotechnology and nanomaterials: toxicology, risk assessment, and regulations. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2010;10(12):8646-8657.
152. Fischer HC, Chan WC. Nanotoxicity: the growing need for in vivo study. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18(6):565-571.
153. Webster TJ. Nanomedicine: real commercial potential or just hype? Int J Nanomedicine. 2006;1(4):373-374.
154. Morigi V, Tocchio A, Bellavite Pellegrini C, Sakamoto JH, Arnone M, Tasciotti E. Nanotechnology in medicine: from inception to market domination. J Drug Deliv. 2012;2012:7.