In vitro and in vivo studies of surface-structured implants for bone formation

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 7, Issue , 2012, Pages 4873-4881

  Xia, Lu ^a,b   Feng, Bo ^a   Wang, Peizhi ^b   Ding, Siyang ^b   Liu, Zhiyuan ^a   Zhou, Jie ^a   Yu, Rong ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Microstructure; Nanostructure; Osteoblast; Osteointegration; Titanium

Indexed keywords

NANOTUBE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE STRENGTH; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MATURATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; RABBIT; WESTERN BLOTTING;

CELL LINE; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NANOTUBES; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; PARTICLE SIZE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84870320878     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S29496     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Satomi K, Alagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Bone-implant interface structures after nontapping and tapping insertion of screw-type titanium alloy endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:339-342.
2. Schmidt C, Kaspar D, Sarkar MR, Claes LE, Ignatius AA. A scanning electron microscopy study of human osteoblast morphology on five orthopedic metals. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:252-261.
3. Vlacic-Zischke J, Hamlet SM, Friis T, Tonetti MS, Ivanovski S. The influence of surface microroughness and hydrophilicity of titanium on the up-regulation of TGFβ/BMP signalling in osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 2011;32:665-671.
4. Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, Danelli S. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:11-19.
5. Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: Three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials. 2006;27: 5892-5900.
6. Wu C, Ramaswamy Y, Liu X, Wang G, Zreiqat H. Plasma-sprayed CaTiSiO5 ceramic coating on Ti-6Al-4V with excellent bonding strength, stability and cellular bioactivity. J R Soc Interface. 2009;6:159-168.
7. Liu X, Morra M, Carpi A, Li B. Bioactive calcium silicate ceramics and coatings. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008;62:526-529.
8. Liu DL, Feng B, Lu X, Chen JM. Titanium oxide nanotubes with large diameters fabricated by two-step anodic oxidation. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering. 2010;39:325-328.
9. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, etal. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:2130-2135.
10. Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Simões LG, etal. The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specific gene expression. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4053-4062.
11. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Loison I, Noël B, Hardouin P. Kinetic study of the expression of β-catenin, actin and vinculin during osteoblastic adhesion on grooved titanium substrates. Biomed Mater Eng. 2004;14:545-556.
12. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4731-4739.
13. Balaur E, Macak JM, Taveira L, Schmuki P. Tailoring the wettability of TiO2 nanotube layers. Electrochem Commun. 2005;7:1066-1070.
14. Balaur E, Macak JM, Tsuchiya H, Schmuki P. Wetting behaviour of layers of TiO2 nanotubes with different diameters. J Mater Chem. 2005;15:4488-4491.
15. Redey SA, Nardin M, Bernache-Assolant D, etal. Behavior of human osteoblastic cells on stoichiometric hydroxyapatite and type A carbonate apatite: role of surface energy. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;50:353-364.
16. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, etal. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;74:49-58.
17. Feng B, Weng J, Yang BC, Qu SX, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4663-4670.
18. Kim HW, Knowles JC, Salih V, Kim HE. Hydroxyapatite and fluor-hydroxyapatite layered film on titanium processed by a sol-gel route for hard-tissue implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;71:66-76.
19. Oh S, Daraio C, Chen LH, Pisanic TR, Fiñones RR, Jin S. Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;78:97-103.
20. Lohmann CH, Bonewald LF, Sisk MA, etal. Maturation state determines the response of osteogenic cells to surface roughness and 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:1169-1180.
21. Boyan BD, Lossdörfer S, Wang L, etal. Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies. Eur Cell Mater. 2003;6:22-27.
22. Gleiche M, Chi LF, Fuchs H. Nanoscopic channel lattices with controlled anisotropic wetting. Nature. 2000;403:173-175.
23. Lenhert S, Meier MB, Meyer U, Chi L, Wiesmann HP. Osteoblast alignment, elongation and migration on grooved polystyrene surfaces patterned by Langmuir-Blodgett lithography. Biomaterials. 2005;26:563-570.
24. Gao L, Feng B, Wang J, etal. Micro/nanostructural porous surface on titanium and bioactivity. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;89B:335-341.
25. Mustafa K, Wennerberg A, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, Lopez BS, Arvidson K. Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO2 blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:515-525.
26. Mustafa K, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, Lopez BS, Arvidson K. Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with TiO2 particles on the initial attachment of cells derived from human mandibular bone. A scanning electron microscopic and histomorphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:116-128.
27. Gori F, Hofbauer LC, Dunstan CR, Spelsberg TC, Khosla S, Riggs BL. The expression of osteoprotegerin and RANK ligand and the support of osteoclast formation by stromal-osteoblast lineage cells is developmentally regulated. Endocrinology. 2000;141:4768-4776.
28. Leach JK, Kaigler D, Wang Z, Krebsbach PH, Mooney DJ. Coating of VEGF-releasing scaffolds with bioactive glass for angiogenesis and bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3249-3255.
29. Johansson CB, Han CH, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:315-321.
30. Rüger M, Gensior TJ, Herren C, etal. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2852-2861.
31. Castellani C, Lindtner RA, Hausbrandt P, etal. Bone-implant interface strength and osseointegration: Biodegradable magnesium alloy versus standard titanium control. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:432-440.
32. Natali AN, Carniel EL, Pavan PG. Investigation of viscoelastoplastic response of bone tissue in oral implants press fit process. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;91:868-875.
33. Degidi M, Iezzi G, Perrotti V, Piattelli A. Comparative analysis of immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods: a 5-year follow-up of 550 dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:257-266.