The effect of nanometric surface texture on bone contact to titanium implants in rabbit tibia

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 2920-2927

  Prodanov, Ljupcho ^a   Lamers, Edwin ^a   Domanski, Maciej ^b   Luttge, Regina ^b   Jansen, John A ^a   Walboomers, X Frank ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Animal experiment; Cortical bone; Nano grooves; Surface roughness; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS; BIOMATERIAL SURFACES; BIOMECHANICAL TESTING; BONE CONTACTS; BONE-TO-IMPLANT CONTACT; CELLULAR RESPONSE; CORTICAL BONE; HISTOLOGICAL EVALUATION; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; LASER INTERFERENCE LITHOGRAPHY; NANO-GROOVES; NANOMETRICS; RABBIT TIBIA; SILICON STAMP; SURFACE TEXTURES; TEXTURED SUBSTRATES; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; TRABECULAR BONES;

BIOMECHANICS; NANOIMPRINT LITHOGRAPHY; SURFACE REACTIONS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TISSUE; TITANIUM;

BONE;

SILICON; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DEFECT; BONE PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA;

ANIMALS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 84873465845     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.027     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hwang D., Wang H.L. Medical contraindications to implant therapy: part II: relative contraindications. Implant Dent 2007, 16(1):13-23.
2. Ulrich S.D., Seyler T.M., Bennett D., Delanois R.E., Saleh K.J., Thongtrangan I., et al. Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision?. International Orthopaedics 2008, 32(5):597-604.
3. Michiardi A., Aparicio C., Ratner B.D., Planell J.A., Gil J. The influence of surface energy on competitive protein adsorption on oxidized NiTi surfaces. Biomaterials 2007, 28(4):586-594.
4. Ucar Y., Brantley W.A., Johnston W.M., Iijima M., Han D.S., Dasgupta T. Microstructure, elemental composition, hardness and crystal structure study of the interface between a noble implant component and cast noble alloys. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2011, 106(3):170-178.
5. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nature Materials 2007, 6(12):997-1003.
6. Lamers E., Walboomers X.F., Domanski M., Te Riet J., van Delft F.C., Luttge R., et al. The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix deposition. Biomaterials 2010, 31(12):3307-3316.
7. Buser D., Schenk R.K., Steinemann S., Fiorellini J.P., Fox C.H., Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1991, 25(7):889-902.
8. Sato N., Kubo K., Yamada M., Hori N., Suzuki T., Maeda H., et al. Osteoblast mechanoresponses on Ti with different surface topographies. Journal of Dental Research 2009, 88(9):812-816.
9. Zhao G., Raines A.L., Wieland M., Schwartz Z., Boyan B.D. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 2007, 28(18):2821-2829.
10. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T., Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1996, 11(1):38-45.
11. Kieswetter K., Schwartz Z., Dean D.D., Boyan B.D. The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine 1996, 7(4):329-345.
12. Weiner S., Wagner H.D. The material bone: structure mechanical function relations. Annual Review of Materials Science 1998, 28:271-298.
13. Ferreira AM, Gentile P, Chiono V, Ciardelli G. Collagen for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia;8(9):3191-200.
14. Dalby M.J., McCloy D., Robertson M., Agheli H., Sutherland D., Affrossman S., et al. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials 2006, 27(15):2980-2987.
15. Lamers E., van Horssen R., te Riet J., van Delft F.C., Luttge R., Walboomers X.F., et al. The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. European Cells & Materials 2010, 20:329-343.
16. Lamers E., Walboomers X.F., Domanski M., Prodanov L., Melis J., Luttge R., et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the inflammatory response to nanoscale grooved substrates. Nanomedicine 2012, 8(3):308-317.
17. Luttge R. Massively parallel fabrication of repetitive nanostructures: nanolithography for nanoarrays. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics 2009, 42(12):18.
18. Domanski M., Luttge R., Lamers E., Walboomers X.F., Winnubst L., Jansen J.A., et al. Submicron-patterning of bulk titanium by nanoimprint lithography and reactive ion etching. Nanotechnology 2012, 23(6):065306.
19. Ronold H.J., Ellingsen J.E. The use of a coin shaped implant for direct in situ measurement of attachment strength for osseointegrating biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials 2002, 23(10):2201-2209.
20. Dalby M.J., McCloy D., Robertson M., Wilkinson C.D., Oreffo R.O. Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. Biomaterials 2006, 27(8):1306-1315.
21. Duyck J., Naert I.E., Van Oosterwyck H., Van der Sloten J., De Cooman M., Lievens S., et al. Biomechanics of oral implants: a review of the literature. Technology and Health Care 1997, 5(4):253-273.
22. Prodanov L., te Riet J., Lamers E., Domanski M., Luttge R., van Loon J.J., et al. The interaction between nanoscale surface features and mechanical loading and its effect on osteoblast-like cells behavior. Biomaterials 2011, 31(30):7758-7765.
23. Shalabi M.M., Gortemaker A., Van't Hof M.A., Jansen J.A., Creugers N.H. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. Journal of Dental Research 2006, 85(6):496-500.
24. Goto T., Yoshinari M., Kobayashi S., Tanaka T. The initial attachment and subsequent behavior of osteoblastic cells and oral epithelial cells on titanium. Bio-medical Materials and Engineering 2004, 14(4):537-544.
25. Juliano R.L., Reddig P., Alahari S., Edin M., Howe A., Aplin A. Integrin regulation of cell signalling and motility. Biochemical Society Transactions 2004, 32(3):443-446.
26. Wojciak-Stothard B., Curtis A., Monaghan W., MacDonald K., Wilkinson C. Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. Experimental Cell Research 1996, March 15, 223(2):426-435.
27. Bahat O., Sullivan R.M. Parameters for successful implant integration revisited part I: immediate loading considered in light of the original prerequisites for osseointegration. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2010, 12(Suppl. 1):e2-12.
28. 2 blasting-tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants. Biomaterials 2002, 23(21):4211-4219.
29. Reigstad O., Johansson C., Stenport V., Wennerberg A., Reigstad A., Rokkum M. Different patterns of bone fixation with hydroxyapatite and resorbable CaP coatings in the rabbit tibia at 6, 12, and 52 weeks. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 2011, 99(1):14-20.
30. 2 blasting - tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants. Biomaterials 2002, 23(21):4211-4219.
31. Palmquist A., Johansson A., Suska F., Branemark R., Thomsen P. Acute inflammatory response to laser-induced micro- and nano-sized titanium surface features. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2011, [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00361.x.