Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 11-22

  Christenson, Elizabeth M ^a   Anseth, Kristi S ^b   Van den Beucken, Jeroen J J P ^c   Chan, Casey K ^d   Ercan, Batur ^e   Jansen, John A ^c   Laurencin, Cato T ^f,g   Li, Wan Ju ^h   Murugan, Ramalingam ^d   Nair, Lakshmi S ^f   Ramakrishna, Seeram ^d   Tuan, Rocky S ^h   Webster, Thomas J ^e   Mikos, Antonios G ^a  

^a Rice University   (United States)

^b UCB 450   (United States)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^e BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^g University of Virginia   (United States)

^h NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomaterials; Nanocomposites; Nanofibers; Orthopedic; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CARBON NANOTUBE; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOCOATING; NANOCOMPOSITE; NANOFIBER; NANOMATERIAL; TANTALUM;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMIMETICS; BONE DEFECT; BONE GRAFT; BONE GROWTH; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOPEDICS; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; ORTHOPEDICS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33846076037     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20305     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Langer R, Vacanti JP. 1993. Tissue engineering. Science 260:920-926.
2. Burdick JA, Anseth KS. 2002. Photoencapsulation of osteoblasts in injectable RGD-modified PEG hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 23:4315-4323.
3. Murugan R, Ramakrishna S. 2005. Development of nanocomposites for bone grafting. Comp Sci Tech 65: 2385-2406.
4. Kaplan FS, Hayes WC, Keaveny TM, et al. 1994. Bone biology. In: Simon SR, editor. Orthopedic basic science. Columbus, OH: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, p 127-185.
5. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, et al. 2000. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 21:1803-1810.
6. Li WJ, Jiang YJ, Tuan RS. 2006. Chondrocytes phenotype in engineered fibrous matrix is regulated by fiber size. Tissue Eng 12:1775-1785.
7. Benoit DSW, Anseth KS. 2005. The effect on osteoblast function of colocalized RGD and PHSRN epitopes on PEG surfaces. Biomaterials 26:5209-5220.
8. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, et al. 2005. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. Tissue Eng 11:1-18.
9. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, et al. 2001. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 7:291-301.
10. Yao C, Perla V, McKenzie J, et al. 2005. Anodized Ti and Ti6A14V possessing nanometer surface features enhance osteoblast adhesion. J Biomed Nanotechnol 1:68-77.
11. Ducheyne P, Bianco P, Radin S, et al. 1992. Bioactive materials: mechanisms and bioengineering considerations. In: Ducheyne P, Kokubo T, VanBlitterswijk CA, editors. Bone-bonding biomaterials. Liederdorp, the Netherlands: Reed Healthcare Communications, p 1-112.
12. Sato M, An YH, Slamovich EB, et al. 2006. Increased osseointegration for tantalum scaffolds coated with nanophase compared to conventional hydroxyapatite. Int J Nanomed (in press).
13. Dalton JE, Cook SD. 1995. In vivo mechanical and histological characteristics of HA-coated implants vary with coating vendor. J Biomed Mater Res 29:239-245.
14. Barrere F, VanDerValk CM, Dalmeijer RA, et al. 2003. In vitro and in vivo degradation of biomimetic octacalcium phosphate and carbonate apatite coatings on titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 64A:378-387.
15. Barrere F, Layrolle P, VanBlitterswijk CA, et al. 2001. Biomimetic coatings on titanium: a crystal growth study of octacalcium phosphate. J Mater Sci Mater Med 12:529-534.
16. Liu Y, Hunziker EB, Layrolle P, et al. 2004. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 incorporated into biomimetic coatings retains its biological activity. Tissue Eng 10: 101-108.
17. Stigter M, Bezemer J, DeGroot K, et al. 2004. Incorporation of different antibiotics into carbonated hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium implants, release and antibiotic efficacy. J Control Release 99:127-137.
18. Wolke JG, VanDijk K, Schaeken HG, et al. 1994. Study of the surface characteristics of magnetron-sputter calcium phosphate coatings. J Biomed Mater Res 28: 1477-1484.
19. Feddes B, Wolke JG, Vredenberg AM, et al. 2004. Initial deposition of calcium phosphate ceramic on polyethylene and polydimethylsiloxane by rf magnetron sputtering deposition: the interface chemistry. Biomaterials 24:633-639.
20. Feddes B, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. 2003. Initial deposition of calcium phosphate ceramic on polystyrene and polytetra-flouroethylene by rf magnetron sputtering deposition. J Vac Sci Technol A 21:363-368.
21. Leeuwenburgh S, Wolke J, Schoonman J, et al. 2003. Electrostatic spray deposition (ESD) of calcium phosphate coatings. J Biomed Mater Res 66A:330-334.
22. Huang J, Jayasinghe SN, Best SM, et al. 2005. Novel deposition of nano-sized silicon substituted hydroxyapatite by electrostatic spraying. J Biomed Mater Res 16:1137-1142.
23. Huang J, Best SM, Bonfield W, et al. 2004. In vitro assessment of the biological response to nano-sized hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15:441-445.
24. Decher G. 1997. Fuzzy nanoassemblies: toward layered polymeric multicomposites. Science 277:1232-1237.
25. Decher G, Hong JD, Schmitt J. 1992. Buildup of ultrathin multilayer films by a self-assembly process: III. Consecutively alternating adsorption of anionic and cationic polyelectrolytes on charges surfaces. Thin Solid Films 210: 831-835.
26. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. 1999. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 20:1221-1227.
27. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, et al. 2001. Enhanced functions of osteoblast-like cells on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 22:1327-1333.
28. Price RL, Gutwein LG, Kaledin L, et al. 2003. Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: influence of chemistry, phase and topography. J Biomed Mater Res 67A:1284-1293.
29. Perla V, Webster TJ. 2005. Better osteoblast adhesion on nanoparticulate selenium - a promising orthopedic implant material. J Biomed Mater Res 75:356-364.
30. Popat KC, LearySwan EE, Mukhatyar V, et al. 2005. Influence of nanoporous alumina membranes on long-term osteoblast response. Biomaterials 26:4516-4522.
31. Palin E, Liu H, Webster TJ. 2005. Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation. Nanotechnology 16:1828-1835.
32. Kikuchi M, Itoh S, Ichinose S, et al. 2001. Self-organization mechanism in a bone-like hydroxyapatite/collagen nanocomposite synthesized in vitro and its biological reaction in vivo. Biomaterials 22:1705-1711.
33. Liao SS, Cui FZ, Zhu XD. 2004. Osteoblasts adherence and migration through three-dimensional porous mineralized collagen based composite: nHAC/PLA. J Bioact Compat Polym 19:117-130.
34. Liu H, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. 2005. Increased osteoblast functions on nanophase titania dispersed in poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid composites. Nanotechnology 16: S601-S608.
35. Smith TA, Webster TJ. 2005. Increased osteoblast function on PLGA composites containing nanophase titania. J Biomed Mater Res 74A:677-686.
36. Elias KL, Price RL, Webster TJ. 2002. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on carbon nanofiber compacts. Biomaterials 23:3279-3287.
37. Price RL, Webster TJ. 2004. Increased osteoblast viability in the presence of smaller nano-dimensioned carbon fibers. Nanotechnology 15:892-900.
38. Price RL, Waid MC, Haberstroh KM, et al. 2003. Select bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. Biomaterials 24:1877-1887.
39. Khang D, Webster TJ. 2006. Selective adhesion and mineral deposition by osteoblasts on carbon nanofiber patterns. Int J Nanomed 1:65-72.
40. Mistry AS, Mikos AG, Jansen JA. 2006. In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo biocompatibility of a poly(propylene-fumarate)-based/alumoxane nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res (in press).
41. Horch RA, Shahid N, Mistry AS, et al. 2004. Nanoreinforcement of poly(propylene fumarate)-based networks with surface modified alumoxane nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 5:1990-1998.
42. Shi X, Hudson JL, Spicer PP, et al. 2005. Rheological behavior and mechanical characterization of injectable poly(propylene fumarate)/ single-walled carbon nanotube composites for bone tissue engineering. Nanotechnology 16:S531-S538.
43. Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, et al. 2002. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 60:613-621.
44. Li WJ, Tuli R, Huang X, et al. 2005. Multilineage differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold. Biomaterials 26: 5158-5166.
45. Shin M, Yoshimoto H, Vacanti JP. 2004. In vivo bone tissue engineering using mesenchymal stem cells on a novel electrospun nanofibrous scaffold. Tissue Eng 10: 33-41.
46. Smith LA, Ma PX. 2004. Nano-fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Coll Surf B Biointerf 39:125-131.
47. Whitesides GM, Boncheva M. 2002. Beyond molecules: self-assembly of mesoscopic and macroscopic components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:4769-4774.
48. Bhattarai N, Edmondson D, Veiseh O, et al. 2005. Electrospun chitosan-based nanofibers and their cellular compatibility. Biomaterials 26:6176-6184.
49. Lee CH, Shin HJ, Cho IH, et al. 2005. Nanofiber alignment and direction of mechanical strain affect the ECM production of human ACL fibroblast. Biomaterials 26:1261-1270.
50. Riboldi SA, Sampaolesi M, Neuenschwander P, et al. 2005. Electrospun degradable polyesterurethane membranes: potential scaffolds for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26:4606-4615.
51. Li WJ, Mauck RL, Tuan RS. 2005. Electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds: production, characterization, and applications for tissue engineering and drug delivery. J Biomed Nanotechnol 1:259-275.
52. Li WJ, Cooper JA, Mauck RL, et al. 2006. Fabrication and characterization of six electrospun poly(alpha-hydroxy ester) based fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 2:377-385.
53. Nair LS, Bhattacharyya S, Bender JD, et al. 2004. Fabrication and optimization of methylphenoxy substituted polyphosphazene nanofibers for biomedical application. Biomacromolecules 5:2212-2220.
54. Laurencin CT, Nair LS. 2004. Polyphosphazene nanofibers for biomedical applications: preliminary studies. Nanoengineered nanofibrous materials, NATO-ASI Proceedings. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer; p 281-300.
55. Bhattacharyya S, Lakshmi S, Bender JD, et al. 2003. Preparation of poly[bis(carbonylato phenoxy)phosphazenel non-woven nanofiber mats by electrospinning. MRS Fall Meeting Proceedings F8:10.
56. Bhattacharyya S, Lakshmi S, Nair LS, et al. 2005. Development of biodegradable polyphosphazene-nanohydroxyapatite composite nanofibers via electrospinning. MRS Symposium Proceedings 845:91-96.
57. Li WJ, Danielson KG, Alexander PG, et al. 2003. Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nanofibrous poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 67A:1105-1114.
58. Li WJ, Tuli R, Okafor C, et al. 2005. A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 26:599-609.
59. Song L, Baksh D, Tuan RS. 2004. Mesenchymal stem cell-based cartilage tissue engineering: cells, scaffold and biology. Cytotherapy 6:596-601.
60. Tuli R, Li WJ, Tuan RS. 2003. Current state of cartilage tissue engineering. Arthritis Res Ther 5:235-238.
61. Sahoo S, Ouyang H, Goh J, et al. 2006. Characterization of a novel polymeric scaffold for potential application in tendon/ligament tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 12:91-99.
62. Savaiano JK, Webster TJ. 2004. Altered responses of chondrocytes to nanophase PLGA/nanophase titania composites. Biomaterials 25:1205-1213.
63. Kay S, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, et al. 2002. Nanostructured polymer: nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. Tissue Eng 8:753-761.