High-strength silk protein scaffolds for bone repair

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 20, 2012, Pages 7699-7704

  Mandal, Biman B ^a,b   Grinberg, Ariela ^a,c   Gil, Eun Seok ^a   Panilaitis, Bruce ^a   Kaplan, David L ^a  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI   (India)

^c National Institute of Rehabilitation   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Composite scaffold; Microfibers; Osteogenesis; Regenerative medicine; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ALKALI; SCAFFOLD PROTEIN; SILK PROTEIN SCAFFOLD; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REMODELING; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIBER; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HYDROLYSIS; IMMUNOMODULATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICROTECHNOLOGY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RIGIDITY; SILK; SILKWORM; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; BOMBYX; BONE REGENERATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FEMALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SILK; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84861203750     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1119474109     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Drosse I (2008) Tissue engineering for bone defect healing: An update on a multicomponent approach. Injury 39(Suppl 2):S9-S20.
2. Langer R, Vacanti JP (1993) Tissue engineering. Science 260:920-926. (Pubitemid 23209960)
3. Marquis ME, et al. (2009) Bone cells biomaterials interactions. Front Biosci 14:1023-1067.
4. Khan Y, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG, Laurencin CT (2008) Tissue engineering of bone: Material and matrix considerations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:36-42. (Pubitemid 351329119)
5. Dawson JI, et al. (2008) Development of specific collagen scaffolds to support the osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 29:3105-3116.
6. Oliveira JM, et al. (2006) Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue engineering applications: Scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 27:6123-6137. (Pubitemid 44429972)
7. Le Nihouannen D, et al. (2006) Micro-architecture of calcium phosphate granules and fibrin glue composites for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:2716-2722. (Pubitemid 43122075)
8. Ochi K, et al. (2003) Use of isolated mature osteoblasts in abundance acts as desired-shaped bone regeneration in combination with a modified poly-DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-collagen sponge. J Cell Physiol 194:45-53. (Pubitemid 35424226)
9. Zhang K, Ma Y, Francis LF (2002) Porous polymer/bioactive glass composites for soft to hard tissue interfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 61:551-563. (Pubitemid 34721499)
10. Hutmacher DW, et al. (2001) Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res 55:203-216. (Pubitemid 32198503)
11. Thein-Han WW, Shah J, Misra RD (2009) Superior in vitro biological response and mechanical properties of an implantable nanostructured biomaterial: Nano hydroxyapatite- silicone rubber composite. Acta Biomater 5:2668-2679.
12. Wei GB, Ma PX (2004) Structure and properties of nano-hydroxyapatite/ polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 25:4749-4757.
13. Zhang Y, Wu C, Friis T, Xiao Y (2010) The osteogenic properties of CaP/silk composite scaffolds. Biomaterials 31:2848-2856.
14. Gil ES, et al. (2011) Mechanical improvements to reinforced porous silk scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 99:16-28.
15. Rockwood DN, et al. (2011) Ingrowth of human mesenchymal stem cells into porous silk particle reinforced silk composite scaffolds: An in vitro study. Acta Biomater 7:144-151.
16. Rajkhowa R, et al. (2010) Reinforced silk scaffolds with silk particles. Macromol Biosci 10:599-611.
17. Mandal BB, Kundu SC (2009) Non-mulberry silk gland fibroin 3D scaffold for enhanced differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into osteocytes. Acta Biomater 5:2579-2590.
18. Mandal BB, Kundu SC (2009) Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow cells on mulberry and non-mulberry silk gland fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 30:5019-5030.
19. Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL (2004) Bone tissue engineering: State of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci 4:743-765. (Pubitemid 39257140)
20. Zhou YF, et al. (2007) Combined marrow stromal cell-sheet techniques and high strength biodegradable composite scaffolds for engineered functional bone grafts. Biomaterials 28:814-824.
21. Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL (2010) New opportunities for an ancient material. Science 329:528-531.
22. Wang Y, Kim HJ, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL (2006) Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. Biomaterials 27:6064-6082. (Pubitemid 44437574)
23. Altman GH, et al. (2002) Silk matrix for tissue engineered anterior cruciate ligaments. Biomaterials 23:4131-4141. (Pubitemid 34765704)
24. Meinel L, et al. (2005) The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 26:147-155. (Pubitemid 38789097)
25. Dal Pra I, Freddi G, Minic J, Chiarini A, Armato U (2005) De novo engineering of reticular connective tissue in vivo by silk fibroin nonwoven materials. Biomaterials 26:1987-1999. (Pubitemid 39575341)
26. Wang Y, et al. (2008) In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials 29:3415-3428.
27. Kim HJ, et al. (2007) Bone regeneration on macroporous aqueous-derived silk 3-D scaffolds. Macromol Biosci 7:643-655. (Pubitemid 47264638)
28. Rajkhowa R, Wang L, Wang X (2008) Ultrafine silk powder preparation through rotary and ball milling. Powder Technol 185:87-95.
29. Rajkhowa R, Wang L, Kanwar J, Wang X (2009) Fabrication of ultrafine powder from eri silk through attritor and jet milling. Powder Technol 191:155-163.
30. Shao ZZ, Vollrath F (2002) The surprising strength of silkworm silk. Nature 418:741.
31. Coleman D, Howitt FO (1947) Studies on silk proteins. I. The properties and constitution of fibroin. The conversion of fibroin into a water-soluble form and its bearing on the phenomenon of denaturation. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 190:145-169.
32. Desai AV, Haque MA (2005) Mechanics of the interface for carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Thin-Walled Struct 43:1787-1803. (Pubitemid 41498051)
33. Kim HJ, Kim UJ, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Min BH, Kaplan DL (2005) Influence of macroporous protein scaffolds on bone tissue engineering from bone marrow stem cells. Biomaterials 26:4442-4452. (Pubitemid 40208605)
34. Hodgskinson R, Currey JD (1992) Young modulus, density and material properties in cancellous bone over a large density range. J Mater Sci Mater M 3:377-381.
35. Müller R, et al. (1998) Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: A quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone 23:59-66. (Pubitemid 28327502)
36. Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW (2001) Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: A review. Compos Sci Technol 61:1189-1224. (Pubitemid 32657276)
37. Lau KT, Gu C, Hui D (2006) A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Compos Part B Eng 37:425-436. (Pubitemid 43776119)
38. WangM (2003) Developing bioactive composite materials for tissue replacement. Biomaterials 24:2133-2151.
39. Nukavarapu SP, et al. (2008) Polyphosphazene/nano-hydroxyapatite composite microsphere scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 9:1818-1825.
40. Nazarov R, Jin HJ, Kaplan DL (2004) Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules 5:718-726. (Pubitemid 38702237)
41. Keten S, Xu Z, Ihle B, Buehler MJ (2010) Nanoconfinement controls stiffness, strength and mechanical toughness of β-sheet crystals in silk. Nat Mater 9:359-367.
42. Nova A, Keten S, Pugno NM, Redaelli A, Buehler MJ (2010) Molecular and nanostructural mechanism of deformation, strength and toughness of spider silk fibrils. Nano Lett 10:2626-2634.
43. Kane RJ, Roeder RK (2011) Effects of hydroxyapatite reinforcement on the architecture and mechanical properties of freeze-dried collagen scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.09.010.
44. Xu C, et al. (2011) Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic bioglass-collagen-phosphatidylserine composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32:1051-1058.
45. Li Z, Ramay HR, Hauch KD, Xiao D, Zhang M (2005) Chitosan-alginate hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26:3919-3928. (Pubitemid 40038783)
46. Kang Y, et al. (2011) Enhanced mechanical performance and biological evaluation of a PLGA coated β-TCP composite scaffold for load-bearing applications. Eur Polym J 47:1569-1577.
47. Wang Y, Dai J, Zhang Q, Xiao Y, Lang M (2010) Improved mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite/poly(caprolactone) scaffolds by surface modification of hydroxyapatite. Appl Surf Sci 256:6107-6112.
48. Mandal BB, Park SH, Gil ES, Kaplan DL (2011) Multilayered silk scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32:639-651.
49. Park SH, Gil ES, Kim HJ, Lee K, Kaplan DL (2010) Relationship between degradability of silk scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 31:6162-6172.
50. Mandal BB, Kundu SC (2009) Cell proliferation and migration in 3D silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials 30:2956-2965.
51. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310:1139-1143. (Pubitemid 41681732)
52. Balloni S, et al. (2009) Effects of titanium surface roughness on mesenchymal stem cell commitment and differentiation signaling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:627-635.
53. Hu X, et al. (2011) The influence of elasticity and surface roughness on myogenic and osteogenic-differentiation of cells on silk elastin biomaterials. Biomaterials 32:8979-8989.
54. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677-689. (Pubitemid 44233625)
55. Giachelli CM, Steitz S (2000) Osteopontin: A versatile regulator of inflammation and biomineralization. Matrix Biol 19:615-622.
56. Ganss B, Kim RH, Sodek J (1999) Bone sialo protein. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 10:79-98.
57. Santin M, Motta A, Freddi G, Cannas M (1999) In vitro evaluation of the inflammatory potential of the silk fibroin. J Biomed Mater Res 46:382-389. (Pubitemid 29293762)
58. Jutras I, Desjardins M (2005) Phagocytosis: At the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:511-527. (Pubitemid 41740644)