Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces: An experimental study in rabbits

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 494-502

  Salou, Laëtitia ^a,b   Hoornaert, Alain ^a   Louarn, Guy ^b   Layrolle, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b Biomedical Tissues   (France)

Author keywords

Bone to implant contact; Nanostructure; Osseointegration; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; METAL IMPLANTS; NANOSTRUCTURES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TITANIUM ALLOYS; TITANIUM OXIDES; YARN;

BONE TISSUE; BONE-TO-IMPLANT CONTACT; IMPLANT SURFACE; KEY FACTORS; MECHANICAL BIOCOMPATIBILITY; NANO-STRUCTURED; NANOSTRUCTURED SURFACE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROPERTIES OF TITANIA; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

NANOMATERIAL; NANOTUBE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; BONE PROSTHESIS; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE GROWTH; BONE IMPLANT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TISSUE; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; FEMUR EPIPHYSIS; HISTOLOGY; MACHINED TITANIUM ALLOY IMPLANT; NANOSTRUCTURED IMPLANT; NEW ZEALAND WHITE (RABBIT); NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STANDARD ALUMINA GRIT BLASTED AND ACID ETCHED IMPLANT; ANIMAL; BONE PROSTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMUR; FRICTION; MATERIALS TESTING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS; RABBIT; SURGERY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

ANIMALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; FRICTION; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RABBITS; TITANIUM;

EID: 84925082782     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Papaspyridakos P, Mokti M, Chen C-J, Benic GI, Gallucci GO, Chronopoulos V. Implant and prosthodontic survival rates with implant fixed complete dental prostheses in the edentulous mandible after at least 5 years: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12036.
2. Gokcen-Rohlig B, Yaltirik M, Ozer S, Tuncer ED, Evlioglu G. Survival and success of ITI implants and prostheses: retrospective study of cases with 5-year follow-up. Eur J Dent 2009;3:42-9.
3. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater Off Publ Acad Dent Mater 2007;23:844-54.
4. Stanford CM. Surface modifications of dental implants. Aust Dent J 2008;53(Suppl 1):S26-33.
5. Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(Suppl 4):185-206.
6. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-33.
7. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:78-86.
8. Rønold HJ, Ellingsen JE. Effect of micro-roughness produced by TiO2 blasting-tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants. Biomaterials 2002;23:4211-9.
9. Rønold HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE. A study on the effect of dual blasting with TiO2 on titanium implant surfaces on functional attachment in bone. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:524-30.
10. Schliephake H, Aref A, Scharnweber D, Bierbaum S, Sewing A. Effect of modifications of dual acid-etched implant surfaces on peri-implant bone formation. Part I: organic coatings. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:31-7.
11. Novaes Jr AB, de Souza SLS, de Barros RRM, Pereira KKY, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Influence of implant surfaces on osseointegration. Braz Dent J 2010;21:471-81.
12. Ross AP, Webster TJ. Anodizing color coded anodized Ti6Al4V medical devices for increasing bone cell functions. Int J Nanomed 2013;8:109-17.
13. Schwartz Z, Nasazky E, Boyan BD. Surface microtopography regulates osteointegration: the role of implant surface microtopography in osteointegration. Alpha Omegan 2005;98:9-19.
14. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(Suppl 4):172-84.
15. Lavenus S, Berreur M, Trichet V, Pilet P, Louarn G, Layrolle P. Adhesion and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on titanium nanopores. Eur Cell Mater 2011;22:84-96.
16. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YSJ, Teng D, Engler AJ, Chien S, et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009;106(7):2130-5.
17. Oh S, Daraio C, Chen L-H, Pisanic TR, Fiñones RR, Jin S. Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78A:97-103.
18. Sirivisoot S, Yao C, Xiao X, Sheldon BW, Webster TJ. Greater osteoblast functions on multiwalled carbon nanotubes grown from anodized nanotubular titanium for orthopedic applications. Nanotechnology 2007;18:365102.
19. Yao C, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;85(1):157-66.
20. Popat KC, Leoni L, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials 2007;28:3188-97.
21. Dalby MJ. Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. Med Eng Phys 2005;27:730-42.
22. Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 2007;7:1686-91.
23. Bacakova L, Filova E, Parizek M, Ruml T, Svorcik V. Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. Biotechnol Adv 2011;29:739-67.
24. Lavenus S, Trichet V, Le Chevalier S, Hoornaert A, Louarn G, Layrolle P. Cell differentiation and osseointegration influenced by nanoscale anodized titanium surfaces. Nanomed 2012;7:967-80.
25. Ercan B, Taylor E, Alpaslan E, Webster TJ. Diameter of titanium nanotubes influences anti-bacterial efficacy. Nanotechnology 2011;22:295102.
26. Ercan B, Kummer KM, Tarquinio KM, Webster TJ. Decreased Staphylococcus aureus biofilm growth on anodized nanotubular titanium and the effect of electrical stimulation. Acta Biomater 2011;7:3003-12.
27. 2nanotube dimensions on bacteria growth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101:677-88.
28. Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, Webster TJ. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials 2010;31:706-13.
29. Subramani K, Wismeijer D. Decontamination of titanium implant surface and re-osseointegration to treat peri-implantitis: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1043-54.
30. Wu Y, Zitelli JP, TenHuisen KS, Yu X, Libera MR. Differential response of Staphylococci and osteoblasts to varying titanium surface roughness. Biomaterials 2011;32:951-60.
31. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, Suzuki M, Silva NRF, Cardaropoli G, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:579-96.
32. Minagar S, Berndt CC, Wang J, Ivanova E, Wen C. A review of the application of anodization for the fabrication of nanotubes on metal implant surfaces. Acta Biomater 2012;8:2875-88.
33. Pérez-Jorge C, Conde A, Arenas MA, Pérez-Tanoira R, Matykina E, de Damborenea JJ, et al. In vitro assessment of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on TiO2 nanotubes on Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012;100A:1696-705.
34. Eisenbarth E, Velten D, Müller M, Thull R, Breme J. Biocompatibility of β-stabilizing elements of titanium alloys. Biomaterials 2004;25:5705-13.
35. Zhang J, Li M, Feng Z, Chen J, Li C. UV Raman spectroscopic study on TiO2. I. Phase transformation at the surface and in the bulk. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:927-35.
36. Koh J-W, Yang J-H, Han J-S, Lee J-B, Kim S-H. Biomechanical evaluation of dental implants with different surfaces: removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbits. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1:107-12.
37. Tsuchiya H, Macak JM, Ghicov A, Schmuki P. Self-organization of anodic nanotubes on two size scales. Small 2006;2:888-91.
38. Liu G, Wang K, Hoivik N, Jakobsen H. Progress on free-standing and flow-through TiO2 nanotube membranes. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2012;98:24-38.
39. Fan X, Feng B, Liu Z, Tan J, Zhi W, Lu X, et al. Fabrication of TiO2 nanotubes on porous titanium scaffold and biocompatibility evaluation in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012;100:3422-7.
40. Von Wilmowsky C, Bauer S, Roedl S, Neukam FW, Schmuki P, Schlegel KA. The diameter of anodic TiO2 nanotubes affects bone formation and correlates with the bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:359-66.
41. Wang N, Li H, Lü W, Li J, Wang J, Zhang Z, et al. Effects of TiO2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. Biomaterials 2011;32:6900-11.
42. Bjursten LM, Rasmusson L, Oh S, Smith GC, Brammer KS, Jin S. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;92:1218-24.
43. Sul Y-T. Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhanced in vivo bone response of TiO2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants. Int J Nanomed 2010;5:87-100.
44. Boyan BD, Dean DD, Lohmann CH, Cochran DL, Sylvia VL, Schwartz Z. The Titanium-bone cell interface in vitro: the role of the surface in promoting osteointegration. Titan. Med., Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2001; 561-85.
45. Lamolle SF, Monjo M, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, Haugen HJ. Titanium implant surface modification by cathodic reduction in hydrofluoric acid: surface characterization and in vivo performance. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;88A:581-8.
46. Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, Guo J, Abron A, Holmén A, et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006;27(6):926-36.
47. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard J-P, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-53.
48. Cochran DL, Jackson JM, Bernard J-P, ten Bruggenkate CM, Buser D, Taylor TD, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter study of early loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1324-32.
49. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
50. De Sanctis M, Vignoletti F, Discepoli N, Zucchelli G, Sanz M. Immediate implants at fresh extraction sockets: bone healing in four different implant systems. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:705-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01427.x.
51. Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CHF. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:616-26.
52. Durmus NG, Webster TJ. Nanostructured titanium: the ideal material for improving orthopedic implant efficacy? Nanomed 2012;7:791-3.
53. Ahn S-J, Han J-S, Lim B-S, Lim Y-J. Comparison of ultraviolet light-induced photocatalytic bactericidal effect on modified titanium implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:39-44.
54. Smith GC, Chamberlain L, Faxius L, Johnston GW, Jin S, Bjursten LM. Soft tissue response to titanium dioxide nanotube modified implants. Acta Biomater 2011;7:3209-15.