Making the difference: Integrating structural variation detection tools

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 852-864

  Lin, Ke ^a   Bonnema, Guusje ^a   Sanchez Perez, Gabino ^a   De Ridder, Dick ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Open source; Reproducible research; Virtual environments

Indexed keywords

GENOME; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; POPULATION GENETICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING;

EID: 84941749763     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbu047     Document Type: Article

References (121)

1. Trappe K, Emde AK, Ehrlich HC, et al. Gustaf: detecting and correctly classifying SVs in the NGS twilight zone. Bioinformatics 2014.
2. Maydan JS, Lorch A, Edgley ML, et al. Copy number variation in the genomes of twelve natural isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Genomics 2010;11:62.
3. Gazave E, Darre F, Morcillo-Suarez C, et al. Copy number variation analysis in the great apes reveals species-specific patterns of structural variation. Genome Res 2011;21:1626-39.
4. Lu P, Han X, Qi J, et al. Analysis of Arabidopsis genome-wide variations before and after meiosis and meiotic recombination by resequencing Landsberg erecta and all four products of a single meiosis. Genome Res 2012;22:508-18.
5. Kirkpatrick M. How and why chromosome inversions evolve. PLoS Biol 2010;8:e1000501.
6. Long Q, Rabanal FA, Meng D, et al. Massive genomic variation and strong selection in Arabidopsis thaliana lines from Sweden. Nat Genet 2013;45:884-90.
7. Magwire MM, Bayer F, Webster CL, et al. Successive increases in the resistance of Drosophila to viral infection through a transposon insertion followed by a duplication. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1002337.
8. Pearce S, Saville R, Vaughan SP, et al. Molecular characterization of Rht-1 dwarfing genes in hexaploid wheat. Plant Physiol 2011;157:1820-31.
9. Vlad D, Rappaport F, Simon M, et al. Gene transposition causing natural variation for growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 2010;6:e1000945.
10. Weischenfeldt J, Symmons O, Spitz F, et al. Phenotypic impact of genomic structural variation: insights from and for human disease. Nat Rev Genet 2013;14:125-38.
11. Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 2012;491:56-5.
12. Cao J, Schneeberger K, Ossowski S, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nat Genet 2011;43:956-63.
13. Lappalainen I, Lopez J, Skipper L, et al. DbVar and DGVa: public archives for genomic structural variation. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D936-41.
14. Stevison LS, Hoehn KB, Noor MA. Effects of inversions on withinand between-species recombination and divergence. Genome Biol Evol 2011;3:830-41.
15. Santos M. Recombination load in a chromosomal inversion polymorphism of Drosophila subobscura. Genetics 2009;181:803-9.
16. Feuk L. Inversion variants in the human genome: role in disease and genome architecture. Genome Med 2010;2:11.
17. Medvedev P, Stanciu M, Brudno M. Computational methods for discovering structural variation with next-generation sequencing. Nat Methods 2009;6:S13-20.
18. Koboldt DC, Larson DE, Chen K, et al. Massively parallel sequencing approaches for characterization of structural variation. Methods Mol Biol 2012;838:369-84.
19. Mills RE, Walter K, Stewart C, et al. Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing. Nature 2011;470:59-65.
20. Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:363-76.
21. Korbel JO, Urban AE, Affourtit JP, et al. Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome. Science 2007;318:420-6.
22. Chen K, Chen L, Fan X, et al. TIGRA: a targeted iterative graph routing assembler for breakpoint assembly. Genome Res 2014;24:310-17.
23. Tsai IJ, Otto TD, Berriman M. Improving draft assemblies by iterative mapping and assembly of short reads to eliminate gaps. Genome Biol 2010;11:R41.
24. Emde AK, Schulz MH, Weese D, et al. Detecting genomic indel variants with exact breakpoints in singleand pairedend sequencing data using SplazerS. Bioinformatics 2012;28:619-27.
25. Ye K, Schulz MH, Long Q, et al. Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2865-2871.
26. Korbel JO, Abyzov A, Mu XJ, et al. PEMer: a computational framework with simulation-based error models for inferring genomic structural variants from massive paired-end sequencing data. Genome Biol 2009;10:R23.
27. Zeitouni B, Boeva V, Janoueix-Lerosey I, et al. SVDetect: a tool to identify genomic structural variations from pairedend and mate-pair sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2010;26:1895-96.
28. Marschall T, Costa IG, Canzar S, et al. CLEVER: cliqueenumerating variant finder. Bioinformatics 2012;28:2875-82.
29. Boeva V, Popova T, Bleakley K, et al. Control-FREEC: a tool for assessing copy number and allelic content using next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:423-5.
30. Xie C, Tammi MT. CNV-seq, a new method to detect copy number variation using high-throughput sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:80.
31. Simpson JT, McIntyre RE, Adams DJ, et al. Copy number variant detection in inbred strains from short read sequence data. Bioinformatics 2010;26:565-7.
32. Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 2008;456:53-9.
33. Gan X, Stegle O, Behr J, et al. Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2011;477:419-23.
34. Iqbal Z, Caccamo M, Turner I, et al. De novo assembly and genotyping of variants using colored de Bruijn graphs. Nat Genet 2012;44:226-32.
35. Yang L, Luquette LJ, Gehlenborg N, et al. Diverse mechanisms of somatic structural variations in human cancer genomes. Cell 2013;153:919-29.
36. Chen K, Wallis JW, McLellan MD, et al. BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nat Methods 2009;6:677-81.
37. Abyzov A, Urban AE, Snyder M, et al. CNVnator: an approach to discover, genotype: characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res 2011;21:974-84.
38. Alkan C, Kidd JM, Marques-Bonet T, et al. Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using nextgeneration sequencing. Nat Genet 2009;41:1061-1067.
39. Rausch T, Zichner T, Schlattl A, et al. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics 2012;28:i333-39.
40. Jiang Y, Wang Y, Brudno M. PRISM: pair-read informed splitread mapping for base-pair level detection of insertion, deletion and structural variants. Bioinformatics 2012;28:2576-83.
41. Hart SN, Sarangi V, Moore R, et al. SoftSearch: integration of multiple sequence features to identify breakpoints of structural variations. PLoS One 2013;8:e83356.
42. Jiantao Wu W-PL. Fast Structural Variation Detection Toolbox. https://github.com/jiantao/Tangram (4 January 2014 date last accessed).
43. Marschall T, Hajirasouliha I, Schonhuth A. MATE-CLEVER: Mendelian-inheritance-aware discovery and genotyping of midsize and long indels. Bioinformatics 2013;29:3143-50.
44. Sindi SS, Onal S, Peng LC, et al. An integrative probabilistic model for identification of structural variation in sequencing data. Genome Biol 2012;13:R22.
45. Suzuki S, Yasuda T, Shiraishi Y, et al. ClipCrop: a tool for detecting structural variations with single-base resolution using softclipping information. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12(Suppl 14):S7.
46. Medvedev P, Fiume M, Dzamba M, et al. Detecting copy number variation with mated short reads. Genome Res 2010;20:1613-22.
47. Qi J, Zhao F. inGAP-sv: a novel scheme to identify and visualize structural variation from paired end mapping data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W567-75.
48. Bellos E, Johnson MR, Coin LJM. cnvHiTSeq: integrative models for high-resolution copy number variation detection and genotyping using population sequencing data. Genome Biol 2012;13:R120.
49. Layer RM, Chiang C, Quinlan AR, et al. LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol 2014;15:R84.
50. Handsaker RE, Korn JM, Nemesh J, et al. Discovery and genotyping of genome structural polymorphism by sequencing on a population scale. Nat Genet 2011;43:269-76.
51. Wong K, Keane TM, Stalker J, et al. Enhanced structural variant and breakpoint detection using SVMerge by integration of multiple detection methods and local assembly. Genome Biol 2010;11:R128.
52. Yao W. intansv: Integrative analysis of structural variations, R package version 1.2.0 2014.
53. Zhang J, Wang J, Wu Y. An improved approach for accurate and efficient calling of structural variations with low-coverage sequence data. BMC Bioinformatics 2012;13(Suppl 6):S6.
54. Lam HY, Pan C, Clark MJ, et al. Detecting and annotating genetic variations using the HugeSeq pipeline. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:226-9.
55. Mimori T, Nariai N, Kojima K, et al. iSVP: an integrated structural variant calling pipeline from high-throughput sequencing data. BMC Syst Biol 2013;7(Suppl 6):S8.
56. Lam HY, Mu XJ, Stutz AM, et al. Nucleotide-resolution analysis of structural variants using BreakSeq and a breakpoint library. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:47-55.
57. Genomes Project C, Abecasis GR, Altshuler D, et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 2010;467:1061-1073.
58. Montgomery SB, Goode DL, Kvikstad E, et al. The origin, evolution, and functional impact of short insertion-deletion variants identified in 179 human genomes. Genome Res 2013;23:749-61.
59. Stewart C, Kural D, Stromberg MP, et al. A comprehensive map of mobile element insertion polymorphisms in humans. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1002236.
60. Flagel LE, Willis JH, Vision TJ. The standing pool of genomic structural variation in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus. Genome Biol Evol 2014;6:53-64.
61. Ventura M, Catacchio CR, Alkan C, et al. Gorilla genome structural variation reveals evolutionary parallelisms with chimpanzee. Genome Res 2011;21:1640-9.
62. Chung WH, Jeong N, Kim J, et al. Population structure and domestication revealed by high-depth resequencing of Korean cultivated and wild soybean genomes. DNA Res 2014;21:153-67.
63. Feulner PG, Chain FJ, Panchal M, et al. Genome-wide patterns of standing genetic variation in a marine population of three-spined sticklebacks. Mol Ecol 2013;22:635-49.
64. Zichner T, Garfield DA, Rausch T, et al. Impact of genomic structural variation in Drosophila melanogaster based on population-scale sequencing. Genome Res 2013;23:568-79.
65. Gokcumen O, Tischler V, Tica J, et al. Primate genome architecture influences structural variation mechanisms and functional consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:15764-9.
66. Arnaud Desfeux BG, Henry V, Pépin A-S. OMICtools -a manually curated metadatabase for multi-omic data analysis. http://omictools.com/sv-calling/(4 February 2014).
67. Li JW, Robison K, Martin M, et al. The SEQanswers wiki: a wiki database of tools for high-throughput sequencing analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D1313-17.
68. Rimmer A, Phan H, Mathieson I, et al. Integrating mapping-, assemblyand haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications. Nat. Genet 2014;46:912-18.
69. Wu J, Lee WP, Ward A, et al. Tangram: a comprehensive toolbox for mobile element insertion detection. BMC Genomics 2014;15:795.
70. Lemaitre C, Ciortuz L, Peterlongo P. Mapping-free and assembly-free discovery of inversion breakpoints from raw NGS reads. In: Proceedings International Conference on Algorithms for Computational Biology (AlCoB 2014). Springer Lect Notes Comput Sci 2014;8542: 119-30.
71. Whelan CW, Tyner J, L'Abbate A, et al. Cloudbreak: accurate and scalable genomic structural variation detection in the cloud with MapReduce. arXiv: 1307.2331 2013.
72. Hayes M, Pyon YS, Li J. A model-based clustering method for genomic structural variant prediction and genotyping using paired-end sequencing data. PLoS One 2012;7:e52881.
73. Keane TM, Wong K, Adams DJ. RetroSeq: transposable element discovery from next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2013;29:389-90.
74. Klambauer G, Schwarzbauer K, Mayr A, et al. cn. MOPS: mixture of Poissons for discovering copy number variations in next-generation sequencing data with a low false discovery rate. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:e69.
75. Zhu M, Need AC, Han Y, et al. Using ERDS to infer copy-number variants in high-coverage genomes. Am J Hum Genet 2012;91:408-21.
76. Clark MJ, Homer N, O'Connor BD, et al. U87MG decoded: the genomic sequence of a cytogenetically aberrant human cancer cell line. PLoS Genet 2010;6:e1000832.
77. Michaelson JJ, Sebat J. forestSV: structural variant discovery through statistical learning. Nat Methods 2012;9:819-21.
78. Hajirasouliha I, Hormozdiari F, Alkan C, et al. Detection and characterization of novel sequence insertions using paired-end next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 2010;26:1277-83.
79. Hormozdiari F, Hajirasouliha I, Dao P, et al. Next-generation VariationHunter: combinatorial algorithms for transposon insertion discovery. Bioinformatics 2010;26:i350-7.
80. Miller CA, Hampton O, Coarfa C, et al. ReadDepth: a parallel R package for detecting copy number alterations from short sequencing reads. PLoS One 2011;6:e16327.
81. Li Y, Zheng H, Luo R, et al. Structural variation in two human genomes mapped at single-nucleotide resolution by whole genome de novo assembly. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:723-30.
82. Yoon S, Xuan Z, Makarov V, et al. Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res 2009;19:1586-92.
83. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 2004;5:R12.
84. Wang J, Mullighan CG, Easton J, et al. CREST maps somatic structural variation in cancer genomes with base-pair resolution. Nat Methods 2011;8:652-4.
85. Abyzov A, Gerstein M. AGE: defining breakpoints of genomic structural variants at single-nucleotide resolution, through optimal alignments with gap excision. Bioinformatics 2011;27:595-603.
86. Stewart C. Spanner. https://github.com/chipstewart/Spanner (4 February 2011).
87. Abel HJ, Duncavage EJ, Becker N, et al. SLOPE: a quick and accurate method for locating non-SNP structural variation from targeted next-generation sequence data. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2684-8.
88. Magi A, Benelli M, Yoon S, et al. Detecting common copy number variants in high-throughput sequencing data by using JointSLM algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:e65.
89. Quinlan AR, Clark RA, Sokolova S, et al. Genome-wide mapping and assembly of structural variant breakpoints in the mouse genome. Genome Res 2010;20:623-35.
90. Ding L, Ellis MJ, Li S, et al. Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft. Nature 2010;464:999-1005.
91. Chiara M, Pesole G, Horner DS. SVM(2): an improved pairedend-based tool for the detection of small genomic structural variations using high-throughput single-genome resequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:e145.
92. Kidd JM, Cooper GM, Donahue WF, et al. Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes. Nature 2008;453:56-64.
93. Kidd JM, Sampas N, Antonacci F, et al. Characterization of missing human genome sequences and copy-number polymorphic insertions. Nat Methods 2010;7:365-71.
94. Levy S, Sutton G, Ng PC, et al. The diploid genome sequence of an individual human. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e254.
95. Wheeler DA, Srinivasan M, Egholm M, et al. The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nature 2008;452:872-6.
96. Genome of the Netherlands C. Whole-genome sequence variation, population structure and demographic history of the Dutch population. Nat Genet 2014;46:818-25.
97. Atanur SS, Diaz AG, Maratou K, et al. Genome sequencing reveals loci under artificial selection that underlie disease phenotypes in the laboratory rat. Cell 2013;154:691-703.
98. Nellaker C, Keane TM, Yalcin B, et al. The genomic landscape shaped by selection on transposable elements across 18 mouse strains. Genome Biol 2012;13:R45.
99. Wang K, Hu Q, Ma H, et al. Genome-wide variation within and between wild and domestic yak. Mol Ecol Res 2014;14:794-801.
100. Rubin CJ, Megens HJ, Martinez Barrio A, et al. Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:19529-36.
101. Venn O, Turner I, Mathieson I, et al. Nonhuman genetics. Strong male bias drives germline mutation in chimpanzees. Science 2014;344:1272-5.
102. Kim HM, Cho YS, Kim H, et al. Whole genome comparison of donor and cloned dogs. Nat Sci Rep 2013;3:2998.
103. Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt ML, et al. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 2013;495:360-4.
104. Poelstra JW, Vijay N, Bossu CM, et al. The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science 2014;344:1410-14.
105. Huang W, Massouras A, Inoue Y, et al. Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster genetic reference panel lines. Genome Res 2014;24:1193-208.
106. Supple MA, Hines HM, Dasmahapatra KK, et al. Genomic architecture of adaptive color pattern divergence and convergence in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res 2013;23:1248-57.
107. Cao K, Zheng Z, Wang L, et al. Comparative population genomics reveals the domestication history of the peach, Prunus persica, and human influences on perennial fruit crops. Genome Biol 2014;15:415.
108. Gordon SP, Priest H, Des Marais DL, et al. Genome diversity in Brachypodium distachyon: deep sequencing of highly diverse inbred lines. Plant J 2014;79:361-74.
109. Wang L, Han X, Zhang Y, et al. Deep resequencing reveals allelic variation in Sesamum indicum. BMC Plant Biol 2014;14:225.
110. Blaby IK, Glaesener AG, Mettler T, et al. Systems-level analysis of nitrogen starvation-induced modifications of carbon metabolism in a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii starchless mutant. Plant Cell 2013;25:4305-23.
111. Jiao Y, Zhao H, Ren L, et al. Genome-wide genetic changes during modern breeding of maize. Nat Genet 2012;44:812-15.
112. Causse M, Desplat N, Pascual L, et al. Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events. BMC Genomics 2013;14:791.
113. Li Y, Zhang W, Zheng D, et al. Genomic evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under Chinese rice wine fermentation. Genome Biol Evol 2014;6:2516-26.
114. Golubchik T, Batty EM, Miller RR, et al. Within-host evolution of Staphylococcus aureus during asymptomatic carriage. PLoS One 2013;8:e61319.
115. Janbon G, Ormerod KL, Paulet D, et al. Analysis of the genome and transcriptome of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii reveals complex RNA expression and microevolution leading to virulence attenuation. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004261.
116. Hormozdiari F, Hajirasouliha I, McPherson A, et al. Simultaneous structural variation discovery among multiple paired-end sequenced genomes. Genome Res 2011;21:2203-12.
117. Hach F, Hormozdiari F, Alkan C, et al. mrsFAST: a cacheoblivious algorithm for short-read mapping. Nat Methods 2010;7:576-577.
118. Quinlan AR. BEDTools: The Swiss-Army Tool for Genome Feature Analysis. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 2014;47:11.12.11-11.12.34.
119. Grimm D, Hagmann J, Koenig D, et al. Accurate indel prediction using paired-end short reads. BMC Genomics 2013;14:132.
120. Teague B, Waterman MS, Goldstein S, et al. High-resolution human genome structure by single-molecule analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:10848-53.
121. Carneiro MO, Russ C, Ross MG, et al. Pacific biosciences sequencing technology for genotyping and variation discovery in human data. BMC Genomics 2012;13:375.