Computational methods for discovering structural variation with next-generation sequencing

Nature Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 11S, 2009, Pages S13-

  Medvedev, Paul ^a   Stanciu, Monica ^a   Brudno, Michael ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; REVIEW;

ALGORITHMS; BASE SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMANS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 70449704529     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1374     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Iafrate, A.J. et al. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 36, 949-951 (2004).
2. Tuzun, E. et al. Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome. Nat. Genet. 37, 727-732 (2005).
3. Korbel, J.O. et al. Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome. Science 318, 420-426 (2007). One of the first studies to use NGS data to detect structural variants, including using the linking signature for detecting insertions larger than the insert size.
4. Feuk, L., Carson, A.R. & Scherer, S.W. Structural variation in the human genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 85-97 (2006).
5. Kidd, J.M. et al. Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes. Nature 453, 56-64 (2008).
6. McCarroll, S.A. et al. Integrated detection and population-genetic analysis of SNPs and copy number variation. Nat. Genet. 40, 1166-1174 (2008).
7. Cooper, G.M., Zerr, T., Kidd, J.M., Eichler, E.E. & Nickerson, D.A. Systematic assessment of copy number variant detection via genome-wide SNP genotyping. Nat. Genet. 40, 1199-1203 (2008).
8. Lee, S., Cheran, E. & Brudno, M. A robust framework for detecting structural variations in a genome. Bioinformatics 24, i59-i67 (2008).
9. Bentley, D.R. et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 456, 53-59 (2008). The first high coverage NGS dataset of an individual. This data set has been used in many subsequent studies.
10. Hormozdiari, F., Alkan, C., Eichler, E.E. & Sahinalp, S.C. Combinatorial algorithms for structural variation detection in high-throughput sequenced genomes. Genome Res. 19, 1270-1278 (2009). One of the first comprehensive tools for structural variant detection; supports most basic signatures and uses soft clustering.
11. Lee, S., Hormozdiari, F., Alkan, C. & Brudno, M. MoDIL: Detecting small indels from clone-end sequencing with mixtures of distributions. Nat. Methods 6, 473-474 (2009).
12. The first method to use a distribution-based clustering approach, allowing the detection of smaller indels, and explicitly modeling heterozygosity.
13. McCarroll, S.A. & Altshuler, D.M. Copy-number variation and association studies of human disease. Nat. Genet. 39, S37-S42 (2007).
14. Futreal, P.A. et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 177-183 (2004).
15. Cooper, G.M., Nickerson, D.E. & Eichler, E.E. Mutational and selective effects on copy-number variants in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39, S22-S29 (2007).
16. Volik, S. et al. End-sequence profiling: Sequence-based analysis of aberrant genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7696-7701 (2003).
17. Raphael, B.J., Volik, S., Collins, C. & Pevzner, P.A. Reconstructing tumor genome architectures. Bioinformatics 19 (suppl. 2), 162-171 (2003).
18. Sebat, J. et al. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science 316, 445-449 (2007).
19. Singleton, A.B. et al. Alpha-synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson’s disease. Science 302, 841 (2003).
20. Kim, P.M. et al. Analysis of copy number variants and segmental duplications in the human genome: Evidence for a change in the process of formation in recent evolutionary history. Genome Res. 18, 1865-1874 (2008).
21. Pinkel, D. et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat. Genet. 20, 207-211 (1998).
22. Sebat, J. et al. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305, 525-528 (2004).
23. Sharp, A.J. et al. Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77, 78-88 (2005).
24. Carter, N.P. Methods and strategies for analyzing copy number variation using DNA microarrays. Nat. Genet. 39, S16-S21 (2007).
25. International HapMap Consortium. The International HapMap Project. Nature 437, 1299-1320 (2005).
26. Conrad, D.F., Andrews, T.D., Carter, N.P., Hurles, M.E. & Pritchard, J.K. A high-resolution survey of deletion polymorphism in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 38, 75-81 (2006).
27. Hinds, D.A., Kloek, A.P., Jen, M., Chen, X. & Frazer, K.A. Common deletions and SNPs are in linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 38, 82-85 (2006).
28. McCarroll, S.A. et al. Common deletion polymorphisms in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 38, 86-92 (2006).
29. Sindi, S. & Raphael, B. Identification and frequency estimation of inversion polymorphisms from haplotype data. in Research in Computational Molecular Biology: Proc. RECOMB 2009 vol. 5541 (ed. Batzoglou, S.) 418433 (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
30. Rusk, N. & Kiermer, V. Primer: Sequencing-the next generation. Nat. Methods 5, 15 (2008).
31. Shendure, J. & Ji, H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1135-1145 (2008).
32. Ansorge, W.J. Next-generation sequencing techniques. New Biotechnol. 25, 195-203 (2009).
33. Siva, N. 1000 Genomes project. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 256 (2008).
34. Bashir, A., Volik, S., Collins, C., Bafna, V. & Raphael, B.J. Evaluation of paired-end sequencing strategies for detection of genome rearrangements in cancer. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000051 (2008).
35. Campbell, P.J. et al. Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing. Nat. Genet. 40, 722-729 (2008). The first study to use the DOC signatures in NGS data, detecting CNVs in tumor samples.
36. Mills, R.E. et al. An initial map of insertion and deletion (INDEL) variation in the human genome. Genome Res. 16, 1182-1190 (2006).
37. Ye, K., Schulz, M.H., Long, Q., Apweiler, R. & Ning, Z. Pindel: A pattern growth approach to detect breakpoints of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics published online, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp394 (26 June 2009).
38. Bailey, J.A. et al. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science 297, 1003-1007 (2002).
39. Cheng, Z. et al. A genome-wide comparison of recent chimpanzee and human segmental duplications. Nature 437, 88-93 (2005).
40. Dohm, J.C., Lottaz, C., Borodina, T. & Himmelbauer, H. Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e105 (2008).
41. Harismendy, O. et al. Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies. Genome Biol. 10, R32 (2009).
42. Korbel, J.O. et al. PEMer: A computational framework with simulation- based error models for inferring genomic structural variants from massive paired-end sequencing data. Genome Biol. 10, R23 (2009).
43. McKernan, K.J. et al. Sequence and structural variation in a human genome uncovered by short-read, massively parallel ligation sequencing using two-base encoding. Genome Res. 19, 1527-1541; doi:10.1101/ gr.091868.109 (22 June 2009).
44. Chen, K. et al. BreakDancer: An algorithm for high resolution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nat. Methods 6, 677-681; doi:10.1038/ nmeth.1363 (9 August 2009).
45. Chiang, D.Y. et al. High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing. Nat. Methods 6, 99-103 (2009).
46. Eid, J. et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323, 133-138 (2009).
47. Wong, K.K. et al. A comprehensive analysis of common copy-number variations in the human genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80, 91-104 (2007).
48. Redon, R. et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444, 444-454 (2006).
49. Locke, D.P. et al. Refinement of a chimpanzee pericentric inversion breakpoint to a segmental duplication cluster. Genome Biol. 4, R50 (2003).