Digital video analysis to support the development of professional pedagogical vision

Digital Video for Teacher Education: Research and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 21-35

  McDonald, Scott ^a   Rook, Michael M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940758202     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458-474.
2. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 417-436.
3. Calandra, B., & Brantley-Dias, L. (2010). Using digital video editing to shape novice teachers: A generative process for nurturing professional growth. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 50(1), 13-17.
4. Calandra, B., Brantley-Dias, L., Lee, J. K., & Fox, D. L. (2009). Using video editing to cultivate novice teachers’ practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(1), 73-94.
5. Calandra, B., Gurvitch, R., & Lund, J. (2008). An exploratory study of digital video editing as a tool for teacher preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 137-153.
6. Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93, 745-770. doi: 10.1002/sce.20311
7. Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651.
8. Derry, S. J., Pea, R., Barron, B., Engle, R., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3-53.
9. Fadde, P., & Rich, P. J. (2010). Guerrilla video: A new protocol for producing classroom video. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 50(1), 4-8.
10. Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1, 225-256.
11. Gobert, J. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891-894.
12. Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a0010
14. Hannafin, M. J., Shepherd, C. E., & Polly, D. (2010). Video assessment of classroom teaching practices: Lessons learned, problems and issues. Educational Technology Magazine:The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 50(1), 32-37.
15. Harford, J., MacRuairc, G., & Mc Cartan, D. (2010). “Lights, camera, reflection”: using peer video to promote reflective dialogue among pre-service teachers. Teacher Development, 14(1), 57-68.
16. Kenyon, L., Davis, E. A., & Hug, B. (2011). Design approaches to support preservice teachers in scientific modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 1-21.
17. Lampert, M., Franke, L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, C., Beasley, H., & Crowe, K.(2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226-243. doi:10.1177/002248711247383
18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lortie, D. C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. McDonald, S. (2010). Building a conversation: Preservice teachers’ use of video as data for making evidence-based arguments about practice. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 50(1), 28-31.
21. McDonald, S., & Kelly, G. J. (2007). Understanding the construction of a science storyline in a chemistry classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2(3), 1-12.
22. McDonald, S. P. (2012). Professional pedagogical vision as an evolving cultural practice for preservice science teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
23. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
24. Nelson, T. H. (2008). Making the hidden explicit: Learning about equity in K-8 preservice science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(3), 235-254. doi: 10.1007/s10972-008-9091-x.
25. Nelson, T. H., & Moscovici, H. (1998). Shifting from activitymania to inquiry. Science and Children, 35(4), 14-17.
26. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
27. Preston, M. (2010). Examining student thinking through video analysis. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 50(1), 25-27.
28. Prusak, K., Dye, B., Graham, C., & Graser, S. (2010). Reliability of pre-service physical education teachers’ coding of teaching videos using Studiocode analysis software.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 131-159. Chesapeake, VA: SITE.
29. Resnick, B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39(3), 183-197.
30. Rich, P., & Calandra, B. (2010). Video, video everywhere: Issues and evidence of video analysis in teacher education. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 50(1), 3.
31. Rich, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008). Decisions and reasons: Examining preservice teacher decision-making through video self-analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(1), 62-94. doi: 10.1007/BF03033432.
32. Rickard, A., McAvinia, C., & Quirke-Bolt, N. (2009). The challenge of change: Digital video-analysis and constructivist teaching approaches on a one year preservice teacher education program in Ireland. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 349-367.
33. Rook, M. M., & McDonald, S. P. (2012). Digital records of practice: A literature review of video analysis in teacher practice. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 1441-1446). Chesa-peake, VA:AACE.
34. Rosaen, C. L., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., & Terpstra, M. (2008). Noticing noticing: How does investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 347-360. doi: 10.1177/0022487108322128.
35. Rosaen, C. L., Lundeberg, M., & Terpstra, M. (2010). The case for constructing video cases: Promoting complex, specific, learner-centered analysis of discussion. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 50(1), 18-22.
36. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
37. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D.,… & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
38. Shepherd, C. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008). Examining preservice teacher inquiry through video-based, formative assessment e-portfolios.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(1), 31-37.
39. Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video Research in the Learning Sciences (pp. 383-395). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
40. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision.Journal ofTeacher Education, 60(1), 20-37. doi: 10.1177/0022487108328155
41. Talanquer, V, Tomanek, D., & Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing students’ understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 189-208.
42. van Es, E. A. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100-137.
43. van Es, E. A. (2010). A framework for facilitating productive discussions in video clubs.Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 50(1), 8-12.
44. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005.
45. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878-903. doi:10.1002/sce.2102
46. Zahn, C., Pea, R., Hesse, F. W., & Rosen, J. (2010). Comparing simple and advanced video tools as supports for complex collaborative design processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 403-440.
47. Zeichner, M., & Tabachnick, R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education “washed out” by school experience?Journal ofTeacher Education, 32(3), 7-11.
48. Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflection on prospective elementary teachers’ science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318-339.