Words speak louder: Conforming to preferences more than actions

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 193-209

  Tu, Yanping ^a   Fishbach, Ayelet ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Conformity; Mental sharing; Preference; Social influence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; SOCIAL CONFORMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937690314     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000031     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ackerman, J. M., Goldstein, N. J., Shapiro, J. R., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). You wear me out: The vicarious depletion of self-control. Psychological Science, 20, 326-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02290.x
2. Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1082-1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
3. Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1, 5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109467059800100102
4. Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 279-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/317585
5. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of the other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
6. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
7. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
8. Baron, R. S., Vandello, J., & Brunsman, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 915-927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.915
9. Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 183-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208911
10. Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1992). The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 1137-1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2118383
11. Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others:Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 121-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/519142
12. Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
13. Bowman, D., & Narayandas, D. (2001). Managing customer-initiated contacts with manufacturers: The impact on share of category requirements and word-of-mouth behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 281-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.3.281.18863
14. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
15. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
16. Brown, R., & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237-273.
17. Burger, J. M., Messian, N., Patel, S., del Prado, A., & Anderson, C. (2004). What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 35-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203258838
18. Cai, H., Chen, Y., & Fang, H. (2009). Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. The American Economic Review, 99, 864-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.864
19. Carmon, Z., & Simonson, I. (1998). Price-quality trade-offs in choice versus matching: New insights into the prominence effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 323-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0704_02
20. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
21. Chen, Y., Wang, Q., & Xie, J. (2011). Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 238-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.2.238
22. Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481
23. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
24. Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808-822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808
25. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 51, 629-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
26. Dong, P., Dai, X., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2015). Actors conform, observers react: The effects of behavioral synchrony on conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 60-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000001
27. Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality experiencing commonality with others' inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x
28. Fishbach, A., Henderson, M. D., & Koo, M. (2011). Pursuing goals with others: Group identification and motivation resulting from things done versus things left undone. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 520-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023907
29. Fiske, A. P. (2000). Complementarity theory: Why human social capacities evolved to require cultural complements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 76-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_7
30. Frey, B., & Meier, S. (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior:Testing conditional cooperation in a field experiment. The American Economic Review, 94, 1717-1722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828043052187
31. Gerber, A., & Rogers, T. (2009). Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody's voting and so should you. The Journal of Politics, 71, 178-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090117
32. Goldstein, N. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). The spyglass self: A model of vicarious self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 402-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.402
33. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/586910
34. Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 281-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281
35. Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Fear and loving in Las Vegas:Evolution, emotion, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 384-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.3.384
36. Gunia, B. C., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Vicarious entrapment:Your sunk costs, my escalation of commitment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1238-1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.004
37. Heath, C., Ho, B., & Berger, J. (2006). Focal points in coordinated divergence. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 635-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.04.004
38. Hornstein, H. A., Fisch, E., & Holmes, M. (1968). Influence of a model's feeling about his behavior and his relevance as a comparison other on observers' helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 222-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0026568
39. Irmak, C., Vallen, B., & Sen, S. (2010). You like what I like, but I don't like what you like: Uniqueness motivations in product preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 443-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/653139
40. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
41. Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
42. Kouchaki, M. (2011). Vicarious moral licensing: The influence of others' past moral actions on moral behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 702-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024552
43. Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.14481
44. Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0026570
45. Levine, J. M., Higgins, E. T., & Choi, H. S. (2000). Development of strategic norms in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 88-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2889
46. Maner, J. K., Luce, C. L., Neuberg, S. L., Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S., & Sagarin, B. J. (2002). The effects of perspective-taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1601-1610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616702237586
47. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
48. Mauro, R., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Higgins, E. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2009). The perfect mix: Regulatory complementarity and the speed-accuracy balance in group performance. Psychological Science, 20, 681-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02363.x
49. McCulloch, K. C., Fitzsimons, G. M., Chua, S. N., & Albarracín, D. (2011). Vicarious goal satiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 685-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.019
50. McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morales, A. C. (2010). I'll have what she's having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 915-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/644611
51. Milgram, S., Bickman, L., & Berkowitz, O. (1969). Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 79-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028070
52. Monin, B., Norton, M. I., Cooper, J., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Reacting to an assumed situation vs. conforming to an assumed reaction: The role of perceived speaker attitude in vicarious dissonance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 207-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430204046108
53. Norton, M. I., Monin, B., Cooper, J., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Vicarious dissonance: Attitude change from the inconsistency of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 47-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.47
54. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
55. Rabbie, J. M., & Horwitz, M. (1969). Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 269-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028284
56. Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311, 854-856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1121066
57. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792779143000006
58. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
59. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., Galak, J., & Frederick, S. (2011). Intuitive biases in choice versus estimation: Implications for the wisdom of crowds. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/658070
60. Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/314308
61. Sinha, D. K., & Cusumano, M. A. (1991). Complementary resources and cooperative research: A model of research joint ventures among competitors. Management Science, 37, 1091-1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.9.1091
62. Slovic, P. (1975). Choice between equally valued alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 280-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.280
63. Smith, E. R., Coats, S., & Walling, D. (1999). Overlapping mental representations of self, in-group, and partner: Further response time evidence and a connectionist model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 873-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025007009
64. Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. M. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self:Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167296226008
65. Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.86.5.518
66. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Random House.
67. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
68. Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 278-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_1
69. Tian, K., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 50-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/321947
70. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371
71. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923
72. Wesselmann, E. D., Bagg, D., & Williams, K. D. (2009). "I feel your pain":The effects of observing ostracism on the ostracism detection system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1308-1311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.003
73. White, K., & Dahl, D. (2006). To be or not be? The influence of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 404-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_11