Three-Dimensional Imaging and Guided Surgery for Dental Implants

Dental Clinics of North America

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 265-290

  Ganz, Scott D ^a,b,c  

^a Hackensack University Medical Center ^*  (United States)

^b HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography cone beam computed tomography; Computer aided design; Computer aided manufacturing; Dental implants; Guided surgery applications

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

CASE REPORT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LABORATORY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; WORKFLOW;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LABORATORIES, DENTAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT CARE TEAM; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84937516123     PISSN: 00118532     EISSN: 15580512     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.11.001     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Abduo J., Lyons K., Bennani V., et al. Fit of screw-retained fixed implant frameworks fabricated by different methods: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2011, 24(3):207-220. [review].
2. Alqerban A., Jacobs R., Souza P.C., et al. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136(6):764.e1-764.e11. [discussion: 764-5].
3. Amet E.M., Ganz S.D. Functional and aesthetic acceptance prior to computerized tomography or implant placement. Implant Dent 1997, 6(3):193-197.
4. Angelopoulos C., Aghaloo T. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Dent Clin North Am 2011, 55(1):141-158.
5. Araryarachkul P., Caruso J., Gantes B., et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005, 20:416-424.
6. Arisan V., Karabuda Z.C., Ozdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. JPeriodontol 2010, 81(1):43-51.
7. Basten C.H. The use of radiopaque templates for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int 1995, 26:609-612.
8. Bavitz B.J., Harn S.D., Hansen C.A., et al. An anatomical study of mental neurovascular bundle-lmplant relationships. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993, 8:563-567.
9. Behneke A., Burwinkel M., Behneke N. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012, 23(4):416-423.
10. Benavides E., Rios H.F., Ganz S.D., et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent 2012, 21(2):78-86.
11. Benington P.C., Khambay B.S., Ayoub A.F. An overview of three-dimensional imaging in dentistry. Dent Update 2010, 37(8):494-496. 499-500, 503-4.
12. Berco M., Rigali P.H., Miner R.M., et al. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136(1):17.e1-17.e9. [discussion: 17-8].
13. Berdougo M., Fortin T., Basten C.H., et al. The use of barium sulfate for implant templates. JProsthet Dent 1996, 76:451-454.
14. Borrow W., Smith J.P. Stent marker materials for computerized tomograph-assisted implant planning. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996, 16:61-67.
15. Chan H.L., Misch K., Wang H.L. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning. Implant Dent 2010, 19(4):288-298.
16. Cordaro L., Torsello F., Roccuzzo M. Implant loading protocols for the partially edentulous posterior mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24(Suppl):158-168. [review].
17. Danza M., Zollino I., Carinci F. Comparison between implants inserted with and without computer planning and custom model coordination. JCraniofac Surg 2009, 20(4):1086-1092.
18. De Vos W., Casselman J., Swennen G.R. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 38(6):609-625. [review].
19. Di Giacomo G.A., Cury P.R., de Araujo N.S., et al. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. JPeriodontol 2005, 76(4):503-507.
20. Drago C., Saldarriaga R.L., Domagala D., et al. Volumetric determination of the amount of misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a multicenter laboratory study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010, 25(5):920-929.
21. Dreiseidler T., Mischkowski R.A., Neugebauer J., et al. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24(2):216-225.
22. Dula K., Mini R., van der Stelt P.F., et al. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001, 16(1):80-89.
23. Eggers G., Patellis E., Mühling J. Accuracy of template-based dental implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24(3):447-454.
24. Ersoy A.E., Turkyilmaz I., Ozan O., et al. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. JPeriodontol 2008, 79(8):1339-1345.
25. Farley N.E., Kennedy K., McGlumphy E.A., et al. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013, 28(2):563-572.
26. Fortin T., Champleboux G., Bianchi S., et al. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002, 13(6):651-656.
27. Fortin T., Isidori M., Blanchet E., et al. An image-guided system-drilled surgical template and trephine guide pin to make treatment of completely edentulous patients easier: a clinical report on immediate loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004, 6(2):111-119.
28. Ganz S.D. CT scan technology - an evolving tool for predictable implant placement and restoration. International Magazine of Oral Implantology 2001, 1:6-13.
29. Ganz S.D. Use Of stereolithographic models as diagnostic and restorative aids for predictable immediate loading of implants. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003, 15(10):763-771.
30. Ganz S.D. Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. JOral Maxillofac Surg 2005, 63(9 Suppl 2):59-71.
31. Ganz S.D. Use of Conventional CT and cone Beam for improved dental diagnostics and implant Planning. AADMRT Newsletter, Spring Issue 2005, (AADMRT).
32. Ganz S.D. Conventional CT and cone beam CT for improved dental diagnostics and implant planning. Dent Implantol Update 2005, 16(12).
33. Ganz S.D. Techniques for the use of CT imaging for the fabrication of surgical guides. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2006, 14:75-97. Elsevier Saunders.
34. Ganz S.D. The reality of anatomy and the triangle of bone. Inside Dent 2006, 2(5):72-77.
35. Ganz SD. The reality of anatomy and the triangle of bone. Inside Dent. Proceedings of ICOI World Congress XXIV. Supplement Implant Dentistry;14:182-91. 2006.
36. Ganz S.D. 3-D imaging and cone beam CT is "Where the action is!". Inside Dent 2007, 102-103.
37. Ganz S.D. CT-derived model-based surgery for immediate loading of maxillary anterior implants. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007, 19(5):311-318.
38. Ganz S.D. Restoratively driven implant dentistry utilizing advanced software and CBCT: realistic abutments and virtual teeth. Dent Today 2008, 27(7):122. 124, 126-7.
39. Ganz S.D. Using interactive technology: "in the zone with the triangle of bone". Dent Implantol Update 2008, 19(5):33-38. [quiz: p1].
40. Ganz S.D. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology. Dent Clin North Am 2008, 52(4):777-808.
41. Ganz S.D. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites - the use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008, 29(5):256-267.
42. Ganz S.D. Advanced case planning with SimPlant. The art of computer-guided implantology 2009, 193-210. Quintessence Publishing, Chicago, Illinois. P. Tardieu, A. Rosenfeld (Eds.).
43. Ganz S.D. Advances in diagnosis and treatment planning utilizing CT scan technology for improving surgical and restorative implant reconstruction: tools of empowerment. Osseointegration and dental implants 2009, 88-116. Wiley-Blackwell, Iowa, Ames. A. Jokstad (Ed.).
44. Ganz S.D. Bone grafting assessment: focus on the anterior and posterior maxilla utilizing advanced 3-d imaging technologies. Dent Implantol Update 2009, 20(6):41-48.
45. Ganz S.D. Implant complications associated with two- and three dimensional diagnostic imaging technologies. Dental implant complications - etiology, prevention, and treatment 2010, 71-99. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex (United Kingdom). S.J. Froum (Ed.).
46. Ganz S.D. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning and the triangle of bone: defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. Dental implants - the art and science 2010, 146-166. Saunders Maryland Heights, (MO). C. Babbush, J. Hahn, J. Krauser (Eds.).
47. Guerrero M.E., Jacobs R., Loubele M., et al. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006, 10:1-7.
48. Haney E., Gansky S.A., Lee J.S., et al. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010, 137(5):590-597.
49. Harris D., Buser D., Dula K., et al. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus work-shop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002, 13:566-570.
50. Horwitz J., Zuabi O., Machtei E.E. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an invitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009, 20(10):1156-1162.
51. Israelson H., Plemons J.M., Watkins P., et al. Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992, 12:52-61.
52. Jabero M., Sarment D.P. Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review. Implant Dent 2006, 15(2):135-142. [review].
53. Jacobs R., Mraiwa N., Van Steenberghe D., et al. Appearance of the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs. Surg Radiol Anat 2004, 26:329-333.
54. Katsoulis J., Pazera P., Mericske-Stern R. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009, 11(3):238-245.
55. Kim K.D., Park C.S. Effect of variable scanning protocols on the pre-implant site evaluation of the mandible in reformatted computed tomography. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 1999, 29:21-32.
56. Kim K.D., Jeong H.G., Choi S.H., et al. Effect of mandibular positioning on preimplant site measurement of the mandible in reformatted CT. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003, 23(2):177-183.
57. Klein M., Abrams M. Computer-guided surgery utilizing a computer-milled surgical template. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001, 13(2):165-169. [quiz: 170].
58. Klein M., Cranin A.N., Sirakian A. Acomputerized tomographic (CT) scan appliance for optimal presurgical and pre-prosthetic planning of the implant patient. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993, 5:33-39.
59. Lal K., White G.S., Morea D.N., et al. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept. JProsthodont 2006, 15(1):51-58.
60. Lam E.W., Ruprecht A., Yang J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. JProsthet Dent 1995, 74:42-46.
61. Laster W.S., Ludlow J.B., Bailey L.J., et al. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005, 34(6):343-349.
62. Lin M.H., Mau L.P., Cochran D.L., et al. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study. JDent 2014, 42(3):263-270. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.014.
63. Mischkowski R.A., Ritter L., Neugebauer J., et al. Diagnostic quality of panoramic views obtained by a newly developed digital volume tomography device for maxillofacial imaging. Quintessence Int 2007, 38(9):763-772.
64. Mol A., Balasundaram A. Invitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008, 37(6):319-324.
65. Moreira C.R., Sales M.A., Lopes P.M., et al. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009, 108(3):430-436.
66. Mraiwa N., Jacobs R., van Steenberghe D., et al. Clinical assessment and surgical implications of anatomic challenges in the anterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003, 5(4):219-225.
67. Naini R.B., Nokar S., Borghei H., et al. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? a three-dimensional finite elementanalysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011, 26(4):776-781.
68. Nickenig H.J., Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. JCraniomaxillofac Surg 2007, 35(4-5):207-211.
69. Norton M.R., Ganeles J., Ganz S.D., et al. 2010 Guidelines of the Academy of Osseointegration for the provision of dental implants and associated patient care. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010, 25(3):620-627.
70. Orentlicher G., Goldsmith D., Horowitz A. Computer-generated implant planning and surgery: case select. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009, 30(3):162-166. 168-73.
71. Orentlicher G., Goldsmith D., Horowitz A. Applications of 3-dimensional virtual computerized tomography technology in oral and maxillofacial surgery: current therapy. JOral Maxillofac Surg 2010, 68(8):1933-1959.
72. Ozan O., Turkyilmaz I., Ersoy A.E., et al. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. JOral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67(2):394-401.
73. Peñarrocha M., Boronat A., Garcia B. Immediate loading of immediate mandibular implants with a full-arch fixed prosthesis: a preliminary study. JOral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67(6):1286-1293.
74. Rinaldi M, Ganz SD, Mottola A. Computer-guided applications for dental implants, bone grafting, and reconstructive surgery. Elsevier, in press.
75. Rodriguez-Recio O., Rodriguez-Recio C., Gallego L., et al. Computed tomography and computer-aided design for locating available palatal bone for grafting: two case reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010, 25(1):197-200.
76. Rosenfeld A.L., Mecall R.A. Use of interactive computed tomography to predict the esthetic and functional demands of implant-supported prostheses. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996, 17:1125-1146.
77. Rosenfeld A.L., Mecall R.A. Use of prosthesis-generated computed tomographic information for diagnostic and surgical treatment planning. JEsthet Dent 1998, 10:132-148.
78. Rosenfeld A., Mandelaris G., Tardieu P. Prosthetically directed placement using computer software to insure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006, 26:215-221.
79. Rothman, Stephen L.G. Computerized Tomography of the enhanced alveolar ridge. Dental applications of computerized tomography 1998, 87-112. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, Chicago. Rothman (Ed.).
80. Rugani P., Kirnbauer B., Arnetzl G.V., et al. Cone beam computerized tomography: basics for digital planning in oral surgery and implantology. Int J Comput Dent 2009, 12(2):131-145.
81. Sakakura C.E., Morais J.A., Loffredo L.C., et al. Asurvey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003, 32:397-400.
82. Sarment D.P., Shammari K., Kazor C.E. Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003, 23:287-295.
83. Sonick M. AComparison of the accuracy of periapical, panoramic, and computed tomographic radiographs in locating the Mandibular Canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994, 9:455-460.
84. Spyropoulou P.E., Razzoog M.E., Duff R.E., et al. Maxillary implant-supported bar overdenture and mandibular implant-retained fixed denture using CAD/CAM technology and 3-D design software: a clinical report. JProsthet Dent 2011, 105(6):356-362.
85. Tahmaseb A., De Clerck R., Wismeijer D. Computer-guided implant placement: 3D planning software, fixed intraoral reference points, and CAD/CAM technology. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24(3):541-546.
86. Tahmaseb A., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014, 29(Suppl):25-42.
87. Terzioğlu H., Akkaya M., Ozan O. The use of a computerized tomography-based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24(1):137-142.
88. Testori T., Robiony M., Parenti A., et al. Evaluation of accuracy and precision of a new guided surgery system: a multicenter clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014, 34(Suppl 3):s59-s69.
89. Tyndall D.A., Price J.B., Tetradis S., American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, et al. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012, 113(6):817-826.
90. Valente F., Schiroli G., Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24(2):234-242.