Dental imaging in implant treatment planning

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 288-298

  Chan, Hsun Liang ^a   Misch, Kelly ^a   Wang, Hom Lay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

CBCT; computer tomogram; cone beam CT; CT scan; dental implants; digital planning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77955434105     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181e59ebd     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Gher ME, Richardson AC. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1995;15:268-283
2. Wyatt CC, Pharoah MJ. Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:442-452
3. Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, et al. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5: 229-238
4. Peker I, Alkurt MT, Michcioglu T. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:463-470
5. Jeffcoat M, Jeffcoat RL, Reddy MS, et al. Planning interactive implant treatment with 3-D computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122:40-44
6. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G, et al. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: A threedimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:806-810
7. Siessegger M, Schneider BT, Mischkowski RA, et al. Use of an imageguided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001;29: 276-281
8. KalenderWA. Computed Tomography-Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality and Applications. Weinheim, Germany: WUey-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co; 2000
9. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, et al. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol. 1993;64: 1243-1249
10. Mordenfeld A, Andersson L, Bergstrom B. Hemorrhage in the floor of the mouth during implant placement in the edentulous mandible: A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:558-561
11. Tepper G, Hofschneider UB, Gahleitner A, et al. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:68-72
12. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357: 2277-2284
13. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, et al. E.A.O. guidelines fo the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:566-570
14. Ekestubbe A, Thilander A, Grondahl HG. Absorbed doses and energy imparted from tomography for dental implant installation. Spiral tomography using the Scanora technique compared with hypocycloidal tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1992;21:65-69
15. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, et al. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: Decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16: 80-89
16. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, et al. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig. 2006; 10:1-7
17. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, et al. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:245-248
18. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, et al. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1558-1564
19. Peck JN, Conte GJ. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2008;36:287-290
20. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, et al. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:219-226
21. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:106-114
22. Lofthag-Hansen S, Grondahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: Visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:246-255
23. Angelopoulos C, Thomas S, Hechler S, et al. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and conebeam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2130-2135
24. Loubele M, Maes F, Schutyser F, et al. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: A pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102: 225-234
25. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, et al. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008; 37:10-17
26. Chen L-C, Lundgren T, Hallstrom H, et al. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol. 2008;79:401-405
27. Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:248-251
28. Israelson H, Plemons JM, Watkins P, et al. Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12:52-61
29. Klein M, Cranin AN, Sirakian A. A computerized tomography (CT) scan appliance for optimal presurgical and preprosthetic planning of the implant patient. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1993;5:33-39, quiz 39
30. Modica F, Fava C, Benech A, et al. Radiologic-prosthetic planning of the surgical phase of the treatment of edentulism by osseointegrated implants: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:541-546
31. Naitoh M, Ariji E, Okumura S, et al. Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:409-414
32. Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Van Assche N, et al. The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: A critical review on accuracy. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:454-474
33. Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, et al. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: A comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implantol. 1990;16:156-164
34. Ekestubbe A, Thilander A, Grö ndahl K, et al. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: Comparison with conventional tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993; 22:13-17
35. White SC. 1992 assessment of radiation risk from dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1992;21:118-126