Accuracy of template-based dental implant placement

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 447-454

  Eggers, Georg ^a   Patellis, Evangelos ^a   Mühling, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Dental implants; Image guided surgery; Oral templates; Stereotaxy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DENTAL CARE; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MANDIBLE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70349566452     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Worthington P. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: A formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19: 731-734.
2. Spielman HP. Influence of the implant position on the aesthetics of the restoration. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;8: 897-904.
3. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20: 40-42.
4. Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70: 32.
5. Heurich T, Stein W, Brief J, Mühling J, Hassfeld S. Computergestützte dentale Implantatplanung auf der Basis volumentomographischer Bildgebung und deren operative Umsetzung Mittels computerunterstützt erstellter Bohrschablonen. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2002;47(suppl 1): 25-28.
6. Eggers G, Mühling J, Marmulla R. Image-to-patient registration techniques in head surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35: 1081-1095.
7. Casap N, Wexler A, Persky N, Schneider A, Lustmann J. Navigation surgery for dental implants: Assessment of accuracy of the image guided implantology system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62: 116-119.
8. Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Schneider M, Reinert S. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: An experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20: 382-386.
9. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18: 571-577.
10. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: Preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005;76: 503-507.
11. Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, Eggers G. Accuracy of imageguided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 495-501.
12. Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Watzinger F, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of computer-aided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13: 59-64.
13. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, Buatois H, Coudert JL. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13: 651-656.
14. Marmulla R, Mühling J. The influence of computed tomography motion artifacts on computer-assisted surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64: 466-470.
15. Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5: 229-238.
16. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6: 96-103.
17. Bou Serhal CB, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Localisation of the mandibular canal using conventional spiral tomography: S human cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 230-236.
18. Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Flygare L, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31: 39-43.
19. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L. Impact of conventional tomography on prediction of the appropriate implant size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92: 458-463.
20. Eufinger H, König S, Eufinger A. The role of alveolar ridge width in dental implantology. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1: 169-177.
21. Hassfeld S, Streib S, Sahl H, Stratmann U, Fehrentz D, Zöller J. Low-dose-Computertomographie des Kieferknochens in der präimplantologischen Diagnostik. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1998;2: 188-193.
22. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 219-226.
23. Sukovic P. Cone-beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6S1: 31-36.
24. Holst S, Blatz MB, Eitner S. Precision for computer-guided implant placement: Using 3D planning software and fixed intraoral reference points. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65: 393-399.
25. Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Neugebauer J, Kübler AC, Zöller JE. Comparison of static and dynamic computer-assisted guidance methods in implantology. Int J Comput Dent 2006;9: 23-35.
26. Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89: 611-615.
27. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: Treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18: 599-604.
28. Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E, Jaschke W, Bale RJ. In vitro accuracy of a novel registration and targeting technique for image-guided template production. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 502-508.