Implant treatment planning using a patient acceptance prosthesis, radiographic record base, and surgical template. Part 1: Presurgical phase

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 193-197

  Amet, Edward M ^a   Ganz, Scott D ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0031218037     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199700630-00005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59: 467-473.
2. Reikie DF. Esthetic and functional considerations for implant restoration of the partially edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:433-437.
3. Murrell GA, Davis WH. Presurgical prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:447-452.
4. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:567-572.
5. Ganz SD. What is the most important aspect of implant dentistry? Implant Soc. 1994;5:2-4.
6. Daftary F, Bahat O. Prosthetically formulated natural aesthetics in implant prostheses. Pract Periodont Aesthetic Dent. 1994;6:75-83.
7. Langer B. Solutions for specific bone situations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9(suppl):21.
8. Saadoun AP, Sullivan DY, Krischek M, et al. Single tooth implant: management for success. Pract Periodont Aesthetic Dent. 1994;6:73-82.
9. Parel SM, Sullivan DY. Esthetics and Osseointegration. Dallas, TX: Taylor Publishing Company; 1989:19-112.
10. Mecall RA, Rosenfeld AL. The influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on implant fixture placement and tooth position. Part 1. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1991;11: 9-23.
11. Lazzara RJ. Criteria for implant selection: surgical and prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodont Aesthetic Dent. 1994;6:55-62.
12. Saadoun AP, LeGall M. Implant positioning for periodontal, functional, and aesthetic results. Pract Periodont Aesthetic Dent. 1992;4:43-54.
13. Amet EM. Fixed provisional restorations for extended implant treatment. Part 1. J Oral Implantol. 1995; 21:201-206.
14. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Chafetz N, et al. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1989;33:555-597.
15. Sethi A. Precise site location for implants using CT scans: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:433-438.
16. James RA, Lozada JL, Truitt HP. Computer tomography (CT) applications in implant dentistry. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17:10-15.
17. Stellino G, Morgano SM, Imbelloni A. A dual-purpose, implant stent made from a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:212-214.
18. Ganz SD. Interactive computer utilization for treatment planning dental implants and optimizing patient communications. Presented at the AAOMS Conference on Esthetic Implant Rehabilitation in the Partially Edentulous Patient; October 20, 1995; Chicago, IL.
19. Ganz SD. The use of computer imaging technology. Presented at the joint meeting of the Academy of Osseointegration and the European Association of Osseointegration on Implant Rehabilitation of the Compromised Patient; October 20, 1996; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.