Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 287-295

  Sarment, David P ^a   Al Shammari, Khalaf ^a   Kazor, Christopher E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; STEREOLITHOGRAPHY; TECHNIQUE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT PLANNING; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DENTAL CARE; EDENTULOUSNESS; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MAXILLA; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0041510493     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988;59:287-296.
2. Albrektsson T. A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:75-84.
3. Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker BE, et al. The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: A prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:31-40.
4. Buser D, Dula K, Belser U, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993;13:29-45.
5. Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:572-676.
6. Tyndall AA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:630-637.
7. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:105-111.
8. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Naert I, Quirynen M, Hermans R, van Steenberghe D. Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:37-41.
9. Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:360-370.
10. Stanford CM, Brand RA. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:553-561.
11. White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, Mosier KM, Ruprecht A, Shrout MK. Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91:498-511.
12. Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, Burtch ML. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: A comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implantol 1990;16:156-164.
13. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Buser D. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: Decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:80-89.
14. Butterfield KJ, Dagenais M, Clokie C. Linear tomography's clinical accuracy and validity for presurgical dental implant analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:203-209.
15. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327-332.
16. Kaeppler G. Conventional cross-sectional tomographic evaluation of mandibular third molars. Quintessence Int 2000;31:49-56.
17. Stella JP, Tharanon W. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: Implications for dental implants. Part 1: Technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:15-22.
18. Yang J, Cavalcanti MG, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:369-374.
19. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, Richardson AC. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol 1993;64:1243-1249.
20. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Santler G, Karcher H. Treatment planning for sinus lift augmentations through use of 3-dimensional milled models derived from computed tomography scans: A report of 3 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:388-392.
21. Bianchi SD, Lojacono A, Nevins M, et al. The use of replicate resin models in the treatment of maxillary sinus augmentation patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:348-357.
22. Israelson H, Plemons JM, Watkins P, Sory C. Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:52-61.
23. Mizrahi B, Thunthy KH, Finger I. Radiographic/surgical template incorporating metal telescopic tubes for accurate implant placement. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:757-765.
24. Rosenfeld AL, Mecall RA. Use of prosthesis-generated computed tomographic information for diagnostic and surgical treatment planning. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:132-148.
25. Eriksson A, Albrektsson T, Grane B, McQueen D. Thermal injury to bone. A vital-microscopic description of heat effects. Int J Oral Surg 1982;11:115-121.
26. Sharawy M, Misch C, Strong T. Bone temperature and its effect on drill size and sequence. A pilot study. In: Misch C (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry, ed 2. St Louis: Mosby, 1999:371-384.