A novel vehicle dynamics stability control algorithm based on the hierarchical strategy with constrain of nonlinear tyre forces

Vehicle System Dynamics

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1093-1116

  Li, Liang ^a   Jia, Gang ^a   Chen, Jie ^a   Zhu, Hongjun ^a   Cao, Dongpu ^b   Song, Jian ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

brake pressure allocation; direct yaw moment control; hierarchical controller; hydraulic model; linear quadratic regulator; tyre combined slip

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC BRAKES; FEEDBACK CONTROL; HYDRAULIC MODELS; STABILITY; TIRES; TRACTION (FRICTION); VEHICLE WHEELS;

BRAKE PRESSURE; COMBINED SLIP; DIRECT YAW MOMENT CONTROL; HIERARCHICAL CONTROLLERS; LINEAR QUADRATIC REGULATOR;

CONTROLLERS;

EID: 84937513559     PISSN: 00423114     EISSN: 17445159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2015.1025082     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Furukawa Y, Abe M. Advanced chassis control systems for vehicle handling and active safety. Veh Syst Dyn. 1997;28(2-3):59-86.
2. Nagai M, Hirano Y, Yamanaka S. Integrated robust control of active rear wheel steering and direct yaw moment control. Veh Syst Dyn. 1998;29(S1):416-421.
3. Zhu H-J, Li L, Jin M-J, Li H-Z, Song J. Real-time yaw rate prediction based on a non-linear model and feedback compensation for vehicle dynamics control. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Autom Eng. 2013;227(10):1431-1445.
4. Van Zanten AT, Erhardt R, Pfaff G, Kost F, Hartmann U, Ehret T. Control aspects of the Bosch-VDC. Proceedings of 1996 AVEC conference, Aachen; 1996. p. 573-608.
5. Mokhiamar O, Abe M. How the four wheels should share forces in an optimum cooperative chassis control. Control Eng Pract. 2006;14(3):295-304.
6. Nagai M, Hirano Y, Yamanaka S. Integrated control of active rear wheel steering and direct yaw moment control. Veh Syst Dyn. 1997;27(5-6):357-370.
7. Hancock MJ, Williams RA, Fina E, Best MC. Yaw motion control via active differentials. Trans Inst Meas Control. 2007;29(2):137-157.
8. Wang C-C, Cheng S, Hsiao T, Chou W. Application of optimum tire force distribution to vehicle motion control. The 2012 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 2012. p. 538-543.
9. Shuai Z, Zhang H, Wang J, Li J, Ouyang M. Lateral motion control for four-wheel-independent-drive electric vehicles using optimal torque allocation and dynamic message priority scheduling. Control Eng Pract. 2014;24:55-66.
10. Buckholtz KR. Use of fuzzy logic in wheel slip assignment-part I: yaw rate control. SAE paper 2002-01-1221; 2002.
11. Buckholtz KR. Use of fuzzy logic in wheel slip assignment-part II: yaw rate control with sideslip angle limitation, SAE paper 2002-01-1220; 2002.
12. Hong D, Yoon P, Kang H-J, Hwang I, Huh K. Wheel slip control systems utilizing the estimated tire force. Proceedings of the 2006 American control conference, Minnespolis (MN); 2006.
13. Pacejka HB, Bakker E. The magic formula tyre model. Veh Syst Dyn. 1992;21(S1):1-18.
14. Bakker E, Nyborg L, Pacejka HB. Tyre modeling for use in vehicle dynamics studies. SAE paper 870421; 1987.
15. Fukada Y. Slip-angle estimation for vehicle stability control. Veh Syst Dyn. 1999;32(4-5):375-388.
16. Rajamani R. Vehicle dynamics and control. New York: Springer; 2006.
17. Pacejka HB. Tyre and vehicle dynamics [M]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006.
18. Ryu J, Lee JS, Kim H. Evaluation of a direct yaw moment control algorithm by brake hardware-in-the-loop. Proceedings of 1998 AVEC conference, Nogoya, Japan; 1998. p. 231-236.
19. Rajamani R. Vehicle dynamics and control [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2005. p. 201-235.
20. Pang HP, Yang Q. Robust LQR tracking control for a class of affine nonlinear uncertain systems. Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 2012 24th Chinese, Taiyuan; 2012. p. 1197-1202.
21. Adhikari P, Bracey SS, Evans KA, Magana IB, O'Neal DP. LQR tracking of a delay differential equation model for the study of nanoparticle dosing strategies for cancer therapy. American Control Conference (ACC), Washington (DC); 2013. p. 2068-2073.
22. Hancock MJ, Williams RA, Gordon TJ, Best MC. A comparison of braking and differential control of road vehicle yaw-sideslip dynamics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Autom Eng. 2005;219(3):309-327.
23. Deur J, Barber P, Hancock M. Design of a cascade structure of sideslip and yaw rate control. International symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks, Manchester; 2011.
24. Abe M, Vehicle handling dynamics: theory and application [M]. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2009.
25. Mokhiamar O, Abe M. Active wheel steering and yaw moment control combination to maximize stability as well as vehicle responsiveness during quick lane change for active vehicle handling safety. Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Autom Eng. 2002;216(2):115-124.
26. Chang S, Gordon TJ. A flexible hierarchical model-based control methodology for vehicle active safety systems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46(S1):63-75.
27. Xiao H, Chen W, Zhou H, Zu JW. Integrated control of active suspension system and electronic stability programme using hierarchical control strategy: theory and experiment. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011;49(1-2):381-397.
28. Kang M, Li L, Li H, Song J, Han Z. Coordinated vehicle traction control based on engine torque and brake pressure under complicated road conditions. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(9):1473-1494.
29. Yasui Y, Tozu K, Hattori N, Sugisawa M. Improvement of vehicle directional stability for transient steering maneuvers using active brake control. SAE paper; 1996.
30. Esmailzadeh E, Goodarzi A, Vossoughi GR. Optimal yaw moment control law for improved vehicle handling. Mechatronics. 2003;13(7):659-675.