Genome-wide binding and mechanistic analyses of Smchd1-mediated epigenetic regulation

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 27, 2015, Pages E3535-E3544

  Chen, Kelan ^a,b   Hu, Jiang ^c,d   Moore, Darcy L ^a,b   Liu, Ruijie ^a   Kessans, Sarah A ^e   Breslin, Kelsey ^a   Lucet, Isabelle S ^a,b   Keniry, Andrew ^a,b   Leong, Huei San ^a,b   Parish, Clare L ^f   Hilton, Douglas J ^a,b   Lemmers, Richard J L F ^g   Van Der Maarel, Silvère M ^g   Czabotar, Peter E ^a,b   Dobson, Renwick C J ^e,h   Ritchie, Matthew E ^a,b   Kay, Graham F ^c   Murphy, James M ^a,b   Blewitt, Marnie E ^a,b  

^a WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c QIMR BERGHOFER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^f FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^g LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clustered protocadherins; Ctcf; Epigenetic control; Smchd1

Indexed keywords

DNA; RNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CTCF; TRANSCRIPTOME; CCCTC-BINDING FACTOR; CHROMATIN; HISTONE; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; SMCHD1 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHROMATIN; EMBRYO; EPIGENETICS; GENE; GENETIC REGULATION; GENOME; IN VITRO STUDY; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOCADHERIN GENE; REPRESSOR GENE; STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE OF CHROMOSOMES FLEXIBLE HINGE DOMAIN CONTAINING 1 GENE; ANIMAL; BRAIN; C57BL MOUSE; CELL CULTURE; CONGENIC STRAIN; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYOLOGY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; GENOME IMPRINTING; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MALE; METABOLISM; METHYLATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; WESTERN BLOTTING;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; BLOTTING, WESTERN; BRAIN; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENOME; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HISTONES; MALE; METHYLATION; MICE, CONGENIC; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, KNOCKOUT; NEURAL STEM CELLS; PROTEIN BINDING; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84936060356     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504232112     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Blewitt ME, et al. (2005) An N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea screen for genes involved in variegation in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(21):7629-7634.
2. Blewitt ME, et al. (2008) SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation. Nat Genet 40(5):663-669.
3. Gendrel AV, et al. (2012) Smchd1-dependent and -independent pathways determine developmental dynamics of CpG island methylation on the inactive X chromosome. Dev Cell 23(2):265-279.
4. Gendrel AV, et al. (2013) Epigenetic functions of smchd1 repress gene clusters on the inactive X chromosome and on autosomes. Mol Cell Biol 33(16):3150-3165.
5. Nozawa RS, et al. (2013) Human inactive X chromosome is compacted through a PRC2-independent SMCHD1-HBiX1 pathway. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(5):566-573.
6. Leong HS, et al. (2013) Epigenetic regulator Smchd1 functions as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Res 73(5):1591-1599.
7. Mould AW, et al. (2013) Smchd1 regulates a subset of autosomal genes subject to monoallelic expression in addition to being critical for X inactivation. Epigenetics Chromatin 6(1):19.
8. Massah S, et al. (2014) Epigenetic characterization of the growth hormone gene identifies SmcHD1 as a regulator of autosomal gene clusters. PLoS ONE 9(5):e97535.
9. Lemmers RJ, et al. (2012) Digenic inheritance of an SMCHD1 mutation and an FSHDpermissive D4Z4 allele causes facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2. Nat Genet 44(12):1370-1374.
10. Sacconi S, et al. (2013) The FSHD2 gene SMCHD1 is a modifier of disease severity in families affected by FSHD1. Am J Hum Genet 93(4):744-751.
11. Iyer LM, Abhiman S, Aravind L (2008) MutL homologs in restriction-modification systems and the origin of eukaryotic MORC ATPases. Biol Direct 3:8.
12. Lorkovic ZJ, Naumann U, Matzke AJ, Matzke M (2012) Involvement of a GHKL ATPase in RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 22(10):933-938.
13. Hagstrom KA, Meyer BJ (2003) Condensin and cohesin: More than chromosome compactor and glue. Nat Rev Genet 4(7):520-534.
14. Hirano T (2006) At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7(5):311-322.
15. Wood AJ, Severson AF, Meyer BJ (2010) Condensin and cohesin complexity: The expanding repertoire of functions. Nat Rev Genet 11(6):391-404.
16. Hirano M, Hirano T (2002) Hinge-mediated dimerization of SMC protein is essential for its dynamic interaction with DNA. EMBO J 21(21):5733-5744.
17. Chiu A, Revenkova E, Jessberger R (2004) DNA interaction and dimerization of eukaryotic SMC hinge domains. J Biol Chem 279(25):26233-26242.
18. Griese JJ, Witte G, Hopfner KP (2010) Structure and DNA binding activity of the mouse condensin hinge domain highlight common and diverse features of SMC proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 38(10):3454-3465.
19. Sun M, Nishino T, Marko JF (2013) The SMC1-SMC3 cohesin heterodimer structures DNA through supercoiling-dependent loop formation. Nucleic Acids Res 41(12): 6149-6160.
20. Haering CH, Löwe J, Hochwagen A, Nasmyth K (2002) Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol Cell 9(4):773-788.
21. Gruber S, et al. (2006) Evidence that loading of cohesin onto chromosomes involves opening of its SMC hinge. Cell 127(3):523-537.
22. Moissiard G, et al. (2012) MORC family ATPases required for heterochromatin condensation and gene silencing. Science 336(6087):1448-1451.
23. Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4(1):44-57.
24. Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37(1):1-13.
25. Wu D, et al. (2010) ROAST: Rotation gene set tests for complex microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 26(17):2176-2182.
26. Feng J, Liu T, Qin B, Zhang Y, Liu XS (2012) Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS. Nat Protoc 7(9):1728-1740.
27. Kehayova P, Monahan K, Chen W, Maniatis T (2011) Regulatory elements required for the activation and repression of the protocadherin-alpha gene cluster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(41):17195-17200.
28. Ribich S, Tasic B, Maniatis T (2006) Identification of long-range regulatory elements in the protocadherin-alpha gene cluster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(52):19719-19724.
29. Monahan K, et al. (2012) Role of CCCTC binding factor (CTCF) and cohesin in the generation of single-cell diversity of protocadherin-α gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(23):9125-9130.
30. Guo Y, et al. (2012) CTCF/cohesin-mediated DNA looping is required for protocadherin α promoter choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(51):21081-21086.
31. McGinnis W, Krumlauf R (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68(2): 283-302.
32. Kmita M, Duboule D (2003) Organizing axes in time and space; 25 years of colinear tinkering. Science 301(5631):331-333.
33. Pearson JC, Lemons D, McGinnis W (2005) Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nat Rev Genet 6(12):893-904.
34. Noordermeer D, et al. (2011) The dynamic architecture of Hox gene clusters. Science 334(6053):222-225.
35. McLean CY, et al. (2010) GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat Biotechnol 28(5):495-501.
36. Shen Y, et al. (2012) A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488(7409):116-120.
37. Chong JA, et al. (1995) REST: A mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons. Cell 80(6):949-957.
38. Schoenherr CJ, Anderson DJ (1995) Silencing is golden: Negative regulation in the control of neuronal gene transcription. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5(5):566-571.
39. Hirayama T, Tarusawa E, Yoshimura Y, Galjart N, Yagi T (2012) CTCF is required for neural development and stochastic expression of clustered Pcdh genes in neurons. Cell Reports 2(2):345-357.
40. van den Boogaard ML, et al. (2015) Double SMCHD1 variants in FSHD2: The synergistic effect of 2 SMCHD1 variants on D4Z4 hypomethylation and disease penetrance in FSHD2. Eur J Hum Genet, 10.1038/ejhg.2015.55.
41. Lo MC, et al. (2004) Evaluation of fluorescence-based thermal shift assays for hit identification in drug discovery. Anal Biochem 332(1):153-159.
42. Murphy JM, et al. (2014) A robust methodology to subclassify pseudokinases based on their nucleotide-binding properties. Biochem J 457(2):323-334.
43. Kung JT, et al. (2015) Locus-specific targeting to the X chromosome revealed by the RNA interactome of CTCF. Mol Cell 57(2):361-375.
44. Su D, et al. (2015) Interactions of chromatin context, binding site sequence content, and sequence evolution in stress-induced p53 occupancy and transactivation. PLoS Genet 11(1):e1004885.
45. Phillips JE, Corces VG (2009) CTCF: Master weaver of the genome. Cell 137(7): 1194-1211.
46. Zlatanova J, Caiafa P (2009) CTCF and its protein partners: Divide and rule? J Cell Sci 122(Pt 9):1275-1284.
47. Ong CT, Corces VG (2014) CTCF: An architectural protein bridging genome topology and function. Nat Rev Genet 15(4):234-246.
48. Kawaguchi M, et al. (2008) Relationship between DNA methylation states and transcription of individual isoforms encoded by the protocadherin-alpha gene cluster. J Biol Chem 283(18):12064-12075.
49. Ballas N, Grunseich C, Lu DD, Speh JC, Mandel G (2005) REST and its corepressors mediate plasticity of neuronal gene chromatin throughout neurogenesis. Cell 121(4): 645-657.
50. Greenway DJ, Street M, Jeffries A, Buckley NJ (2007) RE1 Silencing transcription factor maintains a repressive chromatin environment in embryonic hippocampal neural stem cells. Stem Cells 25(2):354-363.
51. Johnson R, et al. (2008) REST regulates distinct transcriptional networks in embryonic and neural stem cells. PLoS Biol 6(10):e256.
52. Ottaviani A, et al. (2009) The D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat acts as a CTCF and A-type lamins-dependent insulator in facio-scapulo-humeral dystrophy. PLoS Genet 5(2): e1000394.
53. Wang TY, Forsythe JS, Nisbet DR, Parish CL (2012) Promoting engraftment of transplanted neural stem cells/progenitors using biofunctionalised electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials 33(36):9188-9197.
54. Nelson JD, Denisenko O, Bomsztyk K (2006) Protocol for the fast chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) method. Nat Protoc 1(1):179-185.
55. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using realtime quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25(4):402-408.
56. Vert JP, Foveau N, Lajaunie C, Vandenbrouck Y (2006) An accurate and interpretable model for siRNA efficacy prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 7:520.
57. Dickins RA, et al. (2005) Probing tumor phenotypes using stable and regulated synthetic microRNA precursors. Nat Genet 37(11):1289-1295.
58. Majewski IJ, et al. (2008) Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) restricts hematopoietic stem cell activity. PLoS Biol 6(4):e93.
59. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2013) The Subread aligner: Fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res 41(10):e108.
60. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2014) featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30(7):923-930.
61. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26(1): 139-140.
62. Ritchie ME, et al. (2015) limma powers differential expression analyses for RNAsequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43(7):e47.
63. Liu R, et al. (April 29, 2015) Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses. Nucleic Acids Res, 10.1093/ nar/gkv412.
64. Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK (2014) voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol 15(2):R29.
65. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate-A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57(1): 289-300.
66. Li H, et al.; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078-2079.
67. Lawrence M, et al. (2013) Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLOS Comput Biol 9(8):e1003118.
68. Carlson M (2014) org.Mm.eg.db: Genome wide annotation for Mouse. R package version 3.0.0. Available at bioconductor.org/packages/3.0/data/annotation/html/org. Mm.eg.db.html. Accessed November 1, 2014.
69. Hahne F, et al. (2014) Gviz: Plotting data and annotation information along genomic coordinates. R package, version 1.10.5. Available at www.bioconductor.org/packages/ release/bioc/html/Gviz.html. Accessed November 1, 2014.
70. Consortium EP; ENCODE Project Consortium (2011) A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE). PLoS Biol 9(4):e1001046.
71. Bailey TL, et al. (2009) MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Web Server issue):W202-W208.
72. Babon JJ, Murphy JM (2013) In vitro JAK kinase activity and inhibition assays. Methods Mol Biol 967:39-55.
73. Laue TM, Shah BD, Ridgeway TM, Pelletier SL (1992) Computer-Aided Interpretation of Analytical Sedimentation Data for Proteins (The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK).
74. Perugini MA, Schuck P, Howlett GJ (2000) Self-association of human apolipoprotein E3 and E4 in the presence and absence of phospholipid. J Biol Chem 275(47): 36758-36765.
75. Schuck P (2000) Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. Biophys J 78(3):1606-1619.
76. Schuck P, Perugini MA, Gonzales NR, Howlett GJ, Schubert D (2002) Size-distribution analysis of proteins by analytical ultracentrifugation: Strategies and application to model systems. Biophys J 82(2):1096-1111.