Molecular dynamics

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 929, Issue , 2012, Pages 243-285

  Cheng, Xiaolin ^a,b   Ivanov, Ivaylo ^c  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Enhanced sampling; Force field; Free energy; Molecular dynamics; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

BUNGAROTOXIN RECEPTOR; CYTOCHROME P450;

CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENERGY CONSERVATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOLVATE; STATIC ELECTRICITY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84934435664     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-50-2_11     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Liebler DC, Guengerich FP (2005) Elucidating mechanisms of drug-induced toxicity. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4(5):410-420
2. Houck KA, Kavlock RJ (2008) Understanding mechanisms of toxicity: insights from drug discovery research. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 227(2):163-178
3. Gillette J.R., Mitchell J.R., Brodie BB (1974) Biochemical mechanisms of drug toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol 14:271-288
4. Baillie TA (2008) Metabolism and toxicity of drugs. Two decades of progress in industrial drug metabolism. Chem Res Toxicol 21 (1):129-137
5. Guengerich FP (1999) Cytochrome P-450 3A4: regulation and role in drug metabolism. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 39:1-17
6. Gronemeyer H, Gustafsson J, Laudet V (2004) Principles for modulation of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:950-964
7. Sanguinetti MC, Tristani-Firouzi M (2006) hERG potassium channels and cardiac arrhythmia. Nature 440(7083):463-469
8. Cronin MT (2000) Computational methods for the prediction of drug toxicity. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 3(3):292-297
9. Dearden JC (2003) In silico prediction of drug toxicity. J Comput Aided Mol Des 17 (2-4):119-127
10. Valerio LG (2009) In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 241(3):356-370
11. Kavlock RJ et al (2008) Computational toxicology- a state of the science mini review. Toxicol Sci 103(1):14-27
12. Nicholson JD, Wilson ID (2003) Understanding ?Global? systems biology: metabonomics and the continuum of metabolism. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:668-676
13. Bugrim A, Nikolskaya T, Yuri Nikolsky Y (2004) Early prediction of drug metabolism and toxicity: systems biology approach and modeling. Drug Discov Today 9(3):127-135
14. Nicholson JK et al (2002) Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1:153-161
15. Hunter PJ, Borg TK (2003) Integration from proteins to organs: the Physiome Project. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4(3):237-243
16. Silva J.R. et al (2009) A multiscale model linking ion-channel molecular dynamics and electrostatics to the cardiac action potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(27):11102-11106
17. Dill KA et al (2008) The protein folding problem. Annu Rev Biophys 37:289-316
18. Zimmermann O, Hansmann UH (2008) Understanding protein folding: small proteins in silico. Biochim Biophys Acta 1784 (1):252-258
19. de Groot BL, Grubmuller H (2005) The dynamics and energetics of water permeation and proton exclusion in aquaporins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15(2):176-183
20. Roux B, Schulten K (2004) Computational studies of membrane channels. Structure 12 (8):1343-1351
21. McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M (1977) Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 267 (5612):585-590
22. Karplus M, McCammon JA (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol 9(9):646-652
23. van Gunsteren WF et al (2006) Biomolecular modeling: goals, problems, perspectives. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 45 (25):4064-4092
24. Adcock SA, McCammon JA (2006) Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chem Rev 106 (5):1589-1615
25. Scheraga HA, Khalili M, Liwo A (2007) Protein-folding dynamics: overview of molecular simulation techniques. Annu Rev Phys Chem 58:57-83
26. Warshel A (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations of biological reactions. Acc Chem Res 35(6):385-395
27. Garcia-Viloca M et al (2004) How enzymes work: analysis by modern rate theory and computer simulations. Science 303 (5655):186-195
28. Karplus M et al (2005) Protein structural transitions and their functional role. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 363 (1827):331-355
29. Senn HM, Thiel W (2009) QM/MM methods for biomolecular systems. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48(7):1198-1229
30. Ridder L, Mulholland AJ (2003) Modeling biotransformation reactions by combined quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical approaches: from structure to activity. Curr Top Med Chem 3(11):1241-1256
31. Lewis DFV (2001) Guide to cytochromes P450: structure and function, 2nd edn. Informa Healthcare, London
32. Denisov IG et al (2005) Structure and chemistry of cytochrome P450. Chem Rev 105 (6):2253-2277
33. Wang JF, Chou KC (2010) Molecular modeling of cytochrome P450 and drug metabolism. Curr Drug Metab 11(4):342-346
34. Otyepka M et al (2007) What common structural features and variations of mammalian P450s are known to date? Biochim Biophys Acta 1770(3):376-389
35. Henley DV, Korach KS (2006) Endocrinedisrupting chemicals use distinct mechanisms of action to modulate endocrine system function. Endocrinology 147(6):S25-S32
36. Ankley GT et al (2010) Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 29(3):730-741
37. Jugan ML, Levi Y, Blondeau JP (2010) Endocrine disruptors and thyroid hormone physiology. Biochem Pharmacol 79(7):939-947
38. Pearce EN, Braverman LE (2009) Environmental pollutants and the thyroid. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 23(6):801-813
39. Prenzel N et al (2001) The epidermal growth factor receptor family as a central element for cellular signal transduction and diversification. Endocr Relat Cancer 8(1):11-31
40. Bock KW (1994) Aryl hydrocarbon or dioxin receptor: biologic and toxic responses. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 125:1-42
41. Bradshaw TD, Bell DR (2009) Relevance of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) for clinical toxicology. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 47 (7):632-642
42. Gray LE Jr et al (2006) Adverse effects of environmental antiandrogens and androgens on reproductive development in mammals. Int J Androl 29(1):96-104
43. Roncaglioni A, Benfenati E (2008) In silicoaided prediction of biological properties of chemicals: oestrogen receptor-mediated effects. Chem Soc Rev 37(3):441-450
44. Lin JH et al (2002) Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. J Am Chem Soc 124(20):5632-5633
45. Cornell W, Nam K (2009) Steroid hormone binding receptors: application of homology modeling, induced fit docking, and molecular dynamics to study structure-function relationships. Curr Top Med Chem 9 (9):844-853
46. Recanatini M, Cavalli A, Masetti M (2008) Modeling the hERG potassium channel in a phospholipid bilayer: molecular dynamics and drug docking studies. J Comput Chem 29 (5):795-808
47. Stary A et al (2010) Toward a consensus model of the HERG potassium channel. ChemMedChem 5(3):455-467
48. Meharenna YT, Poulos TL (2010) Using molecular dynamics to probe the structural basis for enhanced stability in thermal stable cytochromes P450. Biochemistry 49 (31):6680-6686
49. Skopal?k J, Anzenbacher P, Otyepka M (2008) Flexibility of human cytochromes P450: molecular dynamics reveals differences between CYPs 3A4, 2 C9, and 2A6, which correlate with their substrate preferences. J Phys Chem B 112(27):8165-8173
50. Hendrychovaa T et al (2010) Flexibility of human cytochrome p450 enzymes: molecular dynamics and spectroscopy reveal important function-related variations. Biochim Biophys Acta 1814:58-68
51. Lampe JN et al (2010) Two-dimensional NMR and all-atom molecular dynamics of cytochrome P450 CYP119 reveal hidden conformational substates. J Biol Chem 285 (13):9594-9603
52. Park H, Lee S, Suh J (2005) Structural and dynamical basis of broad substrate specificity, catalytic mechanism, and inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4. J Am Chem Soc 127 (39):13634-13642
53. Fishelovitch D et al (2007) Structural dynamics of the cooperative binding of organic molecules in the human cytochrome P450 3A4. J Am Chem Soc 129(6):1602-1611
54. Seifert A et al (2006) Multiple molecular dynamics simulations of human p450 monooxygenase CYP2C9: the molecular basis of substrate binding and regioselectivity toward warfarin. Proteins 64(1):147-155
55. Winn PJ et al (2002) Comparison of the dynamics of substrate access channels in three cytochrome P450s reveals different opening mechanisms and a novel functional role for a buried arginine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(8):5361-5366
56. Ludemann SK, Lounnas V, Wade RC (2000) How do substrates enter and products exit the buried active site of cytochrome P450cam? 1. Random expulsion molecular dynamics investigation of ligand access channels and mechanisms. J Mol Biol 303(5):797-811
57. Li W et al (2007) Possible pathway(s) of metyrapone egress from the active site of cytochrome P450 3A4: a molecular dynamics simulation. Drug Metab Dispos 35(4):689-696
58. Fishelovitch D et al (2009) Theoretical characterization of substrate access/exit channels in the human cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme: involvement of phenylalanine residues in the gating mechanism. J Phys Chem B 113 (39):13018-13025
59. Subbotina J et al (2010) Structural refinement of the hERG1 pore and voltage-sensing domains with ROSETTA-membrane and molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 78 (14):2922-2934
60. Stansfeld PJ et al (2008) Insight into the mechanism of inactivation and pH sensitivity in potassium channels from molecular dynamics simulations. Biochemistry 47 (28):7414-7422
61. Kutteh R, Vandenberg JI, Kuyucak S (2007) Molecular dynamics and continuum electrostatics studies of inactivation in the HERG potassium channel. J Phys Chem B 111:1090-1098
62. Osterberg F, Aqvist J (2005) Exploring blocker binding to a homology model of the open hERG K+ channel using docking and molecular dynamics methods. FEBS Lett 579:2939-2944
63. Brooks BR et al (2009) CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30(10):1545-1614
64. Case DA et al (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26 (16):1668-1688
65. Christen M et al (2005) The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05. J Comput Chem 26 (16):1719-1751
66. Van Der Spoel D et al (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 26 (16):1701-1718
67. Ponder JW, Richards FM (1987) An efficient Newton-like method for molecular mechanics energy minimization of large molecules. J Comput Chem 8(7):1016-1024
68. Refson K (2000) Moldy: a portable molecular dynamics simulation program for serial and parallel computers. Comput Phys Commun 126(3):310-329
69. Smith W, Forester TR (1996) DL-POLY-2.0: a general-purpose parallel molecular dynamics simulation package. J Mol Graph 14(3):136-141
70. Phillips JC et al (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26:1781-1802
71. Plimpton SJ (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comp Phys 117:1-19
72. Bowers KJ et al (2006) Scalable algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations on commodity clusters. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE conference on supercomputing (SC06). Tampa, FL.
73. MacKerell AD et al (1998) CHARMM: the energy function and its parameterization with an overview of the program. In: Schleyer PVR (ed) The encyclopedia of computational chemistry. Wiley, Chichester, pp 271-277
74. Cornell WD et al (1995) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117(19):5179-5197
75. Oostenbrink C et al (2004) A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 25(13):1656-1676
76. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118:11225-11236
77. Stone JE et al (2007) Accelerating molecular modeling applications with graphics processors. J Comput Chem 28(16):2618-2640
78. Friedrichs MS et al (2009) Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processing units. J Comput Chem 30 (6):864-872
79. Davis JE et al (2009) Towards large-scale molecular dynamics simulations on graphics processors. Lecture Notes Comput Sci 5462:176-186
80. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: an N log (N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98:10089-10092
81. Hockney RW, Eastwood JW (1988) Computer simulation using particles. Taylor & Francis Croup, New York
82. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph Model 14(1):33-38
83. Sali A et al (1995) Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELLER. Proteins 23(3):318-326
84. Wang J et al (2004) Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem 25(9):1157-1174
85. Vanommeslaeghe K et al (2010) CHARMM general force field: a force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J Comput Chem 31(4):671-690
86. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comp Phys 23:327-341
87. Tuckerman M, Berne BJ, Martyna GJ (1992) Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 97:1990-2001
88. Andersen HC (1980) Molecular dynamics at constant pressure and/or temperature. J Chem Phys 72:2384-2393
89. Nose S (1984) A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular-dynamics methods. J Chem Phys 81(1):511-519
90. Hoover WG (1985) Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A 31(3):1695-1697
91. Martyna GL, Klein ML, Tuckerman M (1992) Nose-Hoover chains: the canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics. J Chem Phys 97(4):2635-2643
92. Berendsen HJC et al (1984) Moleculardynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81(8):3684-3690
93. Martyna GL, Tobias DJ, Klein ML (1994) Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms. J Chem Phys 101(5):4177-4189
94. Andricioaei I, Karplus M (2001) On the calculation of entropy from covariance matrices of the atomic fluctuations. J Chem Phys 115:6289-6292
95. Baron R, Hunenberger PH, McCammon JA (2009) Absolute single-molecule entropies from quasi-harmonic analysis of microsecond molecular dynamics: correction terms and convergence properties. J Chem Theory Comput 5(12):3150-3160
96. Kollman PA et al (2000) Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res 33(12):889-897
97. Torrie GM, Valleau JP (1977) Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo freeenergy estimation-umbrella sampling. J Comput Phys 23:187-199
98. Mitsutake A, Sugita Y, Okamoto Y (2001) Generalized-ensemble algorithms for molecular simulations of biopolymers. Biopolymers 60(2):96-123
99. Wang F, Landau DP (2001) Efficient multiple range random walk algorithm to calculate density of states. Phys Rev Lett 86:2050
100. Kumar S et al (1993) The weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM) for free energy calculations on biomolecules: 1. The method. J Comput Chem 13:1011-1021
101. Fasnacht M, Zhu J, Honig B (2007) Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines. Protein Sci 16(8):1557-1568
102. Grossfield A, Feller SE, Pitman MC (2007) Convergence of molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins. Proteins 67 (1):31-40
103. Guvench O, MacKerell AD Jr (2008) Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations. Methods Mol Biol 443:63-88
104. Ponder JW, Case DA (2003) Force fields for protein simulations. Adv Protein Chem 66:27-85
105. Hornak V et al (2006) Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 65(3):712-725
106. MacKerell AD Jr, Feig M, Brooks CL III (2004) Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. J Am Chem Soc 126(3):698-699
107. Patel S, Mackerell AD Jr, Brooks CL III (2004) CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model. J Comput Chem 25(12):1504-1514
108. Ponder JW et al (2010) Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. J Phys Chem B 114(8):2549-2564
109. Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Zhou R (2003) A computationally inexpensive modification of the point dipole electrostatic polarization model for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 24(3):267-276
110. Lopes PE, Roux B, Mackerell AD (2009) Molecular modeling and dynamics studies with explicit inclusion of electronic polarizability: theory and applications. Theor Chem Acc 124(1-2):11-28
111. Shan Y et al (2009) A conserved protonationdependent switch controls drug binding in the Abl kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(1):139-144
112. Arkin IT et al (2007) Mechanism of Na+/H+ antiporting. Science 317(5839):799-803
113. Jensen MO et al (2010) Principles of conduction and hydrophobic gating in K+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 (13):5833-5838
114. Okamoto Y (2004) Generalized-ensemble algorithms: enhanced sampling techniques for Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. JMol GraphModel 22(5):425-439
115. Laio A, Parrinello M (2002) Escaping freeenergy minima. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99 (20):12562-12566
116. Hamelberg D, Mongan J, McCammon JA (2004) Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. J Chem Phys 120:11919-11929
117. Bolhuis PG et al (2002) Transition path sampling: throwing ropes over rough mountain passes, in the dark. Annu Rev Phys Chem 53:291-318
118. Noe F et al (2007) Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: transition networks of metastable states. J Chem Phys 126(15):155102
119. Williams PA et al (2004) Crystal structures of human cytochrome P450 3A4 bound to metyrapone and progesterone. Science 305 (5684):683-686
120. Sine SM, Engel AG (2006) Recent advances in Cys-loop receptor structure and function. Nature 440(7083):448-455
121. Unwin N (2005) Refined structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at 4A resolution. J Mol Biol 346(4):967-989
122. Laskowski RA et al (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 26:283-291
123. Sippl MJ (1993) Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Protein 17:355-362
124. Cheng X et al (2006) Channel opening motion of alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor as suggested by normal mode analysis. J Mol Biol 355(2):310-324
125. Chipot C, Henin J (2005) Exploring the freeenergy landscape of a short peptide using an average force. J Chem Phys 123(24):244906
126. Ivanov IN et al (2007) Barriers to ion translocation in cationic and anionic receptors from the cys-loop family. J Am Chem Soc 129 (26):8217-24