The change laboratory : A tool for collaborative development of work and education

The Change Laboratory : A Tool for Collaborative Development of Work and Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-269

  Virkkunen, Jaakko ^a   Newnham, Denise Shelley ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933052174     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-326-3     Document Type: Book

References (239)

1. Adler, P. S. & Clark, K. B. (1991). Behind the learning curve: A sketch of the learning process. Management Science, 37(3), 267-281.
2. Ahonen, H. (2008). Oppimisen kohteen ja oppijan vastavuoroinen kehitys [The intertwined development of the object and subject of learning]. Helsingin yliopisto. Kasvatustieteen laitoksen tutkimuksia 218. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
3. Ahonen, H., & Virkkunen, J. (2003). Shared challenge for learning: Dialogue between management and front-line workers in knowledge management. Int. J. Information Technology and Management, 2(1/2), 59-64.
4. Ala-Laurinaho, A., Schaupp, M., & Kariniemi, A. (2009). The qualitative differences of the effects of technological changes: Case wood procurement process. In L. Norros, H. Koskinen, L. Salo, & P. Savioja (Eds.), Designing beyond the product-Understanding activity and user experience in ubiquitous environments. Proceedings of ECCE 2009 European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 289-293). Helsinki: VTT.
5. Altshuller, G. (1984). Creativity as an exact science. New York, NY: Gordon & Breach.
6. Altshuller, G. (2007). The innovation algorithm. Worchester, MA: Technical Innovation Centre.
7. Argyris, C. (1985) Action science, concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. Ashby, R. (1956). Introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
10. Bandura, A. (2002) Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era. European Psychologist, 7(1), 2-16.
11. Bannon, L. J. (1995). Issues in computer supported collaborative learning. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 267-282). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Barma, S., Lemieux, B., & Laferrière, T. (2013). Manifestations of contradictions and transitional actions: Modelling an organizational change in an "alternance" cooperative study program. Paper presented at the 29th EGOS Colloquium on Bridging Continents, Cultures and Worldviews. Montréal Canada, 4-6, 7.2013.
13. Barowy, W. & Jouper, C. (2004). The complex of school change: Personal and systemic codevelopment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 9-24.
14. Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483-500.
15. Bartunek, J. M., & Schein, E. H. (2011). Organization development scholar practitioners: Between scholarship and practice. In S. A. Mohrman & E. E. Lawler (Eds.), Useful research: Advancing theory and practice (pp. 233-250). San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler.
16. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
17. Beer, M., Eisenstatt, R. A., & Spector, B. (1990). The critical path to corporate renewal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Béguin, P., & Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 173-190.
19. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20. Bennis, W. G. (1969). Organization development: Its nature, origins, and prospects. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Berliner, D. C., & Nichols, S. N. (2008). Changing America's schools for the worse: Some side effects of high-stakes testing. In D. C. Berliner & H. Kupermintz (Eds.), Changing institutions, environments, and people (pp. 119-148). New York: Routledge.
22. Blackler, F. (2009). Cultural-historical activity theory and organization studies. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with Activity Theory (pp. 19-39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Bodrožić, Z. (2008). Post-industrial intervention. An activity-theoretical expedition tracing the proximal development of forms of conducting interventions. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Research Reports 220.
24. Bodrožić, Z., & Stepanović, I. (2012). Creating organizational innovations in countries in transition using Finnish Change Laboratory: A case study from Serbia. Psihologija, 45(1), 71-94.
25. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical, and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
26. Chen, F.-C., Shi, Y.-H., & Hsiau, S.-S. (2011). The ambiguity of participation: An analysis of contradictions encountered in green school fairs. Paper presented at the Congress of the International Society for Cultural and Activity Research (ISCAR), 2011, 9/5-10 Rome, Italy.
27. Ciborra, C. (2002). The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Cole, M. (2001). Sustaining model systems of educational activity: Designing for the long haul. Paper presented at the Symposium Honoring the Work of Ann Brown. University of California, Berkeley.
29. Cole, M., & Griffin, P. (1980). Cultural amplifiers reconsidered. In D. R. Oleson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought (pp. 343-364). New York: Norton.
30. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
31. Cusumano, M. (2010). Staying power: Six enduring principles for managing strategy and innovation in an uncertain world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Daniels, H. (2010). Implicit and invisible mediation in the development of interagency work. In H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engeström, T. Gallaher, & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Activity theory in practice. Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies (pp. 105-125). London: Routledge.
33. Daniels, H., Leadbetter, J., & Warmington, P. (2007). Learning in and for multi-agency working. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 521-538.
34. Datnow, A, Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (1998). Educational reform implementation: A co-constructed process. Research Report No. 5. Santa Cruz, CA and Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
35. Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
36. Dent, E. B., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Challenging "resistance to change." The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 25-41.
37. Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. London: Norton.
38. Emery, M., & Purser, R. E. (1996). The search conference. A powerful method for planning organizational change and community action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
39. Engeström, Y. (1982). Perustietoa opetuksesta [Basics of instruction]. Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.
40. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
41. Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
42. Engeström, Y. (1994). Training for change: New approach to instruction and learning in working life. Geneva: International Labour Office.
43. Engeström, Y. (1995). Kehittävä työntutkimus. Perusteita, tuloksia ja haasteita [Developmental work research. Grounds, results and challenges]. Helsinki: Painatuskeskus.
44. Engeström, Y. (1996). Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 126-132.
45. Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-406). New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Engeström, Y. (2000). From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies (pp. 150-168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Engeström, Y. (2001a). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
48. Engeström, Y. (2001b). Making expansive decisions. An activity-theoretical study of practitioners building collaborative medical care for children. In C. M. Allwood & M. Selart (Eds.), Decision making: Social and creative dimensions (pp. 281-301). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
49. Engeström, Y. (2003). The horizontal dimension of expansive learning: Weaving a texture of cognitive trails in the terrain of health care in Helsinki. In F. Achtenhagen & E. G. John (Eds.), Milestones of vocational and occupational education and training. Volume 1: The teaching-learning perspective (pp. 153-188). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
50. Engeström, Y. (2004). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1/2), 11-21.
51. Engeström, Y. (2007a). Putting Vygotsky to work: The Change Laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363-382). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Engeström, Y. (2007b). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1-2), 23-39.
53. Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots. Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Engeström, Y. (2009a). From learning environments to activity systems and expansive learning. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 17-33.
55. Engeström, Y. (2009b). The future of activity theory. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303-328). New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598-628.
57. Engeström, Y. (forthcoming). Collective concept formation as creation of new worlds at work. In A. Sannino & V. Ellis (Eds.), Learning and Collective Creativity. New York: Routledge.
58. Engeström, Y., & Engeström, R. (1984). Siivoustyön hallinta ja työntekijöiden laadullinen koulutustarve [The mastery of janitorial cleaning work and the workers' qualitative need for training]. Helsinki: ServiSystems.
59. Engeström, Y., & Engeström, R. (1986). Developmental work research: The approach and the application in cleaning work. Nordisk Pedagogik, 6, 2-15.
60. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1-24.
61. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Volition and agency in organizations: An activity-theoretical perspective. Paper presented at the Conference of Association International de management Stratégique AIMS) in Nantes, France, June 9, 2011.
62. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2012). Whatever happened to process theories of learning? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 45-56.
63. Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Engeström, R., & Koistinen, K. (1989). Organizational forgetting in medical settings. In D. Middleton & D. D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering. London: Sage.
64. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction: An International Journal, 5, 319-336.
65. Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The Change Laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10-17.
66. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 345-374). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
67. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002a) Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211-224). Oxford: Blackwell.
68. Engeström, Y., Engesröm, R., & Suntio, A. (2002b). From paralyzing myths to expansive action: Building computer-supported knowledge work into the curriculum from below. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 211-224). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
69. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kerosuo, H. (2003). The discursive construction of collaborative care. Applied Linguistics 24, 286-315.
70. Engeström, Y., Pasanen, A., Toiviainen, H., & Haavisto, V. (2005). Expansive learning as collaborative concept formation at work. In K. Yamazumi, Y. Engeström, & H. Daniels (Eds.), New learning challenges. Going beyond the industrial age system of school and work (pp. 47-77). Osaka: Kansai University Press.
71. Engeström, Y., Kerosuo, H., & Kajamaa, A. (2007a). Projekteilla kehittämisestä kestävään kehittämiseen. Interventiotutkimus sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon organisaatioissa. Tutkimushankkeen loppuraportti Työsuojelurahastolle [From project-based development to sustainable development. Intervention study in social welfare and health care organizations. The final report of the research project for the Finnish Work Environment Fund]. Helsinki: Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research. Department of Education. University of Helsinki.
72. Engeström, Y., Kerosuo, H., & Kajamaa, A. (2007b). Beyond discontinuity. Expansive organizational learning remembered. Management Learning, 38(3), 319-336.
73. Engeström, Y., Kajamaa, A., Kerosuo, H. & Laurila, P. (2010). Process enhancement versus community building: Transcending the dichotomy through expansive learning. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Activity theory and fostering learning: Developmental interventions in education and work (pp. 1-28). Osaka: Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University.
74. Engeström, Y., Nummijoki, J., & Sannino, A. (2012b). Embodied germ cell at work: Building an expansive concept of physical mobility in home care. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 287-309.
75. Engeström, Y., Rautavuori, J., & Kerosuo, H. (2012c). Expansive learning in library; actions, cycles and deviations from instructional intentions. Vocations and Learning. Doi: 10.1007/s12186-012-9089-6.
76. Engeström, Y., Kaatrakoski, H., Kaiponen, P., Lahikainen, J., Laitinen, A., Myllys, H., Rantavuori, J. & Sinikara, K. (2013). Knotworking in academic libraries: Two case studies from the University of Helsinki. Liber Quarterly, 21(3/4), 387-405.
77. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A., & Laitinen, A. (Forthcoming). In search of an experiment: From Vygotsky to Lewin and Dembo-And forward. New Ideas in Psychology.
78. Everhart, R. B. (1983). Reading, writing, and resistance: Adolescence and labor in a junior high school. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
79. Fichtner, B. (1984). Coordination, cooperation and communication in the formation of theoretical concepts in instruction. In M. Hedegaard, P. Hakkarainen, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Learning and teaching on a scientific basis: Methodological and epistemological aspects of the activity theory of learning and teaching (pp. 207-227). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
80. Fischer, G. (2011). Understanding, fostering, and supporting cultures of participation. Interactions, 18(3), 42-53.
81. Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communications.
82. Freeman, C., & Louça, F. (2001). As times go by. From the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83. French, W. L., & Bell, C. (1973). Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
84. Giesecke, M. (1990). The media revolution at the beginning in the modern era and its historical significance. Universitas. A Quarterly German Review of the Arts and Sciences, 32(3), 219-227.
85. Good, J. A. (no year). The German Bildung tradition. Retrieved from http://www.philosophy.uncc.edu/mleldrid/SAAP/USC/pbt1.html. Retrieved 22.4.2011.
86. Greeno, J. G. (2012). Concepts in activities and discourses. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 310-313.
87. Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1987). New technologies, basic skills, and the underside of education: What's to be done? In J. A. Langer (Ed.), Language, literacy and culture: Issue of society and schooling (pp. 110-131). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
88. Gustavsen, B., Hofmaier, B., Ekman Phillips, M., & Wikman, A. (1996). Concept-driven development and the organization of process of change. An evaluation of the Swedish Working Life Fund. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
89. Haapasari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (Forthcoming). The emergence of learners' transformative agency in a Change Laboratory intervention. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, CRADLE.
90. Hall, P. M., & McGinty, P. J. W. (1997). Policy as the transformation of intentions. Producing program from statute. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(3) 439-467.
91. Hamel, G., & Breen, B. (2007). The future of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
92. Hardman, J. (2005). An exploratory case study of computer use in a primary school mathematics classroom: New technology, new pedagogy? Perspectives in Education, 23(4), 1-13.
93. Hardman, J. (2007). Towards a methodology for using activity theory to explicate the pedagogical object in a primary school mathematics classroom. Outlines-Critical Social Studies, 9(1), 53-69.
94. Haug, W. F. (1974). Vorlesungen zur Einführung ins Kapital. Köln: Pahl-Rugenstein.
95. Heckscher, C., Maccoby, M., Ramirez, R., & Tixier, P.-E. (2003). Agents of change: Crossing the postindustrial divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
96. Hegel, G. W. F. (1968). The logic of Hegel (W. Wallace, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. (Original work published in 1830.).
97. Helle, M. & Töyry, M. (2009). Media concept as a tool for analyzing change in media. In P. Oittinen & H. Saarelma (Eds.) Print media-Principles, processes and quality (pp. 497-530). Helsinki: Paper Engineers' Association/Paperi ja Puu Oy.
98. Hill, R., Capper, P., Whatman, R., Wilson, K., & Wong, K. (2007). Workplace learning in the New Zealand apple industry network: A new co-design method for government 'practice making.' Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(6), 359-376.
99. Hirsschorn, L. (1986). Beyond Mechanization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
100. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Qualitative Research Methods Series, Vol. 37. London: Sage.
101. Hubbard, L., Mehan, H., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Reform as learning. School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York: Routledge.
102. Hughes, T. P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems. In W. B. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 51-82). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103. Hyrkkänen, U. (2007). Käsityksistä ajatuksen poluille. Ammattikorkeakoulun tutkimus-ja kehittämistoiminnan konseptin kehittäminen [From conceptions to cognitive trails. Developing the concept of research and development activity for the university of applied sciences]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education. Research Report 210.
104. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays in its history and theory. Moscow: Progress.
105. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's Capital. Moscow: Progress.
106. Ilyenkov, E. V. (2007). Our schools must teach how to think! Journal of Russian and East-European Psychology, 45(4), pp. 9-49.
107. Jensen, K., Lahn, L. C., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2012). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
108. Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131-155.
109. Kajamaa, A. (2011a). Boundary breaking in a hospital. Expansive learning between the worlds of evaluation and frontline work. The Learning Organization, 18(5), 361-377.
110. Kajamaa, A. (2011b). Unraveling the helix of change. An activity-theoretical study of health care change efforts and their consequences. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Studies in Educational Sciences 241.
111. Kajamaa, A., Kerosuo, H., & Engeström, Y. (2010). Employees' narratives about a development project as a resource for managing organizational change. In E. Bonet, B., Czarniawska, D., McCloscey, & H. S. Jensen (Eds.), Proceedings Second Conference on Rhetoric and Narratives in Management Research (pp. 129-148). ESADE Business School: Barcelona.
112. Kallio, K. (2010). The meaning of physical presence: An analysis of the introduction of processoptimisation software in a chemical pulp mill. In H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engeström, T. Gallagher, & S. R. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Activity theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies (pp. 25-48). London: Routledge.
113. Kerosuo, H. (2001). 'Boundary encounters' as a place for learning and development at work. Outlines- Critical Social Studies, 3(1), 53-65.
114. Kerosuo, H. (2003) Boundaries in health care discussions: An activity theoretical approach to the analysis of boundaries. In N. Paulsen & T. Hernes (Eds.), Managing boundaries in organizations. Multiple perspectives (pp. 169-187). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
115. Kerosuo, H. (2004). Examining boundaries in health care-A method for studying organizational boundaries in interaction. Outlines-Critical Social Studies, 6(1), 35-60.
116. Kerosuo, H. (2006). Boundaries in action. An activity-theoretical study of development, learning and change in health care for patients with multiple and chronic illnesses. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
117. Kerosuo, H. (2008, September). Co-authoring change in talk and text. Creating a new leadership model for hospital surgery unit in a Change Laboratory intervention. Paper presented at Symposium on Discourse in interventions: Empirical studies in cultural-historical activity theory, during the 2nd ISCAR Congress. San Diego, California.
118. Kerosuo, H. (2010). Lost in translation: A patient-centered experience of unintegrated care. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(4), 372-380.
119. Kerosuo, H. (2011). Caught between a rock and a hard place: From individually experienced double binds to collaborative change in surgery. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 388-399.
120. Kerosuo, H., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15, 345-351.
121. Kerosuo, H., Kajamaa, A., & Engeström, Y. (2010). Promoting innovation and learning through Change Laboratory: An example from Finnish Health care. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 110-131.
122. Kindred, J. B. (1999). "8/18/97 Bite me": Resistance in learning and work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(3), 196-221.
123. Koli, A. (2011). Työn ongelmatilanteiden tulkinnat ja muutoksen mahdollisuus opetustyössä [Interpretations of problem situations at work and the possibility of change in teaching work]. Aikuiskasvatus, 31(1), 25-34.
124. Konkola, R. (2000). Yhteismuistelu työyhteisön historiaan liittyvän aineiston keräämisen välineenä [Collective remembering as a tool for collecting material about the history of a work community]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Department of Education. Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research. Technical Reports No. 3.
125. Koschmann, T. D. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin's contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference (pp. 308-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
126. Koschmann, T. D., Myers, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1994). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction. A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 227-264.
127. Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
128. Kroll, E., Condoor, S. S., & Jansson, D. G. (2001). Innovative conceptual design: Theory and application of parameter analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
129. Kurland, D. M., & Kurland, L. C. (1987). Computer applications in education: A historical overview. Annual Review of Computer Science, 2, 317-358.
130. Laitinen, A. (2012). Double stimulation and agency in the experiment of the 'meaningless situation'. Unpublished licentiate thesis. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Department of Behavioural Sciences.
131. Latour, B. (1996). Social theory and the study of computerized work places. In W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, & M. R. Jones (Eds.), Information technology and changes in organizational world (pp. 295-307). London: Chapman & Hall.
132. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
133. Launis, K., Schaupp, M., Koli, A. K., & Rauas-Huuhtanen, S. (2010). Muutospajaohjaajan opas [A guidebook for the leader of a Change Workshop]. Helsinki: Tekes.
134. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
135. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 4, pp. 319-340.
136. Lewin, K. (1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. In The problem of changing food habits. Bulletin of the National Research Council, 108, 35-65.
137. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46.
138. Lewin, K. (1947a). Frontiers in group dynamics. I: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria. Human Relations, 1, 5-41.
139. Lewin, K. (1947b). Frontiers in group dynamics. II: Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1, 143-154.
140. Lewontin, R. C. (1982). Organism and environment. In H. C. Plotkin (Ed.), Learning, Development and Culture (pp. 151-169). New York: Wiley.
141. Lillrank, P. M., Shani, A. B., & Lindberg, P. (2001). Continuous improvement: Exploring alternative organizational designs. Total Quality Management, 12(1), 41-56.
142. Loeser, F. (1968). Interrogativlogik. Zur wissenschaftlichen Lenkung des schöpferischen Denkens. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
143. Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London: Routledge.
144. Luria, A. (1976). Cognitive Development. Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
145. March, J. G. (1991). Exploitation and exploration in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
146. Marshak, R. J. (1993). Lewin meets Confucius: A review of the OD model of change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 393-415.
147. Marton, F., & Trigwell, K. (2000). Variatio est mater studiorum. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(3), 381-395.
148. Maturana, H. R. (2002). Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9(3-4), 5-34.
149. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.
150. McCarthy, L. & O'Driscoll, R. (in press). Transforming inter-agency practice activity in an Irish context: Practitioner research from addiction treatment and social work agencies. In M. C. Van Hout (Eds.), Drug use and abuse: Signs/symptoms, physical and psychological effects and intervention approaches. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
151. McNeil, L. M. (1996). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York: Routledge & K. Paul.
152. Mehan, H., Moll, L. C., & Riel, M. M. (1983). A quasi experiment in guided change. NIE Project Report No. G-83-0027. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
153. Metso. (2012). Chemical pulp production. Retrieved from http://www.metso.com/corporation/info-eng.nsf/webwid/wtb-060629-2256f-5a4fa.
154. Middleton, D., & Edwards, D. (1990). Conversational remembering: A social psychological approach. In D. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering (pp. 23-45). London: Sage.
155. Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
156. Miettinen, R. (1993). Oppitunnista oppimistoimintaan. Tutkimus kauppaopetuksen ja opettajakoulutuksen kehittämisestä Suomen Liikemiesten Kauppaopetuksessa vuosina 1986-1991 [From lesson to learning activity. A study on the development of commercial teaching and teacher education in the Finnish Business College in 1986-1991]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
157. Montoro, C., & Hampel, R. (2012). CALL: A triangle of triangles. The EUROCALL Review. Proceedings of the EUROCALL 2011 Conference, 20(1), 121-123.
158. Moriarty, J. P., & Smallman, C. (2009). En route to a theory of benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(4), 484-503.
159. Mosteller, F., & Boruch, R. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC: Brookings.
160. Mukute, M. (2010). Exploring and expanding learning processes in sustainable agriculture workplace contexts. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
161. Mukute, M., & Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2012). Working with cultural-historical activity theory and critical realism to investigate and expand farmer learning in Southern Africa. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(4), 342-367.
162. Mäkitalo, J. (2005). Work-related well-being in the transformation of nursing home work. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Medica D 837. Oulu: University of Oulu.
163. Newnham, D. S. (2013). Getting to know you-An integration conundrum. A boundary crossing Change Laboratory among participants of a voluntary home-school project. United Kingdom: University of Bath Research Archives.
164. Noffke, S., & Somekh, B. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of educational action research. London: Sage.
165. Ohno, T. (1995). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. Portland, OR: Productivity Press Inc.
166. Pelaprat, E. & Cole, M. (2011). "Minding the gap": Imagination, creativity and human cognition. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 45, 397-418.
167. Perez, C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital. The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
168. Perez, C. (2005). Respecialisation and the deployment of the ICT paradigm. An essay on the present challenges of globalisation. Paper for the IPTS FISTERA Project. Retrieved from http://www.carlotaperez.org/papers/PEREZ-Respecialisation-and-ICTparadigm.pdf.
169. Pihlaja, J. (2005). Learning in and for production. An activity-theoretical study of the historical development of distributed systems of generalizing, Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
170. Pine, B. J. II (1993). Mass customization-The new frontier in business competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
171. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competion: Co-creating unique value with the customers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
172. Projectgruppe Automation und Qualification. (1978). Entwicklung der Arbeitstätikeiten und die Methode ihrer Erfassung. Argument Sonderband AS 19, Berlin.
173. Raeithel, A. (1983). Tätigkeit, Arbeit und Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
174. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685- 695.
175. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). The Sage handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
176. Resnick, L. (1990). Literacy in school and out. Daedalus, 119, 169-185.
177. Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
178. Rheingold. (2000). Tools for thought: The history and future of mind-expanding technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
179. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155- 169.
180. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom. Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Irvington Publishers.
181. Rückriem, G. (2010). Digital technology, mediation, and activity theory. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 6(4), 30-38.
182. Sakharov, L. (1994). Methods for investigating concepts. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 73-98). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
183. Sannino, A. (2008). From talk to action: Experiencing interlocution in developmental interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15(3), 234-257.
184. Sannino, A. (2010a). Breaking out of a professional abstraction: The pupil as materialized object for trainee teachers. In V. Ellis, A. Edwards, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Cultural-historical perspectives on teacher education and development: Learning teaching (pp. 146-159). London: Routlege.
185. Sannino, A. (2010b). Teachers' talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 838-844.
186. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994) The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
187. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
188. Schaupp, M. (2011). From function-based development practices to collaborative capability building: An intervention to extend practitioners' ideas. In R. F. Poell & M. van Woerkom (Eds.), Supporting workplace learning. Towards evidence-based practice (pp. 205-224), Professional and Practicebased Learning, Vol. 5. Dordrecht: Springer.
189. Schein, E. H. (1969). Process consultation: Its role in organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
190. Schein, E. H. (1990). The case for effective organizational intervention. The use of process consultation. Sloan Management Review, 31(3), 57-64.
191. Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 71-86.
192. Somekh, B. (2006). Action research: A methodology for change and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
193. Spinosa, C., Flores, F., & Dreyfus, H.L. (1997). Disclosing new worlds: Entrepreneurship, democratic action, and the cultivation of solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
194. Stellenbosch declaration: "ICT in education: Make it work", http://wwwedu.ge.ch/cptic/prospective/projects/archives/ifip/publications/stellen.html, retrieved 18 October 2012.
195. Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 53-64.
196. Tabulawa, R. T. (1998). Teachers' perspectives on classroom practice in Botswana: Implications for pedagogical change. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(2), 249-268.
197. Tabulawa, R. T. (2009). Educational reform in Botswana: Reflections on policy contradictions and paradoxes. Comparative Education, 45(1), 87-107.
198. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. London: Penguin Books.
199. Taylor, F.W. (1911/1998). The principles of scientific management. New York: Norton & Company.
200. Teräs, M. (2007). Intercultural learning and hybridity in the Culture Laboratory. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
201. Teräs, M., & Lasonen, J. (2012). Developing vocational teachers' intercultural competence through a Change Laboratory method. Vocations and Learning. DOI10.1007/s12186-012-9087-8.
202. Toikka, K. (1984). Kehittävä kvalifikaatiotutkimus [Developmental qualification research]. Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.
203. Toikka, K., Engeström, Y., & Norros, L. (1985). Entwickelnde Arbeitsforschung [Developmental work research]. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 15, 5-41.
204. Tolman, C. (1981). The metaphysic of relations in Klaus Riegel's "Dialectics" of Human development. Human Development, 24, 33-51.
205. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
206. Tryack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
207. Tulviste, P. (1991). The cultural-historical development of verbal thinking. Commac, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
208. Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8-30.
209. Vasilyuk, F. (1988). The Psychology of experiencing. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
210. Venkatraman, N., Lee, C.-H., & Iyer, B. (2007). strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector. Revised version of a paper presented at the 65th Annual Academy of Management meeting in Honolulu, Hawaii. Retrieved from http://www.softwareecosystems.com/SMJManuscript-revised.pdf.
211. Vérillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, X(1), 77-101.
212. Victor, B., & Boynton, A. (1998). Invented here, maximizing your organization's internal growth and profitability. A practical guide to transforming work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
213. Victor, B., Boynton, A., & Stephens-Jahng, T. (2000). The effective design of work under Total Quality Management. Organization Science, 11(1), 102-117.
214. Virkki, M. (2012). Liiketoiminnan transformation tuottaneet toimijaryhmät. Kemira GrowHown Synty. [Actor groups in the transformation of the dominant business unit in a corporation-the emergence of Kemira GrowHow]. Helsinki: Aalto University. Doctoral dissertation 141/2012.
215. Virkkunen, J. (1995). Työpaikkatarkastuksen ristiriidat ja niiden ylittämisen mahdollisuudet. Tutkimus keskusteluun perustuvan työn välineistä ja tuloksellisuudesta [Contradictions in workplace inspections and possibilities of overcoming them. A study of the tools and effectiveness of discussion-based work]. Helsinki: Työministeriö.
216. Virkkunen, J. (2006a). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. Activités revue électronique, 3(1).
217. Virkkunen, J. (2006b). Hybrid agency in co-configuration work. Outlines-Critical Social Studies, 8(1), 61-75.
218. Virkkunen, J., & Ahonen, H. (2004). Transforming learning and knowledge creation on the shop floor. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management 4(1), 57-72.
219. Virkkunen, J., & Ahonen, H. (2011). Supporting expansive learning through theoretical-genetic reflection in the Change Laboratory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(2), 229- 243.
220. Virkkunen, J., Engeström, Y., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1997). Change Laboratory-A tool for transforming work. In T. Alasoini, M. Kyllönen, & K. A. Kasvio (Eds.), Workplace innovations-A way of promoting competitiveness, welfare and employment (pp. 157-174). Helsinki: National Workplace Development Programme. Report No. 3.
221. Virkkunen, J., & Kuutti, K. (2000). Understanding organizational learning by focusing on "activity systems. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10(4), 291-319.
222. Virkkunen, J., Newnham, D. S., Nleya, P., & Engeström, R. ( 2012). Breaking the vicious circle of categorizing students in school. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1(3-4), 153-258.
223. Virkkunen, J., Mäkinen, E., & Lintula, L. (2010). From diagnosis to clients: Constructing the object of collaborative development between physiotherapy educators and workplaces. In H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engeström, T. Gallagher, & S. R. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Activity theory in practice: promoting learning across boundaries and agencies (pp. 9-24). London: Routledge.
224. Virkkunen, J., & Schaupp, M. (2011). From change to development: Expanding the concept of intervention. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 629-655.
225. Virkkunen, J., & Tenhunen, E. (2010). Finding a concept that integrates specialists' know-how-The case of special school for handicapped and neurologically ill children. Actio-International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 3, 1-23.
226. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The psychology of higher mental functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
227. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
228. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
229. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The instrumental method in psychology. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Plenum.
230. Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 6 (R. W. Rieber, Ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
231. Vänninen, I. (2012). Change Laboratory for supporting collaborative innovation and transformative agency in primary production. Unpublished Master's thesis. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Faculty of Technology Management. Lappeenranta, Finland.
232. Vänninen, I., Pereira-Querol, M. A., Forsström, J., & Engeström, Y. (2011). Change Laboratory for developing collective management strategies for an established and a potential alien pest species. In Meeting from the IOBC/wprs 2011 in Sutton Scotney. IOBC/wprs Bulletin, 68, 181-184.
233. Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Perception, representation, and the forms of action: Towards an historical epistemology. In M. W. Wartofsky, Models: Representation and scientific understanding, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 48 (pp. 188-210). Dordrecht: Reidel.
234. Watson, G. H. (1993). Strategic benchmarking: How to rate your company's performance against the world's best. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
235. Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361-386.
236. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
237. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
238. Whyte, F. W. (1991) Participatory action research. London: Sage.
239. Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.