Creating organizational innovations in countries in transition using Finnish change laboratory: A case study from Serbia

Psihologija

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 71-94

  Bodrožić, Zlatko ^a   Stepanović, Ivana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Change laboratory; Eastern europe; Organizational innovation; Publishing house

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865331550     PISSN: 00485705     EISSN: 14519283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2298/PSI1201071B     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bartlett, W. (2009) Economic development in the European super-periphery: Evidence from the Western Balkans. Economic Annals, 54(181), 21-44.
2. Bodrožić, Z. (2008). Post-industrial intervention. An activity-theoretical expedition tracing the proximal development of forms of conducting interventions. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
3. Branyiczki, I., Bakacsi, G., & Pearce, J. L. (1992). The back door: Spontaneous privatization in Hungary. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63, 303-16.
4. Clark, E. (2008). The post-socialist transformation and global process: knowledge and institution building in organizational settings. In C. Smith, B. McSweeney, & R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Remaking management: Between global and local (pp. 127-155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit.
6. Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
7. Engeström, Y. (1994). The working health center project: Materializing zones of proximal development in a network of organizational learning. In T. Kauppinen, & M. Lahtonen (Eds.), Action research in Finland (pp. 233-274). Helsinki: Ministry of Labour.
8. Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
10. Engeström, Y. (2005a). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.
11. Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The Change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10-17.
12. Foot, K. A. (2002). Pursuing an Evolving Object: A Case Study in Object Formation and Identification. Mind, Culture and Activity, 9(2), 132-149.
13. Jacobides, M, G., Knudsen, T., & Augier, M. (2006). Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research Policy, 35(8), 1200-1221.
14. Kerosuo, H., Kajamaa, A., & Engeström, Y. (2010). Promoting innovation and learning through Change Laboratory: An example from Finnish health care. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 108-31.
15. Leontjev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
16. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: I. Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5-42.
17. Perez, C. (2009). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 185-202.
18. Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1, 267-292.
19. Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337-348.
20. Poole, M., Van de Ven, A., Dooley, K., & Holmes, M. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes: theory and methods for research. Oxford: Oxford Press.
21. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th edit.). New York: Free Press.
22. Soulsby, A., & Clark, E. (2007). Organization theory and the post-socialist transformation: Contributions to organizational knowledge. Human Relations, 60(10), 1419-1442.
23. Toiviainen, H. (2003). Learning across levels. Challenges of collaboration in a small-firm network. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
24. Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 169-188.
25. Van de Ven, A. H., & Huber, G. P. (1990). Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organization Science, 1(3), 213-219.
26. Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2005). Alternative approaches for the study of organizational change. Organization Studies, 26, 1377-1404.
27. Virkkunen, J., Engeström, Y., Pihlaja, J., & Helle, M. (1997). The Change Laboratory - a tool for transforming work. In T. Alasoini, M. Kyllönen, & A. Kasvio. (Eds.), Workplace innovations - a way of promoting competitiveness, welfare and employment (Report No. 3). Helsinki: Ministry of Labour.
28. Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead Users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791-805.
29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.