Boundaries in health care discussions: An activity theoretical approach to the analysis of boundaries

Managing Boundaries in Organizations: Multiple Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 169-187

  Kerosuo, Hannele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547439376     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230512559_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Chaiklin, Seth, Mariane Hedegaard, and Uffe Juul Jensen, eds. 1999. Activity theory and social practices. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
2. Engeström, Ritva. 1995. Voice as a communicative action. Mind, Culture, and Activity 2: 192-215.
3. Engeström, Ritva. 1999. Imagine the world you want to live in: A study on developmental change in doctor-patient interaction. Outlines 1: 33-50.
4. Engeström, Yrjö. 1987. Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta konsultit.
5. Engeström, Yrjö. 1999. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Perspectives on activity theory. edited by Yrjö Engeström, Reijo Miettinen and Raija-Leena Punamäki, 19-38. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Engeström, Yrjö. 2001. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14 (1): 133-56.
7. Engeström, Yrjö, Ritva Engeström, and Merja Kärkkäinen. 1995. Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction 5: 319-36.
8. Engeström, Yrjö, Jaakko Virkkunen, Merja Helle, Juha Pihlaja, and Ritva Poikela. 1996. The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Life Long Learning in Europe 2: 10-17.
9. Engeström, Yrjö, Ritva Engeström, and Tarja Vähäaho. 1999. When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In Activity Theory and social practices. edited by S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard and U.J. Jensen, 345-74. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
10. Hannan, Michael T. and John Freeman. 1989. Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Hasu, Mervi. 2001. Critical transition from developers to users: Activity-theoretical studies of interaction and learning in the innovation process. Department of Education, Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research, University of Helsinki, Finland. Espoo: Otamedia.
12. Jensen, Uffe Juul. 1987. Practice and progress: A theory for the modern health-care system. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Kerosuo, Hannele. 2001. Boundaries as limits and possibilities in multiprofessional care. Paper presented at the 2nd Nordic-Baltic Conference on Activity Theory and Socio-cultural Research, September 7-9, Ronneby Sweden.
14. Leont’ev, Aleksej N. 1978. Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Scott, W. Richard. 1998. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
16. Schneider, Susan C. 1987. Managing boundaries in organizations. Political Psychology 8 (3): 379-93.
17. Virkkunen, Jaakko, Yrjö Engeström, Juha Pihlaja, and Merja Helle. 1999. Muutoslaboratorio. Uusi tapa oppia ja kehittää työtä. [The change laboratory. A new way to learn and develop work.] Helsinki: Edita.
18. Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Wertsch, James V. 1991. Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Wertsch, James V. 1998. Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.