Using computers to assess new educational goals

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 309-328

  Ridgway, Jim ^a   McCusker, Sean ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956754781     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594032000148163     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adey, P., and Shayer, M., 1994. Really Raising Standards: cognitive intervention and academic achievement, London: Routledge.
2. Anderson, J. R., 1993. Rules of the Mind, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Archenhold, W. F., Bell, J., Donnelly, J., Johnson, S., and Welford, G., 1988. Science at Age 15: a review of APU findings 1980–1984, London: HMSO.
4. Baddeley, A. D., 1990. Human Memory: theory and practice, Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Clarke, D., & Peter, A, (1993) Modelling teacher change, in: B., Atweh, C. Kanes, M. Carss & G. Booker Contexts in Mathematics Education. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Brisbane.
6. Davydov, V. V., 1995. The influence of L. S. Vygotsky on education theory, research, and practice. Educational Researcher, 24 (3): 12–21.
7. Downes, T., and Zammit, K., 2000. “ New literacies for connected learning in global classrooms ”. In Information and Communication Technologies: the school of the future, Edited by: Taylor, H., and Hgenbirk, P., London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Flavell, J. H., 1976. “ Metacognitive aspects of problem solving ”. In The Nature of Intelligence, Edited by: Resnick, L., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Fullan, M., 1991. The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York: Teachers College Press.
10. McFarlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A., & Heald, Y.(2002) Report on the Educational Use of Games (London: Department for Education and Skills). Available www.team.org.uk
11. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (Reston, VA: NCTM)
12. Ridgway, J., 1997a. “ Vygotsky, informatics capability, and professional development ”. In Information Technology: supporting change through teacher education, Edited by: Passey, D., and Samways, B., Chapman Hall: London.
13. Ridgway, J., 1997b. “ Why measure development? ”. In Piaget, Vygotsky, and Beyond, Edited by: Smith, L., Dockrell, J., and Tomlinson, P., London: Routledge.
14. Schoenfeld, A. H., 1985. Mathematical Problem Solving, Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15. Schubert, S., 2000. “ The impact of modelling in education of informatics on collaborative learning with school Intranets ”. In Information and Communication Technologies: the school of the future, Edited by: Taylor, H., and Hogenbirk, P., London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Taylor, H. G., 1996. “ The TTACOS Project—laying the foundation for national technology standards for students in the United States ”. In Information Technology: supporting change through teacher education, Edited by: Passey, D., and Samways, B., London: Chapman Hall.
17. Vygotsky, L. S., 1981. “ The genesis of higher mental functions ”. In The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, Edited by: Wertsch, J., New York: Sharpe.
18. Webb, N. L. (1999) Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessment in Four States (NISE Research Monograph No. 18) (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison).